IMF / WORLD BANK DESTROYING COUNTRIES
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yL-e60klAU&NR=1
Connie Fogal on those guys and the NAU
The World Bank - IMF is owned and controlled by NM Rothschild and 30
to 40 of the wealthiest people in the world.. For over 150 years they
have planned to take the world over through money. The former chief
economist of the World Bank, Joe Stiglitz, was fired recently. He
pointed out to top executives that every country the IMF/World Bank
got involved in ended up with a crashed economy, a destroyed
government, and sometimes in flames with riots. Jim Wolfensen, the
president of the World Bank would not comment on his dismissal.
Before Joe Stiglitz was fired he took a large stack of secret
documents out of the World Bank. These secret documents from the World
Bank and the International Monetary Fund reveal that the IMF required
nations:
1. to sign secret agreements of 111 items
2. in which they agreed to sell off their key assets - water,
electric, gas, etc.
3. in which they agreed to take economic steps which are really
devastating to the nations involved
4. in which they pay off the politicians billions of dollars to Swiss
bank accounts to do this transfer of a countries fixed assets
If they do not agree to these steps they are cut-off from all
international borrowing. Today if can't borrow money in the
international marketplace, no one can survive, whether you are people
or corporations or countries. If that does not work they overthrow the
government and plant lies about the former government and/or even
rewrite history.
The Argentina Plan
Inside documents from Argentina show the secret Argentine plan. This
is signed by Jim Wolfensen, the president of the World Bank. Argentina
has had six presidents in five weeks because their economy is
completely destroyed. This happened because they started out in the
end of the 80s with orders from the IMF and World Bank to sell-off all
their assets, public assets, like their water system. Then they taxed
the people. They created big government and big government handed it
off to the private IMF/World Bank. They pay off the politicians
billions in Swiss bank accounts.
The Enron Connection
The water system of Buenos Aires was sold off for a song to a company
called Enron. A pipeline was sold off, that runs between Argentina and
Chile, was sold off to a company called Enron. Then the globalists
blow out Enron after transferring the assets to another dummy
corporation..
They come in, pay off politicians to transfer the water systems, the
railways, the telephone companies, the nationalized oil companies, gas
stations - the politicians then hand it over to the IMF for nothing.
The Globalists pay them off individually, billions a piece in Swiss
bank accounts. The plan is total slavery for the entire population.
Enron is a dummy corporation for money laundering, drug money, etc.
IMF Planed Riots
The IMF/World Bank are systematically tearing nations apart, whether
it's Ecuador or Argentina. It's not privatization. They steal it from
the people and hand it over to the IMF/World Bank. They hand it over,
generally to the cronies, like Citibank grabbed half the Argentine
banks. British Petroleum grabbed pipelines in Ecuador. Enron grabbed
water systems all over the place. The problem is that they are
destroying these systems as well. You can't even get drinking water in
Buenos Aires. It is not just a question of the theft. You can't turn
on the tap. It is more than someone getting rich at the public
expense. And the IMF just got handed the Great Lakes. They have the
sole control over the water supply now. The IMF and the World Bank is
51% owned by the United States Treasury. Indonesia is in flames.
Every country IMF/World Bank meddling in they destroyed their economy
and they ended up in flames. They even plan in the riots. They know
that when they squeeze a country and destroy its economy, you get
riots in the streets. And they admit that it an IMF riot. Because you
have riot, all the capital runs away from your country and that gives
the opportunity for the IMF to then add more conditions.
California Utilities & Enron
It is really an imperial economy war to implode countries and now they
are doing it here with Enron. They are getting so greedy - they are
preparing it for America. The chief investigators of Enron for the
State of California said that that it's not just the stockholders that
got ripped off. They sucked millions, billions of dollars out of the
public pocket in Texas and California in particular. Where are the
assets? See, everybody says there are no assets left since Enron was a
dummy corporation - from the experts I've had on and they transferred
all those assets to other corporations and banks. You did pay
California's electric bills according to the investigations, they are
telling me that they were pumped up unnecessarily by 9 to 12-billion
dollars. And I don't know who they are going to get it back from now.
Well they actually caught the Governor buying it for $137 per megawatt
and selling it back to Enron for $1 per megawatt and doing it over and
over and over again.
