Top officials caught Cross dressing..a Carnalville in Rome on Pontiff's list

Of all the rumors floating around about just why Pope Benedict XVI is hanging up his camauro, one has taken on a life of its own. According to several well-placed vaticanisti—or Vatican experts—in Rome, Benedict is resigning after being handed a secret red-covered dossier that included details about a network of gay priests who work inside the Vatican, but who play in secular Rome. The priests, it seems, are allegedly being blackmailed by a network of male prostitutes who worked at a sauna in Rome’s Quarto Miglio district, a health spa in the city center, and a private residence once entrusted to a prominent archbishop. The evidence reportedly includes compromising photos and videos of the prelates—sometimes caught on film in drag, and, in some cases, caught “in the act.” Revelations about the alleged network are the basis of a 300-page report supposedly delivered to Benedict on December 17 by Cardinals Julian Herranz, Joseph Tomko, and Salvatore De Giorgi. According to the press reports, it was on that day that Benedict XVI decided once and for all to retire, after toying with the idea for months. He reportedly closed the dossier and locked it away in the pontifical apartment safe to be handed to his successor to deal with. According to reports originally printed by La Repubblica newspaper and the newsweekly Panorama (and followed up across the gamut of the Italian media), the crimes the cardinals uncovered involved breaking the commandments “Thou shalt not steal” and “Thou shalt not commit adultery,” the latter of which has been used in Vatican-speak to also refer to homosexual relations instead of the traditional reference to infidelity. The trio of cardinals who authored the report, known in the Italian press as the “007 Priests,” were commissioned by Benedict to dig into the Vatileaks scandal that rocked the Holy See last fall when the pope’s butler, Paolo Gabriele, was convicted of stealing secret papal documents and leaking them to the press. The sleuthing cardinals ran a parallel investigation to the Vatican tribunal’s criminal case against the butler, but theirs was far more covert and focused not on the mechanics of the leaks, but on who within the Roman Curia might be the brains behind them. And, according to the leaked reports, what the “007 Priests” found went far beyond the pope’s private desk. “What’s coming out is very detailed X-ray of the Roman Curia that does not spare even the closest collaborators of the Pope,” wrote respected Vatican expert Ignazio Ingrao in Panorama. “The Pope was no stranger to the intrigues, but he probably did not know that under his pontificate there was such a complex network and such intricate chains of personal interests and unmentionable relationships.” The existence of a gay-priest network outside the fortified walls of Vatican City is hardly news, and many are wondering if it is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg of sex scandals. In 2010, investigative journalist Carmello Abbate went undercover with a hidden camera to write a shocking exposé called “Good Nights Out for Gay Priests”. Abbate caught the priests on hidden camera dirty dancing at private parties and engaging in sex acts with male escorts on church property. He also caught them emerging from dark bedrooms just in time to celebrate mass. In one postcoital scene, a priest parades around semi naked, wearing only his clerical vestments. “This is not about homosexuality,” Abbate told The Daily Beast when he published the expose. “This is about private vices and public virtues. This is about serious hypocrisy in the Catholic Church.” Because so much of the secret lives of gay priests is actually not so secret thanks to Abbate’s exposé and subsequent book, Sex and the Vatican, many are wondering what else could be hidden in the alleged red-covered dossier. Vatican elite have also been loosely tied to a number of other secular scandals during Benedict’s tenure, including the ultra-tawdry affair between former Lazio governorPiero Marrazzo and several transvestite prostitutes, including one named “Brenda” who was found burned to death in 2009. At the time that Marrazzo’s relationships with the transvestites were discovered, his driver reportedly told investigators that several high-ranking priests and even cardinals were customers of Rome’s elite transsexual circuit, though no proof was ever provided and no one has ever been arrested tied to the transsexual prostitution circuit. Nor has anyone mentioned whether reference to these crimes might also be in the dossier. But Marrazzo was whisked off to the Vatican-owned Monte Cassino abbey south of Rome to do his penance, and he even wrote a letter to Vatican Secretary of State Tarciso Bertone asking for Pope Benedict XVI’s forgiveness. Whatever secrets the red binders supposedly hold will have to remain just that until the next pope is elected. But Ingrao believes its contents are so important that the dossier will be like the 118th cardinal in the conclave. “Many new skeletons from the closets of the cardinals could come out until the beginning of the conclave,” says Ingrao. “Many voters know or claim to know the secrets of their brothers, but it is already clear that the new pope who leaves the Sistine Chapel will have to be scandal-free in order to proceed with cleaning up [what] Ratzinger has left for his successor.” Source: www.thedailybeast.com

Debtors relief case by case in their corrupted commercial law..

