Another minister follows Christs advise and gets an agreement

Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International
From: minister: Andrew-Clayton: Fidler
General Post
Turtle Island (Southbank, province of British Columbia)
No code - not in a revenue district.
Psalms 118:8 It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.
The thirtieth day of the fourth month of the year of our Lord two-thousand and nine
For: Robert Douglas Nicholson, the private man doing business as Attorney General for the de facto
federal government of the company called Canada.
Asseveration and Notice of Denial of Corporate Status
Agreement
Attention: Robert Douglas Nicholson, the private man doing business as Attorney General for the de
facto federal government of the company called Canada.
RE: This Asseveration and Notice of Denial of Corporate Status Agreement
Hello Robert,
This is a private, ecclesiastical, non commercial 'Asseveration and Notice of Denial of Corporate Status
Agreement' between minister Andrew-Clayton: Fidler and Robert Douglas Nicholson the private man,
and is offered in truth, honour and good faith, pursuant to my religious beliefs, by the man and
immortal soul, created by Yahweh, as a minister of God pursuant to Exodus 19:6, and is a process that I
am going through to remove any and all assumptions of commercial rule, which is contrary to Romans
13:1, 4 and 6; as well as God's first commandment (Exodus 20:3-5) to note a few, for it is vehemntly
clear that the private men and wo-men doing business as agents, employees, actors, etc., for the de
facto government of CANADA/ BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF appear to have assumed that I
have consented, agreed, and/or given my permission to be bound by the laws of man and mammon in
violation of the laws of my Creator which are written in the King James Bible and have been sworn by
an oath to God to be protected by the reigning Christian monarch Queen Elizabeth Alexandra Mary
Windsor as well as Her Majesty's agents under oath.
By my sending you this good faith agreement, I do attempt to ascertain all the facts in honour. If you
have any reason or proof to suggest or provide to me, God’s minister, officially performing the
functions of my calling, that the following statements of the facts are not true, you are being offered the
opportunity to refute these offered facts so as to clear yourself of any assumptive contractual awareness
of the truth of such facts. Also, be aware this communication of agreement cannot be lawfully inquired
of at public or government expense as it is a provable private matter and government funding cannot
support private contracts. All legal bills must and shall be paid for out of your private pocket no
different than Maurice Duplessis the former Premier and Attorney General of Quebec.
http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/fr/browseSubjects/roncarelli.asp
My ecclesiastical role and freewill decision to opt out of the commercial fraud negatively influencing
us all is not contrary to God's laws nor is it at all strange in light of the world wide evidence of
corruption at all levels of the commercially regulated world.
I am that which God created: a private ecclesiastic man under God's law as my creator intended me to
be, and no man or woman has a moral or a lawful right to impose anything upon me without my
informed consent, agreement, and/or permission. I do hereby renounce any fraudulent, corporate,
assumptive contract and I do honour the directive obligation to respect the equal God given freedoms
of other men and women under His law.
I wish for you to be aware that the King James Bible is the rule of law for all commonwealth
courts, bearing the coat of arms of her majesty, and the King James Bible placed with standing at
the right of the judge, justice, or master presiding and must be a letters patent version "cum
priviligio" to give the court it's authority.
I, as God's minister and a believer in the gospels of Jesus Christ have had it come to my attention
that the Government of Canada combined with the provincial governments have, since 1933, been
operating de facto. The word de facto, so we are clear with each other, means illegitimate and
unlawful ( I have attached definitions below). I have no intent to argue or intimidate you by this
private communication but rather intend to make you fully aware that my Christian faith is
defended by the Queen and is based upon the King James Bible and that I, as God's minister, am the
one being intimidated. I do henceforth offer the good faith proclamation of my free born will to live
in peace and declare that, by right of God, the de facto authorities, edicts, codes, obligations,
statutes, taxes, licenses and prohibitions of a de facto commercial entity are not binding on me nor
are they applicable upon God’s ministers and His children.
It is because of this ministerial awareness that I offer this private agreement with you in your
private capacity so that no assumption of detrimental nature can be acted upon in error by either of
us to the anxiety and damage of either our properties or dutiful freedoms as children of God.
It is in honor and reflection of my official ministerial performance of my function as God's minister
to not partake of the false god de facto system and registry created by men of wealth and
predetermined gain that I gain this private agreement with you.
