Sunday, December 29, 2019
Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Sunday, November 24, 2019
The Biblical Weekly Sabbath Days that never change and do not fit the Greco Roman Calendar
8th, 15th, 22nd & 29th Days of the Biblical Month
Amazingly enough, I have never compiled these verses (until now, spring of 2013). I admit to you now that I was lied to. There are not 17-18 places, there are over 20. And if you know anything about the Torah, the Father said that only 2-3 witnesses were required to establish truth.
Please remember that ANY passage in Scripture that provides evidence of one Sabbath falling on the 8th, 15th, 22nd or the 29th day of the month proves the calendar below:
| New Moon Days | 1st Week Day | 2nd Week Day | 3rd Week Day | 4th Week Day | 5th Week Day | 6th Week Day | 7th Week Day |
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
| |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
| |
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| |
| (30) | |||||||
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
Aviv 10, the Passover lamb must be purchased. Aviv 14 is always the preparation day for first day of Unleavened Bread, see Leviticus 23:5-6, Matthew 27:62, Mark 15:42, Luke 23:54--24:1, John 19:14, 31, 42—John 20:1. The barley could be harvested on the 16th after the Wave Sheaf had been offered the morning of the 16th, Leviticus 23:9-14. The fact is that the 10th, 14th and 16th days of Aviv (which all float around on the Roman calendar) are, without exception, commanded work days.
There isn't one, but IF there was a continuous 7 day cycle in Scripture, every 1-3 years either the 10th, 14th, and 16th of Aviv will fall on a satyrday. Evidence: Aviv 10 fell on a satyrday in 2003. The 14th of Aviv fell on satyrday in 2004, 2008 and 2011. The 16th of Aviv fell on a satyrday in 2002, 2006 and 2009. There is no legislation provided to do tasks commanded to be performed on these days a day early or late IF these dates just happened to fall on the Sabbath; these work dates are fixed. And YHWH never has Israel do common work on a rest day. He is not the author of confusion.
Please look at the calendar above. Since the 10th of Aviv can never fall on the weekly Sabbath, neither can the 3rd, 17th or 24th days of the month. Since the 14th of Aviv can never fall on the weekly Sabbath, neither can the 7th, 21st or 28th. Since the 16th of Aviv can never fall on the weekly Sabbath, neither can the 2nd, 9th or 23rd days of the month. Since the Sabbath can NEVER fall on days 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 14, 16, 17, 21, 23, 24 or 28, that is a pretty BIG dent in the days of the month that the Sabbath can NEVER fall on. Can any pagan/papal/man-made/solar-only calendar satisfy these demands? Hardly! If you are looking for evidence, this ALONE blows up the Gregorian calendar!
Here now is the proof in the pudding. I hope you find it to your delight.
#1. (The 8th day of the first month of earth's history was the first weekly Sabbath.) Creation began the first month of earth's history, and it began with a new moon day, described in Genesis 1:1-2. If the Father's months begin with a new moon today, then so did the very first month. When YHWH created heaven and earth it was a TIME CONSUMING event. That unnamed, unnumbered segment of time came before, and was not part of, the seven day work week (see Ezekiel 46:1). In this Creation model, the Sabbath was indeed the seventh day of the week (as it has always been), but it was the EIGHTH day of the first month of earth's history...
| New Moon Day Genesis 1:1-2 | 1st Day of Creation Week Genesis 1:3-5 | 2nd Day of Creation Week Genesis 1:6-8 | 3rd Day of Creation Week Genesis 1:9-13 | 4th Day of Creation Week Genesis 1:14-19 | 5th Day of Creation Week Genesis 1:20-23 | 6th Day of Creation Week Genesis 1:24-31 | 7th Day (of the week) Sabbath Genesis 2:1-3 |
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
The first day of the feast and the "seventh day" [of the week in context] are one and the same. The 21st is the 6th day of the week and of course the 7th day of a seven day feast, but….
| New moon | Work 1 | Work 2 | Work 3 | Work 4 | Work 5 | Work 6 | Sabbath |
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
| |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
| |
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| |
| (30) |
I submit to you that this "seventh day" is Aviv 15, and it is not only an annual Sabbath, but a weekly Sabbath as well. There are no back to back Sabbaths in Scripture. The 15th is without question a Sabbath, meaning that the 22nd of the first month is also a Sabbath. If the 21st is an annual Sabbath, there would be two Sabbaths back to back (21-22), and there would be no preparation day for the second Sabbath of the two. Common sense, right?
