Friday, February 12, 2010

The Subversion of the House of Judah by Antipater and Herod.

Judgment Day Perspectives Newsletter

The Subversion of the House of Judah by Antipater and Herod.
(Compiled by Pastor Eli James

Folks, this Newsletter will demonstrate that the origin of the Jewish people and their religion, Judaism, is no older than 121 BC. All claims the Jews to an earlier origin are categorically false; and they are deliberate lies promoted by the Jews to create the impression that they are the People of Israel. This is history's most gargantuan deception. Judaism and Jewry originated with the promotion of the Pharisees by the Edomite usurper, Herod the Great, who had assassinated the last True Judahite King, John Hyrcanus. This was a COUP by the Edomite usurpers, Antipater and Herod.

The following links give the true history of that time, but virtually all historians, except Identity historians and theologians, equate the word 'Jew' with 'Judah,' thus perpetuating the myth that the Jews are Judah. This is a false equation, because the Judahites never called themselves "Jews." They called themselves and their nation, "Judah." The modern word, 'Jew,' actually derives from the Greek word 'Ioudaios,' which means 'Judean.' The word 'Judean' is NOT a reference to the House, tribe, or people of Judah, because True Judah always strove to remain a racially separate and distinct people, apart from the surrounding Canaanite nations.

Deut. 7:1-9 tells us that the True Israelites shall make no covenants with the Canaanites NOR MAKE MARRIAGES WITH THEM. Ezra and Nehemiah make exactly the same statements; but John Hyrcanus violated this law when he conquered the Canaanite nation of Idumea (Edom) and began circumcising Canaanites and allowing them to become citizens of the nation of Judah. Thus, a new nation was born: the combined nation of Judah and Idumea, now known as JUDEA. All major historians and theologians gloss over this history, because the jews do not want you to know about these factual events. If Christians knew of this history, they would realize that hthe Jews are impostors, who have no Shemitic, Hebvrew, or Israelite ancestry!!!! Judaism would be exposed as the TOTAL FRAUD that it really is!!!!

After Herod took complete control of this new nation, he assassinated the Judahite Sanhedrin and replaced them with his Idumean usurpers. He then elevated the Pharisees to the official Judean political priesthood, shoving the Levitical priesthood into the background.

With this COUP D'ETAT fully in place, the Pharisees began subverting the Mosaic Law with their own additions and subtractions, violating Deut. 4:2, thus creating a new religion: JUDAISM.

Since most historians and theologians ignore this subversion of the House of Judah, they fail to point out the crucial distinction between Judahites and Jews. The Judahites were of the patriarch, Judah, and the Hasmonean Dynasty was the last pure-blooded family to reign in Judah. The Jews of that time were those EDOMITES who bacame Judeans under John Hyrcanus in 121 BC. From that day forward, the Jews have been PRETENDING TO BE JUDAH, when it is patently obvious that the origin of the Jewish people is Idumea, not Judah. Keep this historical fact in mind as you read the following articles. All references to "Jews" before 121 BC are delibrate falsifications of history. The Biblical House of Judah is always called "Judah." They are never called "Jews," even though the KJV inserts this false word into the OT, as this misunderstanding is helping to perpetuate the Great Impersonation of Judah by Jewry.

Before, 121 BC, the correct term is always JUDAH, never 'Jew.' After 121 BC, the correct word is "Judean," which is a word which merely signifies a resident or citizen of Judea. It is not a reference to one's religion or ancestry. Thus, to confuse the word 'Judah' with the word 'Jew' is to play into the hands of the Talmudic rabbis, who want you to be believe that they are the descendants of the Judahites, which they are NOT.

So, as you read, keep in mind that any usage of the word 'Jew' before 121 BC is illegitimate. It should always be translated "Judah," which is the True Biblical Tribe. After 121 BC, the correct translation is 'Judea" or 'Judean." With this understanidng, you can keep the proper ethnic differences in mind and begin to understand how the Jews began to impersonate Judah by falsley claiming to be of Judah and falsely claiming that their religion is of Moses. These two falsifications of history and identity are the basis of the Jewish impersonation of Judah and Israel.