It is my hope that after you read this and observe the facts you will see the light and honourable
position I am seeking and wish you as well will grasp the intent in the honour I am seeking in
respecting my faith in God's laws. As God's minister, I also direct and wish that you will not be
encouraged by anyone inclusive of lawyers (which Christ called vipers and satans followers) and
the members of the R.C.M.P., who have a long history of distorting the truth, to intimidate, extort or
coerce me during my Christian ministry to violate the faith in obeying God's commands.
It is my hope that you and the other men and wo-men who hold de facto offices for the bankrupt
corporations called CANADA/BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF will cease to intimidate me to
violate God's laws, with insinuations that I must submit to the commercial fraud after I have been
diligent in letting you and others know that I cannot violate my faith and religous beliefs by
participating in fraud and the mixing of man's and mammon's laws with God's laws (Deuteronomy 4:2,
12:32).
The law for Canada, which applies to you while you are employed by the company as a corporate
entity, clearly says that you cannot discriminate against me based upon my religious beliefs,
although many of the men and wo-men who are employed by the company which you work for
have and are continuing to violate the laws that govern their conduct as employees/office holders
and they continue to harass me with arbitrary demands in ignorance of the law that applies to it`s
corporate veil and they need to be aware of how this is seen as blatent intimidation and
discrimination.
Be it known that I heretofore and forever decline all offers to submit to man's laws, and know that
the corporate law of Canada only applies to corporate entities that have registered with it.
Please read sections: 176, 180, and 423 of the Criminal Code for Canada, which I make no use of
(Ezekiel 33:6). The 1953 Samur Decision of the Supreme court of Canada applies to all corporate
entities (persons, individuals, employees, etc.), and may enlighten you if it be your choice to
challenge my beliefs and seriously damage me by continuing to violently and un-lawfully compel
me to participate in a fraud.
The ignoarance of the men and wo-men employed by the de facto government of CANADA / BRITISH
COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF has resulted in the near death of my body (temple) during several
occassions, therefore I am making it clear that I can not violate my faith and religious beliefs by
submitting to false gods and the dictates of laws written in addition to God's laws which indeed are in
violation of God's laws (Deuteronomy 4:2).
This 'Asseveration and Notice of Denial of Corporate Status Agreement' shall not be construed by any
man or wo-man named hereon or who may be viewing this peaceful agreement as a threat of violence
or act of terrorism and shall be solely construed as a truthful, peaceful and loving notice of the facts
presented hereon.
This document is filed pursuant to God's laws as written in the King James Bible, Luke 12:58, 1
Corinthians 6:1, sworn to be protected by Queen Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor during her
Coronation Oath, and subsequently having been sworn to be protected by the judges of Her Majesty's
courts pursuant to the 1646 Westminster Confession of Faith, which is still in force today.
This is written notice of threat, duress and intimidation to myself and my wife: Janet-Arlene: Harms by
Her Majesty's agents, and the evidence does so indicate, that a de facto court of the province of British
Columbia is attempting to obtain jurisdiction over my wife and I, by assuming that I/we have either
made joinder with it or that I/we willingly and with informed consent have agreed to have its de facto
jurisdiction inflicted upon me/us.
I do share this asseveration of my truth and notice in the exercise of my religious beliefs rather than an
affidavit because it has come to my attention that only a bankrupt corporation under the Bankruptcy Act
may file an affidavit.
I am not a bankrupt nor a solvent corporation, nor is my wife, and I deny and dissolve by this private
agreement any such assumptive contract status and categorically deny any contractually valid
relationship with the corporation called: 'BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF’ ( U.S. Securites &
Exchange Commission Central Index Key: 0000014306), and ‘CANADA’ (U.S. Securites & Exchange
Commission Central Index Key: 0000230098 -- Business Address: CANADIAN EMBASSY, 1746
MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW, WASHINGTON DC 20036;) or any other de facto state whatsoever.
I continue to be exposed to more and more otherwise suppressed information that has caused me to
strengthen my spiritual bond with the Great Spirit while exercising my faith and beliefs in my Creator.
As a result of my spiritual awareness and expanded consciousness regarding this new knowledge, I
must quest after your awareness and duty to defend my faith, and hopefully establish a peaceful
agreement with you.
As children of God, it is my understanding that we are all supposed to love our neighbor as we love
ourselves, and to do no harm.
During my life experience, I have fallen from time to time along the often lonely road of faith, and
having reviewed my past, and through my new found awareness of God's laws, I have decided that it is
time for atonement and forgiveness, for I have come to the realization that there exists no forgiveness
within the man-made system of law that has tortured, abused, imprisoned, and nearly killed my body
(temple).
It is quite clear to me that the laws of man are nothing more than mere worthless ink blots on paper
which none of the employees and office holders for the company which you work for have shown any
desire to follow as "law".