A debtor can remove right of implied access by displaying a notice at the entrance. This was endorsed by Lord Justice Donaldson in the case of Lambert v Roberts [1981] 72 Cr App R 223 - and placing such a notice is akin to a closed door but it also prevents a bailiff entering the garden or driveway, Knox v Anderton [1983] Crim LR 115 or R. v Leroy Roberts [2003] EWCA Crim 2753 Debtors can also remove implied right of access to property by telling him to leave: Davis v Lisle [1936] 2 KB 434 similarly, McArdle v Wallace [1964] 108 Sol Jo 483 A person having been told to leave is now under a duty to withdraw from the property with all due reasonable speed and failure to do so he is not thereafter acting in the execution of his duty and becomes a trespasser with any subsequent levy made being invalid and attracts a liability under a claim for damages, Morris v Beardmore [1980] 71 Cr App 256. Bailiffs cannot force their way into a private dwelling, Grove v Eastern Gas [1952] 1 KB 77 Otherwise a door left open is an implied license for a bailiff to enter, Faulkner v Willetts [1982] Crim LR 453 likewise a person standing back to allow the bailiff to walk through but the bailiff must not abuse this license by entering by improper means or by unusual routes, Ancaster v Milling [1823] 2 D&R 714 or Rogers v Spence [1846] M&W 571 Ringing a doorbell is not causing a disturbance, Grant v Moser [1843] 5 M&G 123 or R. v Bright 4 C&P 387 nor is refusing to leave a property causes a disturbance, Green v Bartram [1830] 4 C&P 308 or Jordan v Gibbon [1863] 8 LT 391 Permission for a bailiff to enter may be refused provided the words used are not capable of being mistaken for swear words, Bailey v Wilson [1968] Crim LR 618. If the entry is peaceful but without permission then a request to leave should always be made first. Tullay v Reed [1823] 1 C&P 6 or an employee or other person can also request the bailiff to leave, Hall v Davis [1825] 2 C&P 33 Excessive force must be avoided, Gregory v Hall [1799] 8 TR 299 or Oakes v Wood [1837] 2 M&W 791 A debtor can use an equal amount of force to resist a bailiff from gaining entry, Weaver v Bush [1795] 8TR, Simpson v Morris [1813] 4 Taunt 821, Polkinhorne v Wright [1845] 8QB 197. Another occupier of the premises or an employee may also take these steps: Hall v Davis [1825] 2 C&P 33. Also wrongful would be an attempt at forcible entry despite resistance, Ingle v Bell [1836] 1 M&W 516 Bailiffs cannot apply force to a door to gain entry, and if he does so he is not in the execution of his duty, Broughton v Wilkerson [1880] 44 JP 781 A Bailiff may not encourage a third party to allow the bailiff access to a property (ie workmen inside a house), access by this means renders the entry unlawful, Nash v Lucas [1867] 2 QB 590 The debtor's home and all buildings within the boundary of the premises are protected against forced entry, Munroe & Munroe v Woodspring District Council [1979] Weston-Super-Mare County Court Contrast: A bailiff may climb over a wall or a fence or walk across a garden or yard provided that no damage occurs, Long v Clarke & another [1894] 1 QB 119 It is not contempt to assault a bailiff trying to climb over a locked gate after being refused entry, Lewis v Owen [1893] The Times November 6 p.36b (QBD) If a bailiff enters by force he is there unlawfully and you can treat him as a trespasser. Curlewis v Laurie [1848] or Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557 A debtor cannot be sued if a person enters a property uninvited and injures himself because he had no legal right to enter, Great Central Railway Co v Bates [1921] 3 KB 578 If a bailiff jams his boot into a debtors door to stop him closing, any levy that is subsequently made is not valid: Rai & Rai v Birmingham City Council [1993] or Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557 or Broughton v Wilkerson [1880] 44 JP 781 If a bailiff refuses to leave the property after being requested to do so or starts trying to force entry then he is causing a disturbance, Howell v Jackson [1834] 6 C&P 723 - but it is unreasonable for a police officer to arrest the bailiff unless he makes a threat, Bibby v Constable of Essex [2000] Court of Appeal April 2000. Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557 if the debtor strikes the bailiff over the head with a full milk bottle after making a forced entry, the debtor is not guilty of assault because the bailiff was there illegally, likewise R. v Tucker at Hove Trial Centre Crown Court, December 2012 if the debtor gives the bailiff a good slap. If a person strikes a trespasser who has refused to leave is not guilty of an offence: Davis v Lisle [1936] 2 KB 434 License to enter must be refused BEFORE the process of levy starts, Kay v Hibbert [1977] Crim LR 226 or Matthews v Dwan [1949] NZLR 1037 A bailiff rendered a trespasser is liable for penalties in tort and the entry may be in breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights if entry is not made in accordance with the law, Jokinen v Finland [2009] 37233/07

