Friday, June 29, 2007

This link of history is quite revealing

Including only a portion below of what this website offers..Blessings upon your quest.
Part One: The Founding
Douglas V. Gnazzo
January 6, 2005


So who discovered America? Was it Columbus, Lodge, or the Vikings? Maybe it was the Indians, now there’s a novel idea. I doubt if we will ever know for sure, so maybe we should try an easier question: who settled the first Anglo Colony in America, for which a written record exists, and where was it located? Was it Plymouth Rock? Or Jamestown? What about Roanoke?

From whence have we come?

Modern archaeological techniques show that the Vikings had settlements here by the eleventh century. The first explorer that recorded his voyage to North America was Giovanni Caboto, known by the name of John Cabot. Cabot set aground in 1497, claiming North America for the English sovereign King Henry VII. Columbus was still sailing around the Caribbean looking for India, China or Japan – seems he wasn’t too picky.

After floundering about and failing to find China, India or Japan, Christopher Columbus was running low on supplies with which to feed and pay his men. This was Columbus’ first voyage with the three famous ships: Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria. He originally landed on the Canary Islands, and then moved on to what is now called San Salvador. Columbus actually thought he had found India; hence he called the natives Indians. The year: 1492.

On his second voyage (1493-1496) Columbus sailed with a much larger force, 17 ships in all and about 1500 crewmembers. He established a home base at Hispaniola from which he discovered and named the Island of Dominica. From the island of Hispaniola, Columbus captured more than 1000 Taino Indians that became cargo or chattel that he sent to Spain, where they were sold as slaves.

On his third trip Columbus sailed further South to Trinidad and Venezuela. The year was 1498.

Columbus captured more Indian slaves than he could ship to Spain, so he decided to put them to work in mines and plantations that he and his family’s business associates had started throughout the Caribbean.

During his fourth and last expedition, Columbus sailed to Panama, Honduras, Mexico and Santiago (Jamaica). By 1500 Columbus and his men had killed or sold into slavery 100,000 of the Taino Indians. Plantation owners now looked to America and Africa for slaves. If Columbus accomplished anything of merit, it was bringing sugar cane from Spain to the West Indies; however, this too was cursed by the white man’s touch, as it was on sugar plantations that many of the slaves were imprisoned. Slavery is as old as the need of greed that calls it forth.


Arthur Barlowe, 1550-1620

The First Voyage to Roanoke. 1584. The First Voyage Made to the Coasts of America, with Two Barks, wherein Were Captains M. Philip Amadas and M. Arthur Barlowe, Who Discovered Part of the Countrey Now Called Virginia, anno 1584. Written by One of the Said Captaines, and Sent to Sir Walter Ralegh, Knight, at Whose Charge and Direction, the Said Voyage Was Set Forth.

[Boston, Mass.]: [Directors of the Old South Work], [1898].
© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research,
teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the text.

In 1585, Sir Walter Raleigh first attempted to settle in Roanoke, which was part of the land called Virginia, in honor of Queen Elizabeth of England, who was referred to as the Virgin Queen. Roanoke is actually an island off the coast of North Carolina. So why did Raleigh bother to name the territory after Queen Elizabeth?

Thomas Hariot, 1560-1621, John White, fl. 1585-1593, illustrated by,
and Richard Hakluyt, 1552?-1616, translated by

A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia: of the Commodities and of the Nature and Manners of the Naturall Inhabitants: Discouered bÿ the English Colonÿ There Seated by Sir Richard Greinuile Knight In the ÿeere 1585: Which Remained Vnder the Gouerenment of Twelue Monethes, At the Speciall Charge and Direction of the Honourable Sir Walter Raleigh Knight Lord Warden of the Stanneries Who therein Hath Beene Fauoured and Authorised bÿ Her Maiestie and Her Letters Patents / This Fore Booke Is Made in English by Thomas Hariot seruant to the Aboue-Named Sir Walter, a Member of the Colonÿ, and There Imploÿed in Discouering.

[New York]: [J. Sabin & Sons], [1871].
© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research,
teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the text.


King Henry VIII and his daughter, Queen Elizabeth I, issued charters to settle the New World. One such charter was granted to Sir Walter Raleigh, on March 25, 1584. Sir Richard Grenville captained the fleet that brought the colonists to the New World. Thomas Harriot represented Sir Walter Raleigh’s interests in the adventure, which were considerable.................

You decide the link at the top of this and learn more or?????.

Blessings upon the wisdom

Letter to Douglas Finley Conservative Party 2005

Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International
Armstrong Ecclesia
c/o 685 Josselyn Court, Kelowna, British Columbia
no code, non-commercial
Tel: 250-491-0552 Fax: 250-491-0594
c/o 4130 Hales Road, Armstrong, British Columbia
no code, non-commercial
Tel: 250-546-0175

This Fourteenth day, of the twelfth month,
in the year of our Lord and Savior Jesus the Christ, two thousand and five

Urgent Attention!
Re: Conversation with Laura at call center head office Ottawa? December 14th 2005 re: Deliberate knowledgeable Intimidation by Irwin Cotler and John McCallum encouraging their employees to intimidate members of our faith to violate their royally defended religious beliefs based in the letters patent version of the King James Bible.

We hope your serious attention to this unprecedented matter is offered to avert the continuance of this unlawful and treasonous activity by these men and women who have violated their allegiance to the Queen by deliberately intimidating men and women to violate their beliefs based upon the King James Bible.

To: The private man Douglas Finley
C/o Canadian Conservative Party Head Office

From: The Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International
Non corporate Ministers Kaz: Crischuk; Jim: Hueston; Lloyd: Hamilton; and Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger on behalf of all our Church members.
Kelowna Ecclesia Head International Head office
C/0 685 Josselyn Court
Kelowna British Columbia
No code non Commercial

Dear Doug Finley,

My Name is James Hueston and I wish you to be aware that I am in a very compromised and intimidated position. What you are about to read is supported by the Historical Briefing of the treasury board of Canada regarding a petition to the Queen sent by minister Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger on September 29th 2002 A.D., that was overseen by a Senior Analyst for the treasury board named Cameron McEwan in 2003.

The fact they were convened and briefed regarding this petition may offer some comfort as to the credibility and serious nature of the story of religious intimidation and persecution that goes back to the Days of Maurice Duplessis as Attorney General of Quebec and RonCarelli. and the ensuing Supreme court of Canada decision in Mr. RonCarelli’s favour. Mr. Duplessis in his private capacity was brought privately to task via a Supreme Court of Canada Decision in 1959, for his unlawful efforts and had to pay privately for his negligence to stay within the boundaries of law.

Those informed of a crime and do nothing to report or aid the party who is reporting the crime are in fact party to the crime and according to God’s law and mans law are guilty of negligence if harm results in aiding and abetting the crime.

Our faith as defended by her majesty is under attack by the revenue and Justice department lawyers involving many offices and so called allegiants of her Majesty.

They all have.been required under an act of parliament to take an oath to God to be truly allegiant to the Christian monarch Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor. They also have, in ignorance to the law, declined their oath sworn duties to provide that true allegiance and in fact have attempted to by slow action in particles overthrow the government of her majesty by foisting anti biblical `legislation through a de facto sitting of parliament.

We do not offer opinions but factual evidence that encouraged the convening of the the treasury Board of Canada and led to them, being the Treasury board of Canada members, being informed that the information in the petition was irrefutably correct..

This communication to you is neither frivolous nor vexatious but is under the real and perceived threat of duress and intimidation, by pseudo officials, to violate the commands of the King James Bible. This is being perpetrated by the men and women in power that are hiding behind de facto agencies of a de facto regime that is evidentiary in the publicized admission to it’s unlawful nature by the Head of state of Canada being Michel Jean stating she is Canada’s de facto head of state.
De facto mean usurped authority unlawfully obtained as per the creditor for Canada’s admission on it’s website!

We proved to the private men and women at the Canadian revenue agencies and to the private men and women at the Justice department that we stand on the laws of God as defended by the Queen.

We have registered mail proof from Buckingham Palace re the Petition and postings in news papers regarding our faith.

We like our brothers the Doukhabors cannot pay taxes to a false god government as we are commanded to not do so in Exodus 20:3-5 in the rule of law with standing in all of her majesties courts

We have entered into agreements with the imposturing private men acting as Minister of Justice, and Revenue
That are included in text below.

It is our hope in good faith we can have an agreement with you the private man and your party should it take power that will save our faith harmless from reproach and attack from unlawful actions by men and women ignorant of their duty to provide true allegiance in defence of the Christian faith. We ask your assurance the intimidation will not continue should you take office.

We were at the RCMP detachment in Kelowna Friday the 9th of December to press charges for intimidation against these men we have agreements with as they are responsible for intentionally conspiring with the aid of non allegiant lawyers to intimidate our members and ministers to violate our faith contrary to the criminal code. We cannot trust the false God courts as they to are de facto and indeed violate God’s law. We need dejure justice in recognition that if there is no victim and no damaged property of men and women then no crime exists.

We cannot subscribe to laws of man in addition to the laws of God or in derogation to his law.
Deuteronomy 4:2;12:32 in the law you will be required to swear to bear true allegiance to, should your party be elected, tells you that it is unlawful to add to or remove from any of God’s laws.

Please consider the position of the Queen and the historical nature of our information that involves her majesty and a plot to overthrow her Christian throne and oust the Bible from it’s standing by the liberal party who is laced with whispers of corruption connecting all the way to high ranking agents of dark power within the RCMP.

We are indeed threatened and have dozens of complainants and witnesses to the intimidation nation wide.

Please consider exposing this and with irrefutable proof of despicable corruption within the hierarchy of the beast finally with honors sword in hand, killing the creature from the liberal lagoon.

The following documents are but a few of hundred’s that have in good faith been delivered to various officials and agents of the de facto dictatorship called liberalism.

The Petition to the Queen was intended to alert her of the corruption and to extract my family, and me as their minister, from the de facto fraud in tyrannical possession of the power. It was Chief Justice Coke that stated. “If the laws of parliament are not consistent with the ten commandments they are void and of no effect

”. Golden Jubilee Coronation Petition
September 29th 2002 A.D.
To: Her royal majesty Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.
Via her private secretary Sir Robin Janvrin
C/o Buckingham Palace London England
From Minister of Christ Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International
Heatherdown Ecclesia
Near Onoway Alberta Canada
no code non commercial
Your most gracious Majesty defender of the faith, it is my duty in performance of the function of my calling as a minister of God, that I approach you with this petition and news of disservice and treachery by your professed allegiants in Canada. They are defying their oaths and not offering the true allegiance they swore to provide in your name.
It distresses me that I must approach your majesty for your majesty’s aid in this your Coronation year, but this quest is in defense of the Christian faith. I did think that I as a Christian minister armed with God’s truth may be able to provide enough proof for your professed allegiant’s and courts here in Canada, to show that the oath of allegiance to your majesty is being sullied by those of commercial minds and of no respect of the historical honor and integrity of the meaning of that true allegiance to your majesty’s defense of the Laws of God. Those in control and dishonoring their oaths are in a conflict to judge this as it is about their integrity that is non-existent. Historically we have seen our judiciary and parliamentarians ignore their oaths and get away with unlawful ungodly acts, as you were not petitioned.
It is humbly offered that it appears the timing is prime for such long overdue investigation and saving face of biblical and royal honor. The Golden Jubilee is under way and such glorious celebration will be compromised and indelibly stained as a result of the unlawful actions of religious blasphemy, desecration and discrimination against Christ’s ministry and church by such unlawful Commercial entities, as : Toronto Dominion Bank, the Alberta Justice system and courts ,and the Royal Canadian mounted Police, the Governor General’s office and your majesty’s privy council. It is humbly offered that this issue must be examined in true allegiance to your majesty’s honor in biblical fairness and with all merited expedition.
I would never approach your majesty for aid lest I have no other forum that is bound by and of respect to God’s laws. I appeal to you not as a corporate Queen but as the Elizabeth the woman created and anointed of God to hail and hear my plea and petition. I am being unlawfully denied full defense in lawfully formed truly allegiant courts in Canada and as such am being obstructed from carrying out functions of my calling as a minister of God. I have no truly allegiant court of your majesty to apply to! Section 423 of the Canadian Criminal code is being violated. The RCMP NSI have been following my movement and have made discriminating statements about me to others and have lied about me in saying I associate with militants. This is untrue and if I did I would be preaching to them about God’s Kingdom not militant action. There is a deliberate effort to smear my message your majesty. It is not surprising in light of what this information invokes.
Please show the world your power and the light of God’s integrity we all saw in your Coronation.

The lack of concern and desire to have a valid understood oath of true allegiance, to that defense of the faith, by the men and women throughout the provinces in Canada and the commonwealth raises serious questions of immense implications for the history of Biblical standing and guarding over the justice in this country.
No law or decision of man can violate the laws of God nor cause another man or woman to violate God’s laws.

These Questions are posed for review and information of your majesty
1.Why is the Alberta legislature oath of allegiance from the Alberta oath of office act in direct violation with the Schedule five of the BNA act, when to make it correct would have only been addition of one word?
2. Does the Alberta legislature have authority and sanction from your majesty to make up their own oath and then not require its members to know what the allegiance to your majesty means nor seemingly care if they do?
3. Does her majesty offer her authority and sanction to oath takers who have no idea what the allegiance means nor believe in that allegiance or who are not willing to carryout those allegiant obligations?
4.Why are these professed oath sworn true allegiants acting as justices, masters, ministers, and officers of your majesty, so reluctant to state the meaning of that proud oath of allegiance to your majesty?
It is also poised for review:
Why, according to Canadian department of Justice lawyers, without a valid oath of allegiance, and showing distain for the Coronation oath, do those swearing to provide true allegiance to a Christian Monarch, not have to know what the allegiance means and what the purpose of it is?
How can that opinion be correct?
How can federal laws of affiliation direct with the Queen be secondary to provincial when it is of mandatory nature to keep the oath to God and the allegiance to the Queen identical throughout Canada?
This denial of the courts to acknowledge and provide” true allegiance” raises issues of major unprecedented constitutional and international importance. It directly threatens all men and women’s God given unalienable rights and freedoms in having God’s law as supreme, and undermines protection of alloidial title in land via oaths of loyalty to the Crown and ultimately the Bible.
Such foundational facts and points of history can never be considered fluff or the workings of every-day body politics. They directly concern your majesty in your majesty’s ability to contractually maintain the Coronation oath, in your majesty’s honored Royal Style.
By the Grace of God your majesty is, by provision of God’s law in all of her majesty’s courts and by the strict adherence to God’s law covenant and constitution, as such, meeting the needs of every British subject, including generations yet unborn that will Succeed at maintaining and exercising our cherished freedoms in that ancient lexum.
This sacred provision of God’s rule of law as supreme and our duty to defend it is only effective upon those of your majesty’s subjects who are willing to stand and exercise those rights under God so long trodden upon by those of financial plunder and collective immorality.