I have seen many ego-maniacs who believe that they are above the "law(s)" which govern their conduct
as employees/office holders and who continue to poison, abuse, and even kill my brothers and sisters
due to their lack of knowledge in their Creators laws, and a complete lack of liability on the insane,
tyrannical employees/office holders of the company.
My exercising of my faith may conflict with your monetary policies which, in fact, are not law at all
but merely corporate rules and company regulations, so by this agreement I am ensuring no false
assumptions or process may be engaged in which obstructs me and/or intimidates me from having the
ability to practice my faith as a minister of God, harmless from reproach.
I wish for you to be fully aware that this is a sincere expression of what I do know and believe to be
truth and in no way is intended to be mischievous, intimidating, or malicious, for it is a true expression
of my beliefs and of my faith.
I have recently joined an International Church that offers redemption from a system of false god's and
corporate commercial laws which I have never agreed to be bound by.
If you know of any law that can induce me or intimidate me to violate my faith in practicing the laws of
my Creator as written in the King James Bible, of which such faith is founded upon, then I demand that
you either speak up now or forever keep the peace with me as I exercise my faith as a minister of God.
So please get back to me with the information, if you have it available, for if it is not lawful for me to
follow the laws of God then I need to see by whose authority that I can be intimidated to violate them.
If you have no authority to intimidate me to violate Gods first commandment then you have no
authority outside of God's laws as God's first commandment is: 'Do not bow down to false god's nor
worship them'.
Before you reply, I would like you to review some of your governments information.
I feel that the information presented hereon is vitally important for you to be aware of before you can
grasp the significance of what I am endeavoring to tell you, for if you are a believer in your Creator and
His word as shared through his ministers and only begotten son Jesus the Christ as written in the King
James Bible then you may be interested in learning of this truth for your self, for it may increase your
spiritual bond with your Creator and help to spread love and positive energy on this dry land mass
which we call our home.
I would like for you to know what the word "de facto" means so that you may see for your self how the
definition of that one word is a complete demonstration of how a government can act as a false god,
and so that you may see what source it has for it's alleged authority, for it is well established knowledge
that Canada's "government" is a de facto and usurped government, as opposed to a de jure government.
Nearing to the end of the year of our Lord two thousand and five, the following information had been
posted on the website for the Governor-General of Canada. Not long after that it had been removed due
to the truth it did expose:
· Français
· Contact Us
· Help
· Search
· Canada Site
· Honours
· Heraldry
· Media
· Visit us
· Home
Print
Home : Governor General : Role and Responsibilities
· Governor Genera l
 Biography
 Speeches
 Role and
Responsibilities
 A Modern
Governor
General
 Insignias
Governor General
Role and Responsibilities of the Governor General
 Commander
in Chief
 State Visits
 His Excellency
Jean-Daniel Lafond
 Former Governors
General
 Congratulatory
Messages
 Submitting a proposa l
for vice-regal
patronage
· Rideau Hal l
· The Office
Top of Form
Quick Search:
Bottom of Form
The Office of the Governor General, Canada's oldest continuing
institution, is a thread that ties Canadians together. From Samuel de
Champlain in 1608 to Viscount Monck in 1867 to Vincent Massey in 1952
to today’s Governor General, the institution of Governor General dates
back nearly 400 years.
What is the Governor General's position in
Government?
Canada is a parliamentary democracy and a
constitutional monarchy. This means
Canadians recognize The Queen as our Head
of State. Canada's Governor General carries
out Her Majesty's duties in Canada on a daily
basis and is Canada's de facto Head of
State.
Like many other democracies, Canada has clearly defined the difference
between the Head of State and Head of Government.
The Governor General
· represents The Queen who is the Head of State
· is appointed by The Queen on the advice of Canada’s Prime
Minister
The Prime Minister
· is the Head of Government
· is the leader of the party with the most support in Parliament
What does the Governor General do?
The Governor General's role is built on four major themes:
· Representing the Crown in Canada
· Representing Canadians and Promoting our Sovereignty
· Celebrating Excellence
· Bringing Canadians together
Created: 2005-09-27
Updated: 2005-12-06
Important Notices
top of page
Below you will find many definitions for the word:
De Facto
De facto. [L.] actually; in fact; existing; as a king de facto, distinguished from a king de jure, or
by right.
American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster 1828, Vol. I, page 56.
DE FACTO. Actually; in fact; in deed. A term used to denote a thing actually done.
