This below is the oath of allegiance from the Public Service employment act folks. It is federal yet is different from the other one of precedent as it is all about the oath and is the anchoring legislation regarding the oath in Canada.
Canada >> Statutes and Regulations >> Consolidated Regulations of Canada >> Locally-Engaged Staff Employment Regulations, [SOR/95-152] [>] Locally-Engaged Staff Employment Regulations SOR/95-152 (Public Service Employment Act)SCHEDULE IOATH OF ALLEGIANCE
I,.............do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her MajestyQueen Elizabeth the Second, Her Heirs and Successors according to law. So help me God......................Signature of Employeeat...........this day of...........Sworn and subscribed before me......................................Signature of Person Administering Oath
[About CanLII] [Disclaimers] [Advanced search] [Help] [Français]
[Questions / Comments]
Now..From the Federal Oath of Allegiance Act that says ...read carefully and note the word "shall" is an imperative absolute.
(1) Every person who, either of his own accord or in compliance with any lawful requirement made of the person, or in obedience to the directions of any Act or law in force in Canada, except the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Citizenship Act, desires to take an oath of allegiance shall have administered and take the oath in the following form, and no other:
I, ...................., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God. ( Notice no words saying "according to law")
Now on to the oath all of the legislature of Alberta and it's employee's have taken for decades as well as all the lawyers and Judges and police.
Alberta >> Statutes and Regulations >> Consolidated Statutes of Alberta >>
OATHS OF OFFICE ACT for Alberta
HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly
of Alberta, enacts as follows:
Oath of allegiance
1(1) When by a statute of Alberta a person is required to take an oath of
allegiance it shall be taken in the following form:
(Notice there is no word “Do” and no “Queen of Canada” and the words “According to law are not in the federal enactment”.
I, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , swear that I will be
faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the
Second, her heirs and successors, according to law.
So help me God.
(2) Where the name of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second is expressed
In the form, the name of the Sovereign at the time that the oath is taken
Shall be substituted therefore if different.
RSA 1970 c266 ss2,5,Form A
2 When by a statute of Alberta a person is required to take an official
(a) Being appointed to an office other than that of judge or
Justice of the peace, or
(b) Being admitted to a profession or calling,
the oath shall be taken in the following form:
I, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , swear that I will
diligently, faithfully and to the best of my ability execute according to
law the office of . . . . . . . . . . .
So help me God.
RSA 1970 c266 s3,Form B
3 When by a statute of Alberta a person is required to take a judicial
Oath on his appointment as a judge or as a justice of the peace, the oath
Shall be taken in the following form:
I, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , swear that I will honestly
and faithfully and to the best of my ability exercise the powers and duties
of a . . . . . . . . . . . .
So help me God.
RSA 1970 c266 s4,Form C;1975(2) c43 s5
Affirmation or declaration
4(1) A person who is required by a statute of Alberta to take an oath
prescribed by this Act may make a solemn affirmation or declaration instead
of taking the oath.
(2) When on the administering of an oath prescribed by this Act the person
about to take the oath is permitted by law to make a solemn affirmation or
declaration instead of taking an oath, the person may make a solemn
affirmation in the prescribed form of the oath, substituting the words
"solemnly swear and truly declare and affirm" for the word "swear", and
omitting the words "So help me God".
RSA 1980 cO-1 s4;1990 c29 s19
John please correct me if I am wrong but I believe you are in possession of evidence of a violation of 126 of the Criminal code
Disobeying a statute
126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament
by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do
anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly
provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding two years.
Attorney General of Canada may act
(2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene
an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at
the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).
And obstructing a member of the clergy from performing a function of his calling namely pointing out the fraud!! 176 of the code
Obstructing or violence to or arrest of officiating clergyman
176. (1) Every one who
(a) by threats or force, unlawfully obstructs or prevents or endeavours to
obstruct or prevent a clergyman or minister from celebrating divine service or
performing any other function in connection with his calling, or
(b) knowing that a clergyman or minister is about to perform, is on his way to
perform or is returning from the performance of any of the duties or functions
mentioned in paragraph (a)
(i) assaults or offers any violence to him, or
(ii) arrests him on a civil process, or under the pretence of executing a civil
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding two years.
Disturbing religious worship or certain meetings
(2) Every one who wilfully disturbs or interrupts an assemblage of persons met
for religious worship or for a moral, social or benevolent purpose is guilty of
an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(3) Every one who, at or near a meeting referred to in subsection (2), wilfully
does anything that disturbs the order or solemnity of the meeting is guilty of
an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 172.
I hope you can find out why these section of the law are being ignored as I was not the one to break the law and I was wrongfully convicted by a woman who was aware her oath was invalid as she was shown the preceding before I entered her court room and declared “I am ignoring this and will not allow it” Conflict of interest. I cannot appeal in a provincial court as none of them have valid oaths.
This is not allowable John I am entitled to full redress and defense and I am being denied a valid court . This is not opinion it is words in black and white with chiseling lawyers with no valid oath looking for an excuse as to why we do not need a valid oath .
You cannot get advise from a lawyer on this one as according to this discovery there are no valid lawyers oath allegiant to a Christian monarch in Canada, only private smiths of mans law !
What a disgrace to her majesty in this her Golden Jubilee and her own Coronation oath of truth and world proclamation.
Will you bring this up John before Jean PM who has already been made aware of this and ignored it, or will you to ignore the truth of the evidence because of the pride lost of having to admit this Christian Minister is right?
What will the priority be, to your honor and duty in light of such evidence, or to pride ego and arrogance in reluctance to admit the truth and to hide it from all the rest of your fellow MP’s for fear of being labeled the can of worms opener..
Please ask the RCMP to examine this as coming from you they may actually do it!
Sincerely hoping you do know what your oath of allegiance means to the retention of God’s law as supreme in Canada. This is not me stating that as fact John, it is the words of the Coronation oath that do.
God bless the expediency you can provide or may he forgive you for your deceit in duty failing to acknowledge such a glaring evidential example of bogus oaths and treason.
Minister of Christ in his service
Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International
If you stand up to be heard on this issue you will incite others to speak as well as truth has a way of spreading like light in a dark room and must prevail in this her majesty's Coronation Golden Jubilee. No stain is allowed upon the fabric of her Justice as it is God's court we are looking towards and his Temple of Justice is holy and reverent above all.
The principals that I stand upon are irrefutable and sincere in heart and beat as the drum of ages is steady in it;s perpetual rhythm of circadian overstanding.
Truth is that drum and love is the Drummer.
"We are with out that drum some of us for most of our lives so if you hear nothing you must search out the the drum of truth and apply your love so all can hear your discovery."
The more you work on that drum the better you will feel as you realise the power it has when others join you.
"We need we plead for the fate of generations to come, are you going to watch earth bleed or join to beat the drum
Together we can stand for what is and whats is to be
holding hands and and speaking out as we fight for what is free...........
God Bless al questers of his truth as it is revealed
minister of Christ Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
Please comment or make some noise about this as it is a total stain and violation of the Coronation oath to allow this forceful usury. It would cause the Queen to Abdicate if not dealt with fairly in light of the proof and evidence.
God bless the Queen! Long Live the Queen!
Dei Gratia ER