Enron's Auditor - Lord Wakeham
The men who designed the system in California for deregulation then
went to work for Enron right after. Lord Wakeham, who was on the audit
committee of Enron, is the head of NM Rothschild. There isn't anything
that he doesn't have his fingers in. He's on something like fifty
Boards. And he was supposed to be head of the audit committee watching
how Enron kept the books. In fact, they were paying him consulting
fees on the side. He was in Margaret Thatcher's government and he's
the one who authorized Enron to come into Britain and take over power
plants in Britain. Enron owned a water system in the middle of
England. This is what Lord Wakeham approved and then they gave him a
job on the board. On top of being on the board, they gave him a huge
consulting contract. Lord Wakeham is supposed to be in charge of the
audit committee to see how they were handling their accounts, but he
is also the head of the board to regulate the media. Lord Wakeham is
trying to pass laws in England where you can't own your own water. He
can't be touched because he regulates the media.
Rothschild and the Illuminati
Burrow into NM Rothschild, you'll find it all there. The IMF/World
Bank implosion, four points, how they bring down a country and destroy
the resources of the people. First you open up the capital markets.
That is, you sell off your local banks to foreign banks.. Then you go
to what's called market-based pricing. That's the stuff like in
California where everything is free market and you end up with water
bills no one can pay. Then open up your borders to trade - complete
free marketeering. Its like the opium wars. This isn't free trade;
this is coercion trade. This is war. They are taking apart economies
through this. China has a 40% tariff on the USA, but the USA has a 2%
on them. That's not free and fair trade. It's to force all industry
into a country that the globalists fully control, and they control
China.
Wal-Mart
The Illuminati owns Wal-Mart and Wal-Mart has 700 plants in China.
There is almost nothing in a Walmart store that comes from the United
States of America, despite all the eagles on the wall. They have big
flags saying "Buy American" and there's hardly anything from America
in their stores. What's even worst is they will hire a factory and
right next to it will be the sister factory which is inside a prison.
You can imagine the conditions of these workers producing this lovely
stuff for Walmart.
Briberization
Sell off the water company and that's worth, over ten years, let's say
about 5 billion dollars, ten percent of that is 500 million. A Senator
from Argentina said that he got a call from George W. Bush in 1988
saying give the gas pipeline in Argentina to Enron. Enron was going to
pay one-fifth of the world's price for their gas and he said how can
you make such an offer? The answer was that if they only pay one-fifth
that leaves quit a little bit for you to go in your Swiss bank
account. This is the same George W. Bush who said he didn't get to
know Ken Lay of Enron until 1994. Now they are having these white-wash
hearings. Bill Clinton, to get even with Bush's big donor, cut Enron
out of the California power market. He put a cap on the prices they
could charge. They couldn't charge more than one-hundred times the
normal price for electricity. That upset Enron. So Ken Lay personally
wrote a note to Dick Cheney saying get rid of Clinton's cap on prices.
Within 48 hours of George W. Bush taking office, his energy department
reversed the clamps on Enron.
Step Two
Argentina is an example of step two of the IMF. A fifth of the
population of Argentina is unemployed, and they said cut the
unemployment benefits drastically, take away pension funds, cut the
education budgets. Now if you cut the economy in the middle of a
recession (created by the IMF), you absolutely demolish the nation.
You don't start cutting the budget in a recession, you start spending
money to stimulate the economy. You don't raise taxes, you cut them.
But they tell these countries you've got to cut, and cut, and cut. And
why, according to the inside documents, it's so you can make payments
to foreign banks - the foreign banks are collecting 21% to 70%
interest. This is loan-sharking. If fact, it was so bad that they
required Argentina to get rid of the laws against loan-sharking
because any bank would be a loan-shark under Argentine law.
Part 3 and Part 4.
Then they open up the borders for trade, that's the new opium wars.
They destroy an economy so that it can not produce anything, and then
open the borders to sell their own goods. They force nations to pay
horrendous amounts for things like drugs - legal drugs. That's how you
end up with an illegal drug trade. What's there left to survive on
except sell us smack and crack. And so, drive the whole world down,
blow out their economies and then buy the rest of it up for pennies on
the dollar. What's Part 4 of the IMF/World Bank Plan?
In Part 4, they take apart of the government by the coup d'etat and
they install their own corporate government. In Venezuela where they
have an elected president of the government, the IMF has announced
that they would support a transition government if the president were
removed. They are not saying that they are going to get involved in
politics - they would just support a transition government. What that
effectively is is saying we will pay for the coup d'etat, if the
military overthrows the current president, because the current
president of Venezuela has said no to the IMF. He told those guys to
go packing. They brought their teams in and said you have to do this
and that. And he said, I don't have to do anything. He said what I'm
going to do is double the taxes on oil corporations because we have a
whole lot of oil in Venezuela. And I'm going to double the taxes on
oil corporations and then I will have all the money I need for social
programs and the government - and we will be a very rich nation. Well,
as soon as he did that, they started fomenting trouble with the
military and watch this because the President of Venezuela will be out
of office in three months or shot dead. They are not going to allow
him to raise taxes on the oil companies.