As a result of gleaning the knowledge from God’s scriptures and reading the records of mans law written in conflict with that holy text, I find my Christian family, ecclesia, brethren and ministry in an extremely stressful and prejudiced position. As a minister of a Church of Christ and having the knowledge about the meaning of the allegiance to all concerned, as I do, it calls for exceptional extraordinary measures.
Hence our petition to Her Majesty, which exercises rights unused for over 49 years - since my birth and involuntary enslavement to the Corporate fictional body politic of Canada, in exercising God’s privilege to us of Jubilee of Leviticus 25-27.
I wish, as a Christian man in observance of the custom of God’s proclamation of Leviticus Jubilee and you as high priestess in this the Golden Jubilee of your coronation, to be in receipt of full pardon for the crimes I have been accused of and convicted of by the unlawful courts in Alberta Canada. These convictions were filed under the legal fiction nom degerre BELANGER Robin Jay with such fictitious number of ownership as being 618-774-079 which I do not accept being applied.
Such case of prime focus being Failing to Obey the order of a non allegiant court by imposter Ray Bradley, Section 127 CCC June6th and 14th of 2001 A.D. being, leave my parishioner, as the court refused to acknowledge it’s oath to her majesty twenty times on the record, factually disavowing and showing no respect or honor for her majesty. A non-allegiant judge Lawrie Smith sentenced me on May 9th of this year to 30 days in jail for that act of faith as she was in denial of my jurisdictional challenge protest and questions of integrity.
I have included the transcript partial Via email to the Golden Jubilee office and Sir Robin Janvrin. This is one of many cases in question where I as a Christian minister was asked to leave by a non allegiant man having none of her majesty’s sanction. I as a minister appeared in Edmonton Court of Queens bench of May 7th and 9th 2002 on account of the actions of professed judge Ray Bradley the man who refused twenty time to offer me a minister his true allegiance. I was attempting to find integrity within her majesty’s Alberta Court. I was not successful, as the Justice, one Lawrie Smith, who sat to hear the case, did not know what her allegiance meant either and as such was and is void of all sanction in her decision to incarcerate me. I have asked over 100 Justices, masters, judges, prosecutors and clerks if they know what their allegiance to you means. Only Wayne Hatt knew
I have been denied the truly allegiant justice of your majesty’s courts and could not appeal such conviction as all the judges I have stood before in Alberta are in denial of their true allegiance. I have stood in front of over 50 of those imposter judges. The court clerks and provincial registrar who are to stand as servants for the registry’s of her majesty’s subjects refuse to acknowledge their true allegiance to your majesty. I discover this by asking and performing a function of my calling as a Christian minister, in asking for true allegiance and integrity. . I do this as I cannot lawfully file into false registers run by non-allegiants with no official sanction.
Wayne Hatt your majesty’s loyal Justice of the Peace in Edmonton Alberta, deserves special notation and regard as when asked by me in my ministerial capacity if he knew what his allegiance to you meant, he replied without batting an eye “To uphold the laws of the King James Bible”. A true allegiant in singular and deserving commendation for his honorable methods and just manner.
I produced all the evidence inclusive of the King James Bible letters patent version being the rule of law in all of the commonwealth and your majesty’s Coronation oath and definition of an oath from the Westminster confession of faith. I have also included the false oaths of allegiance all of the judges in the provincial system have taken. The proof is overwhelming and irrefutable but, the woman acting as a judge, on May 9th of this year, Lawrie Smith, in the case to convict me of not taking orders from an imposter Ray Bradley, commented, as I showed her the proof of false oaths to her, that she was not going to allow that factual evidence. I concluded upon that evidence and the fact that she did not know the meaning of her oath that even she was without your majesty’s sanction or authority to proceed.
I have never been a violent man and have carefully studied what Christ did to the moneychangers that would ignore his warnings and did desecrate God’s temple. If I adopt Christ’s example I will be labeled as a threat and violent and am in fear for my life as I cannot violate God’s laws and commandments and associate with criminal traitors to her majesty’s Royal rule of law.

Your majesty I fear if I as a Church and man of God am not aided I will be martyred as sacrificial lamb in this Golden Jubilee. This will undoubtedly bring attention to the corruption being disgracefully perpetrated in your majesty’s name and it is not being done by the grace of God. They know who their father is!
I will await your majesty’s response to this petition in defense of the faith I am so dedicated to protecting and serving as part of my calling as a minister of our glorious saviors teachings.
If I may at this time of Jubilee and upon my own Golden Fiftieth year indulge and also thank your majesty for the boon of your majesty’s acceptance of my Jubilee redemption money for myself and family to release me from my Birth record bond of surety for the body politic and corporate debt of the bankrupt commercial fictitious entity known as Canada. I have been recorded with the Canadian treasury under that Bifurcated capitalized name as a corporate legal fiction as part of the consolidated revenue fund of Canada as being bonded as a surety for the national debt of Canada as per the Canadian ownership control and determination act. The subsequent regulations are with the actuarial tables of the value of men and women. My father named me as Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger on September 29th 1952. It is further recorded in fraud my altered name was added to a number being 618-774-079.
This was done by Canada in deceit as it was not revealed to the minor I was at the time that
1. Minors cannot enter into contracts.
2. The contract was not revealed in total and was not fully understood because of that omission and as such according to international commercial law is void.
3. God’s law of bearing false witness and coveting is also breached as first and foremost in the purpose of my Quest in Christ.
4. The men and women that are acting as your agents must by all common sense and biblical standard understand what they are swearing to. To allude to any other conclusion is clearly in avoidance of purpose, but this is just what they are doing in your majesty’s name.
5. Without that adherence and understanding of the reasons for taking the oath on the part of the oath taker there is no defense of the laws of the God of Abraham.
6. No contract in her majesties name is valid if those forming those contracts have no sanction of your majesty.
7. All law not in line with the laws of God is null and void upon those under the defense of the rule of law for the government of Christian princes.
8. No contract to give up ones unalienable rights is valid.
9. Unlawful bondage and fornication cannot be forced upon other men and women
10. No man or woman has the right to dominate another to do things against their will and beliefs.
11. Every man or woman has the right to fight to defend their faith and beliefs if being discriminated against or persecuted because of them.
12. The Bank act is unlawful and is usury, the debt of that usury is serviced by the income tax act.
13. The income tax act is usury and is a violation of God’s law that the king never assented to as it would mean abdication for violating the Coronation oath

I am of humble reverence of this scriptural opportunity to obtain my freedom from being the one held in bondage and registered as a surety of a Commercially dead and bankrupt fictitious entity known as Canada. I will not go into detail here but can provide proof of this system of recording birth records as sureties for the debt bonds that are issued in that sureties name and number. The Canadian Ownership Control and Determination Act is an act of redemption written by Jean Chretien in 1982 49 years after the bonding started and for a determination of worth. I cannot access such determination of my worth for your majesty, as a result of those being in charge refusing to acknowledge their true allegiance and I cannot conspire with them nor accept their registries as a result of their imposter imposition and unlawful procession. That would be aiding and abetting a crime.
As a result of doing my duty and performing my function as a Christian minister under your charge and protection I am being denied access to truly allegiant justice and courts. I am being discriminated against because of my Christian faith and defense of same.
I am pleased that your majesty will in honor of Leviticus scriptural order accept and approve this petition and I would at this time be of extreme undying gratitude for your granting my wish to redeem my loving Wife Cheryl, who came into this world via Sunderland England under the surname of Gray on the 12th day of October 1957 SIN number 458-616-372 for the sum of thirty shekels and my two daughters Amber-Lea Belanger coming into this world on the 14th day of June 1988 and my daughter Terra-Michelle arriving for our joy on August 6th 1990, both for the sum of Twenty Shekels of silver being ten shekels per daughter. I also pray your majesty will in honor of Leviticus scriptural order and my Jubilee right, accept my 50 shekels of silver for redemption from my servitude in the corporate body politic of and under the bankruptcy of the legal fiction Corporation of Canada since September 29th 1952 the day and year of my birth. The fictional commercial entity has created a number of SIN 618-774-079 which I do not and cannot of faith and God’s knowledge accept, as it is the mark of the beast.
I have copied some of the below from a previous petition. I offer no offense to your majesty and prey such plagiarism will not be unfavorably received.
I wish to point out the contract of, as well as clause 61 of Magna Carta, which were reinforced by article 5 of the Bill of Rights.

As your majesty may be aware, the wording of clause 61 says: ...and, laying the
transgression before us, petition to have that transgression redressed without delay...And we shall procure nothing from anyone, directly or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such things has been procured, let it be void and null.

We do so petition Her Majesty as of this petitions receipt, to stay and withhold the procession of all unlawfully sanctioned proceedings filed in fraudulent bifurcations of the church’s parishioners names into the unsanctioned illegitimate corporate Canadian and Alberta Courts.
In January of this year the unlawful unsanctioned agent of the Toronto Dominion Canada Trust Bank Douglas Hughes, of the unlawful firm of Bishop and Mackenzie of Edmonton Alberta filed an unlawful action against my church, sanctuary and family. Such action in awareness of the religious implications was filed against the fictional Capitalized name of my Wife and myself as title holders of the church and sanctuary located at the numbers allocated for definition and location of NE-31-53-1-w5th in the province known as Alberta in the corporation known as Canada. Your majesty’s land title registry in Alberta run by a Mr. Ray Runge was notified of my religious requirement of not allowing my name to be altered from my Birth record and in keeping of my correct grammatical and lawful form of recording in your majesty’s English and in accord with the ”Canadian Style”. This is a document of form, your majesty’s treasury board of Canada, applies to all federal agencies. Mr. Runge of Alberta Land Titles refused to correct such record and Barry Haugrud the director of the Provincial registry vital statistics refuses to record my name in correct form as well. Laurie Beveridge the provincial registrar refuses to recognise my faith and it’s lawful requirements of protecting our names from alteration. Ralph Klein is well aware of this failure on the part of his ministers to respect their oaths and my God given unalienable religious rights. His Justice minister David Hancock has contracted with a private firm for consultation to alter the present defunct and unlawful oath of allegiance to your majesty to delete any reference to God from such oath. Such oath would by the dictate of section 22 of the Confession of faith be rendered an unlawful oath and of no force or effect failing the sanctionable test of integrity in defense of the faith and your majesty’s reputation. Such men and women are imposters and are acting criminally in proceeding without your majesty’s consent and understanding of that proud allegiance to defending God’s laws!
I could not lawfully protest such unlawful act of the TDCT bank as the Manager of your majesty’s Law courts in Edmonton Alberta, Wayne Samis, and the head Clerk John Bachinski both denied true allegiance in failing to answer my ministerial question of integrity in your majesty’s court. John Bachinski did violate section 176 of the Canadian Criminal code and threaten myself as a minister with forcible expulsion from her majesty’s hallowed halls of justice denying me truly allegiant process and capacity to defend our sanctuary. I could not file against the fictitious entity that Douglas Hughes created in the illegitimate provincial registry as it would be consent and recognition I was a corporate fiction. All of the judges I have stood before in the Alberta courts have no legitimate oath as it is deficient not only in words but in that those who took such oath do not know what the allegiance to her majesty is about, means and is purpose of. Such obvious deficiency effectively and actually precludes them from being able to provide such sworn to allegiance. I have heard rumor’s that because of my notice to them of their false oath the department of justice has required all judges in Alberta to re-swear their oaths.
Any process by such traitorous imposters focused and dedicated to expanding the depravity of Usury, the selfish coveting, and lying in false witness is unlawful according to God’s law as defended by your majesty.
It is evidentiary, willfully fabricated and invalid process and we would ask your majesty to concur in showing her displeasure for such arrogance by dissolving the legislature of Alberta for reformation. This reform would be upon those men and women that are equipped to know what they are swearing allegiance to and as such bound by such oath and honorably capable of providing such allegiance as it meet with her majesty’s approval and with lawful sanction of authority in God’s power.
It is our humble suggestion that this one act of fidelity would by your majesty’s proclamation ensure the respect for the Laws of God that is deserved. It would exemplify the defender of the Christian faith being the Coronated and anointed of God in this the Jubilee redemption year of her majesty’s Coronation.
Any process of a civil commercial nature such as a foreclosure proceeding against the Church and sanctuary of my family, NE 31-53-1- w5th is being unlawfully undertaken by the Toronto Dominion Canada Trust bank on account of acct # 501981 branch# 266 and is being facilitated for such bank by those alleged officer/agents of your majesty as such being without a valid oath, and that is opposing and obstructing my ecclesiastical duties as a minister of God, in defense of God’s laws. Our Church property and sanctuary, family, and it’s attending Christians are being threatened by these unlawfully formed commercial financial entities. (in which her majesty’s allegiants are connected with in process of violating 176 of the Criminal code in attempting to enforce a civil process) They are defacto and without lawful sanction of her majesty’s oath, and I as a minister of Christ do so refuse to honor and acknowledge their having an oath of true allegiance to your majesty as the evidence is against them in dishonor.
Please speak with Lois Hole the Alberta Lieutenant Governor on this issue as she did talk to me at my Church last year about one of these imposter allegiants, a Judge by the name of Quinn claiming to be a master. He said in chambers and I quote “ What do I care about treason and the Queen I’m Irish and I have a tough neck! This was in response to telling him in my ministerial capacity that he must have an understood oath to proceed as he commits treason against your majesty if he brought harm to another or his property with no sanction from your majesty to do so lawfully. This man conspired with Douglas Hughes to alter my name in the court record. I can not accept service nor file into records that are formed in a false name. Douglas Hughes in awareness of my instructions to not violate my religious beliefs regarding my name did this in defiance of my beliefs. This also prevented me from registering an opposition.
A master Funduck has had me physically ejected out of proceedings against our Church by the TDCT bank on August 9th, in front of witnesses. He did this for my performing my ministerial act of integrity in trying to verify his true allegiance. I was polite and direct in my reason for asking but he refused to answer and when I insisted he be bonafide to proceed he told the bailiff to eject me. He has issued unlawful possession orders to the Banks agent Douglas Hughes of the firm Bishop and Mckenzie. He has ignored my demands for his oath-sworn allegiance. So have the courts and all of the clerks.
I have written The Chief Justice in Alberta Katherine Frazer about this and Court of Queens Bench Chief Justice Allan Wachowich as well as the justice minister and the premier. The Justice minister will not reply and has instructed his staff to discriminate against me. Lois Hole’s office will not put my communication through to her. The two Chief Justices have indicated they do not agree with your majesty’s authority. They have violated their oaths, as they have done nothing to correct this.
I filed a complaint with the Edmonton City police who gave it to justice for review.
That was over a month ago. No reply. I was just told I am supposed to write a letter to Allan Wachowich. I already know Chief Justice Wachowich’s opinion on that issue and it is not in support of true allegiance. It is in support of usurious commercial law and has no intent on being tied to the Coronation oath.
I look forward to your reply and Royal inquiry.