- Pastor Eli James

Item #1: The Hasmonean Dynasty Under Attack

Item #2: The Hasmoneans violated Yahweh's Segregation Laws when the began to circumcise non-Israelites

Item #3: Reference Map

Item #4: Hyrcanus, Antipater and Herod (This article id an interesting mix of historical facts and Jewish lies. The claim that Antipater was a "faithful Judahite" is absolute rubbish!!! - Eli

Item #5: The Edomite descendants of Antipater

Item #6: The Herodians Who Destroyed the House of Judah


Item #7: Herod was made King of Judea by Antipater bribing Julius Caesar

Item #8: Jewish Encyclopedia: Antipater instigates Civil War Between Aristobulus and Hyrcanus

Item #9: Herod the Great, Bloody Idumean Tyrant

Item #10: Judas Iscariot was a Serpent/Idumean, Bertrand Comparet's

The Bible is NOT a Jewish Book. Many Identity scholars, including Comparet, Swift, Rand, and Capt, were undeer the illusion that the returnees from Babylon began to insinuate Babylonian ideas into the Mosaic Law. Comparet repeats this fable in this article. I have proven conclusively, that this is just more Jewish deception, so I have included my "The Origin of Talmudism" right after Comparet's article, as an explanation of the TRUE origin of the Jewish religion.- Eli

As I explained above, the TRUE ORIGIN of Judaism DOES NOT predate 121 BC. - Eli

Also, here is William Finck's concise explanation of the true genealogy of the Jewish people:

A Concise Explanation of the Creation of the Jewish People

The Old Testament accounts found in the Book of Genesis demonstrate that there was a rivalry between Jacob and Esau. Esau, it is also clear, was a race-mixer who had taken wives of the Canaanites and the Ishmaelites (Genesis 36). The rivalry between the brothers later turned into a national enmity among their descendants, and the Edomites were eventually enslaved by the Israelites (1 Chron. 18), and later revolted (2 Chron. 21). When the Chaldaeans finally took Jerusalem and destroyed the city, we find that the Edomites were in league with them, and are blamed for the temple’s destruction (Psalm 137:7-9; 1 Esdras 4:45 in the Septuagint).

When the Israelites moved into the land of Canaan, they were instructed to destroy all of the Canaanite peoples. They failed to do this, and were warned that harm would later come to them because of this failure (Num. 33:55; Josh. 23:13; Jdg. 2:3). It is evident that both in Jerusalem and elsewhere, the later Israelites did indeed have a problem with infiltration and race-mixing by the Canaanite tribes (Jer. 2:13, 21-22; Ezek. 16:3, 45 et al.). This was one of the chief reasons for their chastisement and removal.

The prophecy found in Ezekiel chapters 35 and 36 discuss the fact that the Edomites had moved into the lands of Israel and Judah after the removal of the Israelites by the Assyrians and Chaldaeans (cf. Ezek. 35:10). The theme of the prophecy found in Malachi chapters 1 and 2 is that Jacob is distinguished from Esau, and that the sacrifices of the priests are not acceptable, because the covenant is with Levi. With this Malachi fully infers that there were (or that there would be) priests who should not have held the office.

In the Biblical records after the Assyrian and Chaldaean deportations of the Israelites, concerning the return of merely 42,000 or so Israelites to Jerusalem we have only the books of Ezra and Nehemiah and a few of the Minor Prophets. These books are focused upon the activities in Jerusalem over a short period of time, and concerning the rest of the country, or concerning the time from approximately 455 to 3 BC, in the Bible we have nothing. It is evident, in Ezra and Nehemiah, that these returning Judaeans did struggle to maintain their race and keep themselves separate from the Canaanites and Edomites in the neighboring districts. Yet this attitude did not prevail, and with the works of the first-century Judaean historian Flavius Josephus and the apocryphal 1 Maccabees along with secular sources we can fill in some of the historical gaps between the testaments.

From Greek and Roman records, we can see that from the Hellenistic period all of the southern portions of the land once known as Judah and Israel were called Idumaea, after the Edomites. Strabo, the early first century Greek geographer, attests that the Idumaeans were “mixed up” with the Judaeans, and that they “shared in the same customs with them” (Book 16). From Josephus it can be determined that shortly before 130 BC, the reigning Maccabean high priest (who had all the authority of a king), John Hyrcanus, decided to conquer all of the surrounding cities of ancient Israel inhabited at that time by Edomites and Canaanites, and to either convert them to the religion of Judaea (first called “Judaism” by the Greeks) or to let them leave the land, or to be slain. (Maccabee was a name given to the Asamonean dynasty of high priests who ruled Jerusalem from about 150 BC down to about 36 BC, when the last of them was slain by Herod.) Josephus states that from this point these Edomites became “none other than Judaeans” (Antiquities, 13.9.1 et al.). Therefore we see with certainty the fulfillment of Ezekiel 35.

Judaea from 130 BC forward was a multiracial polyglot of a nation. The first Herod, an Idumaean by race who usurped power from the Maccabees, bribed the Romans for the kingship and from that time the temple priesthood at Jerusalem was used as a political tool. Both Josephus and the ecclesiastical historian Eusebius admit that many of the priests were not worthy of the distinction under the former Levitical traditions, and the veracity of Malachi’s prophecy becomes quite clear with their testimony. The usurpation of political control in Jerusalem is the primary reason for all of the division recorded in the New Testament. In Romans 16:30 and 2 Thessalonians, Paul alludes to the temple priesthood as “satan” (which means “the adversary”), and this is also attested to in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. Yahshua Christ informs the priests and other leaders in many places that they are the children of the adversary, i.e. Luke 11:47-51, John 8:33-47 and John 10:26. In Romans chapter 9, Paul makes a clear distinction between Israelites of Judaea and the Edomites of Judaea, calling the one “vessels of mercy” and the other “vessels of destruction”. It can be shown from the New Testament that many of the Israelites converted to Christianity during the ensuing years, losing their identity as Judaeans. The Edomites never did, clinging to their traditions found in the Talmud – which has absolutely no authentic connection to the ancient Hebrew religion. Today these people, and all of their many proselytes and those whom they have intermarried with, are known as Jews.

William Finck
AGW is an apocalyptic theory. CO2 is aerial plant food. More CO2 means bigger healthier plants and trees, which deliver more oxygen to the atmosphere. Burn more coal, not less. Carbon is life and life is carbon.

“When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.”
-- Thomas Jefferson

"Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?"
-- Joseph Stalin

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State. ”
-- Joseph Goebbels (29 October 1897 – 1 May 1945) was a German politician and Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945. He was one of German dictator Adolf Hitler's closest associates and most devout followers.

"Our race is the Master Race. We Jews are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves."
-- Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin (1977-1983) in a speech to the Knesset [Israeli Parliament]

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."
-- J. Edgar Hoover

"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." - S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54), Supreme Court of the United States 1795 [Not the "United States Supreme Court"]

“Poor people have access to the courts in the same sense that Christians had access to the lions.” - Justice Earl Johnson, Jr.

US government code specifying the location of it's commercial authority

This lets you see the US has no authority within the States themselves......
§ 3002. Definitions

As used in this chapter:
(1) “Counsel for the United States” means—
(A) a United States attorney, an assistant United States attorney designated to act on behalf of the United States attorney, or an attorney with the United States Department of Justice or with a Federal agency who has litigation authority; and
(B) any private attorney authorized by contract made in accordance with section 3718 of title 31 to conduct litigation for collection of debts on behalf of the United States.
(2) “Court” means any court created by the Congress of the United States, excluding the United States Tax Court.
(3) “Debt” means—
(A) an amount that is owing to the United States on account of a direct loan, or loan insured or guaranteed, by the United States; or
(B) an amount that is owing to the United States on account of a fee, duty, lease, rent, service, sale of real or personal property, overpayment, fine, assessment, penalty, restitution, damages, interest, tax, bail bond forfeiture, reimbursement, recovery of a cost incurred by the United States, or other source of indebtedness to the United States, but that is not owing under the terms of a contract originally entered into by only persons other than the United States;
and includes any amount owing to the United States for the benefit of an Indian tribe or individual Indian, but excludes any amount to which the United States is entitled under section 3011 (a).
(4) “Debtor” means a person who is liable for a debt or against whom there is a claim for a debt.
(5) “Disposable earnings” means that part of earnings remaining after all deductions required by law have been withheld.
(6) “Earnings” means compensation paid or payable for personal services, whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, bonus, or otherwise, and includes periodic payments pursuant to a pension or retirement program.
(7) “Garnishee” means a person (other than the debtor) who has, or is reasonably thought to have, possession, custody, or control of any property in which the debtor has a substantial nonexempt interest, including any obligation due the debtor or to become due the debtor, and against whom a garnishment under section 3104 or 3205 is issued by a court.
(8) “Judgment” means a judgment, order, or decree entered in favor of the United States in a court and arising from a civil or criminal proceeding regarding a debt.
(9) “Nonexempt disposable earnings” means 25 percent of disposable earnings, subject to section 303 of the Consumer Credit Protection Act.
(10) “Person” includes a natural person (including an individual Indian), a corporation, a partnership, an unincorporated association, a trust, or an estate, or any other public or private entity, including a State or local government or an Indian tribe.
(11) “Prejudgment remedy” means the remedy of attachment, receivership, garnishment, or sequestration authorized by this chapter to be granted before judgment on the merits of a claim for a debt.
(12) “Property” includes any present or future interest, whether legal or equitable, in real, personal (including choses in action), or mixed property, tangible or intangible, vested or contingent, wherever located and however held (including community property and property held in trust (including spendthrift and pension trusts)), but excludes—
(A) property held in trust by the United States for the benefit of an Indian tribe or individual Indian; and
(B) Indian lands subject to restrictions against alienation imposed by the United States.
(13) “Security agreement” means an agreement that creates or provides for a lien.
(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.,Notice no internal states are mentioned cause they are not part of the controlled land!
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
(16) “United States marshal” means a United States marshal, a deputy marshal, or an official of the United States Marshals Service designated under section 564.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

I wish you enough!

Recently I overheard a Father and daughter in their last moments
together at the airport. They had announced the departure.

Standing near the security gate, they hugged and the Father said, 'I
love you, and I wish you enough.'

The daughter replied, 'Dad, our life together has been more than enough.
Your love is all I ever needed. I wish you enough, too, Dad.'
They kissed and the daughter left. The Father walked over to the
window where I was seated. Standing there I could see he wanted and needed
to cry.
I tried not to intrude on his privacy, but he welcomed me in by
asking, 'Did you ever say good-bye to someone knowing it would be

'Yes, I have,' I replied. 'Forgive me for asking, but why is this a
forever good-bye?'.

'I am old, and she lives so far away. I have challenges ahead and the
reality is - the next trip back will be for my funeral,' he said.

'When you were saying good-bye, I heard you say, 'I wish you
enough..' May I ask what that means?'
He began to smile. 'That's a wish that has been handed down from
other generations. My parents used to say it to everyone...' He paused
a moment and looked up as if trying to remember it in detail, and he
smiled even more. 'When we said, 'I wish you enough,' we were wanting
the other person to have a life filled with just enough good things to
sustain them.' Then turning toward me, he shared the following as if
he were reciting it from memory.

I wish you enough sun to keep your attitude bright no matter how gray
the day may appear.

I wish you enough rain to appreciate the sun even more.

I wish you enough happiness to keep your spirit alive and everlasting.
I wish you enough pain so that even the smallest of joys in life may
appear bigger.

I wish you enough gain to satisfy your wanting.

I wish you enough loss to appreciate all that you possess.

I wish you enough hellos to get you through the final good-bye.

He then began to cry and walked away.

They say it takes a minute to find a special person, an hour to
appreciate them, a day to love them; but then an entire life to forget

* Only if you wish send this to the people you will never forget and
remember to send it back to the person who sent it to you. If you
don't send it to anyone it may mean that you are in such a hurry tha t
you have forgotten your friends.


To all my friends and loved ones,

Real criminal invesitgation and professionalism regarding the Medpharmfraud of 2019