Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Big Pharma =Big legal Drug dealers= more deaths than heroin

NaturalNews) On the heels of the sudden death of celebrity actress Brittany Murphy (, people are once again raising the question of just how dangerous prescription drugs might really be.

Some are arguing, however, that street drugs are the real danger, not prescription drugs. But the following study demonstrates why prescription drugs are far more dangerous than illegal recreational drugs.

According to a new study conducted by physicians at St. Michael's Hospital and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) in Toronto, the number of deaths due to prescription opioid use has doubled between 1991 and 2004. Following the introduction of oxycodone into Toronto's drug formulary in 2000, there has been a 500% increase in deaths due to the drugs.

Researchers reviewed over 7,000 files from the Office of the Chief Coroner in Ontario and found that between the years of 1991 and 2004, oxycodone prescriptions increased by more than 850 percent, representing about one-third of the opioid prescriptions given in 2006. (This is the largest prescription increase among all opioid drugs.)

Following the addition of this drug into the provincial drug benefit plan in 2000, deaths from opioid usage rose by 41 percent. Shockingly, deaths from prescription opioids like oxycodone were far greater than deaths from heroin. The vast majority of people who died from opioids had visited their doctor and received a prescription for the drug within a month of their death.

The total number of opioid-related deaths in Toronto in 2004 is estimated to be 27.2 per million people. Study authors said they hope to shed light on the tremendous dangers associated with prescription opioid drugs.

Coked up on prescription smack
It's the dirty little secret of the pharmaceutical industry: More people are killed by prescription opioids than all those killed by heroin and cocaine combined. And that probably even includes all the shootings of gang bangers in northern Mexico.

Prescription drug abuse is now more common than street drug abuse -- by far! And yet Big Pharma rakes in huge profits from all the patient addictions to their opioids. And by "opioids", what I mean is narcotics. They are, in fact, one and the same.

So of all the drug addicts in America today, you can divide them into two camps:

1) People addicted to street drugs.
2) People addicted to prescription drugs.

The people in group #1 (street drugs) are taken to jail where they are given prison sentences. People in group #2 (prescription drugs) are taken to their doctor where they are given prescription refills. It's all really the same narcotics, it's just that one group is legal and the other is illegal.

And what really determines whether a particular narcotic is legal or illegal? Whether or not Big Pharma profits from it. If Big Pharma makes money off the narcotics, they're considered legal.

Big Pharma, you see, earns tens of billions of dollars each year from drug addicts. And just by coincidence, it turns out that their prescription narcotics are extremely addicting, guaranteeing repeat business. The business model is so dang lucrative, you might think they were drug dealers...

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

How Moses got the ten commandments


God went to the Arabs and said,
'I have Commandments for you that will make your
lives better.'

The Arabs asked, 'What are Commandments?'
And the Lord said, 'They are rules for living.'

'Can you give us an example?'

'Thou shall not kill.'

'Not kill?
We're not interested.'

So He went to the Blacks and said, 'I have Commandments.'

The Blacks wanted an example, and the Lord said,
'Honor thy Father and Mother.'

We don't know who our fathers are.
We're not interested.'

Then He went to the Mexicans and said,
'I have Commandments.'

The Mexicans also wanted an example,

and the Lord
said 'Thou shall not steal.'

'Not steal? We're not interested.'

Then He went to the French and said,
'I have Commandments.'

The French too wanted an example and the Lord said, 'Thou shall not commit adultery.'

'Not commit adultery?
We're not interested.'

Finally, He went to the Jews and said,
'I have Commandments.'

'Commandments?' They said,
'How much are they?'

'They're free.'

'We'll take 10.'

There, that should offend just about everybody!!

Friday, December 11, 2009

Alberta curriculum guide to writing your name, grade one.....

Specific Outcome Statements WiggleWorks PreK-1
Correlation ---
The Alberta English Language Arts Grade 1 Curriculum to
Scholastic WiggleWorks PreK-1

4.2 Attend to Conventions (continued)
Attend to spelling
• Spell phonically irregular high frequency
words in own writing
• Use phonic knowledge and skills and visual
memory to attempt spelling of words need for
All Guided Reading Teaching Plans
• Know that words have conventionally
accepted spellings
Attend to capitalization and punctuation
• Capitalize the first letter of names and the
pronoun “I” in own writing
• Identify periods, exclamation marks and
question marks when reading, and use them to
assist comprehension
Teacher’s Guide p. 19
Guided Reading Teaching Plans:
Hide and Seek

I Love Mud and Mud Loves Me p.
3, 4
What’s Inside? p. 3
Music Is in the Air p. 4
Frog’s Lunch
The Ball Game p. 4
Itchy, Itchy Chicken Pox p. 4
Buzz Said the Bee p. 3
Jane Goodall p. 4
Ants and Other Insects p. 4
Willie’s Wonderful Pet p. 4
Guided Reading Teaching Plans
4.3 Present and Share
Present information
• Present ideas and information to a familiar
audience, and respond to questions
All Guided Reading Teaching Plans
Enhance presentation
• Add such details as labels, captions and
pictures to oral, print and other media texts
All Guided Reading Teaching Plans
Use effective oral and visual communication
• Speak in a clear voice, with appropriate

Sunday, December 6, 2009

The report : Cannabis the facts and the law.. ISBN 9781902848204.

AND THE LAW ISBN 9781902848204.

from U.S. government researchers’
Empirical 1 Studies:


short or long-term use of cannabis does not have any adverse effect on mental or physical health;


cannabis is non-addictive, smoked, eaten, or taken as a beverage; cannabis does not induce physical or psychological dependence;


"psychosis" is not related to cannabis; pre-existing schizophrenia can occur in a cannabis using population;


no "amotivational syndrome"; "heavy use of ganja does not curtail the motivation to work" [original emphasis]. The contrary is concluded: cannabis has tonic effect, which is conducive to productive work and mental concentration;


investigating any possiblility of "linkage" as exists between alcohol, bad behaviour and/or crime: "No evidence of such causality appeared in the findings." In this context, the evidence is presented that cannabis has a positive influence producing beneficial results: i.e…


cannabis reduces and can preclude the use of drugs, thus mitigating their associated negative effects.

1 Note, Empirical: i.e. definitive clinical studies, human test subjects’ ‘hands-on’, actual use.
N.B. Such findings are replicated in the other official Empirical Studies. See below.


The U.S. Judicial Review and other Official Studies show: 2

cannabis has unique health-promoting, and actually life-saving but prohibited applications in Health, Preventive and Curative;

cannabis has the unique enormous life-saving propensity of replacing or reducing use of addictive pathogens: alcohol, tobacco, opiates and other toxic drugs; i.e. use of cannabis comprises Preventive Measure/Preventive Medicine.
Nota Bene. Cannabis use thus is health-enhancing whether used by the sick or hale: all such use is medical. The arbitrary fictitious ‘distinction’ between ‘medical’ and ‘recreational’ use is a fallacious and profoundly damaging deception.

cannabis smoking is the only reliable countermeasure to glaucoma known to Man, consistently reducing intra-ocular pressure, dispelling glaucoma symptoms and saving eyesight;

restoring appetite to anorexic, ill, crucially wasting patients is another of many ways in which cannabis smoking saves lives;

the cannabis well-being effect uplifts the spirit, and is of greatest assistance in general health, and in medicine and convalescence.

cannabis alleviates and prevents stress-related, psychosomatically-induced adverse conditions;

cannabis is a health-promoting phenomenon Preventive of, and therapeutic in numerous slight or serious adverse conditions: e.g. menstruation pain and tension, headaches and migraine, asthma, fits, spasm from trauma or epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, back pain, pain from various disorders, pruritis, dermatitis, eczema, rheumatism, arthritis, etc. (the list continues and is extremely long 3). The herb ingested as smoke or as part of a normal healthy diet is prophylaxis, i.e. Preventive Medicine, preventing degeneration of the health of the hale.

Denial of cannabis by Prohibition ‘law’ premeditatedly inflicts suffering, blindness, and, in many instances, death. Those who maintain any use of life-saving cannabis to be "illegal" should be regarded and treated as perpetrators of the gravest of crimes, and deemed unfit to hold any public office in a democratic society.

2 See Parts Three, Four & Five of THE REPORT for attribution and details.
3 Cannabis is directly curative treatment for over 100 illnesses and adverse conditions. Additionally, cannabis is recommended and essential secondary ingredient with most other medication, due to the uplifting cannabis-effect of well-being. Notably, cannabis alleviates the grave ill-effects such as extreme emesis (nausea), headache, etc., which are induced by the toxic pharmaceutical drugs. Numerous Medical Case Histories demonstrate that only in conjunction with the smoking of cannabis are patients able to take these laboratory chemical pharmaceuticals. See THE REPORT, Parts One, Three, Four & Five.

Reproduced and collated from the Data and Conclusions of the official Empirical Studies into long and short-term use and smoking of cannabis, the following are
Cannabis: The Facts, Human Rights and the Law.


is not toxic in any possible quantity; i.e. is incapable itself of inducing fatality in a human;

is not addictive, physically or psychologically; i.e. does not induce physical or psychological dependence;

is not pathogenic, does not cause physical or mental deterioration, has no adverse effect on mental or physical health;

does not cause skill impairments (including driving tests);

is benign;

has no potential for abuse, or maltreatment of the user; cannabis has no potential for harm or danger;

does not cause crime;

does not lead to the use of drugs (i.e. toxic, addictive substances);

mitigates, reduces, and can preclude the use of drugs;

cannabis as Preventive Measure/Preventive Medicine is health-enhancing: all use of benign cannabis is medical, whether by the sick or hale: the fallacious arbitrary fictitious ‘distinction’ between ‘medical’ and ‘recreational’ use is exceedingly damaging.

Where cannabis is concerned, the legislation of its Prohibition:

is, in its entirety, without factual foundation;


is based on mendacity;


is itself illegal on numerous grounds by Common, Substantive and International Law;


is perjurious in prosecution; perjury by the state is both implicit and overt in every cannabis trial.


The acts of its enforcement are crime per se; people persecuted thereby qualify for Amnesty and Restitution (as for other Wrongful Penalisation);


the ignoring of these aforegoing Findings of Fact by courts and legislature is ex parte, the crude and criminal denial of Justice.


In its replacement of the use of drugs alcohol, tobacco, etc., by young people and adults, cannabis promotes health. All private cultivation, trade, possession and uses are vindicated.


In regard to cannabis, legislation of substance control is damaging both to individual and to society; all special regulatory control of cannabis produces negative, damaging and/or lethal results, and is per se unlawful.


Cannabis related prosecutions are legally malicious, i.e. premeditated crime against the person.


Cannabis Relegalisation is legally mandatory, that is: legislative amendment for the return to the normal status of cannabis which obtained before the introduction of any controls.

THE REPORT collates the following Findings of Fact concluded by official Empirical Studies:

Cannabis "stimulates mental powers," "creates energy," "alleviates fatigue," is "refreshing and stimulating," "creates the capacity for hard work and the ability to concentrate," "sharpens the wits," and "sharpens the memory."

Although the official Empirical Studies investigate and categorically refute all allegations of ‘harm’ and ‘impairment’, nevertheless, those representing the financial interests of government, of pharmaceutical corporations, and of others, mendaciously circulate the derogatory fictions which do not come from and are dismissed by the definitive empirical studies.

Faced with this shocking discrepancy between exonerative facts and malindoctrination, people find themselves perplexed and ask "if cannabis is clinically proven to be harmless, why does the government say the contrary and punish innocent people ?" THE REPORT reveals that the disinformation results from a massive but concealed motive.

Readers of THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204, will be aware that the Official Findings of Fact exempt cannabis from all legislation and regulatory controls based on criteria of harm. The Empirical Studies’ Findings of Fact, published by world-respected U.S. academic and research institutions, are concealed and to all intents buried by those who gain financially from spurious Prohibitions: the motive for this criminal behaviour by individuals of the state, politicians, and representatives of pharmaceutical and energy corporations’ monetary interests, is ulterior (concealed; illegal). The Exonerative Facts are subreptitiously replaced by much-publicised derogatory fictions. For more information on ulterior motive behind prohibition

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Christian ministers proof of agreement

Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International

c/o 685 Josselyn Court, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada (no code, non-commercial)

Tel: 250-491-0552**Fax: 250-491-0594

In Celebration of the Risen Christ

Notice of Covenant (Letter of Agreement)

This ninth day of the eleventh month

in the Year of Our Lord and Savior, Jesus,

the Christ two thousand and five

To Hugh Stansfield, the private man by registered mail: 78811518714CA

acting as Chief Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o P.O. Box 10287, Pacific Centre

Vancouver, British Columbia

To Jim Threlfall, the private man by registered mail: 78811508728CA

acting as Administrative Judge and/or Circuit Judge

and/or District Judge and/or Associate Chief Judge

and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Nancy Phillips, the private woman by registered mail: 78811508820CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Edward Brecknell, the private man by registered mail: 78811508833CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Ellen Burdett, the private woman by registered mail: 78811508731CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Jane Cartwright, the private woman by registered mail: 78811508745CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Bradford Chapman, the private man by registered mail: 78811508759CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Vincent Hogan, the private man by registered mail: 78811508762CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Wilfred Klinger, the private man by registered mail: 78811508776CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Gale Sinclair, the private man by registered mail: 78811508780CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Robin Smith, the private man by registered mail: 78811508793CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Mark Takahashi, the private man by registered mail: 78811508802CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

To Anne Wallace, the private woman by registered mail: 78811508816CA

acting as Judge and agent of Her Majesty

c/o 1355 Water Street

Kelowna, British Columbia

Attention: Hugh Stansfield, Jim Threlfall, Nancy Phillips, Edward Brecknell, Ellen Burdett, Jane Cartwright, Bradford Chapman, Vincent Hogan, Wilfred Klinger, Gale Sinclair, Robin Smith, Mark Takahashi, and Anne Wallace, the private men or the private women, acting and doing business as Judges for the de facto government of British Columbia and as agents of Her Majesty.

Notice to agents is notice to principals in their private capacity

Notice to principals is notice to agents in their private capacity

All rights reserved in God's law

RE: This Notice of Covenant

Greetings, in the name of God, this Notice of Covenant is offered in good faith, trust, and honour by the man and living soul created by God and a minister ordained by God through his only begotten Son, Jesus the Christ, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk. This may, can and shall not be construed by any man or woman herein named as a threat of violence or act or terrorism and may, can and shall be solely construed as an innocent, peaceful and loving notice of the religious beliefs and faith of me, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk.

It is agreed that my ability to come to a good faith agreement with you, the private man or woman, as the case may be, is only limited upon the fact that I bring no harm to you and/or your property other than expected Biblical compensation for agreed upon damages, redress, and as your understanding of your capacity to save me, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk safe and harmless from any action taken by any of the private men and/or women herein named which may tend to deprive me of my liberty, physical safety, emotional and physical health, property and/or companionship of my friends, family and ecclesia.

It is agreed that I, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, acting as God's minister, am doing my duty in the official performance of the functions of my calling as God's minister and that you, the private man or woman, are in recognition of that function of good faith and of my Biblical reasons for ministering the facts to you in the same truthful manner as Jesus the Christ ordained. Leviticus 6:2-5 may shed some light on this.

It is agreed that I send you these terms of this covenant in the spirit of the advice given by Jesus the Christ in Matthew 18: 15-20 in order to gain from your good faith acceptance of my offer by your lack of a reply that would dismiss my offer of facts.

It is agreed that there is no excuse for encouraging another man or woman into believing that no agreement has been reached by failing to reply that it had not.

It is agreed that no agent, person or allegiant of Her Majesty, including you men and women, is entitled to or has any entitlement of or over me, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, and that any such entitlement which may exist in law is solely over the artificial person created by a federal and/or provincial government upon registration evidenced by the all-caps name of KAZIMIERZ CZESLAW CRISCHUK KRYSZCZUK or any derivation or contraction thereof.

It is agreed that I, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, am not a corporate entity and that I have no corporate status through which any court or agency or government of any province/Province or federal/Federal may obtain assumed or presumed jurisdiction.

It is agreed that Canada is still a colony of Great Britain and that the Canadian Parliament may not amend the British North America Act 1867 as amended and the Constitution Act 1982 without the express consent of the British Parliament and that the said Acts may only be amended by the Parliament of Great Britain.

It is agreed that the Statute at Large known as An Act for removing all Doubts and Apprehensions concerning Taxation by the Parliament of Great Britain in any of the Colonies, Provinces, and Plantations in North American and the West Indies of 1778 is still in effect and that it specifies that "the King and Parliament of Great Britain will not impose any Duty, Tax, or Assessment, for the Purpose of raising a Revenue in any of the Colonies, Provincesexcept only such Duties as it may be expedient to impose for the Regulation of Commerce; the net Produce of such Duties to be always paid and applied to and for the use of the Colony, Province"

It is agreed that the Income Tax Act of Canada does not apply to men and women and only to artificial, legal fictions known as persons.

It is agreed that Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, is not property of Her Majesty or any government of Her Majesty.

It is agreed that any documents exhibiting the name, KAZIMIERZ CZESLAW CRISCHUK KRYSZCZUK or

KAZIMIERZ CZESLAW CRISCHUK or KAZIMIERZ C CRISCHUK or any derivation thereof, purporting to be or represent the man, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, is a fraud to which Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk is not a party.

It is agreed that KAZIMIERZ CZESLAW CRISCHUK KRYSZCZUK or KAZIMIERZ CZESLAW CRISCHUK or KAZIMIERZ C CRISCHUK or any derivation thereof is not one and the same as Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk and that the former represents a legal fiction created by fraudulent means and that the latter represents a flesh and blood, living and moral soul known as a man and created by God.

It is agreed that each and every one of you has sworn an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty who is a flesh and blood, living and moral soul known as a woman and created by God and confirmed as such by Section 46 of the Criminal Code of Canada.

It is agreed that the Provincial Court of British Columbia and the Supreme Court of British Columbia or the PROVINCIAL COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA and the SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA are Admiralty Courts with no inherent jurisdiction over men and women.

It is agreed that such Courts execute a form of court martial in a military court setting and that I am not a member of any military.

It is agreed each of you did swear an oath of office as a private man or woman to Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor, a private woman, acting in the capacity of the Queen of England and who is the defender of the Christian Faith and that she swore an oath at her coronation to uphold the Laws of God as revealed in the Holy Bible.

It is agreed that each of you made an act of religious worship upon your swearing an oath of office, pursuant to the Westminster Confession of Faith of 1646 which is still law in Great Britain and Canada. That religious worship dictates, by the Holy Bible, that no duty or custom or tax may be imposed on a minister of God Ezra 7: 24-26.

It is agreed that anything said or done not in accordance with your oath of allegiance is treason and blasphemy.

It is agreed that there are no injured parties with sworn complaints against me, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk.

It is agreed that without sworn complaints from an injured party, there can be no basis for any charge.

It is agreed that any Crown prosecutor, by way of advancing any charge against me, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, shall perpetrate a fraud upon the court

It is agreed that all my God-given rights as a man to be unmolested in the pursuit of my profession and ministry are protected and guaranteed by the Canadian Bill of Rights 1960, the Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations and the Magna Carta 1215 to which you are subject as agents of Her Majesty. Ezekiel 33:6.

It is agreed any Crown prosecutor who may persecute me, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, in any court of law for any civil action commits a crime under Sections 176 and 423 of the Criminal Code of Canada and that by way of advancing charges against me, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, is a fictitious plaintiff on behalf of Her Majesty who is the Defender of the Faith.

It is agreed that every Crown prosecutor who does not understand and know the true meaning of his oath of allegiance and office is incompetent to represent Her Majesty or any fictitious or real litigant/plaintiff.

It is agreed that every judge who does not understand and know the true meaning of his or her oath of allegiance and office is incompetent to adjudicate or try any case and represent Her Majesty.

It is agreed that upon swearing an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty and of office and making an act of religious worship, that as a judge, each of you is bound by the terms of God's commandment as given through Ezra 7:25-26,
"set magistrates and judges, which may judge all the people that are beyond the river, all such as know the laws of thy God, and teach ye them that know them not. And whosoever will not do the law of thy God, and the law of the king, let judgment be executed speedily upon him, whether it be unto death, or to banishment, or to confiscation of goods, or to imprisonment."

It is agreed that none of you has any authority to intimidate me to violate my religious beliefs which, in part, is the refusal to pay any tax, custom or duty to any de facto government in Canada, during the time that such governments are de facto.

It is agreed that Adrienne Clarkson, the private woman, acting in the capacity of the Governor General of Canada did publish on the latter's website that she was a de facto Head of State.

It is agreed that the Criminal Code is not de jure law; it is only a de facto offer of man's law and has nothing to do with me, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk.

It is agreed that the only law form I follow is God's Law and His rule of law, as per the Ten Commandments Plus One found in His Holy Bible.

It is agreed that as a minister of God, according to my Faith and beliefs, I cannot submit to or obey any false gods and that would mean anyone who does not understand and know the true meaning of his/her oath of allegiance and office.

It is agreed that all court in Canada proceed and move forward under assumptions and presumptions which may and can be and are injurious and cause harm to men, women and children and that men, women and children are not protected or saved harmless by you upon entering your venue of your court.

It is agreed that I, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, have no other contract with you, that I cannot be forced to have a contract with you and that I cannot have a contract with you, any government or agency thereof without my informed consent.

It is agreed that I have never given informed consent to be in the jurisdiction of any court or government or agency.