This imposter Master Funduck has issued unlawful possession orders to seize our Church and sanctuary for the interest on the loan, which was actually an exchange. His arrogance and tyranny has gone unchecked and he is still performing as a master. I have two witnesses to the event of him violating section 176 and 423 and 126 of the Canadian Criminal code and are willing to testify.
It would appear that such events are commonplace in Canada as others have heard similar reactions. Royal respect for the allegiance is a problem that can be solved with your majesty’s aid.
I beg that discretion, consideration, and indulgence from your majesty in saving Grace for her majesty’s Coronation Golden Jubilee and the honor of God thereof.
The RCMP will not enforce your law nor defend God’s law to provide true allegiance to your majesty and will offer no reason why. I cannot accept them as your allegiants as they are acting as traitors to your law. I have told them this and posted notices.
This Christian minister, acting in defense of the faith is humbly petitioning her majesty’s expedient action pending her majesty’s royal inquiry into this serious matter.
We have also petitioned her majesty in this the Coronation year because there is clear factual evidence that the oaths of allegiance to your majesty are being violated and as such is in direct conflict with the Constitution of the United Kingdom under God. It conflicts with Magna Carta, with the Declaration and Bill of Rights, with the honored and respected advise of Westminster and, above all, with Her Majesties anointing by the grace of God, to defend the biblical rule of law through like Oaths of allegiance to Her Majesty.
These oaths of fealty and allegiance being imposed upon all of her majesty’s agents by her majesty’s royal law as proclaimed upon all of her majesty’s ministers, judges governors, and agency servants sworn to be allegiant to her majesty in duty to uphold and defend God’s laws are absolutely sacred in the order of maintaining the rule of law forever as supreme. Those who would flagrantly or in clandestine repose endeavor to disrespect and dissolve that honor rebels against God.
This action by these non-allegiants is treasonous upon your majesty’s retention and defense of that royal rule for the government of Christian princes.
I pray and petition your majesty for release from the unlawful enslavement and persecution by these fraud spinning unlawful entities and imposter authorities.
Every one of these protections for your majesty’s subjects stands to this day, in law of Melchizedek ancient observance and of clarity set in the stone of bethel, as were the Ten Commandments, which is why of necessity our petition is now invoking them.

Ultimately, our supreme protection is your Majesties obligations under the Coronation Oath in defense of the Letters patent Version Cum priviligio of her majesty’s Authorized King James Bible being in every Court Room in the commonwealth.
Alas, because of these dishonorable and vile imposters usurping your majesty’s ecclesiastical authority, the alleged allegiant courts in Alberta and throughout the commonwealth are ignoring that Law your majesty and their allegiance is to defend! These men and women need education or removal as they plan to remove the royal rule of law as supreme and are plotting against your majesty in arrogant disregard of their true allegiance to your majesty.
This Coronation year and your majesty’s honor in receipt of such factual information must not be sullied by allowance of such treason and intentional defiance to God’s rule of law. As such inaction to honor that sacred oath is factually and unlawfully transpiring as I write, my unprecedented petitions is in defense of the Christian faith and based in truth with honorable motive and need.
The Queen has solemnly promised to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of which Canada is according to the Statutes in Parliament agreed on and according to their laws and customs not being contrary to their God’s.
Her Majesty also swore to preserve all rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain to any of them.

From the spiritual and my own single eye’s point of view, it is unimaginable that Her Majesty would seek, in effect, a divorce from her duty. From a secular point of view, the Coronation Oath is a signed contract with God and the men and women she is to rule over in duty to protect them from usurpers and violations of God’s law.

Recent statements by Various of her majesty’s sworn allegiant commonwealth ministers, confirm that they would not advise any measure which might tend to Breach the Coronation Oath nor betray Her Majesties promise to her loyal subjects. Her Majesty accepts the advice of her ministers and the Lord’s Spiritual and it is noted for good faith and factual communication that conversely, it is their sworn duty to advise in accordance with the Coronation Oath and defense of the Christian faith. No sworn allegiant of her majesty can lawfully advise a breach of her majesty’s oath. Nor can they gain royal sanction or remain in power without swearing solemnly in understanding what that true allegiance is to the Christian Crown. Yet the Alberta oath of Allegiance within the oath of office acts mandatory for judges and lawyers in the provincial court act, and legal profession act, respectively represents precisely such a breach, and the Lieutenant Governor has now signed it with the false oath using the Royal Prerogative.
The department of justice refuses to offer copies of the signed oath of allegiance in violation of 337 of your majesty’s law the Canadian Criminal code and has instructed all employees to terminate calls I make to their departments. My purpose is in performance of my calling and in defense of my faith in God and his rule of law as per 176 of the Canadian Criminal Code, a coronation promise. Romans 11:29
I have asked why I cannot see the signed oaths and they, the Alberta department of justice, refuse to say. I have asked what the meaning of that oath is and have been sworn at rebuked, laughed at, jailed and rejected by the police because of my faith and unwillingness to accept imposters as having any authority over me. Joanne Menier ,the Governor General’s assistant, will testify that she was told by a Federal Justice official that even the Governor General can not see the signed oaths.
Your majesty, I humbly submit If they refuse to answer my questions of true allegiance in performance of my duties as a minister of God they are indeed imposters and a criminal threat to the defense of the faith and the honor of her majesty’s oath.
Please in ultimate familial dignity cede to my request dear honored Elizabeth and help this minister’s quest of your own Coronations design and honor.

Blackstone’s Commentaries (volume 1, page 239) says of the Royal Prerogative: The splendor, rights, and powers of the Crown were attached to it for the benefit of the people. They form part of, and are, generally speaking, as ancient as the law itself. De prerogative Regina is merely declaratory of the common law...

The duties arising from the relation of sovereign and subject are reciprocal. Protection, that is, the security and governance of her dominions according to law, is the duty of the sovereign; and allegiance
and subjection, with reference to the same criterion, the constitution and laws of the country, form, in return, the duty of the governed.
We have already observed that the prerogatives are vested in her via such glorious coronation for the benefit of her subjects, and that her Majesty is under, directed by, and not above, the rule of law.

For such words of an oath of allegiance to have meaning, the act of swearing that oath of allegiance must be by a man or a woman who knows what it means and is willing to abide by the requirements of that oath, as in any other case it demonstrates that those taking that oath like our alleged ministers, lawyers, and judges have de facto jurisdiction (unlawful) and in perjury have renounced their oaths of allegiance and are void ab initio of any standing or sanction of the Queen as God’s grace and law cannot be applied by nor honored by liars and imposters.

Indeed, it is humbly offered in reverence of my duty to defend the faith that if necessary for the benefit of your majesty’s subjects a clear explanation and Clarification of the oaths meaning and the allegiants duties in accord with section 22 of the confession of faith would be a majestically wise choice in simple remedy.
In light of such factual information of such vital importance to her majesty’s honor and in contractual defense of God’s law, it would be in universal benefit for the commonwealth and her majesty’s subjects to exercise her majesty’s authority to demand that all of her allegiant’s:
1. Have taken a briefing on and truly understand the meaning of their sworn true allegiance to you’re majesty and authorized form of the oath.
2. That all of your majesty’s allegiants must indicate that they know that the allegiance is about defending God’s laws as supreme over mans laws and to provide such awareness in writing with witnesses.

Your majesty could also dissolve the legislatures or Parliament, or for the government to resign and fight an election on the issue.
The ex-officio defacto government would then be faced with seeking elective power to introduce new royally approved oaths of loyalty under a new constitution as part of their new manifesto. This would distil the issues as perhaps nothing else might, since it would allow the people of the Commonwealth to decide whether or not they wished the understood and true lawful oath of integrity or their constitutional and unalienable rights to be breached in this present unlawful manner.
This honorable and light filled royal action would remove the ability of those in power to oppress prevent and curtail your majesty’s subjects from exercising their lawful God given rights and freedoms in demanding a truly allegiant court.
As the Act of Supremacy and the Bill of Rights put it: all usurped and foreign power and authority may forever be clearly extinguished, and never used or obeyed in this realm. No foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate shall at any time after the last day of this session of Parliament, use, enjoy or exercise any manner of power, jurisdiction, superiority, authority, preeminence or privilege within this realm, but that henceforth the same shall be clearly abolished out of this realm, for ever.

So it is clear that no one - neither sovereign, nor parliament, nor government, nor people - may tamper with, dismantle, destroy or surrender our constitution of God’s law. We are all tenants of it, and trustees. We inherited these rights from God, and we have a supreme responsibility to ensure they are safeguarded and that we pass them on in good order to future generations. They are not ours to discard or diminish. Such is why the oath came into existence in the first place. It was to bond all monarchs to defending God’s laws to maintain and preserve those laws for the benefit of all of those men and women who believe unto him and his word of love and those who do not.

Which is why valid understood oaths of true allegiance place an essential limitation on parliament’s power, and the Queens Coronation Oath is crucial as the foundation and origin of that sanction of God’s power and limitation of mans. The Coronation Oath is a multi faceted obligation of Biblical contractual origins and religious power, it is a statutory obligation, a common law obligation, a historically necessary obligation, on all who swear allegiance to the defense of the Christian faith. It is the duty of all of her majesty’s agents overseeing her governance of the King James Bible, and it is sworn for protecting the nation, the commonwealth and all dominions from immoral acts and violations of God’s law.

The Coronation Oath is the Absolute pinnacle of oaths, and all oaths of allegiance to its Monarch or other natures are bound by its limitations. The armed forces must subscribe and swear true allegiance to the sovereign liege lady Queen Elizabeth the second, not to the government of the day. This helps clarify the principle that understood allegiance is mandatory and a must in maintaining the biblical integrity of God’s rule of law, and not an optional item, as it is being an essential part of the checks and balances of our constitutional preamble. Without these oaths, and their lawful enforcement, we have little to protect us from unlawful government, tyranny and the rule of Commercial law.

We return now to our reasons for stating that the unscrupulous act of taking of an sworn oath to gain authority is unquestionably invalid and immoral if the man or woman taking that oath of allegiance does not know what the allegiance means and is insincere in carrying out the requirements of that allegiance.

Our religious freedom is absolute. The Bill of Rights says so. It cannot be limited in any way. Her Majesty is rightfully inscribed on our coins of the realm as Dei Gratia, Fid. Def. and Lib. Def. – Liberates, Defends...By the grace of God Defender of the fidelity/faith/freedom/liberty

We come back to the oath of allegiance.
Magna Carta says: We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or other officials, only men
that know the law of the realm and are minded to keep it well.... How can such unlawful officers of the Crown organize such a referendum or plebiscite on the oath if they do not have true allegiance? Where does their motive and authority originate?

These procedures would also infringe articles 1, 2 and 4 of the Bill of Rights:

1. That the pretended power of Suspending of Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regal Authority without Consent of Parliament is illegal.
(This must include the Coronation Oath Act.)

2. That the pretended Power of Dispensing with Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regal Authorities as it hath been assumed and exercised of late are illegal.

3. That levying Money for or to the Use of the Crown by pretence of Prerogative without Grant of Parliament for longer time or in other
manner than the same is or shall be granted is Illegal. (This is further protection of our common law rights.)

We respectfully request that Her Majesty grant us an opportunity and power to examine the integrity and opinion of those who seek to alter, trivialize, and diminish the significance of the Oath of allegiance to your Coronation duty contrary to good advice.
Accordingly, under those same terms of Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights quoted earlier, we the undersigned would make it clear that these historical documents are men’s agreement’s/contracts with each other and do not purport to supercede God in allowing violations of God’s law. They simply affirm that for all time the Kings of the realm shall obey by the just and right ruling of the agreement/contract/allegiance between the men and women of the realm and the King.
Call it a pact or a covenant or a law it amounts to the same thing a promise to abide by the rules of the agreement.
Now as we can see from what George Orwell exposed us to in the elaborate satire “Animal farm” that we must be seriously and of strong faith on guard and watchful eye for the assistant of Napoleon in the middle of the night, when we are asleep, sneaking in to alter the laws ever so slightly so as to differ the meaning but not alert the reader with obvious notations, to the change.
Such was the fate of Boxer Snowball and the other animals as they were initially of trust in agreement to have Napolean lead them and that trust endured with the axiom “Napolean is always right” They soon found out Napoleon was just like all the rest “troughers” as he selfishly controlled and enslaved the farm.
We know what happened in that story and it is the tale of our modern parliamentarians, much removed from their professed true allegiance to your majesty and the Biblical principles. They are exhibiting arrogant self sanctioned ignorance of the purpose and meaning of their own oaths.
Such is the position of the Canadian parliament and it provincial counterparts. They have not only altered the oath from it’s form but have no idea what the oath means nor do they care. I am not exaggerating this for your majesty, as it is my duty to provide you with the truth.
I have heard foul blaspheming remarks about your majesty made by the lawyers, judges, justices and ministers in this land, they are deliberately challenging your Royal Style and forcing law upon your majesty’s subjects that is in violation of God’s law.
It is with honor and fortitude of faith I petition your majesty for attention to this immensely prominent conundrum of spiritual faith and secular audacity as it appears it has not been spoken to before in such a manner as to honorably petition and afford your majesty the opportunity to comply with her oath bound requirements in defense of the faith.
It is hoped far and wide throughout your majesty’s realm and in my own ecclesia that in this instance your majesty will see the compelling necessity for action fitting and meet with that which a monarch is expected of, required to provide, and of a clear capacity to perform.

It is in the Hebrew name of our God Yahweh and his son Yahushua that I implore and beseech your majesty to rise to the defense of the Christian faith in God’s honor and invoke removal and termination of this historical slander and unlawful usurping of your majesty’s royal style, title and defense of the royal rule of law the King James Bible, God’s law, in this your Coronation Golden jubilee.
I am your humble Christian ministerial servant in same defense and allegiant to all cause to provide faithfully and truthfully such allegiance to defend God’s laws tirelessly and without fail. 1st Peter 2:17
Treason, in my estimation, is attempting to over throw your majesty’s government. It is when the allegiant defies his/her sworn duty to be allegiant to the Monarch and violates God’s laws and forces those ungodly laws, or decisions, upon those subjects of your majesty that are dependant on God’s laws for protection. These non-allegiant impostors are attempting to overthrow your majesty’s government, which is by the rule of the King James Bible. I am sanctioned by God and praying for your majesty’s attention to this International fraud and disgrace upon this your Coronation GoldenJubilee.
I am a living man and no corporate fiction, a minister of Christ in humble repose yet proud and in stalwart defense of God’s laws at your majesty’s service. I would be extremely honored to act as a Judicial Examiner Delegate International (JEDI) for your majesty’s aid of securing in place, in short oral exam, the veracity of the true allegiance that they swore to your majesty and their bonafide capacity to provide said true allegiance and in ecclesiastical honor aid your majesty as high priestess of God’s temple in carrying out your majesty’s duties and commands in God’s service.