#3. (The 15th and 22nd of the second month of the exodus are weekly Sabbaths.) Exodus 16 is the first place where the word "Sabbath" is used in Scripture. Here YHWH is speaking to Moses and Aaron on the 15th day of the 2nd month and tomorrow would begin a series of 6 days of manna, followed by a Sabbath. From day 15 add 6 days of manna = 21. Next day (22nd) is the Sabbath. See calendar model below...
| New moon | manna | manna | manna | manna | manna | manna x2 | Sabbath |
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
| |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
| |
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| |
| 30 | |||||||
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
#4. (The 15th day of the third month of the exodus is the weekly Sabbath.) Exodus 19:1 proves that the children of Israel arrived at Sinai on the 16th day of the third month. Please read the context. In agreement, the Book of Jubilees 1:1 flat out says that Israel arrived at Mt. Sinai on the 16th day of the third month. Moses indicates that the children of Israel rested at Rephidim the 15th of the third month. The root word for Rephidim means "rest" and this passage says that they arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai the "same day" of the third month that they left Egypt (two months earlier). If you'll remember, Israel got as far as Succoth the 15th, and actually left Egypt the on the 16th. Numbers 33:3-6. So Israel arrived at Sinai on the 16th and Moses was immediately summoned up the mount. YHWH told Moses to go back down the mountain and to tell the people to consecrate themselves for on the third day (the 18th) He would come down on the mount in a cloud, Exodus 19:10-11 --today, tomorrow and the third day. If the 18th is the third day, then the 16th is the first day, meaning that they were "resting" in Rephidim on the Sabbath, the 15th, which is the weekly Sabbath.
Looks like this:
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th |
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
#6. (Leviticus 23:6-7 (see verse 11) proves that Avib 15 is the weekly Sabbath.) The Hebrew word Sabbath is H7676 in verse 11, which is the weekly Sabbath. Verse 11 is about wavesheaf, which is Aviv 16, every year. It is Aviv 16 that Josephus writes about, his words hammering the counterfeit calendar and its proponents. Please understand that Josephus is writing to a non-Israelite audience. In The Antiquities of the Jews, Book 3, Chapter 10, section 5, he has this to say about the Passover season:
-
(248) "In the month of Xanthicus, which is by us called Nisan, and is the beginning of the year, on the fourteenth day of the lunar month, when the sun is in Aries (for in this month it was that we were delivered from bondage under the Egyptians, and law ordained that
we should every year slay that sacrifice which I before told you we
slew when we came out of Egypt, and which was called the Passover; and so we do celebrate this Passover in companies, leaving nothing of what we sacrifice till the day following. (249) The feast of unleavened bread succeeds that of the Passover, and falls on the fifteenth day of the month and continued seven days, wherein they feed on unleavened bread… (250) But on the second day of unleavened bread, which is the sixteenth day of the month, they first partake of the fruits of the earth,
for before that day, they do not touch them. ... (251) They take a
handful of ears, and dry them, then beat them small and purge the barley
from the bran; they then bring one tenth deal to the altar, to Elohim;
and, casting one handful of it upon the fire they leaven the rest for
use of the priest; and after this it is that they may publicly or privately reap their harvest."
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
#9. (Deuteronomy 5:12-15 proves that Aviv 15, Israel's deliverance day, is the weekly Sabbath.) Interestingly, the fourth commandment in Exodus 20:8-11 links the Sabbath with Creation week. Deuteronomy 5 links the Sabbath with the day Israel was delivered from Egypt, which EVERYONE must admit was the 15th of Aviv, considering that Passover is a fixed date feast (Aviv 14).
#10. (The Battle of Jericho proves that the 8th day of the month is the weekly Sabbath.) The battle of Jericho was a seven day event (and blows up satyrday Sabbath keeping all by itself). Every able-bodied Israelite male took with him every weapon at his disposal. The priests even carried the Ark of the Covenant. In this battle/siege, Israel is on the offensive; they are the aggressors. Read Joshua 6. Only Joshua knew it would be a 7 day affair, the men were told they would attack when Joshua gave them the signal. These soldiers were marching around Jericho for seven days in attack mode, on a full tilt adrenalin rush, not knowing for sure when the signal would come. Which of these 7 days was the Sabbath? Did YHWH ever send Israel into battle on the Sabbath? The battle of Jericho is more a calendar statement than it is about the conquest of Canaan. Israel had JUST come out of the wilderness after a 40 year sojourn, having to relearn the law (including the Sabbath) of Yah. Do you suppose that the VERY first thing YHWH commanded Israel to do would be to break the Sabbath with a 7 day siege? If the Sabbath is every seventh day in an unbroken cycle of 7, then ONE of the days Israel marched around Jericho had to have been the weekly Sabbath. You think about this. If you are interested in knowing how they took Jericho WITHOUT breaking the Sabbath, see the calendar model above. It is so simple a child can figure it out. Here's the proof...