A government de facto signifies one completely, though only temporarily, established in
the place of the lawful government; Thomas v. Taylor, 42 Miss. 651, 2 Am. Rep. 625,
Chisholm v. Coleman, 43 Ala. 204, 94 Am. Dec. 677, See De Jure Austin, Jur. Lect. vi. p. 336.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Third Revision (8th Edition)(1914), Volume 1, page 761.
de facto (dë fak’tö). In fact, as distinguished from “de jure,” by right.
Law Dictionary, James A. Ballentine, Second Edition, 1948, page 344.
de facto government. A government wherein all the attributes of sovereignty have, by
usurpation,( see below ) been transferred from those who had been legally invested with
them to others, who, sustained by a power above the forms of law, claim to act and do
act in their stead. 30 Am Jur 181.
Law Dictionary, James A. Ballentine, Second Edition, 1948, page 345.
De facto. In fact; actually; indeed; in reality. Ridout v. State, 161 Tenn. 248, 30 S.W.2d 255,
257, 71 A.L.R. 830.
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 504.
De facto government. One that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of
the rightful legal government and is successful, at least temporarily, in overturning the
institutions of the rightful legal government by setting up its own in lieu thereof.
Wortham v. Walker, 133 Tex. 255, 128 S.W.2d 1138, 1145.
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 504.
de facto (dë fak’tö, da-, de-). [[L]] existing or being such in actual fact though not by legal
establishment, official recognitiont, etc. [de facto government]: cf. de jure.
Webster’s New World Dictionary, 3rd College Ed. (1988), page 360.
Kenneth G. Wilson (1923–). The Columbia Guide to Standard American English. 1993.
de jure, de facto
De jure is a Latin phrase meaning “by right” or “legally” that English has taken over first in legal
jargon and then adopted into the general language. It usually contrasts with de facto , which means “in
fact but not in law.” A de jure government is one legally in place; a de facto government is one
effectively in power and operating, but without legal authority. Spell both locutions as two words, and
pronounce de either dee, dai, or di, stressing the first syllable of the second word in each phrase,
JOOR-ee (or JOOR-uh) and FAK-to. See FOREIGN PHRASES.
The Governor General for Canada is de facto.
- Rape is a de facto sexual act. Marital coitus is a de jure sexual act.
- They are both sexual acts of identical physical function. One is lawful, one is not.
Below is the World Bank's (Canada's creditor) definition for de facto.
Dealings with De Facto Governments
Note:This OP 7.30 replaces OP 7.30, dated November 1994. Questions may be addressed to the Chief
Counsel, Operations Policy.
1. A “de facto government” comes into, or remains in, power by means not provided
for in the country’s constitution, such as a coup d'etat, revolution, usurpation,
abrogation or suspension of the constitution.
Usurpation & Usurp
USURP’, v. t. s. as z. [Fr. usurper ; L. usurpo.]
To seize and hold in possession by force or without right; as usurp a throne; to usurp the
prerogative of the crown; to usurp power. To usurp the right of a patron, is to oust or
dispossess him.
Vice sometimes usurps the place of virtue. Denham.
American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster 1828, Vol. II, page 105.
USURPA’TION, n. [supra.]
The act of seizing or occupying and enjoying the property of another, without right; as the
usurpation of a throne; the usurpation of supreme power. Usurpation, in a peculiar sense,
denotes the absolute ouster and dispossession of the patron of a church, by presenting a
clerk to a vacant benefice, who is thereupon admitted and instituted. Cyc.
American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster 1828, Vol. II, page 105.
USURP’ER, n.
One who seizes or occupies the property of another, without right; as the usurper of a
throne; of power; or of rights of a patron. Shak. Dryden. Cyc.
American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster 1828, Vol. II, page 105.
USURPATION. The unlawful assumption of the use of property which belongs to another; an
interruption or the disturbing a man in his right and possession. Tomi.
There are two kinds of usurpation: first, when a stranger, without right, presents to a church
and his clerk is admitted; and, second, when a subject uses a franchise of the king without
lawful authority. Co. Litt. 277 b.
In Governmental Law. The tyrannical assumption of the government by force,
contrary to and in violation of the constitution of the country.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Third Revision (8th Edition)(1914), Volume 3, page 3380.
USURPER. One who assumes the right of government by force, contrary to and in violation of
the constitution of the country. Toul. Droit. Civ, n. 32.
One who intrudes himself into an office which is vacant, and ousts the incumbent without
any color of title whatever; his acts are void in every respect; McCraw v. Williams, 33 Gratt.