Any other service of ministerial order I can offer your majesty, if it please your royal style and comfort, please communicate such need at your earliest convenience.
I wrote my Mp John Williams who does not seem to honor his oath, and laid it before the Prime Minster, and the House of Commons Mp’s. They offered no reply to myself as a Minister. I have no truly allegiant courts of your majesty to turn and am being denied true justice in your name!
I cannot participate in this fraud your majesty and perform my functions as a minister of God in defending his laws. I petition you for aid and honor in this unprecedented ecclesiastical matter of necessitated spiritual guidance and defense.
“A time comes when silence is betrayal. Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men and women do not easily assume the task of opposing their government’s policy, especially in time of war. Nor does the human spirit move without great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one’s own bosom and in the surrounding world...
“Some of us who have already begun to break the silence of the night have found that the calling to speak is often a vocation of agony, but we must speak. We must speak with all the humility that is appropriate to our limited vision, but we must speak.
“We still have a choice today: nonviolent coexistence or violent co-annihilation. We must move past indecision to action. If we do not act, we shall surely be dragged down the long, dark, and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength without sight.
“Now let us begin. Now let us rededicate ourselves in the long and bitter, but beautiful struggle for a new world....”
Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.
April 4, 1967, in Riverside Church, New York City
Your humble minister and true professor of the gospels of our master and saviour Lord Jesus Christ in quest to save grace for and aid our Lords most trusted and revered earthly servant Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.
Minister of Christ

Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International
Heatherdown Ecclesia near Onoway, Alberta
No code non commercial

CC: Her Royal Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second
C/o Her majesty’s private secretary,
Sir Robin Janvrin
Buckingham Palace

The President of the Privy council of Canada
The Honorable Stephane Dion
66 Slater Street 8th floor Ottawa K1A-0A3
Tel: 613-943-1838 Fax: 613-992-3700

The Treasury Board President
Lucienne Robillard
Tel: 613-957-2666
Fax: 613-990-2806

Secretary of the Treasury Board
Alex Sheppard
Tel: 613-996-4984 613-996-4986
Lesplanade Laurier East Tower 9th Flr.
140 O’Conner St. Ottawa, Ont. K1A0R5
613 -957-2666 fax 613 990-2806

The Registrar General of Canada
Jacqueline Gravelle
Gene Edmunds South tower 9th Flr 365 Laurier Ave W. Ottawa K1a0C8
Tel: 613-941-9053 fax 613-941-9047
The Privy Council of Canada Chair: Stephane Dion

The Governor General Of Canada Adrienne Clarkson
Tel:1-800-465-6890 fax: 1-613-920-7636

The Right Honorable Lieutenant Governor of Alberta
Lois Hole
C/o 3rd flr Legislature Bldg
10800-97 Ave
Edmonton Alberta
Tel: 427-7243
Fax: 422-5134

The Prime Minister of Canada Jean Chretien
Tel; 1-800-465-6890 Fax 613-998-1664
Prime minister’s office 80 Wellington St.
Ottawa Ont. K1A0A2

The Minister of Finance Paul Martin
Lespanade Laurier East Tower 21st flr.
140 O’Conner St.
Ottawa Ont.K1A0G5
Tel:613-996-7861 Fax::-613-995-5176

The Superintendent of Financial Institutions
Mr. John Palmer 255 Albert Street
13flr Ottawa Ont. K1A0H2
Tel:1-800-385-864 Fax:613-990-5591

The Minister of Revenue Martin Cauchon
Connaught Bldg 7th flr. 555 Mackenzie ave. Ottawa K1A0L5
Tel: 613-995-2960 Fax 613-952-6608

The Commissioner of the RCMP, Giuliano Zaccardelli
1200 Vanier Parkway Ottawa K1A0R4
Tel: 613-993-0400 Fax:613-993-5297

The Attorney General of Canada, Martin Cauchon
Justice Bldg 284 Wellington St. Ottawa, Ont K1A0H8
Tel:613-992-4621 Fax:613-996-4516

The speaker for the House of Commons
Peter Milliken
House of Commons Ottawa Ont. K1A0A6
Tel:613-996-1955 Fax:613-996-1958

Minister of Canadian Heritage
The Honorable Sheila Copps
House of Commons
K1A 0A6
Fax: (819) 994-1267

Member of Parliament Rob Merrifield
613-992-1653 Fax:613-992-3459
Parliament Building Ottawa Ont.

Senator Thelma Chalifoux
Tel:613-943-0445 Fax:613-943-0450
Senate of Canada Parliament Blds
Wellington St. Ottawa, Ont.K1A0A4

Senator Tommy Banks
Tel:613-995-1889 Fax:613-995-1938

Senator Nick Taylor
Tel: 613-947-1605 Fax:1-613-947-1607

The Leader of the Opposition
Stockwell Day
Tel:613-996-6740 Fax:613-947-0310

The Registrar for the province of Alberta
Laurie Beveridge
Tel: 780-427-4095
3rd flr. Commerce place [T5J4L4]

The Director of Vital Statistics for the Province of Alberta
Barry Haugrud
Tel: 780-427-4645
Fax: 422-4225
3rd flr. John E. Brownlee
10365-97th St. [T5J3W7]

The Executive Director of Land Titles for the Province of Alberta
Ray Runge
Box 2380,Edmonton,Alberta [ T5J2T3]
Tel: 427-2742 Fax: 422-4290

Minister of Government Services for the Province of Alberta
David Coutts
Tel: 415-4855 Fax: 415-4853

Premier of Alberta
Ralph Klein
Tel: 427-2251 Fax: 427-1349
Rm 307 Legislature bldg.10800 97ave,
Edmonton, Alberta T5K2B7

Mr. A. Charles Baillie
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Executive Offices
Toronto Ontario

Mr. W. Edmund Clark
President & Chief Operating Officer
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, TD Canada Trust

Mr. G. Montegu Black
Chairman and President
Txibanguan Limited

Ms. Eleanor R. Clitheroe
President and Chief Executive Officer
Hydro One Inc.

Mr. Marshall A. Cohen, Q.C.
Cassels Brock & Blackwell

Dr. Wendy K. Dobson
Professor and Director
Institute for International Business
Joseph L. Rotman School of Management

Mr. Henry H. Ketcham
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.

Mr. Pierre H. Lessard
President & Chief Executive Officer
Metro Inc.

Mr. Brian F. MacNeill
Chairman of the Board

Mr. Roger Phillips
President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Edward S. Rogers
President & Chief Executive Officer
Rogers Communications Inc.

Ms. Helen K. Sinclair
Chief Executive Officer
BankWorks Trading Inc.

Mr. Donald R. Sobey
Empire Company Limited

Dr. Michael D. Sopko
Inco Limited

Mr. John M. Thompson
Vice Chairman of the Board
IBM Corporation

Mr. Richard M. Thomson
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Toronto-Dominion Bank

As you can see some very powerful people were put on notice yet in awareness the intimidation continues. We now have Church accounts with the TD with no numbers to connect us to commerce or usury and have total immunity from taxation devils.

This one is From the President of the British Columbia Cariboo Mining Association and is well known by many Conservative members as an honorable man who stands for the freedoms of the miners to gain a livelihood untaxed and intimidated by the de facto power to contribute to a provable fraud.

Good faith introduction

To all concerned parties receiving this as of after September 15th in the year of our Lord two thousand and three. Please take notice that I, the living man with a Christian appellation as Donald Christopher Carter, living on God’s earth in the province of British Columbia, and being a non commercial entity of sound mind and good character, do affirm that as a result of political or religious persecution and intimidation and having exhausted all remedies in commercial law, my diligent research and Christian faith suggests, that the following offer applies.

1.I as a *minister (See Definitions Below) in performing a function of my calling to practice and defend God’s law, and with the knowledge and awareness of the unlawful actions and claims of agents of CCRA upon the created and assumed legal fiction of a name in and for the purposes of executing a fraud upon myself and my brethren , and with the knowledge that such legal fiction debtor number assigned by CCRA to me the flesh is without any informed permission or understanding by myself and with knowledge that it is created by CCRA for the convenience of achieving consent of jurisdiction over my flesh and blood by the Receiver General and Tax court, and also severally with the knowledge that the Queen and all her allegiants are bound to defend the laws of God with all of their power by the tenants of the King James Bible, I must aver: It is as a man of God, not being a *person, that it is under serious issuance of threat, duress and intimidation that I offer this demand via the aid of my clerical *envoy, ambassador and delegate of choice. We are aware that certain moral qualities are central to the survival of our political system, among which are truthfulness, integrity, respect for the law, respect for the dignity of others, adherence to the constitutional process, and a willingness to avoid the abuse of power. We are concerned about the impact of this crisis on our children and on our Brethren. You, reading this as a servant for society as a whole, take account of the ethical commitments that are necessary for a civil society to maintain the integrity and honor of both public and private morality.
2. You are now with the knowledge and awareness that you in pursuit of a fictional debt of Usury (Exodus 22:25; Leviticus 25:36; Deuteronomy 23:19) and are with knowledge it is a fiction as per your own files of artificial assessments between 1992 and 1996 and previous years that you have adamantly denied that I have ever filed. Your own records prove your possession of such filings and as such provide evidence of deceit and concealment on your part. I do aver that I am not a corporate commercial legal fiction nor liable to pay a fictional usurious debt. Agents of the CCRA have conspired by fraud to discredit and to fabricate arbitrary assessments that started at $8000.00 and grew on criminal interest and penalties to $32,000.00 against this artificial commercial entity which I cannot by my faith be compelled to participate with or allow. Aiding and abetting a criminal act, albeit unaware, is a crime! failure to be aware of the law is no excuse. Altering a man’s or a woman’s name and using it for a financial purpose without their permission is fraud. By the ignorance of the law that controls the actions of the government the CCRA has supported and enforced a slavery tax of usury being in force contrary to God’s law. Thou shall not raise a false witness or bear a false report! I know that there are compassionate, fair and honest men and women within CCRA and to those who have eyes to see and ears to hear, I summon you good and kind folk to assist me at this time in provision of truth. May God’s blessing and spirit be upon you.
Exodus 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Deuteronomy 5:20 Neither shalt thou bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Deuteronomy 19:16 If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong;
17 Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days; 18 And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother; 19 Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you. 20 And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you.
21 And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
Proverbs 12:17 He that speaketh truth sheweth forth righteousness: but a false witness deceit.
Proverbs 14:5 A faithful witness will not lie: but a false witness will utter lies.
Proverbs 14:25 A true witness delivereth souls: but a deceitful witness speaketh lies.
Proverbs 19:5 A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape.
Proverbs 19:9 A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall perish.
Proverbs 19:28 An ungodly witness scorneth judgment: and the mouth of the wicked devoureth iniquity.
Proverbs 21:28 A false witness shall perish: but the man that heareth speaketh constantly.
Proverbs 24:28 Be not a witness against thy neighbour without cause; and deceive not with thy lips.
Proverbs 25:18 A man that beareth false witness against his neighbour is a maul, and a sword, and a sharp arrow.
Matthew 15:18 But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.
19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:
20 These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man.
Matthew 19:16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,
19 Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Mark 10:17 And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?
18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
19 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honour thy father and mother.
Luke 18:18 And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.
20 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother.
Romans 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
This Demand notice, being a matter of a religious claim, is not frivolous or vexatious in form and is a serious issue that, if not dealt with, will cause grievous and serious harm to myself and my family and as such the balance of convenience and credibility of the court and its officers favors granting the relief sought. This demand is offered as a result of the CCRA failing to acknowledge that I did supply them with the returns they required when demanded. They denied that I have ever filed those years but their own records of the 1992 and 1996 filings reveal they do indeed have them, showing nil return and no monies owed. These actions, on their part, of violating not only their own laws, but the laws of God by a deliberate attempt to impose a slavery tax unsanctioned in God’s or man's law upon me, are criminal and punishable by their law 46;60;122;126; 180;215;219;336;337;408 ;405 and 403 as well as numerous others not mentioned for lack of paper supply. The effects of a diligent nature, to communicate the facts to agents of the CCRA, have met with indifference and failure to adhere to the terms of their public service employment contract 23. Every deputy head and employee shall, on appointment from outside the Public Service, take and subscribe the oath or solemn affirmation of allegiance and the oath or solemn affirmation set out in Schedule III.R.S., c. P-32, s. 23. and ethical standard as required by the treasury board of Canada policy in favor of public standing. (Any law that is inconsistent with the laws of God is a violation of our faith and we are merely showing you that CCRA and associate departments are breaking their law, among many others.) We also wish all to make note of the fact that, through the admission of agents of the CCRA, the fiction they are applying to me, CARTER DONALD C., is owed in excess of $100,000.00 in child tax credits, GST rebates and other funds. As an alternative CCRA can at its own discretion deduct the claimed owed monies from the actual credit they claim the fictional entity is owed and forward $70,000.00 balance claimed as owing to the Donald C. Carter the man.
False Pretences
False pretence or false statement 362. (1) Every one commits an offence who
(a) by a false pretence, whether directly or through the medium of a contract obtained by a false pretence, obtains anything in respect of which the offence of theft may be committed or causes it to be delivered to another person; (b) obtains credit by a false pretence or by fraud;
knowingly makes or causes to be made, directly or indirectly, a false statement in writing with intent that it should be relied on, with respect to the financial condition or means or ability to pay of himself or any person, firm or corporation that he is interested in or that he acts for, for the purpose of procuring, in any form whatever, whether for his benefit or the benefit of that person, firm or corporation,
(i) the delivery of personal property, (ii) the payment of money,
As such the cause for the issuance of this Demand notice.
Signed at _________________________________on ________________________for good intent and defense of faith in front of three witnesses of good character and sound mind..

Donald Christopher Carter




Minister Definition: 2 Corinthians 3:6 "Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life."
Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)
Source: Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary
one who serves, as distinguished from the master. (1.) Heb.
meshereth, applied to an attendant on one of superior rank, as
to Joshua, the servant of Moses (Ex. 33:11), and to the servant
of Elisha (2 Kings 4:43). This name is also given to attendants
at court (2 Chr. 22:8), and to the priests and Levites (Jer.
33:21; Ezek. 44:11).
(2.) Heb. pelah (Ezra 7:24), a "minister" of religion. Here
used of that class of sanctuary servants called "Solomon's
servants" in Ezra 2:55-58 and Neh. 7:57-60
1 (esp. in Presbyterian and some Nonconformist Churches) a member of the clergy

2 a person appointed to head a government department

3 any diplomatic agent accredited to a foreign government or head of state

4 short for: minister plenipotentiary, envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary
See: envoy1 [1]

5 Also called (in full): minister resident a diplomat ranking after an envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary

6 a person who attends to the needs of others, esp. in religious matters

7 a person who acts as the agent or servant of a person or thing
8 [intr; often foll by to] to attend to the needs (of); take care (of)

9 [transitive] (archaic)
to provide; supply
[ETYMOLOGY: 13th Century: via Old French from Latin: servant; related to minus less]
'minister"ship noun
envoy1 ['ɛnvɔı]noun
1 Formal name: envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary a diplomat of the second class, ranking between an ambassador and a minister resident

[ETYMOLOGY: 17th Century: from French envoyé, literally: sent, from envoyer to send, from Vulgar Latin inviare (unattested) to send on a journey, from in-2 + via road]
'envoyship noun
Persona A person portrayed in fiction or drama: character, personage

Demand Notice
Attention: All the natural men and women as created by God acting as the sworn truly allegiant legal fictions of Federal and Provincial judges, prosecutors, official employees of the Canadian federal and provincial law courts, justice, inclusive and especially Canadian Customs and Revenue officers of her majesty’s service practicing and offering severally the forms of law as being Military Chauncery,(Court of Conscience) Civil, Common Law, Equity, Taxation, Admiralty, Criminally indictable and summary law . Special notice directed to:
The man acting His Holy Eminence Pope John Paul the second
The Vatican
Rome Italy
The woman acting the person of Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith. The Dejure authority
Buckingham Palace
London England
The man acting as the person The Archbishop of Canterbury
Rowan Williams Diocesan House, Lady Wootton's Green
Canterbury CT1 1NQ
The woman acting as the person of Her Excellency Governor General of Canada
Adrienne Clarkson the Defacto authority of all the below listed recipients
Rideau Hall
1 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A1
Role and Responsibilities of the Governor General
The Office of the Governor General, Canada's oldest continuing institution, is a thread that ties Canadians together. From Samuel de Champlain in 1608 to Viscount Monck in 1867 to Vincent Massey in 1952 to Adrienne Clarkson today, the role of the Governor General dates back nearly 400 years.
Today, we celebrate excellence through the Stanley Cup, the Grey Cup, the Governor General's Literary Awards and the Governor General's Academic Medal. These trophies and awards were created by Governors General and are a part of Canada that everyone celebrates.
What is the Governor General's position in Government?
Canada is a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy.