-
14. And it was in the second month, on the first day of the month,
that YHWH said to Joshua, Rise up, behold I have given Jericho into thy
hand with all the people thereof; and all your fighting men shall go
round the city, once each day, thus shall ye do for six days. 17. And on
the seventh day they went round the city seven times, and the priests
blew upon trumpets. (Jasher 88:14,17)
| March 1 time | March 1 time | March 1 time | March 1 time | March 1 time | March 1 time | March 7 times | Keep Sabbath |
| New Moon Day |
1st
work day
|
2nd
work day
|
3rd
work day
|
4th
work day
|
5th
work day
|
6th
work day
|
7th day Sabbath
|
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
| |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
| |
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| |
| (30) |
#12. (The 8th day is the weekly Sabbath as found in II Chronicles 29:17.) The people began to sanctify on New Moon day of the first month and on the 8th of the month they went to the temple. Israel only went the temple porch on new moon and Sabbaths (Numbers 10:1-10, Ezekiel 46:1).
#13. (Ezekiel 46:1 reveals that the new moon days do not count against the week, which reveals the weekly Sabbaths on the 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th days of EVERY month.) Couple this with Genesis 1:1-2, #1 above, and you have an iron clad case. The new moon days never fall during the work week; they are a third category of day. Ezekiel 46:1 says that the gate to the temple is shut on all SIX working days, but open on the Sabbath and new moon. Periodically, new moon day is on th-day. If the tabernacle were still here and I asked you, "Would the gate have been open or shut?" how would you answer? If you say open because it is new moon day, I would respond that th-day is a work day so it must be shut. If you agreed, "Of course th-day is a work day, it must be shut." I'd reply, "But friend, it is new moon, it must be open." You see, you have no correct answer because you are applying a pagan/papal/Roman/solar-only/man-made calendar to this Scriptural calendar event. Isaiah 66:23, II Kings 4:18-23, Amos 8:5 are three more witnesses that the new moon cannot fall on one of the six work days. The calendar model below is the ONLY one that supports all of these verses:
| Open | Shut | Shut | Shut | Shut | Shut | Shut | Open |
| New MoonDay |
1st
work day
|
2nd
work day
|
3rd
work day
|
4th
work day
|
5th
work day
|
6th
work day
|
7th day Sabbath
|
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
| |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
| |
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| |
| (30) | |||||||
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
#15. (John also reveals that the 22nd day of the 7th month is the weekly Sabbath.) John 7:2 says it is Tabernacles time. John 7:37 says Yeshua spoke on the last great day of the feast. Leviticus 23:33-44 says it is a 7 day feast, so Tabernacles is on the 15-16-17-18-19-20-21 days of the 7th month. He spoke on the 21st day of the month, the last day of the feast. From this point in John 7:30 to the end of John 8, he is engaged in a running spiritual battle. A day later (the 22nd day of the 7th month), he heals a man ON THE SABBATH. This is none other than the 8th day of the feast, the weekly Sabbath that always follows the 7 day feast. Since he observed the 22nd as the weekly Sabbath here, he also observed the 8th, 15th and 29th days of the lunar month as the Sabbaths by default. The 8th day is a Hebrew idiom (expression) that refers to the weekly Sabbath. The weekly Sabbath is the 8th day of the month, and also the "8th day" of the seven day Feast of Tabernacles.
Here's the rundown:
John 7:37 – Yah'shua spoke during the last great day (John 7:2 says this was the feast of Tabernacles.)
John 7:43-53 – There was contention between the people and the religious authorities. After which every one went home.
John 8:1 – Yah'shua went to the Mount of Olives.
Scripture says that Tabernacles is a seven day feast:
Leviticus 23:34-36 says that Tabernacles begins on the 15th day of the seventh month and is a seven day feast. Count the days...
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
Now watch… Remember the carpenter from Nazareth spoke on the last great day of a seven day feast…
John 8:2 – The next day (the 22nd of the month), Yah'shua returned to the temple. (Why?) There, another lengthy debate took place… John 8:59 – After which Yah'shua was nearly stoned, but He passed through… John 9:1 – as Yah'shua left the temple, He passed by a blind man...read John 9:14.
The eighth day of the feast was the 22nd day of the month, and the weekly Sabbath. If the 22nd is the Sabbath, by default the 8th, 15th and 29th days of the month are also Sabbaths.
#16. (The crucifixion on Passover day proves that the Aviv 15 is the weekly Sabbath.) Mark 15:42-43 says that the crucifixion took place on preparation day, the day before the Sabbath. Yah'shua rested on the weekly Sabbath of Aviv 15 in the tomb. Since all Israel observed the 15th as the weekly Sabbath here, they also observed the 8th, 22nd and 29th days of this lunar month as the Sabbaths by default. Second witness, Luke 23:54. John 19:31 is a third witness where John calls Aviv 15 (the day after the Passover, which is Aviv 14) an high Sabbath. Every scholar knows that this means it was an annual Sabbath as well as a weekly Sabbath.
