Posted By: X
Date: Friday, 12-Oct-2001 02:03:43
This is from RMNEWS_DAILY_EMAILS:
...with additional earlier information at:
AGENTS: If you have further info on this, involving any State, please add it here.
Date: Thu Oct 11, 2001 8:56 pm
Subject: OREGON SUPREME COURT ACKNOWLEDGES FALSE OATHS OF JUDGES
OREGON SUPREME COURT ACKNOWLEDGES FALSE OATHS OF JUDGES
Oregonian Newspaper, Thursday, October 11, 2001
(Ed Note: Oregon Chief Justice Wallace Carson has now openly
acknowledged that Oregon judges and attorneys have taken false oaths
.......the truth is the great leveler, now is the time for
accountability and recompense for those who have been injured by
actors without authority who have stolen their children and destroyed
their lives without a Constitutional Contract - people in every state
need to investigate their own Constitutions and look at the judges
proper oaths, as well as what was going on around 1910 ..........
this is when the global agenda was entrenched right before WWI , and
the foundations were laid for the corporate socialist system not based
on the Constitution or the authority of the People - we lost our
sovereignty, our allodial titles, our real money backed by gold, and
now the corporate state operates under the false "implied consent"
that it OWNS EVERYTHING........ This is about the REAL PEOPLE and your
REAL RIGHTS and your REAL LAND and REAL MONEY and your CHILDREN and
Now when they take a Constitutional Oath, NOW they UPHOLD
CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIAL DUE PROCESS. The People are the authority,
and it is our DUTY, OBLIGATION and RIGHT to enforce this Lawful
jurisdiction now. These are NOT just words, THIS IS THEIR BOND AND
CONTRACT WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL PEOPLE/STATE OF OREGON. WITHOUT IT
THERE IS NO BOND OR CONTRACT AT ALL TO THE PEOPLE.)
Date: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:46 PM
Subject: Chief justice suggests judges complete oaths
Chief justice suggests judges complete oaths
ASHBEL S. GREEN
Oregon Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace P. Carson Jr. is suggesting that state judges retake their oaths of office because most of them took an incomplete one.
The Oregon Constitution requires judges to swear to uphold the federal and state constitutions and to discharge their duties faithfully and impartially.
At least 10 years ago, the secretary of state's office started sending out to newly elected judges a version of the oath that did not include the words "and impartially."
"I have absolutely no understanding how that could happen," Carson said.
Carson said Wednesday that he planned to e-mail all 163 circuit
judges, suggesting that they retake the oaths if they previously took the incomplete one. He said he intends to attach the complete version of the oath to the message.
"I'm recommending that they do sign the oath, but it's up to them," he said.
Last week, a litigant raised the oath issue during a hearing before Multnomah Circuit Judge Ellen Rosenblum. She responded by retaking the oath on the spot.
"That's one way to address it," Carson said.
Carson said he also expects to suggest that Court of Appeals judges, Supreme Court justices and circuit judges pro tem retake the oath if they took an incomplete one.
A group of activists has been raising the oath issue since at least the beginning of the year, contending that judges who took incomplete ones are invalid and their rulings void.
Carson became aware of the issue from some of these activists.
Legal experts say the failure to take a complete oath does not make a judge invalid, nor would it be a reason to overturn any decisions. No court has made a ruling on the issue.
Carson said Wednesday that the Supreme Court would take up the
effects, if any, of the incomplete oaths only if the issue is raised during the normal appeals process.
The following articles are the background for this unprecedented
acknowledgement that the courts have been for years under a fraudulent
authority...... WE THE PEOPLE HAVE MOVED THE STATE TOWARDS
ACCOUNTABILITY - NOW WE MUST HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE - VOID THEIR
UNLAWFUL DECISIONS, AND FORCE A RESTORED CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION
AND JUDICIAL DUE PROCESS - THE OATH IS ONLY A FACADE UNLESS THEY
ACTUALLY RESTORE OUR ABILITY TO EXCERCISE OUR INHERENT RIGHTS AND
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN A COURT.