Philipps tranceformation@trance-formation.org or http://www.GregPalast.com
or http://www.gregpalast.com
Bush Administration Signals End to Open Government
1) The Bush administration invoked executive privilege to keep Clinton-
era documents secret. The move shocked Republican lawmakers. Why would
Bush want to cover up for Bill Clinton? Representative Dan Burton, who
is the Chairman of the House Government Reform Committee, even
threatened to hold Bush in contempt of Congress unless he releases
several sets of subpoenaed Justice Department documents that he has
hidden. It does not matter. Bush promises to never comply with
congressional investigators. Bush is determined to keep Clinton's
crimes concealed.
2) Bush flatly refuses to hand over records of internal energy task
force meetings. These records could either incriminate or exonerate
Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney regarding allegations of conflict
of interest in the
Enron scandal. Even the General Accounting Office is suing the White
House (a first) to obtain the records. Again, Bush refuses to comply.
The president is even willing to ignore court orders demanding the
release of documents.
3) Just this week, the United States Government's top lawyer told the
U.S. Supreme Court that officials have the right to lie to American
citizens. No, he did not explain how that assertion jives with Bush's
Christian testimony.
4) Two days ago, the White House ordered all federal agencies to
delete their web sites of all "sensitive information." The White House
did not say what information it considered "sensitive."
5) Vice President Cheney is already the stealthiest Vice President in
U.S. history. Seldom does anyone know where he is or what he is doing.
6) President Bush admitted to forming a mysterious "shadow government"
comprised of unknown persons who are living in underground bunkers at
secret sites outside Washington, D.C. Not even top legislators know
who these
people are or what instructions have been given them. Furthermore, how
does a "shadow government" mesh with the U.S. Constitution? These
questions have never been (and never will be) answered..
When asked by a reporter about these and other matters, Bush said, "I
have a duty to protect the executive branch from legislative
encroachment." Congress, for the most part, only learns of Bush's
clandestine carryings-on as brief sketches leak out in the press.
However, none of this seems to bother the American people or members
of the press. Bush is a wartime president (even though no one
officially declared war) and, therefore, can do anything he pleases
with total impunity. In truth, the Bush administration signals the end
to both open government and constitutional government - and few people
seem to even notice.
Christians cannot comment on Government in USA
Congress has decided to silence you, me, and any other Christian who
dares express a moral view that may impact a political campaign! The
U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate have both passed a so-
called "campaign finance reform" bill ... and now President Bush has
said he will sign it into law! In spite of all the propaganda in the
media, this legislation actually silences Christian and conservative
organizations - banning them from commenting on key moral issues
during election campaigns ... while allowing the liberal media to
speak out freely.
This new law is a SLAP IN THE FACE to our right to free speech. It is
absolutely, blatantly UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
* This legislation effectively strips church and conservative leaders
and organizations of religious free speech during elections.
* For me or any other conservative spokesperson to comment and inform
you with a Christian perspective would be illegal ... and the threat
of jail a reality!
* Even your own pastor cannot inform you on key political and moral
issues when it comes time to vote!
So where will you get all your information about the political and
moral views of candidates? FROM THE BIASED, SECULAR MEDIA!
From The Wilderness Publications, www.copvcia.com, see a related
article on how scientists and academics are viewing the possibility of
reducing the world's population by more than four billion people and
doing so selectively with DNA biological weapons. See how hundreds of
microbiologists are being assassinated world-wide to keep this plan in
the hands of only a few people. www.rense.com www.narconews.com
Now to really sink the doubts
The Learned Protocols of the Brotherhood of Zion
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm#Table%20of%20Contents
and learning what re...gistry means
GIST, pleading. (Begging,bowing)Gist of the action is the essential ground or object of it, in point of law, and without which there is no cause of action. Gould on Pl. c. 4, §12. But it is observable that the substance or gist of the action is not always the principal cause of the plaintiff Is complaint in point of fact, nor that on which he recovers all or the greatest part of his damages.