(Va.) 513; Hooper v. Goodwin, 48 Me. 80.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Third Revision (8th Edition)(1914), Volume 3, page 3380.
usurpation (ü-zêr-pä’shon). The absolute ouster or dispossession of a patron by a stranger
who has no right to do so presented a clerk to a benefice who was thereupon admitted to the
living and instituted therein. See. 3 Bl. Comm. 242.
Law Dictionary, James A. Ballentine, Second Edition, 1948, page 1324.
usurper (ü-zêr-pêr). A person who assumes possession of an office, who performs the duties,
and who neither lawful title nor color of right. See Hamlin v. Kassafer, 15 Ore. 456, 3 Am. St.
Rep. 176, 179, 15 Pac. Rep. 778.
Law Dictionary, James A. Ballentine, Second Edition, 1948, page 1324.
USURPATION. The unlawful assumption of the use of property which belongs to another; an
interruption or the disturbing a man in his right and possession. Tomlins.
The unlawful seizure or assumption of sovereign power; the assumption of the
government or supreme power by force or illegally, in derogation of the constitution
and of the rights of the lawful ruler.
“Usurpation” for which writ of prohibition may be granted involves attempted exercise of power not possessed
by inferior office. Ex parte Wilkinson, 220 Ala. 529, 126 So. 102, 104.
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 1713.
USURPER. One who assumes the right of government by force, contrary to and in
violation of the constitution of the country. Toul. Droit. Civ, n. 32.
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 1713.
usurp (yöö zurp’, -surp’) vt. [[ME usurpen < MFr usurper < L usurpare < usus, a use + rapere,
to seize: see rape]] to take or assume (power, a position, property, rights, etc.) and hold in
possession by force or without right – vi. to practice or commit usurpation (on or upon) –
usurp’er n. – usurp’ing|ly adv.
Webster’s New World Dictionary, 3rd College Ed. (1988) page 1470.
usurpation (yöö zer pä’shen, -ser-) n. [[ME usurpacion < L usuparetio]] the act of usurping;
esp., the unlawful or violent seizure of a throne, power, etc.
Webster’s New World Dictionary, 3rd College Ed. (1988) page 1470.
The Criminal Code for Canada, which I make no use of (Ezekiel 33:6), clearly states that:
15. No person shall be convicted of an offence in respect of an act or omission in obedience
to the laws for the time being made and enforced by persons in de facto possession of
the sovereign power in and over the place where the act or omission occurs.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 15.
And the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, which I make no use of (Ezekiel 33:6),
clearly reads:
13. Despite section 15 of the Criminal Code , it is not a justification, excuse
or defence with respect to an offence under any of sections 4 to 7 that the
offence was committed in obedience to or in conformity with the law in
force at the time and in the place of its commission.
Sections 4 and 6 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, which are mentioned above,
read:
4. (1) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence who commits
(a) genocide;
(b) a crime against humanity; or
(c) a war crime.
Conspiracy, attempt, etc.
(1.1) Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the
fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) is
guilty of an indictable offence.
Punishment
(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (1.1)
(a) shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life, if an intentional killing forms the
basis of the offence; and
(b) is liable to imprisonment for life, in any other case.
Definitions
(3) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section.
"crime against humanity" « crime contre l'humanité »
"crime against humanity" means murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation,
imprisonment , torture, sexual violence, persecution or any other inhumane act or
omission that is committed against any civilian population or any identifiable group
and that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a crime against
humanity according to customary international law or conventional international
law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law
recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a
contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission.
"genocide" « génocide »
"genocide" means an act or omission committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, an
identifiable group of persons, as such, that, at the time and in the place of
its commission, constitutes genocide according to customary international law or
conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the
general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it
constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its
commission.
6. (1) Every person who, either before or after the coming into force of this section, commits outside
Canada
(a) genocide,
(b) a crime against humanity, or
(c) a war crime,
is guilty of an indictable offence and may be prosecuted for that offence in accordance with section 8.
Conspiracy, attempt, etc.
(1.1) Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or
counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence.
Punishment
(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (1.1)
(a) shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life, if an intentional killing forms the basis of the offence;
and
(b) is liable to imprisonment for life, in any other case.
Definitions
(3) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section. "crime against humanity"
«crime contre l’humanité »
"crime against humanity" means murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation,
imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution or any other inhumane act or omission
that is committed against any civilian population or any identifiable group and that, at the time and
in the place of its commission, constitutes a crime against humanity according to customary
international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the
general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a
contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission.