Pope Benedict resigned to avoid arrest, seizure of church wealth by Easter

Historic, Breaking News: Wednesday, February 12/13, 2013 - Diplomatic Note was issued to Vatican just prior to his resignation New Pope and Catholic clergy face indictment and arrest as "Easter Reclamation" plan continues A Global Media Release and Statement from The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) Brussels: The historically unprecedented resignation of Joseph Ratzinger as Pope this week was compelled by an upcoming action by a European government to issue an arrest warrant against Ratzinger and a public lien against Vatican property and assets by Easter. The ITCCS Central Office in Brussels is compelled by Pope Benedict's sudden abdication to disclose the following details: 1. On Friday, February 1, 2013, on the basis of evidence supplied by our affiliated Common Law Court of Justice (itccs.org), our Office concluded an agreement with representatives of a European nation and its courts to secure an arrest warrant against Joseph Ratzinger, aka Pope Benedict, for crimes against humanity and ordering a criminal conspiracy. 2. This arrest warrant was to be delivered to the office of the "Holy See" in Rome on Friday, February 15, 2013. It allowed the nation in question to detain Ratzinger as a suspect in a crime if he entered its sovereign territory. 3. A diplomatic note was issued by the said nation's government to the Vatican's Secretary of State, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, on Monday, February 4, 2013, informing Bertone of the impending arrest warrant and inviting his office to comply. No reply to this note was received from Cardinal Bertone or his office; but six days later, Pope Benedict resigned. 4. The agreement between our Tribunal and the said nation included a second provision to issue a commercial lien through that nation's courts against the property and wealth of the Roman Catholic church commencing on Easter Sunday, March 31, 2013. This lien was to be accompanied by a public and global "Easter Reclamation Campaign" whereby Catholic church property was to be occupied and claimed by citizens as public assets forfeited under international law and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. 5. It is the decision of our Tribunal and the said nation's government to proceed with the arrest of Joseph Ratzinger upon his vacating the office of the Roman Pontiff on a charge of crimes against humanity and criminal conspiracy. 6. It is our further decision to proceed as well with the indictment and arrest of Joseph Ratzinger's successor as Pope on the same charges; and to enforce the commercial lien and "Easter Reclamation Campaign" against the Roman Catholic church, as planned. In closing, our Tribunal acknowledges that Pope Benedict's complicity in criminal activities of the Vatican Bank (IOR) was compelling his eventual dismissal by the highest officials of the Vatican. But according to our sources, Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone forced Joseph Ratzinger's resignation immediately, and in direct response to the diplomatic note concerning the arrest warrant that was issued to him by the said nation's government on February 4, 2013. We call upon all citizens and governments to assist our efforts to legally and directly disestablish the Vatican, Inc. and arrest its chief officers and clergy who are complicit in crimes against humanity and the ongoing criminal conspiracy to aid and protect child torture and trafficking. Further bulletins on the events of the Easter Reclamation Campaign will be issued by our Office this week. Issued 13 February, 2013 12:00 am GMT by the Brussels Central Office, The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State http://www.itccs.org/ =================================== Pope Leaves Financial Disarray in His Wake http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2013/02/11/Pope-Benedict-Leaves-Financial-Disarray-in-His-Wake.aspx#page1

Pope resigns!!!