2. It frequently bappens that upon that part of his declaration which contains the substance or gist of the, action, he only recovers nominal damages, and he gets his principal satisfaction on account of matter altogether collateral thereto. A familiar instance of this is the case where a father sues the defendant for a trespass for the seduction of his daughter. The gist of the action is the trespass, and the loss of his daughter's services, but the collateral cause is the injury done to his feelings, for which the principal damages are given. In stating the substance or gist of the action, every thing must be averred which is necessary to be proved at the trial. Vide 1 Vin. Ab. 598; 2 Phil. Ev. 1, note. See Bac. Abr. Pleas, B; Doct. P. 85. See Damages, special, in pleading; 1 Vin. At. 598; 2 Phil. Ev. 1, n.
GIVER, contracts. He who makes a gift. (q. v.) By his gift, the giver always impliedly agrees with the donee that he will not revoke the gift.
Benjamin Freedman Speaks:
A Jewish Defector Warns America
by Benjamin H. Freedman (1961)
Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us - his warning to the West - is more urgent than ever before. - K.A.S.
Contents.
Zionists Rule the US
The First World War
Stalemate in 1916. Zionist Offer to get USA into the War
USA Railroaded into World War I after Balfour Declaration
Versailles
Effect on Germans when they understood Jewish Activity
Freedman says World War I was started against Germany
German Camps in 1933
Germans fought Jewish Control
1933: Jews Declare Sacred War (and Trade War) on Germany
Reichskristallnacht and Rearmament
1961: Nuclear War? For Israel?
Secrecy (e.g. 1916 Zionist deal with USA) can happen again
History of 'Jews'
Kol Nidre: Evidence of Disloyalty
George Washington's Vision
Zionists Rule the US
Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
The First World War.
What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.
Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.
Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that - seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
Stalemate in 1916. Zionists Offer to get USA into the War
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and (I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make) they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.* However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that (I don't know how many here remember it) the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.
* Benjamin Freedman obviously did not know that the British peoples are the true Israel whose land it is. Even so, they had no right to give it to the Zionists whose land it is not, even though it was prophesied by Ezekiel that the Zionists would do this and succeed - 11:15 Son of man, thy brethren, [even] thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and all the House of Israel wholly, [are] they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, Get you far from the "I AM": unto us is this land given in possession (Idumean zionists - 1948).
I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.
Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
USA Railroaded into World War I after Balfour Declaration
The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into (if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into) that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
Versailles
That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine* and were determined to get it at any cost.
* Without Adolf Hitler, who was half Jewish and his Jewish generals, there would be no Zionist State in Israel. Why was Rudolf (Walter Richard) Hess (1894-1987), who was Adolf Hitler's second-in-command, kept incommunicado in Spandau Prison until his death in 1987, after parachuting into Scotland to seek peace in 1941? Even the prison guards were not allowed to speak to him. What did he know that had to be kept so secret and made him seem so dangerous? Was the formation of the Zionist State the REAL reason for WW2? Was that what Hess knew?- JAH.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
Effect on Germans when they understood Jewish Activity
That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, [Albert Ballin-RW] who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers - the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."
It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat.* A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass.! Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.
* Ironically, as is prophesied to happen both by George Washington's Vision (see end of article) and the Holy Scriptures.
Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine* as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."
* Ezekiel 11:15 Son of man, thy brethren, [even] thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and all the House of Israel wholly, [are] they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, Get you far from the "I AM": unto us is this land given in possession (Idumean zionists - 1948).
Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers (and the press was filled with their statements) that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat (and the reparations, which ruined and crippled Germany financially).
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
Freedman says World War I was started against Germany
And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
German Camps in 1933
When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
Germans fought Jewish Control
Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.
The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.
The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
1933: Jews Declare Sacred War (and Trade War) on Germany
After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them.
So what did the Jews do?
In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.
Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
Reichskristallnacht and Rearmament
The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.
Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
1961: Nuclear War? For Israel?
For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
Secrecy (e.g. 1916 Zionist deal with USA) can happen again
What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.
Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
History of 'Jews'
What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews*, because I know what they are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe - so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.
* Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but [are] (Idumeans) the synagogue of Satan.
3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but do LIE (Idumeans); behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith - either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews." But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.
These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral home and, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.
That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.
[Back to start] [ Back to Table of Contents]
Kol Nidre: Evidence of Disloyalty
Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them.* How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.
* Exodus - The Ten Commandments - 20:16 Thou shalt not tell lies [even to thyself].
Matthew 5:37 (Jesus said) But let your Yes, be yes; and your No, be no: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
15:1 Then came to Jesus lawyers and politicians, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
15:2 Why do thy disciples transgress the Tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
15:3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the COMMANDment of God by your Tradition?
No comments:
Post a Comment