"An high day" has been misconstrued to mean the occasions that a annual Sabbath just happens to coincide with a weekly Sabbath. Truth be told, the three pilgrimage feasts (Exodus 23:14-17) ALL fall on weekly Sabbath, every year. The first day of Unleavened Bread and the first day of Tabernacles fall on the 15th day of the first and seventh month, respectively. Feast of Weeks (a.k.a. Pentecost) falls on the 29th day of the 4th month.
#17. (The resurrection proves that Aviv 15 is the weekly Sabbath.) Matthew 28:1 says he rose the day after the Sabbath day. "Sabbath day" in the Greek refers to the WEEKLY Sabbath. Mark 16:1-2 is a second witness. Luke 23:56-Luke 20:1 is a third witness.
#18. (Acts 20 reveals that the 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th days of the month are the weekly Sabbaths.) Below is a Gregorian calendar model with Aviv 14 and Aviv 15 in the appropriate places (preparation day and Sabbath).
Please read Acts 20:5-7 and put these dates on the calendar. Paul left probably on the evening of the 21st (said he left after the days of Unleavened Bread) but he could have left after the Sabbath (the 22nd). All that is necessary is for him to arrive in Troas 5 days after the last day of Unleavened Bread. The number of travel days are not mentioned, and not necessary to know, only that he arrived at Troas in 5 days (arriving on the 26th of Aviv). And at Troas they abode 7 days (26-27-28-29-30-1-2) and he preached until midnight on the last night of his stay (the first day of the week), departing on the morrow (the second day of the week).
Is the 2nd of the month (below) the first day of the week? No, it is the 3rd day of the week.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thur | Fri | Sat |
1
| ||||||
| 2 |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
| 9 |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
| 16 |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
| 23 |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
| 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thur | Fri | Sat |
1
|
2
|
3
| ||||
| 4 |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
| 11 |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
| 18 |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
| 25 |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
1
|
| 2 |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
Do you remember what happens on Aviv 10? The 10th day of Aviv is a commanded work/commerce day, the day to set aside the Passover Lamb. If you did not own a lamb, you had to go and purchase one on THIS particular day. Aviv 10 is a commanded commerce day (Exodus 12:3). There is no provision to procure this lamb a day early or a day late IF the Sabbath just happens to fall on Aviv 10.
Isn't it interesting how the Father maneuvered His commanded work days in such a fashion that they would totally disrupt and destroy all the calendar manipulations of apostate man? So, would you like to see how Paul CAN abide in Troas for seven days AND preach on the first day of the week without running afoul of any of the calendar defenses Yah has set in place? No problem...
| New Moon | 1st day | 2nd Day | 3rd Day | 4th Day | 5th Day | 6th Day | Sabbath |
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
| |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
| |
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| |
| 30 | |||||||
| 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
Isn't it amazing? There is always harmony in the truth.
I'm not sure, but I think I've exhausted the list of Sabbaths that can be date identified with the 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th days of the month that were presented in the bodies of the studies I've done on the Creation Calendar. I'm kind of surprised actually that there are more than 18 as #16 and #17 both have 2 additional witnesses (meaning that there are 3 different texts saying the same thing for the point made in #16 and #17), and #7 proves two Sabbath dates that fall on the Sabbath (the 15th and the 22nd), and #13 posts THREE additional witnesses, meaning there are actually 25 places in Scripture where the Sabbaths can be dated identified by triangulation if the text does not flat out STATE that the Sabbath fell on the 8th, 15th, 22nd or 29th day of the month. I could argue that #13 and #18 prove all four of these Sabbath dates, since no particular Sabbath is listed, so this number could be expanded to 31 different Sabbaths in Scripture that can be date identified on the 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th days of the month.
I hope this is helpful. I am certain that continued study will reveal more weekly Sabbaths that fall on the 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th days of the month. However, what can also be said is that there will never be a Sabbath that can be date identified that falls on a date OTHER than these particular dates. Bro. Arnold Bowen (www.lunarsabbath.info) has offered $10,000 and World's Last Chance (WLC) (www.worldslastchance.com) at one point offered a cool one million dollars to anyone who could find a Sabbath on a date OTHER than the 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th days of the month. I'm guessing that the million was seen as hyperbole by their readers because this was later changed to a world wide public confession. They could have changed to a more reasonable $10,000 like Bro. Arnold, but they did not.
To date, there have been a few who have tried to manufacture weekly Sabbaths that fall on dates other than the 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th days of the month, but so far their deception or lack of studiousness has been discovered and no monies have been transferred and there has been no world wide public confession by WLC that they have been proven wrong.
Bro. Arnold's money and WLC's reputation are quite safe.
Cosmetic Changes
The only changes that have been made to the article by NCCG.ORG have been Abib to Aviv (the correct pronunciation), YHVH to YHWH (the modern Hebrew transliteration for the Tetragrammaton back to the classical Biblical Hebrew one), and Yeshua to Yah'shua (the Aramaic for Jesus back to the Hebrew).
Saturday, November 23, 2019
Friday, November 22, 2019
Toronto Protocols Like the Brotherhood of Zion plans
Toronto Protocols revealed 20 years ago – What are they about?
The debate about the existence of a master plan for the economic, cultural and political unification of the world and the radical transformation of societies has been going on for decades. Even though the mainstream media consistently regards these assumptions as conspiration theories, videos and posts about secret organizations, their meetings and the establishment of a united “One World” reach millions of viewers on YouTube and other social networks. The origin of the so called “Toronto Protocols” – which were published 20 years ago– is still not clear, but the bare content of the document seems to be certified by the elapsed time.
The document running under the name “Toronto Protocols” was published by a French-Canadian journalist, Serge Monast in May, 1995. There is little accessible information about Monast –who was born in 1945–, but what we do know about him was amassed in a post by “Konteó blog” in 2012. Monast started off as a poet and writer, but from the second half of the ‘80s he became interested in investigative journalism. At the beginning, he worked for a journal called L’Enquête (Investigation), but since mainstream media outlets refused to publish his writings, he established his own news agency, l’Agence Internationale de Presse Libre (International Agency of Free Press), where he published his findings and the results of his investigations. He and his work gained fame in May, 1995 when he got his chance to present his views in a Canadian television program.
He didn’t survive
Monast's writings covered topics like medical experiments influencing human thinking and emotions, conducted by the CIA, or the joint sequence of operations (code name: “Blue Beam”) by NASA, CIA and NSA. The aim of “Blue Beam” was to manipulate people’s religious faith with the help of electromagnetic waves, computers and global, real-time holographic projections to fake the coming of the Messiah.Monast, having been singled out by Canadian and American authorities, had a troubled life: he was accused several times of committing crimes, he was repeatedly placed under detention, dozens of house searches were carried out in his flat and office, piles of his semi-finished materials and documents were confiscated, they didn’t let him see his children, and his friends' distrust of him was engendered.
One and a half years after the revelation of the Toronto Protocols, he was arrested again on 3rd December, 1996 in Montreal. A criminal procedure was initiated against him for scare-mongering and other crimes, then he was taken into custody for 24 hours. The following day he was freed, but almost immediately he felt sick, and died the following day. According to his post-mortem – that was only carried out as a result of the persistent efforts of his wife, as no hospital wanted to deal with his case – the cause of death was heart failure. Serge Monast was 51 years old, known as a religious person, healthy as a horse, living without any addictions.
Concerning the origins of the Toronto Protocols (Les Protocoles de Toronto) Monast only stated that he obtained it through “adventurous means”, and his reason for not revealing any details to the public was that “he could have endangered lives”. He claimed that the first part of the Protocols was created around the end of June, 1967 and it was further clarified and amended 18 years later, at a meeting in 1985. According to Monast, the leaders of the “New World Order” (NWO) ideology gathered in Toronto to elaborate their strategies for the following 50 years. One thing he revealed that out of the 18 participants, six represented the World’s most influential banks, six represented the most significant energy consortiums and six represented the largest agricultural and food consortiums.
Since Monast passed away shortly after the meeting, and his records have not been found either, the origins of the document cannot be verified, and we do not wish to attempt to do so either. The only thing that is certain is that the document is at least 20 years old, thus concerning the course of events after 1995, the protocols are remarkable regardless of whether Monast himself wrote them or not. There is very few content available of the Toronto Protocols online, so we wish to provide you with a shortened version highlighting the most interesting parts in our opinion. The original document of 60 thousand characters is available here.
 |
| Is there a master plan? |
Man without values
The document emphasizes, the “New World Order” is much more than a thorough and radical reform of the world’s economy, politics, and society; it aims to unite humankind so the population of the Earth will act together as one, and in ways the creators of the Plan want them to. Throughout history many have tried, but no one ever came even near to ending all the divisions of mankind. In order to achieve this, the individual and the traditional social structures –like family, nation and religion– have to lose their meaning so that new, global ideas can replace them.The program is all about planning for long term. All steps are planned according to this and have been built on each other. The two main directions are given by the document’s motto “Panem et circenses” (Bread and circuses) because according to the authors, most people can be controlled if you provide them the means of sustenance and give them ways to spend their free time. According to the document if the masses go in the desired direction, others who think differently about politics, ideologies and religion, can be easily isolated, eliminated or forced to cooperate. The globalist project aims to create a “society of comfort” where everybody is provided with entertainment like easily accessible and varied travelling, sports and sex. “The Man has to be controlled so that he might believe this is "Modern", and that his modernity consists of his capacity, and his possibility of being able to enjoy much, and now all that surrounds him.“ To achieve this, the media, the fashion industry and the culture have to be controlled. “Thus holding the "senses" of the youths (that is, tomorrow's adults) under control, we will consequently have the way clear for infiltrating and transform in depth without being disturbed, the politics, the legal system and the education.”
The liberation of the individual
How can total control be achieved over the life of people, especially young people? The document considers changing the social structure based on family to be the most important goal, saying if this can be shaken, the traditional religious beliefs can be done away with as well. "The foundations of 'Western Society' in its essence, originates straight from Judeo-Christian heritage. It is precisely the same heritage which made "family", the "node", the "cornerstone" of all existing social structures."Changing the idea of family started by the authors of the 19th and 20th century. It was continued by non-conformist philosophers, so people will replace the interest of the family with the interest of the individual. The changes were made in the name of being progressive, modern, and democratic.
By making the rights of the individual absolute, the interest of
national, ethnic, religious groups are overshadowed. ‘It is no longer
society (the right of the majority) that must be protected against
individuals that can threaten, but rather (the Right of the Individual)
needs to be protected against the potential threats of the majority’.
The legal protection of nontraditional sexual behaviours as fundamental
individual rights serves prioritizing the individual over the society,
just as making child protection laws and institutions that enable the
state to take the supervision over children from the parents if it is
considered justified.
"Thereby transferring the "Parental Role" to the State, it will become
much easier for us to monopolize, one by one, all the responsibilities
that had been, to this day, the exclusive responsibility of parents.
This is how we can make be considered by all as an abuse against
children, the traditional religious education of the Judeo-Christian
origin."
People who think only the Communists and the Nazis wanted to monopolize education, are mistaken. Progressive societies don't want parents to raise their children according to their beliefs. They claim that they are protecting children’s individual rights, when for example they allow them to choose their own sexual identity at an early age. If this can be put into a global “child protection” constitution, the ban on separating sexes will not only be ushered in schools (as it is already happening in Scandinavian states) but it also will be expected of families to do the same. If parents insist on bringing up their children by naming them and dressing them according to their biological sex, "child protecting services" can intervene and take the "endangered" children away, as it would be done in case of physical abuse.
The document also talks about the staff needed, to get through the plans: "For guaranteed success of such an enterprise, it is essential that civil servants who work in these "offices" in the service of the State are young, without past experiences that are imbued with ideas which we consider empty and vain, but believe with missionary enthusiasm that they are protectors of vulnerable children. These officials must consider all parents to be potential criminals who can be a danger to the welfare of the child."
"To complete the breakdown of the family, the education system, thus the society in general, it is essential to encourage the "Sexual Freedom" at all levels of the Western Society. It is necessary to lower the individuals by all possible means, and thus the masses made up of them, to be centered around satisfying their primal instincts" - stated in the 1967 document, highlighting that sexual revolution is not only supported by culture and music but is also backed by the development of the pharmaceutical industry.
The development of modern contraceptives "revolutionizes the Western societies and pushes the traditional moral principals and the Judeo-Christians into oblivion" - says the document. The pill brings sexual freedom" without consequences. It convinces women to break off everything that is perceived as "the chains of tradition" and the past, when women were slaves to men and the traditional Judeo-Christian family. In the past, women were the "center and the main pillar of the family unit", the modern woman however is an independent individual trying to step out from her traditional position and perception, to break away from the family and pursue her own agenda and goals.
This process is supported by "progressive feminist protest movements" pursuing ever more radical demands, to bring about the "total and obvious destruction of the family and the Judeo-Christian society. " This "Sexual liberation" will be the ultimate means that makes it possible for us to remove from the "consciousness of the society" any form of the concept of "Good and to the Evil". The collapse of the moral and religious guidelines enable the complete liberation of humankind from under the "oppression of the past".
"This open door, from the encouragement of sexual freedom and divorce to abortion and the legal recognition of the different forms of homosexuality, will help us to radically change the historical foundations of the legal system of the societies. It be a major asset to push for all of the individuals in a general relaxation of the morals, to divide the individuals as compared against each other, according to their instincts and their own interests, to destroy the future of the youth by pushing the adverse experiences of early sexuality and abortions, and to break the future generations morally by pushing them to alcoholism, addiction to different drugs (which our Senior International Lodge Officers will take charge of taking the control at the world level), and in suicide" – states the document.
"The basic structure of our New World Order consists, in its essence, of a multitude of different networks, each covering all the spheres of the human activity on the whole of the planet. Until this day, all these networks were interconnected by a common ideological base: that of the Man as being the center and the ultimate fulfillment of the Universe." The statements of the document show a great deal of foresight from the authors, even if they had been written by Monast in 1995 (the largest social network, Facebook, only started at 2004 and became a global platform in 2010 when it reached 1 billion users).
The authors deem it necessary, that the individuals take part in the new global system enthusiastically and willingly, as opposed to the former authoritarian systems. Through this, people will not be alienated by the complete lack of control over their private sphere. "And that is precisely what we will give him, encouraging him to take part, "Body and Soul", in this "Global Electronic Network" (...) While this misled man will be absorbed by his blind enthusiasm to be a part of this new "World Community" by being a part of this vast "Network of Computers", for our account, we shall see, from the superior levers, which will be hidden from him, to file, to identify , to record, and to make profitable according to our own objectives. " – says the document.
The enthusiasm towards technology is further encouraged by the educational system, which prefers technical skills rather than classical arts and literature. This enthusiasm is very similar to the transhumanist views of contemporary culture.
"We would maintain a global economy worldwide that would be totally out of the influence of nation states. This "New World" economy would stand above all, neither politics nor trade unions would have control over it. It would dictate its own global politics, and would enforce political reorganisation, according to our viewpoints expanded on the world of course” – says the document, which also suggests increasing the defencelessness of the nations with financial-political instruments – for example with debt traps.
We would manipulate the governments and the population of nation states so as that they give us a pretext that we, using the IMF, call on the Western states to accept so called "restrictive budgets" so they could virtually decrease state debt and maintain their international credit classification (which is an absolutely theoretical and unimportant aspect), and to preserve the peace of the society – which is also an impossible task for them.” The state debt, the dependence of international credits, and the credit classification of nations –these expressions emerged in the news nearly every day during the past years.
The most interesting paragraph of the document today was written 20 years ago but is about the use of a migrant crisis in order to realize the global plans: "To assure us at all costs of the success of such an enterprise, making sure that our Agents already infiltrated in the Ministries of Intergovernmental Affairs and Immigration of Nation States make indepth modifications to the Laws of these Ministries. These modifications will essentially aim to open the doors of the western countries to a more and more massive immigration inside their borders (immigrations that we will provoke by taking care of touching off, here and there, new local conflicts). By well orchestrated press campaigns in the public opinion of nation states targeted, we shall provoke among them a significant refugee influx, which will destabilize their internal economy and increase the racial tensions inside their territory. We have to take care that there are foreign extremists among the migrants as well. This will facilitate the destabilization." – writes the Toronto Protocols in 1985 (or not later than in 1995).
People who think only the Communists and the Nazis wanted to monopolize education, are mistaken. Progressive societies don't want parents to raise their children according to their beliefs. They claim that they are protecting children’s individual rights, when for example they allow them to choose their own sexual identity at an early age. If this can be put into a global “child protection” constitution, the ban on separating sexes will not only be ushered in schools (as it is already happening in Scandinavian states) but it also will be expected of families to do the same. If parents insist on bringing up their children by naming them and dressing them according to their biological sex, "child protecting services" can intervene and take the "endangered" children away, as it would be done in case of physical abuse.
The document also talks about the staff needed, to get through the plans: "For guaranteed success of such an enterprise, it is essential that civil servants who work in these "offices" in the service of the State are young, without past experiences that are imbued with ideas which we consider empty and vain, but believe with missionary enthusiasm that they are protectors of vulnerable children. These officials must consider all parents to be potential criminals who can be a danger to the welfare of the child."
The promise of freedom
If children are successfully separated from their families at an early age, it becomes possible to educate a "youth that is arogant, looks down on and humiliates" others, by using the buzzwords of "self-realization" and "freedom.""To complete the breakdown of the family, the education system, thus the society in general, it is essential to encourage the "Sexual Freedom" at all levels of the Western Society. It is necessary to lower the individuals by all possible means, and thus the masses made up of them, to be centered around satisfying their primal instincts" - stated in the 1967 document, highlighting that sexual revolution is not only supported by culture and music but is also backed by the development of the pharmaceutical industry.
The development of modern contraceptives "revolutionizes the Western societies and pushes the traditional moral principals and the Judeo-Christians into oblivion" - says the document. The pill brings sexual freedom" without consequences. It convinces women to break off everything that is perceived as "the chains of tradition" and the past, when women were slaves to men and the traditional Judeo-Christian family. In the past, women were the "center and the main pillar of the family unit", the modern woman however is an independent individual trying to step out from her traditional position and perception, to break away from the family and pursue her own agenda and goals.
This process is supported by "progressive feminist protest movements" pursuing ever more radical demands, to bring about the "total and obvious destruction of the family and the Judeo-Christian society. " This "Sexual liberation" will be the ultimate means that makes it possible for us to remove from the "consciousness of the society" any form of the concept of "Good and to the Evil". The collapse of the moral and religious guidelines enable the complete liberation of humankind from under the "oppression of the past".
"This open door, from the encouragement of sexual freedom and divorce to abortion and the legal recognition of the different forms of homosexuality, will help us to radically change the historical foundations of the legal system of the societies. It be a major asset to push for all of the individuals in a general relaxation of the morals, to divide the individuals as compared against each other, according to their instincts and their own interests, to destroy the future of the youth by pushing the adverse experiences of early sexuality and abortions, and to break the future generations morally by pushing them to alcoholism, addiction to different drugs (which our Senior International Lodge Officers will take charge of taking the control at the world level), and in suicide" – states the document.