A sign from above? Lightning strikes Vatican hours after Pope's shock resignation http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/lightning-strikes-vatican-on-the-day-the-pope-1704295 A sign from above? Lightning strikes Vatican hours after Pope's shock resignation 11 Feb 2013 21:47 The lightning touched the roof of St. Peter's Basilica, one of the holiest Catholic churches, hours after Benedict XVI's shock announcement This was the moment lightning struck the Vatican today - hours after Pope Benedict XVI's bolt-from-the-blue resignation. The lightning touched the dome of St. Peter's Basilica, one of the holiest Catholic churches, after the Pope's shock admission he lacks strength to do the job. The Vatican stressed that no specific medical condition prompted Benedict's decision to quit - the first pontiff to do so in 600 years. The move surprised even his closest aides, even though Benedict, 85, had made clear in the past he would step down if he became too old or infirm. In recent years, the Pope has slowed down significantly, cutting back his foreign travel and limiting his audiences. He now goes to and from the altar in St Peter's Basilica on a moving platform, to spare him the long walk down the aisle. Occasionally he uses a cane. His 89-year-old brother, Georg Ratzinger, said doctors had recently advised the Pope not to take any more trans-Atlantic trips. "His age is weighing on him," Mr Ratzinger said. "At this age my brother wants more rest." Benedict announced his resignation in Latin during a meeting of Vatican cardinals, calling it "a decision of great importance for the life of the church." He emphasised that carrying out the duties of being pope requires "both strength of mind and body." He told the cardinals: "I have come to the certainty that my strengths due to an advanced age are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry." The Vatican will hold a conclave before Easter to elect a new pope, with Benedict holding great sway over who should succeed him to lead the world's one billion Catholics. Benedict has already hand-picked the bulk of the College of Cardinals - the princes of the church who will elect the next pope - to guarantee an equally-conservative legacy. There are no obvious front-runners to replace him - the same situation when Benedict was elected in 2005 after the death of Pope John Paul II. Given half of the world's Catholics live in the global south, there will once again be arguments for a pope to come from the developing world. When Benedict was elected aged 78, he was the oldest pope chosen in nearly 300 years. He raised the possibility of resigning if he were too old or sick to continue, when he was interviewed in 2010 for the book "Light of the World." "If a pope clearly realises that he is no longer physically, psychologically and spiritually capable of handling the duties of his office, then he has a right, and under some circumstances, also an obligation to resign," Benedict said. The former Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger had an intimate view as Pope John Paul II, with whom he had worked closely for nearly a quarter-century, suffered through the debilitating end of his papacy. The Vatican said immediately after his resignation that Benedict would go to Castel Gandolfo, a summer retreat south of Rome, and then would live in a cloistered monastery. Benedict said he would serve the church for the remainder of his days "through a life dedicated to prayer." Obi-Wan Kabuki at 11:03 PM

More Scamming commercial gurus get busted!!

