Hello Joyce in the name of our risen Savior Jesus,
I as per my faith and as witness for brother Robert am writing to you privately as a woman and not a corporate employee utilising a SSN.
I have heard from my good brother Robert that you have an opinion that Ted Decker is not privately liable with regards to brother Roberts agreement with him in his private capacity..
You may find it interesting that a public prosecutor in Front Royal Virginia withdrew from a 50 pounds of trafficking Cannabis Charge against another good brother when he received a private agreement to the facts on behalf of brother Dean Harting. He heard from 6 witnesses that he failed to dispute the facts sent to his private self. I am attaching a copy of that letter for your benefit so you can see why that man acting as a prosecutor knew he could not escape private communication performed to save the brother harmless from submitting to and respecting persons. That word person is evident in the scriptures and it is a sin to respect as found in Deuteronomy 1:17,10:17, 2nd Samuel 14:14,Matthew 22:16 ,Acts 10:34 Romans 2:11 and for emphasis James 2:9 in the 1611 King James Bible.
Our good brother Robert is not only scripturally directed to not respect persons but is sanctioned and of a duty to exercise the right of self-determination(resurrection) as per Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political rights in order to save his article 18 freedom of faith harmless by waiving article 16 as of it being offensive to his faith.
That covenant, unlike the US Constitution is of application to all service providers that when a demand to save one's faith harmless, as was brother Robert's, is received it will be respected and if necessary the service provider must go to a hardship to accommodate the demand.
Ted will encounter no hardship what so ever by privately contacting brother Robert in order to be coming to amicable terms with brother Robert. He will in fact be standing in honor by privately addressing the damage and discrimination infringing upon our good brothers liberty that brother Robert has experienced upon his reputation, his ability to gain a livelihood, his ability to maintain his family and commitments to his relations.
Your attempt to subject brother Robert to a corporate submission to a person of law is noted and is ill advised. You are now aware that brother Robert cannot subject himself to such dialogue as he sent that agreement to Ted privately as a living man as he cannot communicate with the dead corporate person as CEO of a corporation. I do hope you grasp the sincerity and severity of this communication as it is of intent to confirm brother Roberts faith based inability to communicate to Ted as a person of law.
I thankyou for your attention to this private matter and do suggest that Ted contact brother Robert to privately resolve this issueprivately as I assure you that using legal fiction corporate employee's corporate lawyers and corporate funds to settle a clearly private matter is a fraud upon the corporation.
The attached letter is an open office document.
Bliss and light upon your path Joyce!
ICCPR. Article 7. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
If you love your creator you will walk only in his ordinances and no others! Matthew 15:9 KJVB