IT IS OPENED NOW, AND THEY ARE GOING TO ANSWER.... NOTICE THERE IS NO
REBUTTAL AT ALL - NO FACTUAL DISPUTE - JUST LIIKE IN COURT - THEY LOSE
!!! UNDISPUTED FACTS BECOME LEGAL FACT AND NOW IT IS FACT THAT THE
JUDGES ARE UNDER FALSE OATHS IN OREGON - THEY KNOW THE DIFFERENCE IS
LIKE NIGHT AND DAY - THE WORDS ARE MEAN JURISDICTIONS....ONE WHERE YOU
HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND ONE WHERE YOU ARE A CORPORATE COMMODITY
FOR THE STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDING STREAMS.......READ ON.... and by the
way, there are more words missing from the oath than "impartially" -
also "said state" which is WHO the judge is supposed to contract to,
impartially..... notice that there is NO REBUTTAL and you better
believe that this nullifies every thing these imposters have signed.
They have NO defense to this, as seen in the article, the Bars
response is "we can ignore it", just like there is NO ANSWER for the
people being destroyed by these unjust attorneys pretending to be
"judges" having no contract with the People...... read on..... this
breaks open the whole LIE that has been perpetrated on us for many
years, and it is up to SOVEREIGNS TO MAKE SURE THIS DOES NOT GO
IGNORED... IT IS TIME FOR ACCOUNTABILIITY........
From: Nancy H.
Date: Saturday, October 06, 2001 7:35 AM
Subject: $$ HEADS UP OREGON! JUDICIAL OATHS! AP NEWS! $$
CONGRATULATIONS OREGON!!!!!! FROM THE ASSOCIATED
Missing phrase in judicial oath could prove troublesome
The Associated Press
10/6/01 3:04 AM
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) -- decade-old error in the wording of the state's
judicial oath could render thousands of rulings by Oregon's 163 judges
null and void, some legal activists contend.
The Oregon Constitution requires that before judges assume their
duties, they must swear to support the federal and state constitutions
and to "faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of a judge
At least 10 years ago, the words "and impartially" vanished from the
copy of the oath judges get from the secretary of state's office after
they are elected.
The apparent oversight went unnoticed until earlier this year, when it
came to the attention of some activists who challenge the legitimacy of
a range of judicial decisions.
This week, Multnomah County Circuit Judge Ellen F. Rosenblum took an
updated oath during a Portland hearing after a lawyer challenged her
ability to preside over the case because she had taken the shorter
The attorney who challenged Rosenblum, Roger G. Weidner, was the
Reform Party's 1998 candidate for governor. During his campaign, he
said he would battle judicial corruption.
Milton E. Mitchek of Durkee, near Baker City, has distributed a
pamphlet saying his research revealed the discrepancy in the oaths.
"A rebel Oregon Judge who does not take and uphold Oregon's required
oath is committing treason against the Oregon Constitution, the Law of
the Land and the People," his pamphlet says.
Legal experts disagree with the activists about the implications of
the missing phrase.
"Nothing in the constitutional provision ... indicates that a failure
to include one of the words would have that effect," said Roy Pulvers,
a former staff attorney for the Oregon Supreme Court.
John Lindback, director of the Oregon Elections Division, said he did
not know how the incomplete oath got sent out. He said it was up to
court officials to decide what to do.
Chief Justice Wallace P. Carson Jr. of the Oregon Supreme Court said
he is aware of the issue but had not decided Friday what -- if anything
-- should be done.
Pulvers and other experts say the discrepancy is not legally
significant and would not be grounds to overturn any of the thousands
of rulings made by judges who had not taken the complete oath.
(Ed. note: PLEEEEEEASE !!! a typographical error???? Court and Law
are courts of EVIDENCE and an I is an I and a t is a t...... that is
the standard held against Sovereigns, but note the responses when it is
bar members who have been caught, "We can ignore it" and "it is not
important", "not legally signifaicant", . the comments of the legal
staff of the Supreme Court",
Please KNOW that the false oath, and the fact that Rosenblum took her
llawfull oath proves it is fraud . .....she was in court, under oath,
on the Record, and could have said aanything else "you are mistaken"
or "this is the real case" or, as one judge in Josephine County told
Chris Youngblood, "I'm sure there is another one you just didn't find
it".........THIS IS OVER NOW IN OREGON......CHECK IN YOUR OWN STATES -
EVERY STATE NOW IS UNDER THIS CORPORATE SYSTEM - IT IS CALLED JUSTICE
2020...... iIT IS UP TO ALL OF US TO BRING FORTH REMEDY IN THIS AND
FORCE ACCOUNTABILITY - DO NOT LET THEM GET AWAY WITH THIS.....
AT THIS TIME THE BAR AND RON WYDEN ARE PASSING "RULES" TO LET BAR
MEMBERS "LIE, CHEAT, STEAL AND MISREPRESENT" AND NOT CALL IT
CRIMINAL........ IT IS TIME FOR THE PEOPLE TO SAY ENOUGH OF THIS......
SIGN MEASURE #1 AND STOP THIS STATUTORY FRAUD NOW....... OUR CHILDREN
AND RIGHTS ARE ON THE LINE TODAY, AND OUR FUTURE IS IN DANGER IF THIS
IS NOT CORRECTED NOW....... INSIST CARSON FORCES ALL OREGON JUDGES TO
TAKE THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL OATH
THE MAIN POINT THE ARTICLE LEAVES OUT INTENTIONALLY IS THAT THE
ORIGINAL OATH IS A DIFFERENT JURISDICTION THAN THE ONE THEY ARE UNDER
NOW, AND THEY KNOW IT.....THEY CAN NO LONGER UPHOLD THEIR STATUTORY
FRAUD AND CORPORATE NON CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS IN A COURT OF
CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION. DO NOT ACCEPT THEIR LIES, AND THEY HAVE
TO SHOW CAUSE TO SUPPORT THEIR NONSENSE...... THEY DO THIS ALL THE TIME
IN COURT AND NO ONE STOPS THE BULLIES ......
THE OATH IS FRAUD, UNDER THE RULES OF EVIDENCE IF IT IS NOT THE SAME
IT IS NOT THE SAME, AND THE PARTICULAR WORDS LEFT OUT ARE NOT AT ALL BY
CHANCE WHEN YOU LEARN ABOUT THE WAY THIS CAME IN THROUGH THE AMENDED
VII FRAUD IN 1910 THAT OPENED THE WAY FOR THE CORPORATE COURTS TO COME
IN. IT IS ALL DECEPTION. IT IS NOT AS SIMPLE AS WORDS ON A PAGE -
EVERY WORD MEANS LAW AND YOUR RIGHTS.... JUST TRY TO GO INTO COURT AND
PLEAD FOR YOURSELF THAT IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT IT SAYS ON THE COURT
PAPERS - YOU ARE INGORED OR DISMISSED..
THE WHOLE BAR DECEPTION IS LIKE HUMPTY DUMPTY - EGGHEADS WHO SAY
'THE WORDS MEAN WHAT I SAY THEY MEAN' AGAINST PEOPLE, FOR THE STATE, IN
EVERY COURT RIGHT NOW..... HUMPTY DUMPTY IS NOW ON THE GROUND A PUTRID
PUDDLE OF SLIME IN THE LIGHT OF THE TRUTH AND PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE.....
ALL THE KINGS HORSES AND ALL THE KINGS MEN WILL NOT PUT HIM BACK
TOGETHER THIS TIME.
JUDGE ROSENBLUM TAKES CONSTITUTIONAL OATH IN KETTLEBERG CASE IN
AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF WITH "VULTURES" EXPOSE' OF FALSE OATH OF JUDGES
ENTERED INTO RECORD OF JUDGE COON IN CHRISTINES CASE IN JOSEPHINE
Judge Coon enters Amicus Curiae Brief into Record with exhibits of
judicial fraud; UNDISPUTED..... Judge Rosenblum allows Racketeering
case brought by Roger Weidner to proceed, affirmation of criminal
charges against judges, attorneys for theft and conversion of hundred
million dollar estate of Janette Kent.
Judges in Oregon are under false oaths since l998; and a changed oath
since l910. (go to www.avoiceforchildren.com to download the expose'
(long download!) with exhibits written by researcher and court
advocate Milt Mitcheck, or write to the addresses at the end for the
articles on this that went out on September 5, 2001)
Multnomah County - October 2, 2001 - State attorneys met in the
Multnomah County Courthouse of Judge Ellen F Rosenblum on October 2,
2001, on a motion to dismiss a Racketeering Complaint brought against
numerous judges and attorneys for criminal acts in the theft and
conversion of the Estate of Don Kettleberg, that was willed to Janette
Kent thirteen years ago. Weidner, a former prosecuting attorney, has
for more than ten years filed into the courts to force the state to
turn over the estate to Kent, as the courts ordered the state to do
ten years ago.
The state attorneys brought a motion to dismiss on a "Rule 21", the
arbitrary, biased and routinely used method to dismiss the Complaints
from abused Citizens when they charge public officials or bar members
criminally. As the hearing began, Weidner told Rosenblum that there
were some problems with the oath she was acting under. Weidner
showed Rosenblum a certified copy of her oath, and the exhibits that
show that the current oath leaves out words from the constitutionally
mandated oath, in particular the words "said" state, and faithfully
and "impartially". (The differences are like night and day in a
court - the word "said" refers to the REAL land, water, air, Sui Juris
Inherent Rights, that only belong to SOVEREIGNS - NOT corporations or
states or groups of any kind - and NOT adherent or bound or bonded or
contracted in any way to administrative rules. This is about HUMAN
RIGHTS AND FAMILY RIGHTS; and to leave out the word "impartially" is
obvious that the judges only swear to "faithfully" uphold THEIR
Amended VII Statutory system, the OVERLAY of codes, ordinances,
statutes and "offences", NOT the Organic Constitution.)
Agreeing that her oath was faulty, exactly as Weidner had charged,
Judge Rosenblum said "sometimes things are inadvertently left out, but
I will take that oath right now !" Rosenblum stood at the Bench,
raised her right hand, and said "normally this would be in front of a
judge, but I am under oath and this is on the Record", and Rosenblum
took the ORIGINAL oath in front of the audience of attorneys and
courtwatchers. By taking an oath to the "said" state of Oregon, this
is the first time since around 1910 that a court has excercised
Original Jurisdiction in the state of Oregon, and the first judge
since that time to swear to IMPARTIALLY uphold the SAID state, the
REAL land, your REAL person and Human Rights. "Said", literally,
"aforementioned", in this case, the Constitutionally Lawful Republic
of Sovereigns in the State of Oregon. Article 1, Section 1, "All
authority inherent in People", Oregon Constitution. (only HUMANS can
excercise inherent rights, not a "corpse" - "corps" - corporations
that are NOT human, cannot sign anything, have no signature or voice,
cannot bear any CLAIM against any Sovereign, cannot bear children or
have parental righs, cannot own property - except in the counterfeit
overlay the bar and legislature has created and in which the bar spins
the people around for their own profit).
Rosenblum told the state attorneys that she was not going to allow
their motion to dismiss. Rosenblum said "No - there are allegations of
criminal conduct and racketeering and conspiracy in Mr. Weidners
Complaint." Rosenblum went on to say that elements of the Racketeering
and Conspiracy were both criminal and civil, and told Weidner to
amend his Complaint to seperate the criminal charges from the civil
charges to make it more clear and certain and bring it back in the
next hearing. Rosenblum has now acknowledged on the record the
evidence of a criminal enterprise of Racketeering involving numerous
attorneys, judges and corporate interests in the Kettleberg Estate
case, affirming the criminal evidence and facts as Janette Kent and
Roger Weidner have testified on the Record for many years.
Rosenblum, by taking an oath to the Original Jurisdiction, lawfully
threw out the state administrative, color of law, statutory,
unconstitutional paperwork that the attorney generals office
generates, always to dismiss without factual dispute or Law.
Rosenblum knew in a court of lawfull Judicial Due Process that it would
be misprison of felony for her to deny the evidence before her and
that the criminal charges could not be ignored. Under the LAWFUL OATH,
only credible evidence comes in and a criminal indictment cannot be
dismissed in an administrative quasi-judicial process, that is in
place at this time under color of Law and their false oaths.
On September 20, 2001, in Josephine County in the court of Judge Coon,
researcher and court advocate Chris Youngblood filed an Amicus Curiae
brief into the case of Brian and Ruth Christine, with the "vultures"
book and the evidence of the judges false oaths. Right now the court
is moving to terminate parental rights on the Christines five
daughters, rolling over the parents Inherent Rights like road kill,
yet have never allowed a trial or conviction against the parents.
The state also has NEVER supported or produced any evidence whatsoever
in a court to substantiate their kidnapping of the Christine children,
unsupported yet printed repeatedly in the newspapers, who work for the
state and money interests too, who have slandered and biased the case
with unsupported, unproven and uninvestigated lies.