Indictments Rage on for 1099 OID Scammers I thought I would write and explain... Why YOU should shy away from Patriot Myth Mongers (PMM): You Could Go To JAIL. Maybe you can see a bigger issue in this: People generally go to jail for doing something wrong that endangers or hurts government or fellow humans. Here's a case in point: The FAKE 1099 OID Tax Return. What they did wrong: Filed the fake 1099 OID tax return to get undeserved money from the IRS/Treasury. Intended Purpose: The 1099 OID serves only one legitimate purpose. People who buy original issue bonds at a discount and agree to forego coupon interest can sell the bonds back at face value, generally at maturity, or if the corporation calls in the bonds early. The 1099 OID return identifies to the IRS the amount of money earned at maturity, the difference between the discount price and the face amount. The scheme: scammers get conned into believing that US Government went bankrupt in 1933 (even though no such court case exists) and converted all Americans into chattel of the creditors from birth. Thus government ultimately guarantees payment of all debts from a secret birth certificate bond account with the Treasury. By filing the 1099 OID with some related forms, the scammers get the government pay their tax debt, plus some. The Problem: The scheme actually cheats government out of tax revenues. Maybe many other reasons can explain why people don't actually owe the taxes, but the 1099OID scam presumes they do, and then makes a false claim to government, a felony crime. I know of two central PMMs who promoted this nonsense: Winston Shrout and Sam Kennedy. I heard of numerous accolytes who learned from those gurus and then became gurus themselves, like Sam Davis, Tim Turner (who filed fake maritime liens against people he didn't like), Paul Laird, etc. And many others learned from them to become "practitioners" who would fill in paperwork for people who then filed them and got busted. My Beef: I do not love the IRS. I consider the IRS a criminal enterprise for its abusive collection of taxes I believe people do not owe. As a student of history, I acknowledge effective legal and political activism (including everything from elections, pressuring elected representatives, picketing, marching demonstrations, and open rebellion) for defeating crookedness in government, such as IRS crimes. However, I discourage individual crimes like FILING FALSE tax returns because they become a nifty way to win a prison term. AND you will still owe the money plus penalties. Many victims of such hoaxes became criminals. And only a doofus could possibly claim "I didn't think I was doing anything wrong." What Ultimately Happens: Grand Juries Indict Scammers, the DOJ Prosecutes them, Courts Convict Them, THEY GO TO PRISON As I have explained in the past, Winston Shrout, Glenn Richard Unger (Sam Kennedy), Sam Davis, Tim Turner, and others conducted seminars over the past 7 years instructing attendees on the "correct" methods to use in filing fraudulent financial instruments like 1099 OID in connection with income tax returns and other interactions with Government. Until a couple of weeks ago, the main theorists avoided prosecution. But the IRS and DOJ investigations have landed indictments against their Patriot Myth Mongering (PMM) understudies like Sam Davis and James Timothy "Tim" Turner. Chris Marrero got indicted in 2011. Pete Hesser from Port Charlotte just got convicted in November for filing false returns and tax evasion for that. And Glenn Unger ("Sam Kennedy") just got indicted a few days ago. Follow these links and read for yourself: Examples: David Marrero http://www.forbes.com/sites/billsinger/2012/05/03/federal-inmate-indicted-for-filing-false-tax-returns-from-prison/ Sam Kennedy (Glenn Unger) http://www.justice.gov/usao/nyn/news/1795-3530-669737344.pdf Chris Marrero http://www.justice.gov/tax/txdv111583.htm Straw Man Fraud http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2011/12/straw_man_tax_fraud_south_florida.php Pete Hesser http://www.justice.gov/usao/flm/press/2012/dec/20121205_Hesser.html Sam Davis http://www.justice.gov/usao/nv/press/march2011/davismarch252011.htm James Timothy Turner http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/September/12-tax-1126.html EFFECTIVE ACTIVISM If you agree with my assessment of the IRS, don't fight the battle against them alone because you will lose. The US Congress has devised a perfect way of making you into a slave in violation of the principles of the US Constitution. They wrote a confusing law (codified in 26 USC) which most Americans find daunting, arcane, and inscrutable. Most of America's Legal community, including the DOJ, have construed the Constitution ( especially the 16th Amendment) as supporting the direct taxation of the people in spite of crystal clear language that Congress shall apportion direct taxes among (and collect them from) the states (state legislatures). The President and the IRS agree with the lawyers. Generally, so do the courts. I don't. And I have only one voice. So I have hundreds of thousands of government operatives against me. I have two points to make: I cannot and shall not go it alone in a battle against the IRS and DOJ and Courts and Congress and President on the issue of income and wage taxes. Millions of informed, armed, resolute, belligerent Americans can defeat the abusive scheme of income and wage taxation by legal and political action ONLY if they work together and focus their power on the weakest part of government - the individual operative, removing the evil perps one at a time till none remain. The ICE PICK Government beats individual Americans on the tax issue by the ICE PICK method. The full power of the government focuses on one tiny needle-sharp point of cold steel: the bank accounts. Government agents forcibly extract so-called tax money from the accounts of recalcitrant taxpayers in banks, and banks cooperate. Failing that, the operatives steal automobiles, houses, and wages through unjust liens and levies. Failing that, theyget an indictment, prosecute, convict, and imprison the recalcitrant taxpayer. One Obama Democrat, taking his cue from 9-11-2001, protested abusive taxes by crashing his airplane into the IRS building in Austin, Texas. Had he managed to fly a freshly fueled Boeing 787 into the White House US Capitol building in Washington DC, that might have gotten his point across. If that continued to happen in a variety of ways, maybe Congress would get the point. But short of massive, meaningful protest that "No means No," the tax abuse will continue. Bottom line, you cannot break down a block of ice by smacking it with the flat of your hand. You use an ice pick. You focus all the power of your arm on the point, and when you jam it into the block of ice, with that force, it begins to shatter and break apart. I believe the voter base has become watered down by immigration and procreation of millions of people of such low intelligence that when they vote, the always vote for candidates who will make laws that rob from one group of people to give to another. And I believe that the super-smart of the world have used credit and debt to enslave the people, corrupt the government, and destroy the value of savings and of our currency. And I believe that the energy producers, including oil companies, have joined in to keep the world enslaved to fossil fuels and nuclear power when we should have switched to water fracturing technology to produce HHO gas decades ago for our power sources. America needs crash programs to produce HHO gas through water fracturing devices, and to establish eugenics programs to clean up the gene pool, and to re-engineer suffrage so the irresponsible and ignorant cannot have any voice in government. America needs to return to family values so that men and women marry, produce children, and stay married to rear those children in a responsible household environment so the children become good and sensible citizens. This means all of us should start to work on that today, right now. We cannot stop runaway spending that justifies bilking the populace without forceful, pin-point political and legal activism. How will YOU make that happen? Bob Hurt Blog 1 2 3 f t 2460 Persian Drive #70 Clearwater, FL 33763 Email; Call: (727) 669-5511 Law Studies: Donate Subscribe Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary