allcreatorsgifts

Statement of Facts/Request for Admissions 1. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that On 8/21/2009 Jessica and I were married in Niagara Falls, NY. That same year we moved from Buffalo, NY to Emsdale, Ontario. 2. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that in the Summer of 2010 we moved to Utterson, Ontario where I landed a new job. On July 29 2015 our daughter Vela was born, with the help of our midwife, in Huntsville, Hospital. 3. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that in October 2017 we sold our Home and I accepted a job with the state of Hawaii. Jessica did not want to go to Hawaii so I went to test the job for 6 months. Jessica and Vela moved to Midland. 4. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that in 2017 we met half way in Venice, California and spent Christmas together. 5. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that March 2018, we spent 2 weeks together on vacation in Hawaii. Jessica and Vela returned to Midland and I returned to Oahu to pack up. In may I quit my job and returned to Midland to live with Jessica and Vela in the in law suite of Jessica’s parents basement. 6. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that In December 2018, Jessica applied for, and I agreed to, with intent to avoid State interference with our marriage , an uncontested New York divorce which was granted January 2019. 7. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that in January 2020, upon our return from a 2 week vacation in Florida, I learned that my father’s health and life expectancy had taken a turn for the worse so I stayed in Buffalo for a week to spend time with my father. 1 of 5 8. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that on or about February 15, 2020 Jessica and I had a minor disagreement about who would get Vela on the school bus each morning. Jessica’s mother over heard and intervened. The disagreement was exasperated by Jessica’s mothers’ previous threat to subject Vela to an experiment to forcibly vaccinate Vela without our consent. Jessica’s mother upon hearing our minor argument told me to leave at that time. I moved 4 minutes away. 9. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that on or about March 1, 2020 Jessica Woodley without my knowledge or consent or without a required travel order removed Vela, age 4 from my my custody, and intentionally hid, contrary to the courts endorsement, at 101 Picnic Island Rd, Honey Harbor with the man she revealed to me had raped her at 15 years old. This was done while I was in Buffalo, a couple of days, as of a compassionate necessity, caring for my dying father. 10. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that Christine Woodley, Frank Woodley, and the named Child rapist, Andrew Nicholson, all aided, abetted and conspired in Vela’s non consensual removal separation and seclusion from my dutiful ministerial care. It was Jessica’s own uncoerced admission that when Jessica was 15 Andrew the man she is living with and subjecting my daughter to, unsafe, as he raped her. Because of Andrews age at the time of the rape, that makes Andrew a Pedophile. Andrew has also been a chronic alcoholic for over 20 years. 11. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that up and until March 1, 2020 that I was Vela’s safe and secure primary Care giver, and financial provider. 12. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley there is no dispute to the fact that on or about June 19, 2020, Father’s day Weekend, Vela found Jessica’s cell phone, called me and told me she was near picnic island, close to the water and that mommy’s abusive boyfriend, Andrew, drove a blue pick up truck. Jessica heard Vela talking to me and took the phone away from Vela. At that point Vela was crying and telling Jessica she wanted her Daddy before Jessica hung up the phone. 2 of 5 13. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that on June 19th 2021 that Jessica’s car was parked in the driveway of the 101 Picnic Island Rd when I pulled in and yelled up to Jessica to bring Vela and come down. Jessica, was shocked that I found her, came down and handed me Vela. I buckled Vela into her seat, put Vela’s bike in my trunk and pulled away to return to my home address.. 14. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that Vela stayed with me the entire father’s day weekend. I exchanged Vela with Jessica at my home, with the mutual understanding that Vela will be returned immediately to the safety of Jessica’s mothers family home just 4 mins from me. Jessica took Vela back to 101 Picnic Island w/o my knowledge or consent. Subsequently, Jessica retained a lawyer, Jeremy Herron, who advised Jessica to keep(kidnap) Vela. Jeremy foolishly, in an attempted adhesion parenting agreement sent via email, threatened me, with out a court order, that I would not see Vela again unless I agreed to his terms(threats). 15. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that Justice Wildman issued an Endorsement DATED acknowledging mothers (Jessica’s) and Vela’s home address as 36 Dawlish Ave. Port Mc Nicoll. In contempt of J. Wildman’s Endorsement, Jessica continued to keep Vela at 101 Picnic Island. Jessica has claimed Andrew Nicholson was her childhood pedophile rapist and staying with him is endangering vela. 16. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that subsequently, in contempt of Justice Graham’s 02/2021 ruling, and 10 minute court admonishment to Jessica and her Attorney, Jeremy Herron, that Vela be returned to 36 Dawlish Ave Port McNicholl. Jessica has remained, and still is, in contempt of J Graham’s ruling over a year ago. J. Graham further directed Jessica and Jeremy that they needed a mobility order which they never applied for or received! 17. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that at the 02/21 hearing, I informed J Graham that Vela had been unlawfully taken, again, from the family home and from Vela’s Tay Shores Elementary school without my knowledge or consent and registered at Honey Harbour Elementary(30 minutes north of Tay Shores) with a fraudulent address, fraudulent last name and Andrew Nicholson fraudulently listed as Vela’s step father! Weeks earlier Vela informed me that Jessica told Vela that she had two fathers-me and Andrew. When Vela informed me of the Child abuse(psychological and emotional manipulation) I drove with a friend to Honey Harbour Elementary and met with the principal who confirmed the same information that Vela had conveyed to me. 18. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that subsequently, Jessica’s co-conspirator, pedophile rapist, Andrew Nicholson, threatened to kill me in front of Vela. CAS investigated and confirmed that Andrew admitted to the CAS workers he had uttered death threats to kill me in front of Vela age 5. Vela is being held against her will under Andrew’s roof with nobody to help Vela. Jessica in contempt of both J. Wildman’s and J. Graham’s Endorsements and continues to violate both Endorsements with impunity. 19. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that on or about March 2021, I retained a process server to serve a civil suit on Jessica and her criminal co-conspirators: Andrew Nicholson, Christine Woodley, Frank Woodley and Jeremy Herron. The process server went to 101 Picnic Island to serve Jessica and pedophile rapist Andrew. Jessica dialed 911 and in violation of the criminal code committed mischief as she falsely claimed I was kidnapping Vela. Approximately 10 minutes later, OPP arrived and witnessed that my process server was lawfully serving process and that Jessica had intentionally falsified her 911 kidnapping call. No charges that may have rightfully been laid against Jessica were preferred at that time. 20. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that Jessica committed child abuse(parental alienation) and separation trauma to Vela and I for 6 weeks the summer of 2021 including, but not limited to, blocking Vela’s grandmother, aunts, uncles, cousins and my cell phone number. 21. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that Jessica is currently Committing intentional selfish child abuse(parental alienation) by withholding Vela, for the 3rd time. Jessica has not returned Vela since February 27, 2022, our agreed upon exchange date, witnessed by a disinterested 3rd party, Vince Spacone, until present. 4 of 5 22. It’s agreed by Jessica Woodley that there is no dispute to the fact that I never ever assaulted Jessica or took her cell phone that she forgot and left at my house which was returned to her. Jessica assaulted me on my private property, on or about May 2, 2021 in retaliation for relating the facts relative to our sharing parental time agreement to her, by scratching my face then grabbed Vela, on my access day, fleeing the scene of her crime and falsely reporting(committed perjury) that I assaulted her. Jessica, after calling 911 and refusing a 911 ambulance twice , was coached for approximately 90 minutes by two female police officers to go to the hospital and feign head injuries that had zero connection to or were a result of any of my actions. 5 of 5 https://www.midlandtoday.ca/classifieds/announcements-and-events/business-announcements/1727681

Hello Joyce in the name of our risen Savior Jesus, I as per my faith and as witness for brother Robert am writing to you privately as a woman and not a corporate employee utilising a SSN. I have heard from my good brother Robert that you have an opinion that Ted Decker is not privately liable with regards to brother Roberts agreement with him in his private capacity.. You may find it interesting that a public prosecutor in Front Royal Virginia withdrew from a 50 pounds of trafficking Cannabis Charge against another good brother when he received a private agreement to the facts on behalf of brother Dean Harting. He heard from 6 witnesses that he failed to dispute the facts sent to his private self. I am attaching a copy of that letter for your benefit so you can see why that man acting as a prosecutor knew he could not escape private communication performed to save the brother harmless from submitting to and respecting persons. That word person is evident in the scriptures and it is a sin to respect as found in Deuteronomy 1:17,10:17, 2nd Samuel 14:14,Matthew 22:16 ,Acts 10:34 Romans 2:11 and for emphasis James 2:9 in the 1611 King James Bible. Our good brother Robert is not only scripturally directed to not respect persons but is sanctioned and of a duty to exercise the right of self-determination(resurrection) as per Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political rights in order to save his article 18 freedom of faith harmless by waiving article 16 as of it being offensive to his faith. That covenant, unlike the US Constitution is of application to all service providers that when a demand to save one's faith harmless, as was brother Robert's, is received it will be respected and if necessary the service provider must go to a hardship to accommodate the demand. Ted will encounter no hardship what so ever by privately contacting brother Robert in order to be coming to amicable terms with brother Robert. He will in fact be standing in honor by privately addressing the damage and discrimination infringing upon our good brothers liberty that brother Robert has experienced upon his reputation, his ability to gain a livelihood, his ability to maintain his family and commitments to his relations. Your attempt to subject brother Robert to a corporate submission to a person of law is noted and is ill advised. You are now aware that brother Robert cannot subject himself to such dialogue as he sent that agreement to Ted privately as a living man as he cannot communicate with the dead corporate person as CEO of a corporation. I do hope you grasp the sincerity and severity of this communication as it is of intent to confirm brother Roberts faith based inability to communicate to Ted as a person of law. I thankyou for your attention to this private matter and do suggest that Ted contact brother Robert to privately resolve this issueprivately as I assure you that using legal fiction corporate employee's corporate lawyers and corporate funds to settle a clearly private matter is a fraud upon the corporation. The attached letter is an open office document. Bliss and light upon your path Joyce! ICCPR. Article 7. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. If you love your creator you will walk only in his ordinances and no others! Matthew 15:9 KJVB