This means Canadians recognize The Queen as our Head of State. Canada's 26th Governor General, the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, carries out Her Majesty's duties in Canada on a daily basis and is Canada's de facto Head of State.
The man acting as the person the Honourable Stéphane Dion, President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada
8th Floor
66 Slater Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A3
The man acting as the person the Honourable Martin Cauchon, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Justice Building,
Kent and Wellington Streets
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
The woman acting as the person the Honourable Elinor Caplan, Minister of National Revenue
7th Floor, Connaught Building
MacKenzie Avenue
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0L5
The man acting as the person the Revenue Collections supervisor of clerks; J.M. Inglis Director, The woman acting as the person the Team leader Christine Cook and et al all men and women in Canada acting as the persons of the officers,employees agents or other assignees of the government of Canada assigned to acct# 619-248-214 RI . Northern B.C. and Yukon Tax office 280 Victoria street Bag 7500 Prince George B.C. V2l5N8
To all the men and women acting as the persons of officers of the Supreme Court of Canada and all other formed courts in Canada being:
The Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, P.C., C.J.C. (Chairperson)
Federal Court of Canada
The Honourable John D. Richard, Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Canada
The Honourable Allan F. Lutfy, Associate Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Canada
Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
The Honourable Barry L. Strayer, Chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
Tax Court of Canada
The Honourable Alban Garon, Chief Judge of the Tax Court of Canada
The Honourable Donald G. H. Bowman, Associate Chief Judge of the Tax Court of Canada

The Honourable R. Roy McMurtry, Chief Justice of Ontario
The Honourable Heather J. Smith, Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice (of Ontario)
The Honourable Dennis O'Connor, Associate Chief Justice of Ontario
The Honourable J. Douglas Cunningham, Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice (of Ontario)

The Honourable J.J. Michel Robert, Chief Justice of Québec
The Honourable Lyse Lemieux, Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Québec
The Honourable Robert Pidgeon, Senior Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Québec
The Honourable André Deslongchamps, Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Québec

The Honourable Constance R. Glube, Chief Justice of Nova Scotia
The Honourable Joseph P. Kennedy, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
The Honourable J. Michael MacDonald, Associate Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
The Honourable Robert F. Ferguson, Associate Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Family Division
The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick
The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick

The Honourable J. Edward Richard, Senior Judge of the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories

The Honourable Richard J. Scott, Chief Justice of Manitoba
The Honourable Marc M. Monnin, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba
The Honourable Jeffrey J. Oliphant, Associate Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba
The Honourable Gerald Mercier, Associate Chief Justice, Family Division, of the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba

The Honourable Lance Finch, Chief Justice of British Columbia
The Honourable Donald I. Brenner, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia
The Honourable Patrick D. Dohm, Associate Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia

The Honourable Gerard E. Mitchell, Chief Justice of Prince Edward Island
The Honourable Armand DesRoches, Chief Justice of the Trial Division, Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island
The Honourable Edward D. Bayda, Chief Justice of Saskatchewan
The Honourable W. Frank Gerein, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan

The Honourable Ralph Hudson, Senior Judge of the Supreme Court of the Yukon Territory

The Honourable Catherine A. Fraser, Chief Justice of Alberta
The Honourable Allan H.J. Wachowich, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
The Honourable Allen B. Sulatycky, Associate Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta

The Honourable, Clyde K. Wells, Chief Justice of Newfoundland
The Honourable J. Derek Green, Chief Justice of the Trial Division of the Supreme Court

The Honourable Beverley Browne, Senior Judge of the Nunavut Court of Justice

Staff of the Canadian Judicial Council
Canadian Judicial Council
Att: Denis Guay
Suite 450 - 112 Kent Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
(613) 998-5182, facsimile (613) 998-8889
Executive Director: Ms. Jeannie Thomas
The man acting as the person the Honourable David Anderson, Minister of the Environment
10 Wellington, Floor 28
Hull, Quebec
K1A 0H3
The man acting as the person the Honourable John Manley,
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance
140 O'Connor, 21st Floor, East Tower
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0S5
The man acting as the person the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Receiver General of Canada Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Minister Responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians
Place du Portage, Phase III
11 Laurier Street
Hull, Quebec
K1A 0S5
The man acting as the legal person Honourable Wayne Easter, Solicitor General of Canada
13th Floor, 340 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0P8
The woman acting as the legal person Honourable Lucienne Robillard, President of the Treasury Board Secretariat
L'Esplanade Laurier,
140 O'Connor Street,
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0R5
The man acting as the legal person the Honourable Herb Dhaliwal, Minister of Natural Resources
21st Floor, 580 Booth Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0E4
The man acting as the legal person the Honourable David Michael Collenette, Minister of Transport
Tower C, Place de Ville
330 Sparks Street, 29th Floor,
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0N5
The man acting as the legal person the Honourable John McCallum, Minister of National Defence National Defence HQ,
101 Colonel By Drive
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0K2
The man acting as the legal person the Honourable Robert Thibault, Minister of Fisheries and Oceans
15th Floor, 200 Kent Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0E6
The woman acting as the legal person The Honourable Sharon Carstairs, Leader of the Government in the Senate
Parliament Buildings, Room 279-S
Wellington Street,
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A4
The man acting as the legal person of the premier of British Columbia the
Honorable Gordon Campbell
PO Box 9041
Victoria BC V8W 9E1
the man acting the legal person of the Minister of fisheries the
Honorable John Van Dongen
PO Box 9058
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
man acting as the person the
Honourable Kevin Falcon
Minister of State for Deregulation
PO Box 9051
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
The man acting as the person the
Honourable Gary Collins
Minister of Finance
PO Box 9468
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
The man acting as the person the
Honourable Michael de Jong
Minister of Forests
PO Box 9049
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
The man acting as the person the
Honourable Bill Barisoff
Minister of Provincial Revenue
PO Box 9065
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
The man acting as the person the
Honourable Stan Hagen
Minister of Sustainable Resource Management
PO Box 9054
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
The woman acting as the person the
Honourable Judith Reid
Minister of Transportation
PO Box 9055
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
The woman acting as the person the
Honourable Joyce Murray
Minister of Water, Land and Air Protection
PO Box 9047
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
The man acting as the person the
Honourable Rich Coleman
Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General for the province of British Columbia
The woman acting as the person the
Honorable Shirley Bond MLA Prince George
The man acting as the person the
Honorable Richard Harris MP Prince George
The man acting as the person the
Honorable Collin Kingsley mayor of Prince George
The man acting as the person the
Honorable MLA Dr.John Wilson
The man acting as the person the
Honorable Philip Mayfield MP
The man acting as the person the
Honorable Stephen Harper MP
The man acting as the person the
Honorable Jay Hill MP
The man acting as the person the
Honorable Walt Cobb MLA
The man acting as the person the
Honorable Richard Neufeld MLA.
All the men and woman acting as the persons of Chief Prosecutor for the federal Customs and Revenue Justice Department, Chief prosecutor for the civil law department of the provincial government of British Columbia and all subordinate prosecutors and legal advisors of Justice, Revenue and investigators of the risk management departments of federal and provincial revenue.
Chapter 1: Statement of Public Service Values and Ethics
Ethical Values: Acting at all times in such a way as to uphold the public trust.
• Public servants shall perform their duties and arrange their private affairs so that public confidence and trust in the integrity, objectivity and impartiality of government are conserved and enhanced.
• Public servants shall act at all times in a manner that will bear the closest public scrutiny; an obligation that is not fully discharged by simply acting within the law.
• Public servants, in fulfilling their official duties and responsibilities, shall make decisions in the public interest.
• If a conflict should arise between the private interests and the official duties of a public servant, the conflict shall be resolved in favour of the public interest.
People Values: Demonstrating respect, fairness and courtesy in their dealings with both citizens and fellow public servants.
• Respect for human dignity and the value of every person should always inspire the exercise of authority and responsibility.
• People values should reinforce the wider range of Public Service values. Those who are treated with fairness and civility will be motivated to display these values in their own conduct.
• Public Service organizations should be led through participation, openness and communication and with respect for diversity and for the official languages of Canada.
• Appointment decisions in the Public Service shall be based on merit.
• Public Service values should play a key role in recruitment, evaluation and promotion.
This Code applies to all public servants working in departments, agencies and other public institutions listed in Part I, Schedule I, of the Public Service Staff Relations Act.
This Code is a policy of the Government of Canada. Public service institutions not covered by this Code should respect its spirit and should adopt similar provisions for their organizations.
Chapter 4: Avenues of Resolution
Public Service Values and Ethics
Any public servant who wants to raise, discuss and clarify issues related to this Code should first talk with his or her manager or contact the senior official designated by the Deputy Head under the provisions of this Code, according to the procedures and conditions established by the Deputy Head.
Any public servant who witnesses or has knowledge of wrongdoing in the workplace may refer the matter for resolution, in confidence and without fear of reprisal, to the Senior Officer designated for the purpose by the Deputy Head under the provisions of the Policy on the Internal Disclosure of Information Concerning Wrongdoing in the Workplace.
Furthermore, any public servant who believes that he or she is being asked to act in a way that is inconsistent with the values and ethics set out in Chapter 1 of this Code can report the matter in confidence and without fear of reprisal to the Senior Officer, as described above.
If the matter is not appropriately addressed at this level, or the public servant has reason to believe it could not be disclosed in confidence within the organization, it may then be referred to the Public Service Integrity Officer, in accordance with the Policy on the Internal Disclosure of Information Concerning Wrongdoing in the Workplace.
It is expected that most matters arising from the application of this Code can and should be resolved at the organizational level.

From : The Cariboo Sui Juris Church

, being a non commercial, benevolent congregation of respected men and women not being persons, (James 2:9;Deut:10:17;Acts:10:34) having assembled in response to a universal calling for the maintaining of truth liberty and freedom. This assembly of men and women is not to be assumed as purposed in clandestine order nor cultish performance but of quest for open and honest unfettered sharing of truths to ensure integrity and honor prevail. "The one law is to cause no harm" Those who deem faith in God as cultish are obviously without God and discriminating against those who do on a religious basis and with intent to ignore their oath sworn duty and to label a Christian monarch as cultish.

Minister of Christ Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger in official function and performance of a ecclesiastical duty et al the man Donald C. Carter President Cariboo Mining Association asserting no association with a false Fictitious tax file number ITA-1441-01 Acct# 619-248-214

Exodus 19:6 Romans 11:29) as per your legal requirement of your government law (Preamble Section 26; 32 Canadian Constitution)126,176 CCC. complimented by 423CCC and 337 of the CCC and in defense of my parishioners of the formed ecclesiastic body of God’s servants of the Cariboo region

Notice of Demand to all professed allegiants of her majesty Queen Elizabeth II in duty and performance of provision of true allegiance to a Christian monarch, being defender of the Christian faith, via sworn Oath.

Before any conclusions are drawn and assumptions formed upon the previous assumptions of other professed allegiants and those consulted for their opinions about myself as a man and minister I hope you will look at the facts I am presenting. These facts although not comfortable to those in lack of knowledge are still facts of indisputable proportions. If you wish to judge these words please do so with the facts.

The men and women I speak for as their minister have an inherent right and duty , God commanded, to not bow to defacto authority. It is in ignorance that the masses have given over their energy. We cannot contribute to what we have proof of is a fraud. We as followers of God’s word cannot be driven from the scriptural warnings and commandments of God it is only by our free will of allowing deception to prevail that we can ignore them.

In our belief your fictional government form is based upon commerce and we are not to unite with nor serve mammon being commerce. We do not wish to insult any one nor decline our responsibility to pay for road upkeep and maintenance of other usufructs. It is the servicing of a usurious and fraudulently obtained debt that we have issue with. It is pure slavery and forced work outside of God’s laws.

I do hope that by collective communication in open dialogue we can avert any confrontations that would tend to harm our ability and freedom to practice our faith and to maintain our unalienable right of gaining a livelihood. Entrance into the corridor of a mans freedom by any government without probable cause is inhibiting his liberty to provide for himself and family as well as to freely communicate his discoveries in faith to others. Please remember our offer in demand is not in offensive mode but an imperative rendering of the instant matter concerning those of my ministry who are caught in the fictitious trap of taxation in violation of their faith and belief in the no harm ethic of the King James Bible and laws provided.

Justice is in disrepute and I as a non-commercial man and minister of God am required, as of my awareness of corruption within the system, to not contract with any man acting as a Commercial fiction nor un sanctioned by the Christian monarch and anointed of God. I as a performing minister of God cannot receive integral justice or honor of truly allegiant men and women unless their oaths are understood. My duty and performance of a function of my calling as a minister of God in defense of his laws is to enquire of all as to the provision of the legitimacy of their understanding that oath and the validity of its form. (Numbers 30:2; Jeremiah 9:3-9)

Without a truly understood oath in the possession of a truly sworn allegiant to her majesty the anointed of God, I as a minister of God and my parishioners in faith and right unassailable in Christ cannot participate in your unlawful defacto commercial process of assumption that we are commercial debtors. Neither can my parishioners participate as we have no truly allegiant dejure and authentic court of God’s law of defense by her majesty to bring forth the truth in. We cannot bow down to nor serve false defacto authority. (Exodus 20:3-5 ;Luke 16:13) This is the command of God! Read chapter 3 of Daniel.

I hope you will not assume this is avoiding unlawful taxes (Romans 16:17-20 Exodus 30:13-14 Matthew 17:24-27), as we wish to ensure you that you have no need to assume that, as it is absolutely true, no assumption needed. Taxes not instituted by God are not lawful among his children and not of God. (Ezra:7:24-26;1Peter 2:13 only laws written for God’s sake! Acts 5:29 Duet:4:1-2)Only dead commercial entities are taxable not God’s creation! God’s truly allegiant ministers know that his law is the rule of law mentioned of in the preamble to the Canadian Constitution. The Coronation of her majesty in 1953 is clear unavoidable evidence of that. She swore to uphold the laws of God with all of her power!

Colonial Tax Repeal Act (1778) Still in force
it is hereby declared and enacted ... that, from and after the passing of this act, the king and parliament of Great Britain will not impose any duty, tax, or assessment whatever, payable in any of his majesty's colonies ... in North America or the West Indies, except only such duties as it may be expedient to impose for the regulation of commerce;
Filings of Kisikawpimootewin North American Signatory Indian as serviced upon the Governor General of Canada as of January 24th 2002 A.D. et al
Filings of Sherwood-T: Rodrigues Notice of Collateral Esttopel May 2003
To be clear, the men and women of this Church are of faith and belief not commercial nor under commercial jurisdiction and we challenge you to prove that we are.
If you proceed against us without proving that, under the provisions of your public service employment act and the terms of your public liability insurance policy via revenue risk management, that it was warranted, we will be forced to file a claim against you. If you can prove you have lawful jurisdiction over the non commercial men and women of a non incorporated sui juris church and its holdings of properties, we demand, as of unalienable unchartered right, that you produce that evidence in good faith so we can submit and not be wasting audited monies with arguments of assumed and fictitious legal nature. To do so would be a fraud . I , as the officiating minister of this religious congregation am demanding in good faith that you validate your jurisdiction "quo warranto veritas". Please remember I am not being adversarial just performing a function of my calling ,an officiating minister of Christ of a formed Church,to protect my parishioners from avoidable offences not of God enforced by imposters.(Acts 5:29; Romans 16:17-20) I am with the authority to be requesting verification of your true integrity and sanctioned authority in God’s law to enforce the Income tax act or any other ungodly law upon my flesh and the ecclesiastical property of God. Please do not be intimidated by this notice, I only want what is right in God’s law for my congregation and their family’s ensured security. The civil laws of man have no force against the ministry of God and the Queen has supported that in law. Please read 176 and 423 of the criminal code and ask how you or any one man or woman can make up a meaning to that true allegiance you promised you would provide. Read the Coronation act of 1688 and the text of the Coronation ceremony of 1953. We just went through the fiftieth Jubilee of her majesty and the oath bound duty is still as ever clear not foggy nor gray you just have to read it.
Matthew 6:24......You are acting as mammon(Commerce) and I cannot bow to you as you are false authority . Exodus 20:3-5. I cannot violate the laws of God. Deuteronomy 4:2;12:32 Numbers 15:15 You are harming my ministry and my right as a man and minister of God to receive truly allegiant justice for my parishioners. There is a value to that harm you are causing my ministry and it’s parishioners. Your liability insurance via Jubilee insurance and other insurance services is in jeopardy.
I,do aver that I officiating as a minister of God in performance of a function of my calling and via the provisions of 337 of the Canadian criminal code am demanding of you, in reciept of this demand notice, to produce the property of a certified copy of your signed oath of true allegiance and authority to have her majesty’s sanction in jurisdiction over the natural body of my parishioners and to inflict a violation of religious beliefs being intimidation (423C.C.C.) upon myself or members of my congregation namely bowing submitting and understanding to false authority. Produce your true authority to invoke taxation upon the Queens subjects that supercedes God’s rule of law.(424C.C.C.) Prove we as members of an international religious body are debtors of a commercially bankrupt corporate body. Prove your created legal fictions (430C.C.C.) are capable of being cross examined. Staufen vs. regina 2001 BCSC

[para9] Whilst there is no evidence before the Court that Mr. Staufen was born in Vancouver or, for that matter, where he was born, the law is riddled with legal fictions, it is said. The Court may do so here, Mr. Azevedo suggests,and create a legal fiction with respect to Mr. Staufen's name and place and date of birth. [para10] As defined by the Oxford Canadian Dictionary a "legal fiction" is "an assertion accepted as true (though probably fictitious) to achieve a useful purpose, esp. in legal matters". In An Historical Introduction to English Lawand Its Institutions (3rd ed.) by Harold Potter, the learned author, at p. 302, groups the fictions used into three classes: (1) fictions used to increase the jurisdiction of Courts; (2) fictions designed to avoid cumbersome and archaic forms of action; (c) fictions having a false assumption of fact in order to extend the remedy the Court could grant. Jowitt's Dictionary of English Law (2nd ed.), at p. 787, provides two examples in order to illustrate how the former practice and jurisdiction of the courts rested largely on fictions. Thus, the king's Bench acquired jurisdiction in actions for debt by "surmising" or "feigning" that the defendant had been arrested for a trespass which he had never committed and then allowing the plaintiff to proceed against him for debt. In the second example the Court of Exchequer acquired jurisdiction by permitting the plaintiff in certain actions to plead that he was a debtor to the king and that by reason of the cause of action pleaded he had become less able to pay his wholly fictitious debt to the king.
[para11] Although fictions have been used extensively over the centuries to expand the jurisdiction of the courts and the nature of the relief they can grant, I have not been referred to, and have not in my own research found, an instance where a fiction has been used by a court to invent the facts necessary to decide the very issue before it. Judges are frequently told by appellate courts not to speculate on the evidence. What is sought here would require the Court to do more than speculate.

I, because of discriminatory treatment and knowledge of the lack of sanction by her majesty to enforce the commercial laws of men ( Matthew 6:24) upon me am in lack of trust of your process as it is clearly corrupt and replete with imposters. My religious obligations are clear and I cannot bow down to false authority. I hope you will help me determine your integrity so you are not in total appearance of dishonor.
I am an officiating minister of God ( Of my religious belief no capitalization or alterations of my name are allowed to be formed or attached to any document or to be associated with me or my parishioners) of the Cariboo Sui Juris Church.
It is important that you avail yourselves of this information as of the CBC Airing of the Coronation Ceremony on February sixth 2002. Please take notice and read the following. This is follow up to a notice in the Edmonton Journal 2001 December 19th to all allegiants of her majesty:

TO all private parties acting publicly as oath sworn allegiants of Elizabeth the second, by the grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and her other realms and territories Queen, head of the commonwealth, defender of the faith, and all private parties acting publicly or private, relying on oath sworn allegiants to the Queen so mentioned for their professional advise or oath sanctioned protection. Re: The meaning of that sacred oath of allegiance, and statement of faith may be viewed by contacting Minister of Christ
Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger in faith of defense of faith for Donald C. Carter et al 1-780-967-3915

CHAPTER XXII.From the Westminster Confession of faith an Act of the British Parliament of 1646
Of Lawful Oaths and Vows.
I. A lawful oath is a part of religious worship, wherein upon just occasion, the person swearing solemnly calleth God to witness what he asserteth or promiseth; and to judge him according to the truth or falsehood of what he sweareth.
II. The name of God only is that by which men ought to swear, and therein it is to be used with all holy fear and reverence; therefore to swear vainly or rashly by that glorious and dreadful name, or to swear at all by any other thing, is sinful, and to be abhorred. Yet, as, in matters of weight and moment, an oath is warranted by the Word of God, under the New Testament, as well as under the Old, so a lawful oath, being imposed by lawful authority, in such matters ought to be taken.
III. Whosoever taketh an oath ought duly to consider the weightiness of so solemn an act, and therein to avouch nothing but what he is fully persuaded is the truth. Neither may any man bind himself by oath to any thing but what is good and just, and what he believeth so to be, and what he is able and resolved to perform. Yet it is a sin to refuse an oath touching any thing that is good and just, being imposed by lawful authority.IV. An oath is to be taken in the plain and common sense of the words, without equivocation or mental reservation. It can not oblige to sin; but in any thing not sinful, being taken, it binds to performance, although to a man's own hurt: nor is it to be violated, although made to heretics or infidels.
V. A vow is of the like nature with a promissory oath, and ought to be made with the like religious care, and to be performed with the like faithfulness.
VI. It is not to be made to any creature, but to God alone: and that it may be accepted, it is to be made voluntarily, out of faith and conscience of duty, in way of thankfulness for mercy received, or for obtaining of what we want; whereby we more strictly bind ourselves to necessary duties, or to other things, so far and so long as they may fitly conduce thereunto.
VII. No man may vow to do any thing forbidden in the Word of God, or what would hinder any duty therein commanded, or which is not in his own power, and for the performance of which he hath no promise or ability from God. In which respects, monastical vows of perpetual single life, professed poverty, and regular obedience, are so far from being degrees of higher perfection, that they are superstitious and sinful snares, in which no Christian may entangle himself.
Default Notice
Will you discriminate against my official Ministry, and prejudice my ability to fair defense of my congregation’s men and women? Will you ignore your duty to that oath? Will you fabricate a meaning to that oath? Will you believe someone else’s fabrication? You have seen and are now with the knowledge of her majesty’s law regarding lawful oaths and if you can refute what I am saying do so with in 10 days of receipt of this document and Notice of demand. Failure to rebut or reply, *nihil dicit, to the notice of demand, sent via registered mail for proof of service, will be taken and acknowledged via notice in her majesty’s Royal post office and advertisement locally, of your open acceptance of my lawful sanction as a minister (Exodus19:6; 2 Corinthians 3:6) having only laws in accord with his law as authority over my congregation(Deuteronomy 4:2;12:32;Numbers 15:15) and will be taken and accepted as tacit consent and agreement to the assertions of law and ecclesiastical right contained herein
Please consider your subscribing to and understanding this oath in it’s entirety
I, ...................., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God.
If your oath is not in this form it is invalid. If you cannot verify what the true allegiance is that you swore you would provide, it is evidence that you are in breach of your obligation and have committed perjury.
Please tell me: If one does not believe in God but takes an oath to be truly allegiant to a Queen sworn to uphold the laws of God with all of her power can they decline to enforce and uphold the laws of God and still be truly allegiant?
Sincerely offered in performance of a function of my calling as an officiating Minister and founder of the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International 2001 and of and the Cariboo Grove of the Church of the Reformed Druids 2003, The Head Druid and minister of the Onoway Grove of the Church of the Reformed druids 1993; Received Philosophy Degree in 1992 From the Edmonton Grove of the Church of the Reformed Druids, and Master of law degree in 2000 from Grand Druid Kevin Sisk under a charter mission from the Assembly of the Universe, Honorary Minister of the China Grove of the Church of the reformed Druids 1992 and international law Consulting minister for the Belize Grove of the Church of the Reformed Druids 1993 and a Chartered mission brother and research consultant of the Assembly of the Universe Hamilton Ontario 1969 al and the Center for Self Awareness and the Church of Christian Science being all interfaith churches All glory to God and his infinite wisdom. May we all be humbled by his mysteries.

Minister Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger Ph.d Doctorate of Theosophy and Theocratic law

Parishioners Present
Matthew 18:15-20




*Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1045
Nihil Dicit.
Judgment taken against party who withdraws his answer is judgment nihil dicit, which amounts to confession of cause of action stated, and carries with it, more strongly than judgment by default, admission of justice of plaintiff's case. See also Nil dicit judgment

This one has been sent out by many of our ministers as it says it all. It is a binding agreement in law.

Good faith agreement July 8, 2005 A.D.

To: The private men, Irwin Cotler Michel Dorais ,John McCallum, and Giuliano Zaccardelli pictured above in order and acting as the Canadian Justice Minister, commissioner of Revenue, The Canadian Minister of Revenue and the Canadian Commissioner of the R.C.M.P. , and to the private man known as or near to being accurate as Steven Wright acting a s a officer of the RCMP from Carnduff Saskatchwan.

Fax: For the private man Michael Dorais:

Fax: For the private man John McCallum:

Fax: For the private man Guiliano Zaccardelli:

Fax : for the private man Steven Wright: 1-306-482-4402

Hello gentlemen I am Minister Matt Lozinski, an officiating minister of the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International , Hyas eccelsia . I wish you to be aware that it is a violation of my faith to bow to men and women acting as de facto gods, being the de facto governments of man creating law in addition to God’s laws and in derogation to his law. This is especially true when it applies to men and women who have no understanding of the established and in force law regarding their oaths of allegiance to the Christian monarch her Majesty the Queen.

As a result of my unavoidable awareness of corruption within the police, judiciary, and various political bodies of this country I am, as of my duty to defend my Christian faith, and in an official performance of a function of my calling, compelled to demand of you the private men, true certified copies of your oath’s of allegiance, to prove to me, in my ministerial function, that you understand the true meaning of your oaths in law.

It is agreed that I make these demands in quest of honor and upholding God’s law.

It is agreed that you know and understand I am performing an official function of my calling as a Christian minister in defense of the faith in making this ministerial demand of honor that you will deliver to me the meaning of the law, regarding your oath, that is still in force and that I make this demand as of the evident corruption in posiitions of power.

It is agreed that the facts will be evident that you are not competent to practice law enforce law or collect taxes if you do not know the true, in law, meaning of your oath to the Queen as defender of the faith.

It is agreed that no man or woman can be competent to practice or enforce law or collect taxes if they do not know or dishonorably refuse to offer the law and definition thereof regarding their own oaths to one in official function of his calling as a minister of God.

Please deliver to me your honor in your intent to uphold your lawful oath as defined in law.

It is agreed by you that one who takes an oath to be truly allegiant to a Christian monarch to get the job and does not know what their oath in active law means when asked, is indicating they are incompetent as they lied or were foolish when they said they would be faithful and bear true allegiance. Can you provide true allegiance if you do not know what it is? It is agreed that this is evidence of either incompetence or perjury in obtaining official status by a deception, and is also known as fraud and impersonating.
Exodus 20:3-5 Leviticus 6:2

It is agreed by you that you will uphold your oath to support and aid her majesty to defend the law of the King James Bible as the rule of Law defended by the anointed of God Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor. It is agreed by you that you honor your oath as an act of religious worship.

I look forward to your simple agreement and acceptance of this privately offered covenant via your honor in good faith tacit consent of failing to rebut the agreed upon terms with a private reply.

It is agreed that you are aware and know that if you do not reply privately you will be advising me as God’s minister, and the members of our faith who will witness this, of your total agreement with all of the terms offered and that you will act as my witness to that fact should I need you to give evidence.

It is agreed that failure to reply will also be taken as proof positive, with no possible rebuttal, of your agreement with me. It is agreed that the private men and women who act as her majesty’s officers are accomplice and party to the enforcement of taxation with de facto law, and have no public authority from her Majesty the Queen to intimidate and extort men and women of Christian faith to violate their faith.

It is agreed that the failure to rebut and dispute this good faith agreement will mean in submission and understanding, by all parties to this private notice, that we have a good faith covenant of terms as indicated above and that the Authorized King James Bible is the Supreme rule of law with uncontested standing in the British Commonwealth and no intimidation by any man or woman to violate it’s commands can be possibly seen as lawful.

Please get my name and general delivery correct as you cannot falsify them for a financial purpose without my consent or full knowledge as to what your purpose was, and as of my faith I cannot accept legal fictions applied to me or accept postal coded mail. I will, in two weeks, if you choose to tacitly accept my position and agree, be sending confirmation of our agreement witnessed by three members of the Church to ensure honor is present. Upon your acceptance of the final covenant of terms we will be, in ecclesiastical duty, posting and advertising our mutually beneficial agreement to all sources pertinent to this situation of faith. Matthew 18:15-20

It is agreed that any and all attempts by your de facto incompetent associates to continue this intimidation and violation of our faiths freedoms will be seen as proof and evidence of your mens rea or to be clear guilty mind. Treason is also a descriptive term that is used. I intend to stand in my faith regardless of your de facto attempt to intimidate me, should that be your private choice, as you will have no public protection from de facto incompetent lawyers as they are in conflict. You may wish to refer to the RonCarelli v Duplessis Decision of 1959. He lost. Ezekiel 33:6

I look forward to your agreement in remembrance of Section 22 from the in force law of the Westminster Confession of Faith from 1646.
Do not assume you have any true authority to intimidate me to accept any de facto process.