It is agreed that I am officiating in the performance of my religious calling at all times and that I stand under the jurisdiction of the Kingdom of God wherever I go and am and that no amount of trickery or deceit may dislodge me from that venue.

It is agreed that any Social Insurance Number existent belongs to KAZIMIERZ CZESLAW CRISCHUK KRYSZCZUK or KAZIMIERZ CZESLAW CRISCHUK or KAZIMIERZ C CRISCHUK, artificial entities and not to me, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, a living and moral soul. It is further agreed that the judgements in the trials of Her Majesty/MNR vs. Phil Naudi and Gerry Bohemier are settled and final on this issue.

My Good Faith Notice of My Ministry Unto God

Take Notice that I, the flesh, blood and bones, man and living soul, with the appellation of Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk and all its grammatically correct derivations, live on God's earth in the geographic area commonly known as British Columbia. I live in peace and harmony with all righteous men ("men" means all God's children of both genders). I am a non-commercial man of sound mind and good character. I state that as a result of political or religious persecution and intimidation and having exhausted remedies in commercial law under a proclaimed a state of Martial Law, My diligent research and spiritual faith suggests that the following applies.

I, as a "minister" in performing a function of My calling to practise and defend God's laws and with the knowledge and awareness of the unlawful actions and claims of agents of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency also known as CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY, Canada Revenue Agency and CANADA REVENUE AGENCY and the Crown upon the created and assumed legal fiction of a name in and for the purposes of executing a fraud upon Me and My brethren, and with the knowledge that such a legal fiction debtor number assigned by either Canada Customs and Revenue Agency or predecessor or other agency or department of the Crown (such as the departments or agencies of the Health and Welfare Canada and/or the Unemployment Insurance Commission and/or Human Resources Canada) to Me, the man, is without any informed consent/permission or My understanding and with foreknowledge that such a number called a Social Insurance Number (S.I.N.) is utilized by the Minister of National Revenue and Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for the convenience of achieving wrongful consent of jurisdiction over Me by the Receiver General and all other departments of the corporation called Canada and its spawned agencies such as the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency and the courts of Canada and the Provinces. I have the knowledge that Elizabeth Alexandra Mary: Windsor acting in the capacity as the Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and all her allegiants are bound to defend the Laws of God with all of their power by the tenants of the King James Bible.

I must aver: It is as a man of God, not being a "person", and it is under serious issuance of threat, duress and intimidation that I offer this demand via the aid of My clerical "envoy, ambassador and delegate" of choice. We are aware that certain moral qualities are central to the survival of our political system, among which are truthfulness, integrity, respect for the law, respect for the dignity of others, adherence to the constitutional process and a willingness to avoid the abuse of power. We are concerned about the impact of this crisis on our children and on our Brethren. You, reading this as a servant for society as a whole, shall take account of the ethical commitments that are necessary for a civil society to maintain the integrity and honour of both public and private morality.

You are now with the knowledge and awareness that you are in pursuit of a fictional debt of usury (Exodus 22:25; Leviticus 25:36; Deuteronomy 23:19). You are now also with the knowledge it is a fiction as per the files of assessments of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency which cannot provide one validation of its assessments by the Minister of National Revenue. I do aver that I am not a corporate commercial legal fiction nor liable to pay a fictional usurious debt. Various agents of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency may have conspired and may be conspiring by fraud to raise unlawful assessments, debts and charges against the artificial commercial entity/party/person known as KAZIMIERZ C CRISCHUK which I cannot by My faith be compelled to participate with or allow. Aiding and abetting a criminal act, albeit unaware, is a crime! Failure to be aware of the law is no excuse. Altering a man's name and using it for financial purposes without his permission is fraud. By the ignorance of the law that controls the actions of the government, private men and women of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency have supported and enforced a slavery tax of usury being in force contrary to God's Law. "Thou shalt not raise a false witness or bear a false report".

Exodus 20:16 "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour".

Exodus 23:1 "Thou shalt not raise a false report; put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness."

Deuteronomy 5:20 "Neither shalt thou bear false witness against thy neighbour."

Deuteronomy 19:16 "If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong; 17 then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the Lord, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days 18 and the judges shall make diligent inquisition; and, behold, if the witness be a false witness,

and hath testified falsely against his brother; 19 then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother; so shalt thou put the evil away from among you. 20 And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall

henceforth commit no more any such evil among you. 21 Andy thine eye shall

not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot."

Proverbs 6:16 "These six things doth the Lord hate: yes, seven are an abomination unto him; 17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood; 18 A heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, 19 a false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren."

Proverbs 12:17 "He that speaketh truth sheweth forth righteousness but a false witness deceit."

Proverbs 14:5 "A faithful witness will not lie; but a false witness will utter lies."

Proverbs 14:25 "A true witness delivereth souls; but a deceitful witness speaketh lies."

Proverbs 19:5 "A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape."

Proverbs 19:9 "A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall perish."

Proverbs 19:28 "An ungodly witness scorneth judgment; and the mouth of the wicked devoureth iniquity."

Proverbs 21:28 "A false witness shall perish; but the man that heareth speaketh constantly."

Proverbs 24:28 "Be not a witness against thy neighbour without cause; and deceive not with thy lips."

Proverbs 25:18 "A man that beareth false witness against his neighbour is a maul; and a sword, and a sharp arrow."

Matthew 15:18 "But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man 19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies 20 These are the things which defile a man; but to eat with unwashed hands defileth not a man."

Matthew 19: 16 "And, behold, one came and said unto him, 'Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?' 17 And he said unto him, 'Why callest thou Me good? There is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.' 18 He saith unto him, 'Which?' Jesus said, 'Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, 19 Honour they father and they mother; and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."

Romans 13:9 "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love they neighbour as thyself."

This demand notice, being a matter of a religious claim, is not frivolous or vexatious in form and is a serious issue that, if not dealt with, will cause grievous and serious harm to Me and My family. This demand is offered as a result of specific men and women of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency refusing to acknowledge that they do not have jurisdiction over a living soul, man, child of God and minister unto the Lord. The private man acting as a public servant and director, Kevin Ritcey, of the Penticton, British Columbia Tax Services Office is indifferent to the truth and, by actions, refuses to abide by the terms of his public service employment contract, specifically paragraph 23 which states, "Every deputy head and employee shall, on appointment from outside the Public Service, take and subscribe the oath or solemn affirmation of allegiance set out in Schedule III R.S., c. P-32, s 23 and ethical standard as required by the Treasury Board of Canada policy in favour of public standing. (Any law that is inconsistent with the laws of God is a violation of our faith and we are merely showing you that the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, Ministry of National Revenue and the Attorney General of Canada are breaking the law of the land and sea).

The Criminal Code of Canada states:

False Pretences

362. (1) Every one commits an offence who by a false pretence, whether

False pretence or directly or through the medium of a contract obtained by a false pretence,

false statement obtains anything in respect of which the offence of theft may be

committed or causes it to be delivered to another person; (b) obtains credit

by a false pretence or by fraud knowingly makes or causes to be made,

directly or indirectly, a false statement in writing with intent that it should

be relied on, with respect to the financial condition or means or ability to

pay of himself or any person, firm or corporation that he is interested in or

that he acts for, for the purpose of procuring, in any form whatever,

whether for his benefit or the benefit of that person, firm or corporation;

(i) the delivery of personal property, (ii) the payment of money.

Such is the cause of the issuance of this demand notice

Autographed at Kelowna on this ninth day of the eleventh month in the year of Our Lord two thousand and five for good intent and defence of the faith in front of three witnesses of good character and sound mind and reverent spirit.

minister unto the Lord






The ecclesiastical Church of England, a Templar Church. All "Bar Attorneys" owe their allegiance and give solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple through the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple located at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London, Great Britain.


1 Formal name: envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary a diplomat of the second class, ranking between an ambassador and a minister resident.

[etymology: 17th century; from French envoyé, literally: sent, from envoyer to send, from Vulgar Latin inviare (unattested) to send on a journey, from in- + via road]

'envoyship' noun


2 Corinthians 3: 4-6 "Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit; for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life."

Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913); "one who serves, as distinguished from the master. (1.) Heb. Meshereth, applied to an attendant on one of superior rank, as to Joshaua, the servant of Moses (Exodus 33:11), and to the servant of Elisha (2 Kings 4:43). This name is also given to attendants at court (2 Chorinthians 22:8), and to the priests and Levites (Jerimiah 33:21; Ezekiel 44:11). (2.) Heb. Pelah (Ezra 7:24), a "minister" of religion. Here used of that class of sanctuary servants called "Solomon's servants" in Ezra 2:55-58 and Nehemiah 7:57-60)

1 (esp. in Presbyterian and some Nonconformist Churches) a member of the clergy

2 someone appointed to head a government department

3 any diplomatic agent accredited to a foreign government or head of state

4 short for minister plenipotentiary, envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary (see "envoy")

5 Also called (in full) minister resident - a diplomat ranking after an envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary

6 someone who attends to the needs of others, esp. in religious matters

7 someone who acts as the agent or servant of someone else

8 verb: intr. often followed by "to": to attend to the needs (of); take care (of)

9 [transitive] (archaic) to provide; supply

[etymology: 13th century: via Old French from Latin; servant; related to minus less]

'minister'ship - noun


Persona: A person portrayed in fiction or drama: character, personag; a human being (monster).


Smith's Bible Dictionary, (Spire Books, Fleming H. Revell Company, Old Tappan, New Jersey, 1970) "(Hebrew, sôpherîm). I Name[Originally] The Sôpherîm were so called because they wrote out the Law To this period [of Hezekiah] it no longer designates only an officer of the king's court, but a class, students and interpreters of the Law, boasting of their wisdom."

Demand Notice

Attention: Hugh Stansfield, Jim Threlfall, Nancy Phillips, Edward Brecknell, Ellen Burdett, Jane Cartwright, Bradford Chapman, Vincent Hogan, Wilfred Klinger, Gale Sinclair, Robin Smith, Mark Takahashi, and Anne Wallace, the private men or the private women, acting and doing business as Judges for the de facto government of British Columbia and as agents of Her Majesty practising and offering severally the forms of law as being Military, Chauncery, (Court of Conscience) Civil, Common Law, Equity, Taxation, Admiralty, Martial, Criminally indictable and summary law.

Take Notice that a similar Notice was delivered by the Cariboo Sui Juris Church to dozens of men and women acting in the capacity of servants of Her Majesty on or about the thirteenth day of the ninth month in the year of Our Lord two thousand and three.

Chapter 1: Statement of Public Service Values and Ethics

Ethical Values: Acting at all times in such a way as to uphold the public trust.

· Public servants shall perform their duties and arrange their private affairs so that public confidence and trust in the integrity, objectivity and impartiality of government are conserved and enhanced.

· Public servants shall act at all times in a manner that will bear the closest public scrutiny; an obligation that is not fully discharged by simply acting within the law.

· Public servants, in fulfilling their official duties and responsibilities, shall make decisions in the public interest.

· If a conflict should arise between the private interest and the official duties of a public servant, the conflict shall be resolved in favour of the public interest.

People Values: Demonstrating respect, fairness and courtesy in their dealings with both citizens and fellow public servants

· Respect for human dignity and the value of every person should always inspire the exercise of authority and responsibility.

· People values should reinforce the wider range of Public Service values. Those who are treated with fairness and civility will be motivated to display these values in their own conduct.

· Public Service organizations should be led through participation, openness and communication and with respect for diversity and for the official languages of Canada.

· Appointment decisions in the Public Service shall be based on merit.

· Public Service values should play a key role in recruitment, evaluation and promotion.


This Code applies to all public servants working in departments, agencies and other public institutions listed in Part I, Schedule I of the Public Service Staff Relations Act. Refer also to the Public Service Employment Act and the Financial Administration Act. This Code is a policy of the Government of Canada. Public service institutions not covered by this Code should respect its spirit and should adopt similar provisions for their organizations.

Avenues of Resolution

Public Service Values and Ethics

Any public servant who wants to raise, discuss and clarify issues related to this Code should first talk with his or her manager or contact the senior official designated by the Deputy Head under the provisions of this Code, according to the procedures and conditions established by the Deputy Head.

Any public servant who witnesses or has knowledge of wrongdoing in the workplace may refer the matter for resolution in confidence and without fear of reprisal to the Senior Officer designated for the purpose by the Deputy Head under the provisions of the Policy on the Internal Disclosure of Information Concerning Wrongdoing in the Workplace.

Furthermore, any public servant who believes that he or she is being asked to act in a way that is inconsistent with the values and ethics set out in Chapter 1 of this Code can report the matter in confidence and without fear of reprisal to the Senior Officer, as described above.

If the matter is not appropriately addressed at this level, or the public servant has reason to believe it could not be disclosed in confidence within the organization, it may then be referred to the Public Service Integrity Officer, in accordance with the Policy on the Internal Disclosure of Information Concerning Wrongdoing in the Workplace.

It is expected that most matters arising from the application of this Code can and should be resolved at the organizational level.

From the Okanagan Sui Juris Church

Being a non-commercial, benevolent congregation of respected men not being "persons" (James 2:9; Deuteronomy 10:17; Acts 10:34) having assembled in response to a universal calling for the maintaining of truth, liberty and justice. This assembly of men is not to be assumed as purposed in clandestine order nor cultish performance but of quest for open and honest unfettered sharing of truths to ensure that integrity and honor prevail. "The one law is to cause no harm". Those who deem faith in God as cultish are obviously without God and discriminate against those who do profess their faith on a religious basis. The cult deemers do so with the intent to ignore their oath-sworn duty and to label a Christian monarch as cultish.

Minister of Christ, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk in official function and performance of an ecclesiastical duty asserting no association with a false fictitious tax file number Account 607-902-723.

(Exodus 19:6; Romans 11:29) as per your legal requirement of your government law (Preamble; Section 26 and 32 of the British North America Act) and Sections 126, 176 of the Criminal Code of Canada (C.C.C.) complemented by Sections 423 and 337 of the C.C.C. and in defence of our parishioners of the formed ecclesiastic body of God's servants of the Okanagan region.

Notice of Demand to all professed allegiants of Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II in duty and performance of provision of true allegiance to a Christian monarch, being defender of the Christian faith, via sworn Oath of Allegiance.

The men I speak for as their minister have an inherent right and duty, God commanded, not to bow to de facto authority. It is in ignorance that the people have given over their energy. We cannot contribute to what we have proof is a fraud. We, as followers of God's word and commandments, cannot be driven from the scriptural warnings and commandments of God. It is only by our free will of allowing deception to prevail that we can ignore them.

It is our belief that your fictional government form is based upon commerce and we are not to unite with or serve mammon which is commerce. We do not wish to insult anyone or decline our responsibilities to pay for essential social services and the maintenance of other usufructs. It is the servicing of a usurious and fraudulently obtained debt with which we take umbrage. It is pure slavery and forced work outside of God's Laws.

I do hope that by collective communication in open dialogue that we can avert any confrontations that would tend to harm our ability and liberty to practice our faith and to maintain our unalienable right of earning a livelihood. The entrance into the corridor of a man's liberty by any government without probable cause is inhibiting his liberty to provide for himself and family as well as to communicate freely his discoveries in faith to others. Please remember our offer in demand is not in offensive mode but an imperative rendering of the current matter concerning those of My ministry who may be caught in the fictitious trap of taxation in violation of their faith and belief in the no-harm ethic of the King James Bible and laws therein provided.

Justice is in disrepute and the Crown is being dishonoured by the continuing efforts of those who have sworn to uphold their oaths of allegiance. Since the Crown is the Church of England of which Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom is the Head, and you have sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen, you have, in fact, sworn and oath of allegiance to the Church of England. The Queen is, by her Coronation Oath, the defender of the faith and has taken a solemn vow to defend the Christian faith even unto death.

Shall you dishonour your oath to do the same?

As a non-commercial man and minister unto God, I am required, nay commanded, as of My awareness of corruption within the system, not to contract with any man or woman acting as a commercial fiction nor un-sanctioned by the Christian monarch and anointed of God. I, as a performing minister of God in the Ecumenical Church of Redemption International©, cannot receive integral justice or honour of truly allegiant men unless their oaths are understood. My duty and performance of a function of My calling as a minister unto God in defence of His Laws is to enquire of all men as to the provision of the legitimacy of their understanding of that oath and the validity of its form (Numbers 30:2; Jeremiah 9:3-9)

Without a truly understood oath in the possession of a truly sworn allegiant to Her Majesty, the anointed of God, I, as a minister unto God and My parishioners in faith and right unassailable in Christ, cannot participate in your unlawful de facto commercial process of assumptions and

presumptions that we are commercial debtors. Nor can My parishioners participate as we have no truly allegiant de jure and authentic court of God's Laws of defence by Her Majesty in which to bring forth the truth. I cannot, by the grace and protection of God, bow down to nor serve false de facto authority. (Exodus 20:3-5; Luke 16:13)

This is the command of God! (Daniel: chapter 3).

Take Notice that this is not a statement that we wish to avoid lawful taxes (Romans 16:17-20; Exodus 30:13-14; Matthew 17:24-27). We wish to ensure you that you have no need to assume that as it is absolutely true, no assumption needed. Taxes not instituted by God are not lawful among his children and are not of God (Ezra 7:24-26; 1 Peter 2:13 only laws written for God's sake Acts 5:29; Deuteronomy 4:1) Only dead commercial entities are liable for taxes. God's truly allegiant ministers know that His law is the rule of law stated in the preamble to the British North America Act. The Coronation of Elizabeth Alexandra Mary: Windsor in the capacity as Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II in 1950 is clear and unavoidable evidence of that. She swore to uphold the laws of God with all her power!

I now refer you to the Colonial Tax Repeal Act (1778) which I understand is still in force! It states: "It is hereby declared and enactedthat, from and after the passing of this act, the King and Parliament of Great Britain will not impose any duty, tax or assessment whatever, payable in any of His Majesty's coloniesin North America or the West Indies, except only such duties as it may be expedient to impose for the regulation of commerce."

To be clear: The men of this Church are of faith and belief not commercial nor under commercial jurisdiction and we challenge you to prove that they and I are. If you continue to proceed against Me without such proof under the provisions of your public service employment act and the terms of your public liability insurance policy via revenue risk management that such proceedings were warranted, we may file a claim against you.

If you can prove that you have lawful jurisdiction over the non-commercial men of a non-incorporated sui juris church and its holdings of properties, I demand, as of unalienable unchartered right, that you produce that evidence in good faith so that we can submit to you and not be wasting audited funds with arguments of assumed and fictitious legal nature. To do so would be a fraud. I, as the officiating minister of this religious congregation am demanding in good faith that you validate your jurisdiction "quo warranto veritas". Remember that I am not adversarial or argumentative, but that I am performing a vital function of My religious calling, an officiating minister of Christ of a formed Church to protect Myself and My parishioners from avoidable offences not of God which are being enforced by imposters (Acts 5:29; Romans 16:17-20).

I am with the authority to request verification of your true integrity and sanctioned authority in God's Law in enforcing the Income Tax Act or any other ungodly law upon My flesh and the ecclesiastical property of God. It is My understanding and belief that the civil laws of man have no force and effect against the ministry of God and the Queen has supported that in law. I refer you to Sections 176 and 423 of the Criminal Code of Canada and ask how you or any man or woman can make up a meaning to that true allegiance you promised that you would maintain. I refer you also to the Coronation Act of 1688 and the text of the Coronation ceremony of 1953.

Matthew 6:24. You are acting as mammon (Commerce) and I cannot bow to you as you are false authority. Exodus 20:3-5. I cannot violate the laws of God. Deuteronomy 4:2; 12:32 Numbers 15:15. You are harming My ministry and My right as a man and minister of God to receive truly allegiant justice for Me and My parishioners.

I, Kazimierz-Czeslaw: Crischuk, do aver that I officiate as a minister of God in performance of the function of My calling. Via the provisions of Section 337 of the Criminal Code of Canada, I now demand of you to produce the public property of a certified copy of your blue-ink signed oath of true allegiance and authority to have Her Majesty's sanction in jurisdiction over My natural body to inflict a violation of My religious beliefs.

"CHAPTER XXII from the Westminster Confession of Faith, an Act

of the British Parliament of 1646 of Lawful Oaths and Vows

"I. A lawful oath is a part of religious worship, wherein upon just occasion, the person swearing solemnly calleth God to witness what he asserteth or promiseth; and to judge him according to the truth or falsehood of what he sweareth.

"II. The name of God only is that by which Men ought to swear, and therein it is to be used with all holy fear and reverence; therefore to swear vainly or rashly by that glorious and dreadful name, or to swear at all by any other thing, is sinful, and to be abhorred. Yet, as, in matters of weight and moment, an oath is warranted by the Word of God, under the New Testament, as well as under the Old, so a lawful oath, being imposed by lawful authority, in such matters ought to be taken.

"III. Whosoever taketh an oath ought duly to consider the weightiness of so solemn an act, and therein to avouch nothing but what he is fully persuaded is the truth. Neither may any man bind himself by oath to any thing but what

is good and just, and what he believeth so to be, and what he is able and resolved to perform. Yet it is a sin to refuse an oath touching any thing that is good and just, being imposed by lawful authority.

"IV. An oath is to be taken in the plain and common sense of the words, without equivocation or mental reservation. It can not oblige to sin; but in any thing not sinful, being taken, it binds to performance, although to a man's own hurt; nor is it to be violated, although made to heretics of infidels [or even to prostitutes of Satan, sometimes referred to as whores of Babylon].

"V. A vow is of the like nature with a promissory oath, and ought to be made with the like religious care, and to be performed with the like faithfulness.

"VI. It is not to be made to any creature, but to God alone; and that it may be accepted, it is to be made voluntarily, out of faith and conscience of duty, in way of thankfulness for mercy received, or for obtaining of what we want; whereby we more strictly bind ourselves to necessary duties; or to other things, so far and so long as they may fitly conduce thereunto.

"VII. No man may vow to do any thing forbidden in the Word of God, or what would hinder any duty herein commanded, or which is not in his own power, and for the performance of which he hath no promise or ability from God. [emphasis in bold added] In which respects, monastical vows or perpetual single life, professed poverty, and regular obedience, are so far from being degrees of higher perfection, that they are superstitious and sinful snares, in which no Christian may entangle himself."


Will you discriminate against My official ministry and prejudice My ability to fair hearing of Me and My congregation? Will you ignore your duty to that oath? Will you fabricate a meaning to that oath? Will you believe someone else's fabrication?

You have seen and are now with the knowledge of Her Majesty's law regarding lawful oaths. If you can refute/challenge and dare abrogate what I have stated herein, do so within ten days of the receipt of this document and Notice of Demand. Your silence on this matter shall be your admission of the truth of the contents herein and a public notice will be advertised as to the lawful sanction of My ministry (Exodus 19:6; 2 Corinthians 3:6) having laws only in accord with His Law as authority over My congregation and Me (Deuteronomy 4:2; 23:32; Numbers 15:15). Thereafter your silence will be deemed to be tacit consent and covenant to the assertions of law and ecclesiastical right contained herein.

The solemn oath per the Oaths of Allegiance Act is as follows:

"I, _____, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help Me God."

If your oath is not in this latter form, it is invalid. Can you verify what the true allegiance is that you swore you would provide? If not, it is prima facie evidence that you are in breach of your duty and have committed perjury.

Can you tell Me: if one does not believe in God but takes an oath to be truly allegiant to a Queen who has and is sworn to uphold the Laws of God with all of her power, can one decline to enforce and uphold the Laws of God and still be truly allegiant? Should one not conclude, therefore, that one is a "hypocrite" as Jesus said according to Matthew 23:

14 "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretense make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cumin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchers, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. 28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity."

You, Hugh Stansfield, Jim Threlfall, Nancy Phillips, Edward Brecknell, Ellen Burdett, Jane Cartwright, Bradford Chapman, Vincent Hogan, Wilfred Klinger, Gale Sinclair, Robin Smith, Mark Takahashi, and Anne Wallace, the private men or the private women, acting and doing business as Judges for the de facto government of British Columbia and as agents of Her Majesty.have ten days to challenge the facts in this Notice and My unalienable right given by God to be exempt from the jurisdiction of the MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE / Minister of National Revenue and/or the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency / CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY.

Should I not receive any such challenge within ten days in an unambiguous and unrhetorical way, on a point by point basis the acknowledge the truth of these matters and the terms of this covenant by your implied consent through silent, this covenant shall become binding and irrevocable. I shall have the right by common law and Her Majesty's rule of law, the Holy Bible, to deem your silence as acknowledgement and acquiescence of the contents herein. Furthermore, your silence will be your approval for My taking any and all lawful action against you in your private capacity should any physical, emotional, financial or psychological injury and discomfort befall Me as a result of your actions or inactions.

Autographed at Kelowna on the ninth day of the eleventh month in the year of Our Lord two thousand and five for good intent and defence of My faith

Ezekiel 33: 6

minister Kazimierz-Chester: Crischuk

All rights reserved in God's law




Sunday, November 15, 2009


Think this one over!!!


In a small Texas town, ( Mt. Vernon ) Drummond's bar began construction on a new building to increase their business.

The local Baptist church started a campaign to block the bar from opening with petitions and prayers.

Work progressed right up till the week before opening when lightning struck the bar and it burned to the ground.

The church folks were rather smug in their outlook after that, until the bar owner sued the church on the grounds that the church was ultimately responsible for the demise of his building, either through direct or indirect actions or means.

The church vehemently denied all responsibility or any connection to the building's demise in its reply to the court.

As the case made its way into court, the judge looked over the paperwork. At the hearing he commented, 'I don't know how I'm going to decide this, but as it appears from the paperwork, we have a bar owner who believes in the power of prayer, and an entire church congregation that does not.'

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Some judges view of religion

Per McLachlin C.J. and Iacobucci, Major, Arbour and Fish JJ.: Defined broadly, religion typically involves a particular and comprehensive system of faith and worship. In essence, religion is about freely and deeply held personal convictions or beliefs connected to an individual's spiritual faith and integrally linked to his or her self-definition and spiritual fulfilment, the practices of which allow individuals to foster a connection with the divine or with the subject or object of that spiritual faith.
Freedom of religion under the Quebec (and the Canadian) Charter consists of the freedom to undertake practices and harbour beliefs, having a nexus with religion, in which an individual demonstrates he or she sincerely believes or is sincerely undertaking in order to connect with the divine or as a function of his or her spiritual faith, irrespective of whether a particular practice or belief is required by official religious dogma or is in conformity with the position of religious officials. This understanding is consistent with a personal or subjective understanding of freedom of religion. As such, a claimant need not show some sort of objective religious obligation, requirement or precept to invoke freedom of religion. It is the religious or spiritual essence of an action, not any mandatory or perceived-as-mandatory nature of its observance, that attracts protection. The State is in no position to be, nor should it become, the arbiter of religious dogma. Although a court is not qualified to judicially interpret and determine the content of a subjective understanding of a religious requirement, it is qualified to inquire into the sincerity of a claimant's belief, where sincerity is in fact at issue. Sincerity of belief simply implies an honesty of belief and the court's role is to ensure that a presently asserted belief is in good faith, neither fictitious nor capricious, and that it is not an artifice. Assessment of sincerity is a question of fact that can be based on criteria including the credibility of a claimant's testimony, as well as an analysis of whether the alleged belief is consistent with his or her other current religious practices. Since the focus of the inquiry is not on what others view the claimant's religious obligations as being, but what the claimant views these personal religious "obligations" to be, it is inappropriate to require expert opinions. A court's inquiry into sincerity should focus on a person's belief at the time of the alleged interference with his or her religious freedom. It is inappropriate for courts rigorously to study and focus on the past practices of claimants in order to determine whether their current beliefs are sincerely held. Because of the vacillating nature of religious belief, a court's inquiry into sincerity, if anything, should focus not on past practice or past belief but on a person's belief at the time of the alleged interference with his or her religious freedom.
Freedom of religion is triggered when a claimant demonstrates that he or she sincerely believes in a practice or belief that has a nexus with religion. Once religious freedom is triggered, a court must then ascertain whether there has been non trivial or non-insubstantial interference with the exercise of the implicated right so as to constitute an infringement of freedom of religion under the Quebec (or the Canadian) Charter. However, even if the claimant successfully demonstrates non-trivial interference, religious conduct which would potentially cause harm to or interference with the rights of others would not automatically be protected. The ultimate protection of any particular Charter right must be measured in relation to other rights and with a view to the underlying context in which the apparent conflict arises.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Free masonry has corrupted the system of Justice the Queen defends

UK Masonic Criminal Elite Called "Untouchables"
The UK is currently being run by a Masonic group who consider themselves untouchable. These people are often high end criminals who use their Freemasonry links to hide their illegal activities.

These untouchables include drug dealers, pimps, murderers, and gangsters. They have Masonic links to UK police and security services. For example, if a dirty job is required,the criminal gangs will happily carry it out allowing it to be completely deniable to security service and the police. In the event that the criminal gangs require a blind eye or even assistance, security services and the police are very happy to become involved.

In fact, I have specific evidence of the activities of these people and the line between untouchable criminals, MI5 and the police is often blurred: Police and MI5 acting as criminals for the criminals, criminals doing "Favours" for the police.
This level of corruption runs through the justice system, lawyers, politicians and much of local government.

The links these untouchables have enabled them to commit murder, drug trafficking, and any other heinous crime you can think of with the collusion of masonic police officers, judges, politicians and lawyers.

Ever so often in the UK a "special" police unit is set up to tackle police corruption. These units are allowed to continue as long as they do not uncover the truth. If they ever do, then they are shut down very quickly.
Once such unit based in London was set up to expose pedophile rings trafficking children. Senior people within this covert operation were very close to exposing a network that served important people and was operated by untouchables. The specialist police unit was immediately disbanded.

Some of these "Untouchables" operate with complete impunity. They have access to some of the most advanced technology and resources including equipment which is normally only available to secret service and special forces.

The willingness or obligation from officials at all levels to assist these people comes from two directions. The Freemasonry oath to help "Brothers" before anything else; and the fact that once you cross the line and help these people, you then become their property. These "Untouchables" with the right connections can call on assistance from the very top. When orders come through, those carrying out the dirty work will often believe they are just doing their job. This means these untouchable criminals can do anything and will tell you if you happen to become their target.
This network of senior freemasons is unknown to the lower ranks who willingly comply to orders.

The level of corruption has now reached a stage that they are willing to expose themselves to the public in the belief that they are completely untouchable. The Freemasonry untouchable criminals, corrupt police officers (not all of them) and security services are in for a suprize. The truth is coming out.

Maureen Spalek who's video is at the bottom of the page was once married to an individual who told her openly that he was an untouchable high level Freemason. After a major disagreement and subsequent divorce her children were illegally taken after a visit to hospital for one of her children who was knocked over by a motor cycle in suspicious circumstances. The nurse involved wrote a report saying that Maureen was unstable and an unfit mother. The children were immediately taken in to care and very soon after adopted. Maureen has had independent reports stating that she is perfectly fit.

She decided to contact the nurse who made the report. However, the nurse was murdered before she could speak to her. An individual was convicted of the murder and sentenced. Maureen attempted to get a visiting pass to the prison in an attempt to find out if this person did murder the nurse and why. Before she could make the visit the prisoner was killed in prison. Maureen is receiving daily harrassment from Cheshire and Mersyside police organized through the untouchable masonic connections, she has also been the victim of corrupt judges and medical staff.

UK Security services, UK police and untouchable criminals attempted an illegal operation on Saturday 31st October 2009 in central London. The security services were used for surveillance and tracking of the victim, the untouchables planned to carry out a heinous crime and the police colluded by standing by once these people had done their work to take the victim of this high level organized masonic crime.

UK security services protect untouchables who organize and run a high level child trafficking ring for elite masonic groups who call themselves illuminati. Theses people will be called upon by security services to set a target up as a pedophile in order to drive the target to suicide. This is probably the most heinous tactic of MI5 and clearly a target not wanting to allow these thugs to bring disgrace on family and friends would have no option.

Police tracking techniques and the masonic stooges will be used to follow the target until he reaches a location then the team will swing in to action orchestrating a crime scene in order to set up the target. Bribes will be paid to as many people as required in order for them to carry out their crimes at any given location and they will often tell members of the public anything to get their agreement including labeling the target as a dangerous attacker when in fact the rouge elements of the security services and police combined with Freemason untouchables are the most dangerous people in society. There have been unsubstantiated claims that these groups participate in satanic ritual sacrifices, from what I have witnessed I can certainly not dismiss these claims.

These people rely on fear to prevent people from speaking out and encourage people to take part in their activities. If you have any information or have been targeted yourself please email

Monday, November 9, 2009

Letter to a top Mason in Alberta

March 7th 2001 A.D.
To: The private man acting as an executive of the Standing committee on the administration of justice and the Chair person of the Administration of justice committee and associate justice of the Judicial conduct committee and as Chief Justice of the Alberta Court of Queens Elizabeth II’s Bench of God’s Justice, Allan Wachowich
Tel: 422-2493 Fax: 427-0334
From: Minister of Christ Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
Heatherdown ecclesia, Church of Ecumenical Redemption International
C/o near Onoway Alberta no code non commercial
Tel: 1-780-9673915, email:

Dear Allan, I apologize for the lateness of my letter and I hope you do not mind me calling you by your first name, please correct me if you do. As you aware my ability to receive her majesty’s justice in the Alberta courts has been prejudiced by the lack of understanding of the meaning of the oaths of allegiance to her majesty that all the members of the judiciary of Alberta took to gain the sanction and authority of her majesty in defense of the faith. The King James Bible by royal proclamation and royal letters patent must be present in all proceedings in her majesty’s courts. All those men and women that take that oath of allegiance must understand the meaning of that oath in order to provide that allegiance. It is undeniable than any man or woman that has no knowledge of the meaning of the or oath of allegiance that they took, has no sanction nor authority from her majesty as they cannot provide the allegiance they swore and promised to. They by logical definition are imposters. If there is another explanation for this Allen, I would appreciate your discretion and intelligence and in telling me just how her majesty’s authority extends to one man or woman that does not subscribe to aiding her majesty in defense of the faith and upholding the laws of the King James Bible nor even know what they were being allegiant to. I as a Christian Minister and a man intend no malice nor deception in presenting my faith compounded with knowledge and wisdom of God’s word and the right to be judged by a man or woman that understands fully and without reservation that God’s law, of the King James Bible of her majesty’s defense is the supreme law in Canada, (the corporate legal fiction, as well as the province of Alberta the corporate legal fiction,) and it is the supreme law of all Christians practicing the teachings of Christ.

I wish to suggest you that a synod be formed with members of the judiciary in Alberta of your choosing that recognize the supremacy of God and his law of her majesty’s defense, the King James Bible. This meeting within the confines of an ecclesiastical structure will attempt to remind all of the origins of the courts of her majesty’s justice. This action seems unavoidable and imperative in light of the corrupt attitudes and vile contempt for her majesty and the rule of law that has been demonstrated by numerous colleagues of yours, members of the Alberta judiciary, police officers, members of legislative assembly, and of the Alberta Bar .

This type of information relating to so many high ranking members of our society is referred to by many as a conspiracy theory. I assure you Allen is no Theory that corruption long ago invaded politics the judiciary the criminal justice system in general as that is the controlling structure of our society. Avarice greed and acquisition have always been the enemies of the common man woman. “The Golden rule is he who has the Gold rules” this greed oriented maxim is prima facie evidence of empirical attitude and the corrupt pride of money mongers.

I have noticed the head clerk, registrar and the manager of the Alberta law courts of my religious faith and beliefs. I have made them aware that my name is private and a religious belief cannot be altered in any shape form or fashion attached to or associated with any legal fiction statutory person or corporate commercial entity of any kind as that is association with mammon and is a violation of my faith as directed by Jesus Christ Matthew 6:24.

I have told the Alberta law Court clerks then I cannot accept nor indeed apply to make record in the court that is not formed truly allegiant to her majesty’s defense of the faith.

It is in performance of a function of my calling as a Minister of God that I of original right insist, yes I demand, that a true oath bound allegiant of her majesty Queen Elizabeth II, be employed and available as head overseer of her majesty’s courts, and at all agents of her majesty comply with and subscribe to the meaning and intent of that oath so taken to gain sanction and authority from her majesty to govern over and protect her subjects from threats to God’s justice and laws.

One more thing Allen, your justices and Judges have long been supporting the act of usury by the banks in the foreclosure cases that have come before the Alberta courts. Usury is simply the act of charging interest. The original definition is biblical and was altered some time in the 16th century by financial interests influencing the Vatican , to mean excessive interest. This is a corruption of the original translations and intent of the biblical scriptures. Usury by definition has brought pain war, and starvation to the woe of man and is only profiting the select few vampirical families on this planet. All the countries of the world are in debt to these families. Does this sound like the kind of world God intended?

Do you wish to aid these families as they steal from the poor?
A few simple facts to show they loan no money!
A promissory note, bank note, negotiable instrument, is by correct definition, funds.

I provide, as a borrower, a bank note, a negotiable instrument called funds, to the banker that has advertised that he has money to loan. The banker takes my negotiable instrumental funds and deposits them into an account he creates in the bank’s name. He then transfers the funds in the newly created that he creates in my name. The bank of Canada receiving from the banker my promissary note, negotiable instrument, the original funds, in ex-change sends back to the banker, Canadian negotiable instruments, funds, banknotes, who in turn gives them to me in exchange for the same value of funds that I gave to him. This exchange although clearly an exchange has since 1913 been advertised as a loan. Since the original value is in my energy and funds and I was told that the bank was the one that had the funds to loan, it is apparent I was deceived and misled by the bank to believe that it was Loaning me something that it already had in its possession. The paper money that the government of Canada calls legal tender or currency has only the value that my promissary note gives it. There’s no gold in Canada to back or give value to the paper that we perceive as money. In 1933 every man woman and child was registered and bonded as sureties for the fraudulently unlawfully created debt and listed as members of the corporate commercial entity known as Canada and once registered and monetized, are listed as assets of that commercial entity in the consolidated general revenue fund.
Those bonds that were formed with the men and women listed at sureties for the debt that was created by usury and unlawful and treasonous acts of traitors to her majesty and the defense of God’s laws are then sold in blocks of 1000 on the futures commodity exchange in New York.

It has been that way since 1917 and finalized in 1931 when the statute of Westminster left Canada with a defacto government ruled by commercial law! 1933 saw orders in council ban gold as backing the buck. When they receive the promissory note the consolidated revenue fund can be attached to and the bond can act as a surety to fund the loan that you in turn are told you have to repay. This is your value and energy registered at birth you are being asked to give back to the Bank ,not theirs. You are the money!

When I as a Christian Minister stood before you in approximately December 2001 I would not go into the arraignment box as it was against my religious beliefs to submit to a de facto Court. It was on charges of failing to obey the order of a court to leave his court and my parishioner Katherine Ibsen by the private imposter Ray Bradley. I have no qualms about calling this man an imposter as he declined my offer to define his jurisdiction and allegiance to the Queen twenty times on the record to me in violation of 176 of the code and 337 of that same code as it applies to government via section 32 of the Canadian Constitution. I did not ask you if you understood the meaning of your oath allegiance in front of all those people that day as I felt it would be counterproductive to embarrass you the private man Acting as the Chief Justice of Alberta and may bring justice to disrepute to all courts beneath you.

It is not my intent to embarrass nor indeed rebuke those of your capacity but rather to invoke and remind of the integrity that is the basis of your office.
Please respond Allan, as if you don’t I can only conclude that you are acting as an enemy to Christian Justice and her majesty’s defense of the faith. This will mean that you are traitor to her majesty and are engaged in acts of treason. I am not looking forward to that possibility.

According to brother-in-law Orest and fellow Mason’s, I have had good occasion to talk with, you are good man. I would trust Orest in Interpretation of your character when and if I get reply from you the private man as I cannot all faith in duty to serve Christ respond to or offer respect to persons. (Deuteronomy 10:17;Acts 10:34; James 2: 9 of the KJV). that have no respect for the widows son, but for the person, as god is no respecter of persons he is real not fiction nor a player on a stage wearing a mask, and nor am I.

Please talk with Neil Skinner and Wayne Hatt Justice of the peace in the Alberta Courts about my quest and sincerity. Wayne has sworn the information for me against several judges and is aware of the injustice that is going on. Please ask him as he is the one man that I have found who understands the meaning of his oath. Judge Marshall in Leduc affirmed he had an oath to her majesty and also affirmed the supreme law in Canada is the King James Bible after I read the Coronation oath into the record in a proceeding last spring involving Puget Sound Agricultural Society and Tim Wishewan in appearance a rather disjointed plant for the RCMP who professed he was a member of our society at the time. The man acting as a judge that day was also made aware of the requirement to have a KJV of the Bible in the court as he did not at the time. The clerk affirmed my assertion to to judge Marshall’s amazement!.

I have been assaulted by some of these men and women entrusted with our safety such as the man acting as a judge in Stony Plain a Mr. Ayotte and Scott Brooker from Calgary in Edmonton and have been insulted by them as well. I have been obstructed by them as well in my performance of a function of my calling and from receiving her majesty’s justice. They in appearance commit treason as if it was nothing to them. So called master Quinn said in December 2000 that he cared not about the Queen or treason as he was Irish and he had a tough neck. The transcripts were then altered to remove those comments. I have four witnesses that will testify to what this man did and how what is being evidenced as the record is fraud and conspiracy to commit treason!

I know there seems to be some body wanting the statute of limitations to be extremely short on treason but not fraud Allen that goes on for quite a while. My name has been altered on the court records despite my repeated attempts to get the clerks to stop doing it. I cannot allow alteration of my name and will not respond to those who have done so as they are criminals and I cannot conspire with criminals. My name is mine and I cannot accept corporate fictions as me or as otherwise known as me nor will I as it is a sin. This action by your courts judiciary and indeed the BAR associations themselves has prejudiced me from receipt of fair justice of her majesty’s intent and I want to know what will be done to insure the reputation of justice is not stained indelibly with a scandal of this caliber. Remember this is inclusive of RCMP who are supposed to be sworn allegiant’s. I can only accept them if they let me know they are in true understanding of their oaths as otherwise they are definitely imposters, private, and as such without her majesty’s sanction of authority and are trespassers upon my rights.

Allen I intend no contempt when I tell you that I will not present myself before imposters of her majesty for their criminal enterprise with me as their meat. Either I am informed how I have to obey imposters or I will not show up for your courts and if men or women are sent to my Church I will inquire of them of their understanding of their oaths and it is of my right and duty as a minister to do so. If they will not comply with an affirmative answer to uphold that oath I will quite rightfully conclude they are imposters and enemies to her majesty and my Christian ministry.
I hope you will see this requires a meeting of members of the clergy and judiciary to guide our passage through these perilous waters of deceit and corrupt control of the courts by financial vested interests. I Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger am not a corporate fiction nor statutorily created person nor a debtor but simply a man created by God and under his and only his law. I as a minister and a man am under no duty or obligation to offer permission to or accept the authority of another, without the proof that other man or woman’s capacity of understanding that oath, being produced upon request! Deuteronomy 4:1-2 :12:32 I obey only God’s laws.
I await you’re integral reply.
May the Kirlian speed of Christ’s light fill your body

Minister Of Christ Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
"The Divine constantly works in every detail of life according to spiritual laws that look to our eternal welfare."