"genocide"
«génocide »
"genocide" means an act or omission committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, an
identifiable group of persons, as such, that at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes
genocide according to customary international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its
being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations,
whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its
commission.
The Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada website also clearly states that:
From: Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
http://www.international.gc.ca/court-cour/war-crimes-guerres.aspx?lang=eng
Defences
Canadian and international defences are available to persons accused of crimes listed in the CAHWCA,
with some exceptions.
Arguing that a crime was committed in obedience to the law in force at the time and in the place
of its commission does not constitute a defence. And though the defence of superior orders is
consistent with the Rome Statute, if the accused's belief is based on information about an
identifiable group of persons that is likely to encourage inhumane acts or omissions against that
group, then the defence of superior orders cannot be based on a belief that the order was lawful.
Proceeds of Crime Offences
The Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act also makes it an offence to possess and/or launder
proceeds obtained from crimes listed under the Act. This means that if proceeds from genocide, crimes
against humanity or war crimes are located in Canada, they can be restrained, seized or forfeited in
much the same way as proceeds from other criminal offences in Canada.
(Note: That means profiting from bonds and other valuable securities through imprisonment,
torture, enslavement, murder, persecution and other inhumane acts is a violation of the Crimes
Against Humanity and War Crimes Act (Ezekiel 33:6))
I will also refer you to the repealed section two (2) of the British North American Act, wherein it
reads that the Queens heirs will be bound by and inherit the Act as under their authority.
Footnotes to the Constitution Act, 1867
(Note: These footnotes are taken from the April 1, 1996 Consolidation of The Constitution Acts 1867 to 1982)
(1) The Enacting clause was repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.).
It read as follows:
Be it therefore enacted and declared by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice
and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled,
and by the Authority of the same, as follows:
(2) As enacted by the Constitution Act, 1982, which came into force on April 17, 1982. The section, as
originally enacted, read as follows:
1. This Act may be cited as The British North America Act, 1867.
(3) Section 2, repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14
(U.K.), read as follows:
2. The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and
Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Ireland.
(4) The first day of July, 1867, was fixed by proclamation dated May 22, 1867.
(5) Partially repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.). As originally
enacted the section read as follows:
4. The subsequent Provisions of this Act, shall, unless it is otherwise expressed or implied, commence
and have effect on and after the Union, that is to say, on and after the Day appointed for the Union
taking effect in the Queen's Proclamation; and in the same Provisions, unless it is otherwise expressed
or implied, the Name Canada shall be taken to mean Canada as constituted under this Act.
(6) Canada now consists of ten provinces (Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba,
British Columbia, Prince Edward Island, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland) and three
territories (the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut).
Statute Law Revision Act, 1893
56-57 Victoria, c. 14 (U.K.)
[Note: Only parts affecting the Constitution Acts are reproduced here.]
An Act for further promoting the Revision of the Statute Law by repealing Enactments which have
ceased to be in force or have become unnecessary
[19th June 1893]
Whereas it is expedient that certain enactments, which may be regarded as spent, or have ceased to be
in force otherwise than by express specific repeal by Parliament, or have, by lapse of time or otherwise
become unnecessary, should be expressly and specifically repealed:
Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of
the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the
authority of the same, as follows:
1. The enactments described in the schedule to this Act are hereby repealed, subject to the provisions of
this Act and subject to the exceptions and qualifications in the schedule mentioned; and every part of a
title, preamble, or recital specified after the words "in part, namely," in connexion with an Act
mentioned in the said schedule may be omitted from any revised edition of the statutes published by
authority after the passing of this Act, and there may be added in the said edition such brief statement
of the Acts, officers, persons, and things mentioned in the title, preamble, or recital, as may in
consequence of such omission appear necessary:
..........
4. This Act may be cited as the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893.
SCHEDULE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reign and | Title
Chapter |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
......................................
Constitution Act, 1867.
30 & 31 Victoria In part; namely,
c. 3 From "Be it therefore" to "same as follows."
Section two.
Section four to "provisions" where it last occurs .
Section twenty-five.
Sections forty-two and forty-three.
Section fifty-one. from "of the census" to "seventy-one and" and the word
'subsequent ."
Section eighty-one.
Section eighty-eight, from "and the House" to the end of the section.
Sections eighty-nine and one hundred and twenty-seven.
Section one hundred and forty-five.
Repealed as to all Her Majesty's Dominions.
I will also offer to you who it is that the Supreme law of Canada corporation applies to as per Heritage
Canada liberal interpretation.