Minister: ____________________________________

Print name ____________________________________

Address _____________________________________ _____________________________________

Witnesses _____________________________________ _____________________________________

_____________________________________ _____________________________________

Date _____________________________________

Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International
Armstrong Ecclesia
c/o 685 Josselyn Court, Kelowna, British Columbia
no code, non-commercial
Tel: 250-491-0552 Fax: 250-491-0594
c/o 4130 Hales Road, Armstrong, British Columbia
no code, non-commercial
Tel: 250-546-0175

This eighth day, of the twelfth month,
in the year of our Lord and Savior Jesus the Christ, two thousand and five

Attn: Wendy Petersmeyer, the private women
acting as counsel for Her Majesty in Right of Canada

c/o Department of Justice Canada
900-840 Howe Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
No code non commercial

Offered Under Protest, of Duress, Threat and Intimidation

Ecclesiastical Agreement &
Covenant of Good Faith

TAKE NOTICE that I James-Albert: Hueston, the living soul, living principal, minister unto God, do aver that the use of this communication is not intended for acknowledging or understanding the alleged jurisdiction of corporate fictions formed by private men and women acting as agents for the de facto government of the debtor corporation of Canada. This communication will be of intent to gain your agreement with the provided facts, as known to me to be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, correct, complete and certain without the intent to mislead under penalty of perjury. I wish no argument with you but must ensure I only communicate to those in honor and standing in God’s Kingdom of the living.

1. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal that, an alleged debt owing to the de facto corporation A.K.A. Canada Revenue Agency(CRA) and/or Canada Customs and Revenue Agency and/or Revenue Canada by the state created and owned fiction JAMES A. HUESTON, was attempted in honor to be discharged by the best knowledge of me the man of God being James Albert Hueston(myself, I, me), the live flesh and blood sentient soul standing in God’s Kingdom, and that I being that man and the minister of God was put under threat duress and intimidation by the de facto state to act on behalf of the state created and owned fiction in August of 2002, and did attempt satisfy the alleged debt by paying with a verifiable and lawful Bill of Exchange.

2. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that, no notice was given to myself that this good faith offer settlement, via lawful Bill of Exchange, was disallowed nor was the Bill of Exchange ever returned to indicate payment was rejected or refused contrary to 153 of that enactment that applies to the Federal Government and all their departments and agencies.

3. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that another Bill of Exchange was issued in March of 2005 as per the Bills of Exchange Act and that the bill being paid was not returned as cancelled and/or discharged by private men and women acting as agents of Her Majesty employed by CRA.

4. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that no notice was given to me that these good faith offers were disallowed even though it was asked of the private agent via a cover letter to please inform the writer if there was a problem with settlement and to contact the writer immediately.

5. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that provincial court Bailiffs are not lawful deputies of the Federal Attorney General of Canada. (See section 2 Criminal code of Canada and Bruno Decision 2003 British Columbia Supreme Court(BCSC), Ezekiel 33:6) It is further agreed that the private men acting as unlawful deputies with pseudo law and de facto claims descend upon the hanger building located at the Salmon Arm Airport owned by myself and used as a sanctuary and repository for my property, and proceeded unlawfully seizeto all of said property including all contents therein including property not owned by me and being that of other Church members.

6. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that liens on the property of the state created legal fiction owned by Canada being the all capital corporate debtor name known as a nom de gerre, JAMES A. HUESTON, were placed with the Personal Property Registry in the year 2000 in the miscellaneous section of the PPR contrary to section 125 of the British North American Act.

7. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that James Albert Hueston the man acting under threat duress and intimidation on behalf of the unlawful state created fiction JAMES A. HUESTON, licensed and insured several vehicles through the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia(ICBC) even though there were provincial civil law PPR liens placed by Canada Revenue Agency Federal Employee’s on the legal fiction property owned by Canada being JAMES A. HUESTON contrary to the provisions of section 91, 92 and 125 of the British North American Act.

8. It is agreed by you, with no rebuttal to the fact, that the 1994 Ford pick-up bearing serial number ITFEX14N5RKA15012 was registered and insured with ICBC by myself who was under threat, duress and intimidation to do so.

9. It is agreed by you, with no rebuttal to the fact that the de facto provinces and Canada in awareness, consort and collusion unlawfully created and own the legal fiction JAMES A. HUESTON, and this was achieved as a result of the unlawful practice of all provincial registries creating this all capital corporate name for a financial purpose without the permission of the man in full allodial possession of the Christian appellation of upper and lower case lawful formation and as such the registry was done in fraud by specifically refusing to record the Christian appellation accurately in the Queen’s lawful grammar of upper and lower case first name middle name and family name, this action being influenced unlawfully and intentionally directed by the international united nations organization called Huridoc’s.

10. It is agreed by you, with no rebuttal to the fact that such de facto registered Ford pick-up bearing serial number ITFEX14N5RKA15012 was lawfully in unawareness of any dejure claim and in ecclesiastical good faith traded in on a 1994 Ford Cube van bearing serial number 1FDKE30M7RHB19026 and was registered by the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption under protest of threat duress and intimidation to do so and to use flesh based de facto fiat currency recognized and created in fraud by the Bank of Canada.

11. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that a lien search contractually was purchased by myself at the Province of British Columbia Access Center in Vernon, British Columbia on September 1st 2005 A.D., to ensure that no liens existed, and as a result of that diligent effort no liens at all were found to be existing on the 1994 Ford pick-up as confirmed by two subsequent searches on the same vehicle, performed by Jona Emke the owner of the car lot where the trade in and purchase of the cube van took place.

12. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that most car dealers in the province of British Columbia access BC OnLine for lien searches on trade-in of automobiles and trucks to verify that no liens exist. It is further agreed by you the purpose of the registry is to lawfully alert the one being liened that the lien exists and that whatever is liened cannot be sold until the lien is satisfied. It is further agreed by you that entrapment, deliberate deception and unlawful action is being practiced by the private men and women acting as CRA being de facto Federal Employee’s attempting to act as lawful deputies of the Attorney General of the province contrary to the lawful definition of Attorney General’s lawful deputies in section 2 of the criminal code as decided by the BCSC Bruno Decision of 2002. It is further agreed by you that the word de facto used by the Governor General of Canada to describe her position as head of state means unlawful usurped authority.

13. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that the dealer, Jona Emke the private man acting in his capacity as owner of Global Truck Sales, Kelowna, British Columbia. accessed BC OnLine to verify the computer print out of the lien search provided by myself and twice found no lien on file.

14. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that the private men and women acting for the de facto CRA, in unlawful conspiracy and premeditated collusion to effect a damage upon the financial state of myself, placed an unlawful lien on the legal fiction name that they unlawfully in fraud created for a financial purpose without the permission of myself and as such the creation of the all capital legal fiction name is property owned by Canada, such created legal fiction corporate debtor name being, JAMES A. HUESTON. It is further agreed by you those private men and women using de facto law did maliciously place an unlawful claim in an obscure place on the provincial registry failing in duty, contrary to 180 of the criminal code, to lawfully inform any agency or private parties that such obscure unlawful liens were registered on all collateral belonging to the unlawfully created fiction JAMES A. HUESTON possibly placing ICBC in a negligent position, acting in collusion and definitely bringing myself to a point of extreme discomfort which speaks to damages.

15. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that the private man named Donald McPhail in his private capacity acting as a de facto Bailiff for NORTH CENTRAL BAILIFF’S LTD., entered church property near Armstrong, British Columbia. with two other Bailiff’s and did unlawfully seize a 1994 E-350 cube van bearing serial number 1FDKE30M7RHB19026 registered to a benevolent Church and non profit organization being under Threat, Duress and Intimidation.

16. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that Donald McPhail was truthfully informed that the 1994 Ford Cube van was registered to and owned by the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption not the state created fiction JAMES A. HUESTON.

17. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that when informed of the ownership of the van Donald McPhail made an unlawful legal determination in his private capacity to disregard proof of registry and then proceeded to commit an illegal seizure of Church property as verified by ICBC registries in offering their honorable legal opinion on the legality of the seizure. It is further agreed by you that Donald McPhail was warned that some of the contents in the van belonged to a third party. This warning was also disregarded and the contents were removed from the property. It is further agreed that the Criminal Code of Canada was produced for Donald McPhail by an officiating minister of the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International claiming a right under section 39.1 over the property in question being the 1994 Ford cube van.

18. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that when informed of the ecclesiastical ownership of the van Donald McPhail made an unlawful legal determination in his private capacity to disregard this proof of registry and warning and proceeded to commit an illegal seizure of Church property as verified by ICBC registries in offering their opinion on the legality of the seizure. It is further agreed that the Criminal Code of Canada was produced for Donald McPhail by an officiating minister of the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International claiming a right under section 39.1 over the property in question being the 1994 Ford cube van.

19. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that Donald McPhail in his private capacity made another unlawful determination confirming, as witnessed by two men, that the Criminal Code of Canada did not apply to him and that he, Donald McPhail was above the law.

20. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that when Donald McPhail was asked for identification proving who he and the others were, made another legal determination stating that providing identification was not a requirement and refused to identify himself.

21. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact a call to the local RCMP detachment in Armstrong to file a complaint of theft was taken by the officer on duty one Doug Baron, and he did advise this was a civil matter and he would not get involved claiming that 39.1 of the Criminal Code was a very obscure part of the code and that I could get myself in trouble for using it. This was witnessed by two men.

22. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that letters of agreement and notice of my faith were sent to several private men and women acting as employees of the CRA, Donald McPhail, private men and women acting as the private man ministers of government agencies etc. in their private capacity ensuring their private awareness and to date there has been no reply to those letters denying anything in them.

23. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that the license plates and the registration for the cube van evidencing that the van was insured were never returned. It is further agreed by you that the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption was never reimbursed for their plates, their insurance or inconvenience of having their property stolen. It is further agreed that personal possessions not belonging to myself and not listed on the seizure order were never returned to the rightful owners after the van had been unlawfully seized and sold along with all contents enclosed.

24. It is agreed with no rebuttal to the fact that you, Wendy Petersmeyer have a sworn oath of allegiance to a Christian Monarch who by law is defender of the Christian faith. It is further agreed by you, that the Westminster confession of faith from 1646 chapter 22 defines your oath in law. It is further agreed that refusing to provide true allegiance to her majesty incapacitates any lawful sanction you may feel you have. It is further agreed by you that perjury and incompetence are evidenced by one and all who do not know the meaning of their oath in law or refuses to provide it when asked. It is further agreed that nuisance is failing to perform your duty oath sworn and thereby bringing myself, the Christian man to a point of discomfort by you, aiding the deliberate acts of intimidation by private men and women acting as de facto government officials in defiance of their own de facto court decisions being Roncarelli v. Duplessis 1959 SCC.

25. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that you are hereby informed of my faith requirements regarding the formation of my name and not accepting commercial postal codes, as shown above as of my religious beliefs. (2Peter 2:3) It is my hope you will not offend my beliefs with the bad faith and discriminatory act of continuing to use my name for a financial enslavement purpose in an altered form without my permission done primarily for your public convenience as per the postal codes in a manner that amounts to a fraud and associates my flesh with a dead thing which is a violation of my faith.

26. It is agreed by you Wendy Petersmeyer with no rebuttal to the fact that if you, the private woman do not rebut, refute or diligently prove the above points of agreement as untrue within fifteen days from receipt of this Ecclesiastical agreement and good faith covenant (if you need more time please ask) otherwise you will be accepting our ecclesiastical good faith offer and covenant of such truth being binding upon you as a private woman. It is further agreed we have no intent to intimidate you. However I am under threat, duress and intimidation by a group of private men and women some of whom are Jewish lawyers who work for the de facto Justice department who are attempting to enforce talmudic law upon me, in my belief, and I am forced to communicate in this manner, as I am not able to trust the de facto system of justice, due to the massive evidence it is unlawful, corrupt and stands as a false God.

27. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that you the private woman work for some of the private men we have placed liens against and that you are aware of the difference between public and private and that you cannot expend taxpayer dollars on private matters.

28. It is agreed by you with no rebuttal to the fact that this issue has been the subject of a petition to the Queen Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor on September 29th 2002 that was the subject of a briefing of the Treasury Board of Canada in 2003 by Cameron McEwan, Senior Analyst for the Treasury Board of Canada at that time, who informed those private men and women that all material in the Petition was true accurate and correct and that they had no precedent in law to deal with the ecclesiastical matters being the subject matter of the Petition.

God bless you in grasping the instant gravity of these matters of agreement between me, as the Christian man performing a function of my calling, and you the private woman.

Sincerely officiating as God’s ministers the following ministers of our Church , but not limited to number, of those who have been intimidated and will testify to that fact.

James Albert Hueston
all rights reserved in God’s law
Armstrong Ecclesia

Kaz: Crischuk
all rights reserved in God’s law
Kelowna Ecclesia

Lloyd: Hamilton
all rights reserved in God’s law
Salmon Arm Ecclesia

Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
all rights reserved in God’s law
Universal Ecclesia

Stuart: Leis
all rights reserved in God’s law
Kamsack Ecclesia

Rolf: Hartloff
all rights reserved in God’s law
Regina Ecclesia

Helen Hill
all rights reserved in God’s law
Penticton,, British Columbia Ecclesia

Paul Ricci
all rights reserved in God’s law
Toronto Ontario Ecclesia

Art Rundell
All rights reserved in God’s law
Red Deer Alberta Ontario Ecclesia

Matt Lozinski
All rights reserved in god’s law
Hyas, Saskatchewan Ecclesia

Jerry Lazoroff and Daniel Gurski
All rights reserved in God’s law
Canora, Saskatchewan Ecclesia

c/o Armstrong Ecclesia State of Awareness Armstrong BC no code non commercial

This one got minister Belanger a visit from National Security Intelligence agent Roger Piper and Edmonton Police special investigator John Hansen who were sent by Jean and threatened Minister Belanger to stop writing the MP’s Re: the following……….

Sent March 20th 2001 A.D.
To The Honourable Jean Chretien
Prime Minister of Canada
From Minister of God: Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger (Copy write, no changes or alterations permitted)
Church of Ecumenical Redemption International Heatherdown ecclesia
Tel/Fax: 1-780-967-3915
C/o general delivery
near Onoway, Alberta no code
Dear Sir,

I would like amend my previous letter of the 16th of this month with this one to make you aware of the crime of treason being committed by various federal judges I have stood before, in defence of the faith and the Christians I represent. I’m a Minister of God bonafide, and his law as contained in the Royal King James Bible decreed by Royal Letters patent and By Royal decree is in every courtroom in the land as defence of the faith.