Saturday, November 7, 2009

The U.K. Government Warns Of An "Inevitable" H5N1 Bird Flu Pandemic That Will Kill 50 Million People Worldwide

The government of the United Kingdom is warning of an "inevitable" flu pandemic that will kill 75,000 Britons and 50 million people worldwide.

Meanwhile, a newly discovered respiratory illness is killing people in areas of Oregon, Washington, Texas and South Carolina.

Many people that we talk to these days do not take the threat of a flu pandemic seriously. But when you start putting all of the pieces together, the picture becomes absolutely terrifying.

The following information has been adapted from an article put together by Dr. Laibow. Dr. Laibow has urged everyone to share this information as widely as possible:


Avian Flu Has Already Been Weaponized

I’ll give you the bottom line first: based on Gen. Stubblebine’s careful analysis of the existing evidence, Avian Flu has already been turned into a pandemic virus with a lot of sophisticated help from people who are not your friends, but who are very good at weaponizing organisms, like the previously innocuous bird flu virus, H5N1.

There is a basic virological fact you need to know to make sense of what comes next: it is impossible to make a vaccine against a virus that does not yet exist. Public relations efforts to the contrary, IF a vaccine is being made against the Avian Flu virus in its pandemic form, that means that the pandemic virus already exists. Period. End of discussion. So that fact that the Avian Flu vaccine is already being manufactured in China by Sanofi-Pasteur, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the French arm of the Rockefeller oil cartel (Total Petroleum) is confirmation of what you are about to read. If you allow it to be introduced into your body, there is no reason to imagine it will be anything but an unmitigated disaster for your immune system and for you. We believe it’s planned to be that way.

I do not know A. True Ott, PhD, but he was kind enough to send me a PDF file recently in which he puts a lot of the pieces together that I have been finding in my own research. Some of his conclusions I have serious difficulty with, but parts of his chronology are used here with appreciation.

Let’s start with the basics: H5N1 is a benign, commonplace virus which most birds carry with no harm to themselves or humans. Humans also have viruses we have no problem with: these viral companions keep our immune systems healthy and humming. Only under the stimulus of novel and dangerous toxins which your body has no way to get rid of (detoxify), and stress which overwhelms your coping capacity, does an innocuous virus mutate and become something that can make you sick or kill you.

All human cases of H5N1 have occurred in areas of sick birds in large concentrations such as factory farms where handlers come into contact with stressed and sick birds in toxic surroundings where toxic residues are concentrated at high levels.

For example, in Vietnam, where thousands of gallons of Monsanto chemicals such as Agent Orange were dumped in huge amounts during the Vietnam war outbreaks of Avian Flu are not uncommon. These outbreaks occurred in highly toxic environments, where crowded, sick factory farm chickens have been inoculated [supposedly] against Avian Flu.

It will also become deadly, of course, when labs are employed to alter it so that it becomes an efficient weapon of mass destruction. The U.S. has had a program to accomplish exactly that for over a century now, astounding as that may seem!

Our best intelligence estimate is that pandemic Avian Flu already exists. It appears to have been turned into a massive viral threat through bioengineering by the United States, fusing the deadly genome of the 1918 Pandemic, mis-named the “Spanish Flu”, with the DNA of the H5N1 virus in a growth medium of human kidney cells to make sure that the virus recognizes human cells and knows how to invade them.

Please re-read that paragraph again and consider the threat that poses to you and your family.

The Spanish Pandemic Rides Again

The genome of the 1918 pandemic so-called “Spanish Flu” was recently intentionally resurrected. Because of that resurrection, the Avian Flu, and its vaccine, are now a US government-instigated threat to life - your life.

The Spanish Flu, which was not Spanish at all, was created in the U.S. through an early bioweapons program and injected into healthy young men (i.e., ’soliders’) as the first mandatory vaccination in the military during WWI (also known as the “War to End Wars” and the “Great War”). The “Spanish Flu”, which originated in Kansas on U.S. Military bases, killed a minimum of 50 million people worldwide (650,000 Americans). It was one of the deadliest pandemics in modern history. It was also one of the most successful biological weapons ever created.

Time Line To Disaster

This may be one of the most important chronologies you will ever read:

April 6, 1917:

* US declares war on Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, Germany, and the Ottoman Empire.
* America swings into full production of war material.
* American men are drafted into military service and deployed for training in Spain.
* ALL NEW RECRUITS ARE GIVEN MANDATORY VACCINATIONS — One of which is a “broad-spectrum” live virus influenza vaccination.
* Rockefeller makes millions in vaccine sales while consolidating Standard Oil contracts worldwide.
* Following mass vaccine injections, U.S. soldiers are crowded into troop ships and sent to “train” in Spain. Seasick, stressed soldiers aged 18-34 exhibit influenza symptoms on the voyage.
* Immediately after arriving in Spain, U.S. soldiers are “trained”, that is, exposed to, the various forms of gas they will experience in the trenches in France.
* Exposure to these highly toxic gasses causes the live-virus influenza organisms to mutate into an extremely lethal, and highly communicable, form of the virus.
* Millions of young, healthy men and women aged 18-34 die worldwide as a result of vaccinations combined with novel and highly toxic chemicals.
* John D. Rockefeller and the Rothschilds have consolidated and vastly increased their wealth through actively funding both sides of the war.

March 28, 1924

* Rockefeller forms a French oil conglomerate calling it “Total”, the “French Company of Petroleums” aka CFP.
* TOTAL is awarded a controlling interest via Deutsche Bank’s stock in the Turkish Petroleum Company in Baghdad which was eventually renamed the Iraq Petroleum Company
* The Iraq Petroleum Company was confiscated and nationalized by Saddam Hussein in 1990.
* TOTAL Inc. is a true multi-national mega-corporation which operates in more than 130 countries and has over 110,000 employees.

Here’s the Play: Oil to Drugs to Death

Two of TOTAL’s prime, wholly-owned subsidiaries are the pharmaceutical giants Sanofi-Aventis, and Sanofi-Pasteur. Both are world-leaders in the development and testing of experimental vaccines, which are manufactured primarily in China. On March 23, 2005, NIH, through the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, announces the initiation of a program to develop a vaccine for Avian Flu, asserting that although there have only been less than a handfull of cases, Avian Flu poses a vast public health menace.

And it is clearly true that a weaponized virus does present a massive threat to public health. That’s the whole point of weaponizing it, isn’t it? For a look at Sanofi-Pasteur’s plans for its profit (and perhaps your death). You can confirm their plans here:

But please come back when you finish reading. The information below is critically important to you.

As a side note, the Chinese factories of these two pharmacetuical mammoths are (unlike Sanofi-Pasteur’s Swiftwater, PA, factory, according to dissidents such as Harry Wu, et. al.) staffed in part or entirely by poltical and other prisoners working under brutal slave labor conditions.

Bear in mind that most influenza strains and their hosts adapt to each other after roughly two years, so that the same strain of flu no longer causes symptoms. Of course, once a strain has been weaponized, there is little reason to think that it will revert as natural strains do. It, or the vaccine it seems to legitimize, will go on killing and killing and killing. Or is the word “culling”?

To date, there have only been around 385 human cases identified worldwide (if those identifications are trustworthy, of course), with only 243 deaths. To put the absurdity of this effort into perspective, Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD), which researchers believe is heavily associated with aspartame consumption, is a leading cause of death which, according to the CDC, for example, killed 460,000 Americans in 1999 and the numbers keep rising ( But Aspartame is not under the gun. Instead, Avian Flu is.

To quote Dr. Ott, “There are 6.7 Billion humans on planet earth. This equates to a statistical infection rate of .000000004215 percent. In other words, statistically speaking, you are over 100,000 times more likely to be hit by lightning in your home than to contract the “Bird Flu”.

Given the shockingly obvious lack of a real threat from an unweaponized H5N1 virus, how can we explain the Bush Administration spending billions of dollars preparing each of the 50 States for what it drums into us is the “inevitable Bird Flu pandemic” anticipated to kill half or more of all Americans and similar numbers of people around the globe?

Back to the Time Line

March 1997:

* Zero confirmed “H5N1″ human cases exist anywhere in the world.
* The U.S. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Ft. Detrick, Rockville, Maryland, the US research center for biological weaponry, commissions Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger to lead a research team to ISOLATE the 1918 Flu Virus’ genetic code, the most lethal pathogen in history.

Aug. 24, 1997:

* Brevig, Alaska. Research team member Johan Hultin sends well-preserved 1918 flu virus specimens (from a frozen body killed by the 1918 flu) to Dr. Taubenberger’s lab in Maryland.
* Days later, Taubenberger detects the genetic fragments for which he has been searching.
* The 1918 virus’ RNA-based gene fragments are analyzed by computer sequencing in order to reveal its complete genetic code. Even with a super-computer, this code sequencing will take years to complete.

October, 2003:

* Taubenberger’s team finally deciphers the deadly 1918 flu virus’ entire genetic code - completing a 6 year project.
* Taubenberger’s colleague, R.G. Webster, publishes an article in the American Scientist Magazine declaring: “The world is teetering on the edge of a flu pandemic that could kill a large fraction of the human population”.

October, 2004

* Dmtry Lvov, head of the Russian Virology Institute declares that up to one billion people around the world could die during the next pandemic.

June, 2005:

* At Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York (alleged to be Rockefeller controlled), Taubenberger, Peter Palese and Adolfo Garcia-Sastro create plasmids, or DNA rings, from the 1918 killer virus, permanently “stabilizing” its genetic material for use as a biological weapon.
* This is the final step in revitalizing the deadly pathogen but the press is told that it will only to be used as a “vaccination tool” - even though the disease is currently non-existent.

August, 2005:

* Taugenberger’s team inserts plasmids into human kidney cells which then transfers human DNA into the virus making it “human specific”.
* The 1918 virus, responsible for the death of millions around the world is now ready for use by humans.

Sept. 9, 2005:

* The UN in New York City issues a world-wide press release introducing David Nabarro as the “UN System Senior Coordinator for Avian, Human Influenza”.

Sept. 29, 2005:

* Nabarro issues an “Official U.N. Warning” that “an outbreak of ‘avian influenza’ would kill between 5 million and 150 million people on each continent.”

Oct. 2005:

* Pres. Bush’s newly appointed secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS, the parent organization of both the CDC and the FDA), former Utah Governor Mike O. Leavitt, intensifies multibillion dollar pandemic bird flu preparations.

Dec. 2005:

* Bush solicits Congress for $7.1 Billion to fund “preparations” — $3.3 billion is immediately allocated to Leavitt’s HHS.

January 24, 2006:

* Department of Homeland Security awards KBR, a Halliburton subsidiary, a $385 million contract for US detention centers.

Jan. 2006:

* Leavitt launches a website - - on which he says: “Let me be clear. It is only a matter of time before we discover H5N1 in America. The migration patterns of the wild fowl that carry the virus makes it appearance here almost inevitable!”

* China hosts the “International Pledging Conference on Avian and Human Influenza” in Beijing and is promised massive sums of money from the west — Leavitt alone commits $334 million in funds to aid China’s research into “vaccine development”.
* Leavitt has a long history of fostering Chinese trade activities as Utah’s Governor.

March 2006:

* Breaking new ground, Leavitt’s HHS allocates funds to a private television network to produce a “made-for-TV” movie about the “bird flu”.
* Leavitt jokes that he wants “the handsomest actor” to play his character.
* Leavitt declares on the HHS website (exactly as John D. Rockefeller declared in 1916): “The best defense against influenza is VACCINATION.”
* Leavitt further declares: “The current U.S. capacity for manufacturing egg-based vaccines is not sufficient to supply our entire population. HHS is supporting research into [human kidney] cell-based vaccine manufacture of producing vaccine domestically.

April, 2006:

* HHS announces a $97 million contract for the development of a cell-based flu vaccine.
* Leavitt declares: “The FDA can use its Emergency Use Authorization authority to permit the use of unapproved products if there’s a reasonable belief the products may be effective.”
* 32 states pass laws which make resisting inocculation once ordered by the governor a felony.
* These laws join Patriot Act I, II, BARDA, BIOSHIELD I, II in making drug treatment and innoculation mandatory once a pandemic is called.
* Unlimited quarantine without review is mandated under these laws for those who resist innoculation under pandemic conditions.
* Fully staffed, empty detention centers exist all over North America. The largest, in Alaska, is rumored to have a 2.5 million person capacity.

December, 2006

* The New York Times reports Gulf War Syndrome positively linked to vaccination of veterans.
* More than 100,000 vets contracted the syndrome during the 1991 Desert Storm Operation.
* More than 20,000 vets have died to date from this syndrom believed to be triggered by squalene, a vaccine “adjuvant.”
* All modern vaccines contain squalene.

April 17, 2007:

* The Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA) branch of HHS utilizes its Emergency Use Authorization authority and awards a license to produce H5N1 “Bird Flu” vaccines to Sanofi-Pasteur.

Nov. 26, 2007:

* Leavitt’s HHS orders 100 million H5N1 “vaccines [doses]” from Sanofi-Pasteur. Expected delivery date, August, 2008.
* Sanofi-Pasteur issues a press release announcing their lucrative HHS contract (100 million vaccines @ $15 USD each) and declares that the cell-based vaccine will be mass produced in the company’s CHINA facility - then shipped to Stillwater, PA for hypodermic syringe-friendly packaging.
* Approval and contract have all been consumated in the absence of offical human testing.

Jan. 2008:

* Covert ‘human trials’ of Sanofi-Pasteur H5N1 vaccine is conducted on 350 homeless vagrants in Poland.
* According to London Telegraph ( and Examininer articles, this results in 21 “instant” deaths and over 200 severely incapacitated or hospitalized.” Development and sales of H5N1 vaccine continues.

February 14, 2008

* U.S. Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, commander of North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command, and Canadian Air Force Lt.-Gen. Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command, sign a Civil Assistance Plan that allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a civil emergency.

* Avian Flu response is a part of NorthCom’s mission, and according to Gen. Stubblebine’s analysis, appears to be the primary element in its mission:

June 17, 2008

* Dr. David Nabarro, UN Influenza Coordinator, welcomes a donation of 60 million doses of H5N1 Avian Flu vaccine by Sanofi-Pasteur.
* This adds to the stockpile of a previous donation of 30 million doses by GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Nabarro said that good progress had been made but Avian Flu could still kill as many of 150 million people.
* Avian Flu still entrenched in Vietnam, Bangladesh, India, Egypt and India says Dr. Nabarro.
* Outbreaks recorded in 60 more countries according to the U.S. Influenza Coordinator.

But the people who make vaccines are ethical and look out for our best interests don’t they? The cold, hard fact is that vaccine makers are neither ethical nor concerned with the health and longevity of their recipients.

Remember: vaccination remains an uninurable risk. No parent, physician or pharmaceutical company can buy insurance against vaccine induced harm. The insurance industry refuses to accept the risk. That’s why Congress created the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that is funded by a special tax added to the cost of each vaccine shot: we pay to protect pharmaceutical company profits.

Vaccines can be used for a great deal more than just for what it says on the label. After all, faced with a syringe of fluid, who is to say exactly what is in there and what the intended, or unintended outcomes of being injected will be?

It takes a huge amount of faith to allow a hypodermic under your skin. That faith is, the Natural Solutions Foundation believes, without significant basis.

Shielded by the FDA, vaccine (and drug) manufacturers are immune from prosecution for wrongdoing and continue to do wrong with horrifying impunity. That’s even BEFORE the Avian Flu weaponization and subsequent vaccine development. A few examples out of many, many will sufficice:

April, 1930

* Eli Lilly, makers of Thimerisol, inject the product into 22 people with meningitis who all die. Lilly publishes the “study”, claiming that thimerisol, 50% mercury by weight, is safe.


* World Health Organization (WHO) Bulletin No.47 refers to the creation of an immune virus and suggests that a useful way to study the effects would be “to put it into a vaccination program and observe the results.”
* It is theorized that WHO used the smallpox vaccination program in central Africa for this study, since the spread of HIV infection coincides precisely with the most intense and recent smallpox vaccination campaigns.
* Information on the central African countries most infected with HIV precisely matches WHO figures indicating the number of people vaccinated in these areas.
* The virus requested would selectively destroy the T-cell system. (1972 Federation Proceedings of WHO).


* Henry Kissenger writes a classified “National Security Study Memorandium 2000: Implications of worldwide population growth for U.S. security and overseas interest (NSSM 200)” which identifies India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia as targets for initial population reduction.
* The Philippine Supreme Court found that 3 million Philippinas between 12 and 45 years of age were given this vaccine.
* Native American women and black women in the U.S. received this vaccine.
* The sterility rate in Native American women in the U.S. is over 35%.
* The sterility rate in black women in the U.S. is over 25%.

December 1976

* No epidemic of swine flu surfaces despite rapid approval and respone to perceived threat following 1 death of a solder at Ft. Dix, NJ.
* Swine Flu innoculation program shut down after risk of death and polio like syndrome from the vaccination is found to be almost 12 times greater in vaccinated than unvaccinated people. 5% of people afflicted die, 10% are crippled or maimed for life.

May 1987:

* The Times of London reported on its front page that smallpox vaccine administered by the World Health organization had triggered HIV/AIDS.
* 100 million vaccinated Africans are at risk.
* Areas with highest vaccination rate show the highest HIV/AIDS rates.
* Robert Gallo, discoverer of the HIV/AIDS virus, defends those figures and says, “AIDS researchers will keep their mouths shut because they are paid to do so.”

November 28, 2002

* A rider tacked onto the end of the Homeland Security Bill confers immunity from liability prosecution on Eli Lilly and other manufacturers of vaccines.

June 1990:

* Court case reveals that babies in Los Angeles were used as human gunea pigs for an experimental measles vaccine called Edmonston Zagreb high titer measles vaccine (E-Z ). From 1989-1991, Kaiser Permanente and LA County Department of Health and CDC injected 700+ “mostly minority” babies with unlicnesed experimental vaccines with fraudulently-obtained parental consent.
* E-Z is closely associated with increased death rate in infant girls in Sendgal, Guneau Bisseau, and Haiti before their second birthday.
* Most of the families are not aware to date that their child was used as a human guinea pig.

World Health Organization (WHO) Uses Vaccines to Make Women Sterile


* WHO begins its “Special Program” in human reproduction with programs for both male fertility control through vaccines and female fertility control.


* WHO Vaccines for smallpox and tetanus are laced with female reproductive hormones to induce permanent sterility to “eliminate 150 million excess Sub-Saharan Africans” according to WHO documents.

July, 1989

* After years of denial, a scientific paper demonstrates conclusively that WHO tetanus vaccines used in the Philipines contained female reproductive hormones, inducing permanent sterility without consent or knowledge of the women treated.
* Tetanus toxoid is linked to the human reproducitve hormone to overcome immunological tolerance to the hormone and prod the body of the woman into producing antibodies to her own reproductive hormones.


* Women between the ages of 12 and 45 are targeted for a 5 injection series of “tetanus” shots.
* Boys, men, children and older women are not given the shots.
* Tetanus ordinarily requires a single booster every 10 years.
* The 5 shot tetanus protocol is used with vaccines which contained female reproductive hormones to render the women of Tanzania, Nigeria, Nicaragua, Mexico and other countries infertile.
* Oxford University Press publishes article titled “Bypass by an alternate carrier of acquired unresponsiveness to hCG upon repeated immuniztions with tetanus-conjugate vaccine" confirming method of inducing sterility requires multiple vaccinations.


* WHO commits more than $356 million on “reproductive health” research.
* Funding for abortificant (abortion producing) vaccine comes from many sources:

1. $90+ million contributed by Sweden
2. $52+ million contributed by Great Britain
3. $41 million contributed by Norway
4. $27 million contributed by Denmark
5. $12 million contributed by Germany
6. $5.7 million contributed by US
7. $61 million contributed by UNFPA
8. $15.5 million contributed by World Bank
9. $2.5 million contributed by Rockefeller Foundation
10. $1+ million contributed by Ford Foundation
11. $716.5 thousand contributed by IDRC (International Research and Development Centre of Canada)

April 2000

* Observer Newspaper rerports Glaxo, Pfizer, Squibb and Genentec experimented on children at Incarnation Children’s Center, NY.
* Incarnation Children’s Center is run by Columbia University which was paid to experiment on children, mostly wards of the state who were also minority children.
* Babies as young as 6 months were injected with double doses of experimental measles vaccine.
* Children as young as 4 were given multi-drug cocktails.
* More than 100 orphans and babies were used in 36 experiments.

March 2008

* Haruna Kaita, a pharamceutical scientist and head of a Nigerian Universtiy analysed the latest WHO vaccine in Indian labs.
* Sterility agents were among the contaminants found in the samples.
* According to the local population of the Akha, a Thai hill tribe, pregnant women are forced to receive the vaccine in order to get ID cards for their children.
* Violent still births and miscarriages result.


It is time to get informed people!

You can read the rest of this information at Dr. Laibow's blog:

Real criminal invesitgation and professionalism regarding the Medpharmfraud of 2019