The top law for the government of Canada is the Charter, which is over all the other statutes, bills, etc.,
and says that it only applies to government.
Minister's page | Minister of State (Sport) | Minister of State (Multiculturalism)
Location: Home - Human Rights Program 2005/03/12
GUIDE TO THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND
FREEDOMS
Part II : The Contents of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 32
Application of Charter
· This Charter applies
o to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all
matter within the authority of Parliament including all matters
relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
o to the legislature and government of each province in respect of
all matters within the authority of the legislature of each
province.
· Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until
three years after this section comes into force.
The purpose of this section is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to
governments, and not to private individuals, businesses or other organizations.
Excerpts from the BC Constitution Act:
This Act of the BC Legislature sets out the Power
of the Lieutenant Governor of BC and of the Queen of England
This Act stipulates the way government for BC is to be organized, and under it, British Columbians
(persons) are given no political rights.
The Legislature cannot be elected without the permission of the Lieutenant Governor, it cannot meet in
session without his/her permission, it must dissolve on his/her order, and the Legislature cannot spend
one dollar without the permission of the Lieutenant Governor - without his/her prior permission.
Quote # 1 from the BC Constitution Act
"2 Despite anything in this Act to the contrary, this Act must be construed as subject to the
Constitution Act, 1867 and amending Acts applicable to British Columbia, and to the order of Her
late Majesty Queen Victoria in Council for the union of British Columbia with the Dominion of
Canada under the authority of that Act."
Note that the BC Constitution Act, which designates the structure of the BC Government, is subject to the
Constitution Act, 1867. However, the BC Constitution Act is also subject to the order of the late Queen
Victoria of England. In the original BNA Act 1867, all references to the Queen of England were intended
to refer to her heirs, after her death. But in 1893 the British Parliament repealed that intention in the
"Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict, c. 14 (UK), therefore it all ended during 1901 when the
Queen died. Hence, the current de facto government for Canada is a usurped fraud.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 2 from the BC Constitution Act
Lieutenant Governor
3 (1) The Lieutenant Governor is a corporation sole.
The office of the Lieutenant Governor is a Legal Person called 'Lieutenant Governor', in the same way
that the usurped de facto government is a Legal Person. Who created this Legal Person in the first place?
Who for British Columbia has the power to create any Legal Person at any time? Who for BC has the
power to make any person the supreme power for British Columbia?
Answer: The (corporate) government has been usurped and is de facto.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 3 from the BC Constitution Act
Appointment to public office
4 (1) The appointment to public office under the government of British Columbia, whether vacant or
created and whether salaried or not, is vested in the Lieutenant Governor, with the advice of the
Executive Council, with the exception of the appointment
(a) of the officials who are also appointed members of the Executive Council, which appointments are
vested in the Lieutenant Governor alone, or
(b) for which other provision is expressly made by an Act.
(2) All officers appointed by the Lieutenant Governor, whether by commission or otherwise, remain in
office during pleasure only.
The Lieutenant Governor is the sole authority (a corporation = mammon's law) vested with the power to
appoint persons to public office for BC - he/she appoints the Executive Council, and they appoint the rest.
And anyone appointed by the Lieutenant Governor (which means everyone) holds his/her office only as
long as the Lieutenant Governor wants him to. This implies the power to fire every public official for the
usurped de facto government for British Columbia.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 4 from the BC Constitution Act
Assent or signification date for legislation
5 (1) The Clerk of the Legislative Assembly must endorse on every Act
(a) the date when the Act was assented to by the Lieutenant Governor,
Nothing becomes law for BC unless the Lieutenant Governor wants it to be law. Everywhere else on the
planet calls that a fascist dictatorship. A clear violation of God's law.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 5 from the BC Constitution Act
Executive power
7 Executive power continues, so far as it is unaltered by this Act, as it existed on February 14, 1871,
subject to sections 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 66 and 67 of the Constitution Act, 1867, and to any other part of
that Act affecting it and to the order of Her late Majesty in Council.
Executive power for BC is controlled by the provisions of the BNA Act 1867, and is subject to the order of
Her late Majesty in Council?
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 6 from the BC Constitution Act
Executive Council
9 (1) The Executive Council is composed of the persons the Lieutenant Governor appoints,
including the Premier of British Columbia, who is president of the Executive Council.
(2) The Lieutenant Governor in Council must from among those persons appointed under subsection
(1) designate
(a) those officials with portfolio and must designate the portfolio for each official, and
(b) those officials without portfolio.