The preamble to the Canadian Constitution as consented to as advised by the Lords spiritual, is testament to the supremacy of God and his rule of law, for no other law can be superior to God’s law , as God is supreme.

The oath of allegiance to her majesty stems from hundreds of years ago when in defence of the faith the Christian monarchs of early England were consecrated as those Christian monarchs, in the coronation ceremonial signed oath, promising to uphold God’s law as intent on protecting the integrity and honour of God’s court. As did her majesty the Queen Elizabeth the second in 1953 in the royal coronation oath of acclaim before the whole world.

All agents of the crown, magistrates, justices, Judges, commissioners, masters, police politicians, public servants, and agents of the crown of any sort that are sworn allegiant or doing work for her majesty the Queen, defender the faith, head of the church of England, the Christian monarch of the Commonwealth, must in acknowledgement of an oath to the defender of the faith being Christian , and in acknowledgement of the preamble to the Canadian Constitution, recognize the supremacy of God, if asked by a concerned and affected party with authority such as myself. If that oath allegiant to a Christian Monarch ,fails to acknowledge the supremacy of God when asked by anybody with authority to do so they violate their oath of allegiance and section 337CCC and have no jurisdiction in any of the Queens business. They revert themselves to a private party and if they attempt to proceed against you in her majesty’s name, they commit treason. Treason by attempting to overthrow the Queens Government under Gods rule with mans rule under the authority of a Judge.

The judicial oath of the Judges is stored in the office of Denis Guay acting commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs. The clerk that holds the files is Junette Bopla. Judith Bellis is the director of Judicial Affairs, she has told her assistant Karen Cutty to inform me that the judges have no written oaths of allegiance and that they only swear to her majesty verbally. This was after I received information from Junette Bopala that the oaths with the signatures were held in her records. Elizabeth Sanderson is connected with Justice and so is Joy Kane I believe, Georgette Sheridan, and Ann Mclellan herself may to also be connected to an all out to attempt, vacant of any bonafide”law”,to prevent me from gaining access to certified copies of the signed oaths of allegiance to her majesty Queen defender the faith the Christian monarch of Canada by the Judges listed below. They are inclined to hang up when they hear me calling even your office staff will do the same when I ask them those two questions of integrity testing nature as have the staff at Rideau house and the RCMP that work there.

When I as a Minister of God, ask Judges, Justices, Masters, Crown prosecutors members of the RCMP, Federal MP’s police CSIS or any other Crown agent that is sworn allegiant to her majesty the Queen if they recognize the supremacy of God such as the infamous Revenue Canada crew, if they fail to answer in the affirmative they are not agents of the Queen they are imposters.

I hope the vision I witnessed in the church during Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s funeral was that of one that Sincerely has faith in God and does so recognize his supremacy. This will make my job a lot easier as I fear the dark forces spoken on at Ephesians 6: 10-16 have taken hold of our justice system and behind the very doors of the Governor General’s office. I have on my armour (Ephesians 6:10-20)and will repel the darts that these dark skirted Lords have attempted to throw at me in preventing me access to those oaths and the justice Ministers office even telling the Governor Generals aid Joanne Menier that even she could not see them, this the Queens reps assistant! The oath is to the Queen not the Judges! The Queen and anyone else in defence of the faith has the right to ask and be replied to in respect in the affirmative,

I have made deliberate attempts to communicate my intent to the Minister of justice the Solicitor General’s office the Governor General’s office to (governor’s office of Alberta the justice ministers office of Alberta the chief justice of the provincial Court of Alberta Edward Walter the RCMP K. division a Mr. Chill, an inspector I believe who was not it all interested in my claims of treason and my proof via the documents of the Canadian Constitution the statutes of Westminster and coronation oath of 1953. I was not able to convince the RCMP officer telling me he was inspector Schill to at least investigate. I have also attempted to communicate with Jag the military component of the public judiciary. The people I have spoken to at these departments t do not understand their oath of allegiance to the Christian monarch as the Lt. at the Namao JAG office.He told me he only swore allegiance to that part of her majesty that was head of the state of Canada. I asked him “where is your bloody Sword that you just severed her majesty with and who gave you the authority to decide which part of her majesty you consider appropriate to swear an oath of allegiance to?” He was needless to say left speech less and declined any further comment after I asked him if he recognised the supremacy of God. to this date after many requests to Department of Defence to investigate my claims they have expressed little or no interest in pursuing the crime of treason.

If it is the judiciary that are committing treason we can hardly expect judiciary to find them guilty unless the Queen is lying on the floor in a pool of blood and the Judge has a smoking gun in his hand. Since a portion of the judiciary have via the Kol Nidre or the masonic oath ascribed to in the masonic handbook, secretly declined their oaths and have no faith in God as supreme. I must include, in faith of God and in common sense as a man created by God that these Judges have a hidden agenda, a private law that we’re not informed of nor ruled by.
The rule of law in Canada it is as the Queen has proclaimed, God’s law is permanent, as I would turn you to Deuteronomy in the Queens Royal Law the Kings James Bible 4: 1-2: 12:32 and numerous other scriptures wherein God’s law is commanded by God to neither add to nor take away. This intent is further supported by Paul in Romans 16: 17-20, wherein he advises to beware of those that would divide you from the doctrine. Romans 13 states that he is Gods minister several times, any minister of God will proudly proclaim their recognition of that supremacy to anyone that asks. They the judges I am complaining about will not reply when asked indicating extreme arrogance and that they do not feel allegiant to the Queen. This said indicates they have no jurisdiction in any matters before the court as they are not the court formed under her majesty in defence of the faith to be supervised by allegiants that are equipped to know the law! No allegiance, no recognition of God as Supreme = no Canadian Judge!!!

The Queen having sworn to uphold God’s law and having accepted the royal law from the Archbishop of Canterbury as the greatest gift in the world, empowers her allegiant’s with the royal law the lively oracle of God as supreme. Any of those so-called allegiant men or women that fail to recognize the duty of their oath to a Christian Monarch and open recognition of the preamble (inclusive of God’s supremacy ) to the supreme law of Canada must either resign their position or continue in Dishonour and commit treason.

You may say this is a violation of the charter rights and freedoms as religious discrimination, but that charter does not apply to me, but only to you and all the rest of the government Federal and provincial(section32). I have no contract to a relationship that is bona fide with the government of Canada I am not a member of the body corporate or the body politic neither am I an entity or described as a statutory person enslaved to any fiat debt equity structure perpetrated by Canadian customs and revenue or the IMF or the world bank.

I am a Minister of the Most High with Jesus Christ as my saviour as he appears is yours. Our common bond is the same that the Queen defends. I hope this truth and faith in God will get by the red tape and cause you to inquire into this blasphemic attempt at treason and as to just exactly what the Hell is going on!

I even Had the RCMP at Rideau Hall threaten to cut off my phone under 372 of the CC because of my insistence on reporting the crime of treason now that is a conspiracy of a weird nature!
The operators there were instructed to hang up on me as soon as I spoke. They did today leave my line open for over half an hour preventing me from using my own phone without a court order to do so. I hope they taped those calls I wish you to hear what I asked them as a Minister of God. And because of my defence of the faith I have been hung up on or refused to return my calls by all of the aforementioned parties now inclusive of Mr. Guay who was amazed at what I told him and shocked to hear my request. He among the group seemed most sincere aside from Ms. Meneir the GG’s assistant who was told by Justice that even she as the GG’s assistant who wanted to see a Judges oath would to be refused and that the FOIP would not apply in this circumstance!!! I commend Mr Guay for his efforts to not get caught in the cross fire he is an integral man and you should be proud to have him in your judicial staff and as a loyal agent of the crown her majesty the Queen. The worst case of arrogantitis I have ever seen was Master Quinn,of the Alberta court of Queens Bench, he, after being asked the Questions of allegiance and primadeo recognition by a Christian minister in defence of a fellow Christian, told he had no jurisdiction without the courts affirmation of the questions and told that if he proceeded he would be committing treason, then tilted his head sideways and said “what do I care of the Queen I’m Irish, I have a tough neck” This alone if not treason on the record is contempt of court!!!!

Please investigate as the superior public servant in as expedient fashion as treason permits. I will await what a reasonable man would conclude would be enough time to get a oath allegiant response to such a factual allegation of this magnitude from an office of your influence. Please adhere to the tenants of 337 of the criminal code as I as a minister of God and a freeman sovereign under God and in her majesty’s Queen Elizabeth’s name, in defence of the faith, do so hereby make this request of you to tell me what law exists and to provide me with that law that is bonafide in Canada as proclaimed by the Queen, that has the power to prevent me or any other concerned party of faith from gaining access to and receiving a certified copy of these oaths of allegiance to the Queen sworn to by the pending judges of this country’s court system.

I anxiously await your reply

Minister of God Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger

March 17th 2001 A.D.
To: Denis Guay: Acting commissioner for the Commission of Federal Judicial Affairs
Tel: 1-613-995-7438
Fax: 1-613-995-5615
From: Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger (Copy write, no changes or alterations permitted)

Tel/Fax: 1-780-967-3915
C/o general delivery
near Onoway, Alberta

Dear Denis,
This is a repeat formal request for the signed oaths of allegiance to her majesty the Queen Elizabeth II of England of the following Federal Judges, justices masters and adjudicating members, that did subscribe to her majesty’s oath upon taking the office of Judge Justice etc.

Justice Costigan of the Alberta Court of Appeals
Master Quinn of the Alberta Court of Queens Bench
Justice Belzil of the Alberta Court of Queens Bench
Member Loreen Clark Adjudicator Adjudication appeal division immigration Canada
Member Paul Kyba Adjudicator Adjudication Appeal division immigration Canada
Daphne Shaw Dyck Adjudication appeal division immigration Canada
Anita Bascariol Adjudicator Adjudication appeal division immigration Canada
Sylvia Albi-Rapaj QC Immigration

Gary Reimer QC Immigration
A Mr. McQuage QC Justice Canada Alberta
Elinor Caplan MP Minister of Immigration
If you choose denial of access, I demand the reasons, in legislation format, in line with 337 of the CCC that you may deny me access to these proudly proclaimed documents of integrity..

Without free public access to these documents it challenges and brings justice to disrepute. The Judges will not want to let anyone to see them as some of them are committing treason in her majesty’s name and wish to be immune to any reproach.

As a Minister of God and in defence of the faith I demand in her majesty Queen Elizabeth’s name that certified copy’s of the oaths of the allegiants of the crown listed above so hereby requested in good faith and expectation be released to me immediately in the administration of justice and the sanctity of our judicial system.

The criminal code has provision that these documents must be released not withstanding superceding legislation and allows for a prison penalty if not complied with.

Public servant refusing to deliver property

337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty
in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and
entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or
control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is
authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence
and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

R.S., c. C 34, s. 297.

Please do not get caught up with aiding and abetting a crime, ask for the originating authority that may have the audacity to suggest that you cannot release them. Please do not obstruct justice, these documents are to be used in a test prior to criminal proceedings involving treason on the part of certain judges justices etc.

Please take the time to read the preamble to the Canadian Constitution and then read section 32.
This will tell you who is in charge as the first line tells you.

Looking forward to your reply in an expeditious manner as the reason for it’s request is treason taking place in the courts and must be dealt with post haste.

Sincerely in defence of the faith and in God’s light to cut the darkness

Minister of God

Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger

CC: Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 011-44-207-839-5950
The Archbishop of Canterbury 011-01-227- 450964
Governor General Adrienne Clarkson 1-613-998-1664
Privy Council of Canada 1-613-992-3700
JAG 1-613-992-3418
The House of Commons 1-613-992-1273
The Senate 1-613-992-1995
Prime Minister Jean Chretien 1-613-941-6900
Solicitor General Lawrence McAuly 1-613-952-2240
Justice Minister Mclellan 1-613-990-7255
Judith Beliss Director Judicial Affairs 1-613-990-7255
Elinor Caplan Immigration Minister 1-613-952-5533
Loreen Clark Immigration Adjudicator1-613-6666582
Elinor Caplan Minister of Immigration1-613-952-5533
Daphne Shaw-Dyck > Immigration Adjudication1-613-6666582
Anita Bascariol.Immigration Adjudicator1-613-6666582
The Governor General of Alberta Lois Hole
The Attorney General of Alberta Dave Hancock
Justice Costigan Alberta
Justice Belzil Alberta
Master Quinn Alberta
Canadian Council of Churches 1-416-236-4532
Cannabis Culture MAgazine 1-425-795-7189
Judges as Criminals
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985).
The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 1, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges. The criminal activities that the Federal Courts found in the Circuit Court of Cook County still exist, and are today under the care, custody and control of Judge Greylord II (Chief Judge Donald O'Connell). The Circuit Court of Cook County
is a criminal enterprise
Judges have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
Judicial immunity does not exist for judges who engage in criminal activity, for judges who connive with, aid and abet the criminal activity of another judge, or to a judge for damages sustained by a person who has been harmed by the judge's connivance with, aiding and abeting, another judge's criminal activity.
The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law,and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... it is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse."
When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state officer.
The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).

In Illinois, 705 ILCS 205/4 states "Every person admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law shall, before his name is entered upon the roll to be kept as hereinafter provided, take and subscribe an oath, substantially in the following form:
'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be), that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of attorney and counselor at law to the best of my ability.'"
In Illinois, a judge must take a second oath of office. Under 705 ILCS 35/2 states, in part, that "The several judges of the circuit courts of this State, before entering upon the duties of their office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation, which shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State:
'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of judge of ______ court, according to the best of my ability.'"
Further, if the judge had enlisted in the U.S. military, then he has taken a third oath. Under Title 10 U.S.C. Section 502 the judge had subscribed to a lifetime oath, in pertinent part, as follows: "I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; ...".
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.". Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).
Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.
Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below).
If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.

Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
What is the penalty for treason?
Citizens for Legal Responsibility suggest that the following judges may have acted without jurisdiction and therefore may have engaged in an act or acts of treason:
Judge Philip L. Bronstein
Justice Robert Chapman Buckley
Judge Grace G. Dickler
Judge Thomas C. Dudgeon (DuPage County)
Presiding Judge Timothy C. Evans
Judge Lester D. Foreman
Chief Judge Michael Galasso (DuPage County)
Justice Michael J. Gallagher
Judge Francis A. Gembala
Justice Thomas E. Hoffman
Judge Moshe Jacobius
Judge Thomas James
Judge Aubrey F. Kaplan
Judge Philip S. Lieb
Judge Veronica B. Mathein
Justice Sheila M. O'Brien
Chief Judge Donald O'Connell (Cook County)
Judge Edmund Ponce de Leon
Judge Daniel J. Sullivan
Justice Mary Jane Theis
Judge William F. Ward, Jr.
Any judge or attorney who does not report the above judges for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprison of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382.
Please let us know shortly if you intend in honor to bring this issue up to defend the foundation of the law in this country or in fact you will just like the liberals continue the Intimidation and deliberate violation of the criminal code by doing nothing…We in honor need to know your fully aware intent very soon..

Blessings From Minister Hueston et al!!!

Real criminal invesitgation and professionalism regarding the Medpharmfraud of 2019