The state, acting as though it can "sever" UN A LIEN ABLE parental
rights, is moving without Law in an unconstitutional process without
evidence or judicial due process in that case, as well as EVERY case
against families in Oregon. The Christine's "reposessed" their
children from the state, had them for a few days, and now the state
has again taken them, as well as the newborn in Montana. Ruth
Christine was forced to bear her baby in shackles imprisoned, having
commited no crime nor convicted of any crime, and Baby Abby Rose,
whom the state has already destroyed the maternal human bond of mother
and child, having NEVER convicted either parent of ANY crime! The
Christine's are now in jail in Montana for their brave and selfless
acts to excercise Inherent Rights to protect their family body. They
have put their lives on the line for their children and for every
family in America.
Youngbloods Amicus brief was filed ten minutes before the hearing,
and Judge Coon acknowledged the brief immediately. Coon told the
court to make copies for all adverse parties in the case, and that the
Amicus was now part of the case file in the Christine case. The state
attorneys present, as well as attorneys for the State Offices for
Services to Children and Families, had no rebuttal to the Amicus
brief, outlining the lack of jurisdiction of the adminstrative non
constitutional court, and that the actions against the Christines
have been committed by false judges with no worn oath/contract/bond to
the organic Constitutional State of Oregon. The Amicus and exhibits
prove that the orders and actions previously brought against the
Christines are null and void of Law, and cannot be lawful enforcement.
The brief made clear that the state cannot proceed in the manner it
has been any longer, having no Lawfull Constitutional jurisdiction.
By entering this evidence of false oaths into the Record, and the
facts undisputed by the state became legal fact. The facts in the
Record have to be disputed in every hearing, on both sides, or what
is claimed becomes undisputed fact in the Record. On September 20,
the evidence of the false oaths became fact in the Record. And on
October 2, when Ellen Rosenblum took a Lawful oath, she became the
first judge to do so in nearly a hundred years, restoring a court of
Constitutional Judicial Due Process under the Organic Constitution.
By swearing to uphold "said" state, the statutory overlay is now
burnt away, vaporized, and any judge swearing their lawful oath cannot
support the unconstitional statutory overlay anymore now in Oregon. It
is all in the process. It is difficult for many to understand the
manipulations of this information, without experience in a court.
These are deeply embedded manipulations, intentionally deceptive, and
how the bar has operated in the dark to deceive and control the common
people as they are being exploited and destroyed in administrative
process for profit 'INTEREST' for the corporate state.
Today, Oregon has at least one judge with a Lawful oath to excercise
an Original Jurisdiction, which reestablishes our Soveriegn, Republic
in Oregon, and sets the tone for the rest of the country. Now that
the evidence has been exposed, entered in to Record and affirmed by a
judge, the bridge has reached across between the People, Our Republic
and our Rights, and the door is opened for everyone to Claim their
birthrights and inheritance, Inherent Rights given to you by God and
protected by the Bill of Rights and the Constitutions. We have to
CLAIM our rights to excercise them.
We have to realize now that every order, judgement, trial, fines or
assessments, that have been generated by these actors under false
oaths is NULL AND VOID, including previous judgements of Rosenblum
herself. Also, there is NO JUDGE at this time setting on the Supreme
Court, including Chief Justice Wallace Carson, who have a lawful oath,
as Rosenblum took yesterday. The People have to insist now that their
cases be dismissed as they were not allowed Judicial Due Process in
the courts. This has now been established as FACT now that Rosenblum
has confirmed that the previous oath was false and VOID.
We have to demand that EVERY judge in Oregon takes their Lawfull oath
now, and no longer tolerate statutory fraud or the counterfeit amended
VII statutory judicial system in Oregon. Measure #1 is gathering
signatures now across the state, to repeal the Amendment to the
Constitution in 1910 that "supplanted" the organic Constitution of the
SAID state of Oregon, the Law, the Bond, the Oath and the Contract
with the Sovereigns. TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW TO FIND THIS PETITION,
AND MAKE SURE THEY SIGN IT.....
Please contact Roger Weidner at 503-232-6691 for more information
about the Racketeering case. For information on Measure #1, and how to
help restore Constitutional Government in Oregon, please call
503-845-6734 , or 503-371-8742 , for more information, or contact the
Chief Petitioners through the website www.avoiceforchildren.com, also
e-mail at email@example.com).
Also, please mail to: PO Box 132, Mt Angel, Oregon 97362