In the network
The 1985 additions to the original documents give practical guidelines for the re-education of the youth. "It is now possible to foresee the establishment of a kind of "International Highway" where all these machines are interconnected. Because, as you already know, the direct control of individual populations of the planet at the very least would be totally impossible without the use of electronic computers and attaching them to each other in a vast "Global Network". These machines also have the advantage of replacing millions of people. In addition, they have neither self-awareness nor any moral, which is essential for the success of a project like ours. Above all, these machines do, without question, everything what is dictated to them. They are perfect slaves of which our predecessors only dreamed, although they never doubted that one day it would be possible to perform such a miracle. These machines without nationality, color of skin, religion, and political affiliation are the our greatest possible tools and the slaves of the New World Order. They are the "Cornerstones"!""The basic structure of our New World Order consists, in its essence, of a multitude of different networks, each covering all the spheres of the human activity on the whole of the planet. Until this day, all these networks were interconnected by a common ideological base: that of the Man as being the center and the ultimate fulfillment of the Universe." The statements of the document show a great deal of foresight from the authors, even if they had been written by Monast in 1995 (the largest social network, Facebook, only started at 2004 and became a global platform in 2010 when it reached 1 billion users).
The authors deem it necessary, that the individuals take part in the new global system enthusiastically and willingly, as opposed to the former authoritarian systems. Through this, people will not be alienated by the complete lack of control over their private sphere. "And that is precisely what we will give him, encouraging him to take part, "Body and Soul", in this "Global Electronic Network" (...) While this misled man will be absorbed by his blind enthusiasm to be a part of this new "World Community" by being a part of this vast "Network of Computers", for our account, we shall see, from the superior levers, which will be hidden from him, to file, to identify , to record, and to make profitable according to our own objectives. " – says the document.
The enthusiasm towards technology is further encouraged by the educational system, which prefers technical skills rather than classical arts and literature. This enthusiasm is very similar to the transhumanist views of contemporary culture.
Downgraded nations
If the young generations are placed into a technological and sensual dependence, it is possible to relativize nation states and finally, to disintegrate them. “If the nations would be deprived thereof that they can lean on a strong youth and that the individuals in the society could group around a common ideal, which is strengthened by indestructible moral trellises and historical support, they would have no choice but to subject themselves to our global will” – says the Protocols, that is detailing the program of economic and financial undermining of nation states. First it would transform the national economics throughout multinational companies, and then by the extraction of capital at the right moment in order to crack them."We would maintain a global economy worldwide that would be totally out of the influence of nation states. This "New World" economy would stand above all, neither politics nor trade unions would have control over it. It would dictate its own global politics, and would enforce political reorganisation, according to our viewpoints expanded on the world of course” – says the document, which also suggests increasing the defencelessness of the nations with financial-political instruments – for example with debt traps.
We would manipulate the governments and the population of nation states so as that they give us a pretext that we, using the IMF, call on the Western states to accept so called "restrictive budgets" so they could virtually decrease state debt and maintain their international credit classification (which is an absolutely theoretical and unimportant aspect), and to preserve the peace of the society – which is also an impossible task for them.” The state debt, the dependence of international credits, and the credit classification of nations –these expressions emerged in the news nearly every day during the past years.
The flow of refugees
The creators of the Plan believe, once they are able to restrict nation states' margins using international economy, global trade and expensive UN-projects launched to handle all crisis, people's mind can be controlled freely as well: "This independent economy will operate on the basis of our laws and hereby we will establish a global mass culture". With the help of the international media we control, we will establish a new culture, which will be uniform, thus making it practically impossible that someone would create something new. The future artists will be like we want them to be like or else they will not be artists. We don't have to fear any more that such independent works of art come into being that endangered the realization of our global ambitions so often in the past."The most interesting paragraph of the document today was written 20 years ago but is about the use of a migrant crisis in order to realize the global plans: "To assure us at all costs of the success of such an enterprise, making sure that our Agents already infiltrated in the Ministries of Intergovernmental Affairs and Immigration of Nation States make indepth modifications to the Laws of these Ministries. These modifications will essentially aim to open the doors of the western countries to a more and more massive immigration inside their borders (immigrations that we will provoke by taking care of touching off, here and there, new local conflicts). By well orchestrated press campaigns in the public opinion of nation states targeted, we shall provoke among them a significant refugee influx, which will destabilize their internal economy and increase the racial tensions inside their territory. We have to take care that there are foreign extremists among the migrants as well. This will facilitate the destabilization." – writes the Toronto Protocols in 1985 (or not later than in 1995).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)