Note that the Premier is not the person elected. The Lieutenant Governor has not given any person a
political right to vote for a Premier. The Premier is the person that the Lieutenant Governor appoints, and
the Lieutenant Governor appoints all the Cabinet too.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 7 from the BC Constitution Act
Transfer of powers and duties
10 (1) Any of the powers and duties assigned by law to any of the officials constituting the Executive
Council may, by order in council, be assigned and transferred for any period to any other of the
officials.
"Any of the powers assigned by law" means assigned by the law of the BC Constitution Act, which means
assigned by the Lieutenant Governor. When did a usurped de facto government become superior to God's
law? The term "order in council", means a dictator’s power to give an order without consulting anyone.
This power of issuing orders in council is how all usurped de facto governments these days operate outside
the control of elected officials under God's law - in the us of A they call them "Executive Orders".
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 8 from the BC Constitution Act
Organization of executive government
13 (1) Despite any Act, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may determine the organization of the
executive government and the various ministries.
In spite of what the elected representatives of the people may want ("Despite any Act"), the Lieutenant
Governor may organize the executive government of BC in any way he/she wants.
The "Lieutenant Governor in Council", which means the Cabinet, only hold office as long as they do what
they are told ( "(2) All officers appointed by the Lieutenant Governor, whether by commission or
otherwise, remain in office during pleasure only.")
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 9 from the BC Constitution Act
Legislative Assembly
17 There must be in British Columbia a Legislative Assembly constituted as provided by this Act, and
the Lieutenant Governor has the power, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative
Assembly, to make laws in and for British Columbia in all cases, subject to the Constitution Act, 1867,
and to the order of Her late Majesty in Council.
"By and with the advice and consent " is meaningless. The Lieutenant Governor has the supreme
corporate de facto authority to remove the premier and the executive council. "By and with the advice and
consent" is also contradictory. It contradicts a later section of the BC Constitution Act that prevents the
Legislature from spending any money without the prior approval of the Lieutenant Governor.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 10 from the BC Constitution Act
Demise of the Crown
20 (1) A Legislative Assembly summoned or called is not determined or dissolved by a demise of the
Crown, but continues, and may meet, convene, sit, proceed and act, despite the demise of the Crown, as
if the demise had not happened.
(2) This section does not alter or abridge the power of the Crown to prorogue or dissolve the
Legislative Assembly.
This seems to make it clear that persons are under the power of the Crown. The Crown can terminate any
session of their elected representatives at any time the Crown wants. Perhaps that is why the corporate
"government" openly admits that it is de facto. Because it is not a lawful government under God's law, it
is usurped and de facto. It is mammon's/man's law, not God's.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 11 from the BC Constitution Act
Summoning and proroguing
21 (1) The Lieutenant Governor must, by proclamation in Her Majesty's name, summon and call
together the Legislative Assembly.
(2) It is not necessary for the Lieutenant Governor, in proroguing the Legislative Assembly, to name
any day to which it is prorogued, or to issue a formal proclamation for a meeting of the Legislative
Assembly, unless it is intended that the meeting is to be for the dispatch of business.
Duration
23 (1) The Lieutenant Governor may, by proclamation in Her Majesty's name, prorogue or
dissolve the Legislative Assembly when the Lieutenant Governor sees fit.
It seems that the elected representatives can not even meet without permission from that Lieutenant
Governor, acting for the Queen of England. Or the elected representatives cannot meet without the
permission of the Queen of England, acting through her Lieutenant Governor. And he/she can end the
session and send them all home when he/she feels it necessary.
And paragraph 23 seems to make it clear that the Lieutenant Governor is the personal representative of
Her Majesty, who swore an oath to God to protect my faith and to uphold His laws.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 12 from the BC Constitution Act
Oath of allegiance
24 (1) A member of the Legislative Assembly must not vote or sit until he or she has taken and
subscribed the following oath before the Lieutenant Governor, or some other person authorized by the
Lieutenant Governor to administer the oath:
I, A.B., swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II [or
her successor], her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.
Those are the words (above) in the BC Constitution Act, indicating prima fascia an unlawful,
unsanctioned deficient form by the omission of the word “do” in the BC oath of Allegiance thus effectively
invalidating the oath by making the oath grammatically incoherent.
These are the words (below) from the federal Oath of allegiance Act for Canada ,..... it is very clear as
to how the oath is to be worded for Canada, it is
(1) Every person who, either of his own accord or in compliance with any lawful requirement made of
the person, or in obedience to the directions of any Act or law in force in Canada, except the
Constitution Act, 1867 and the Citizenship Act, desires to take an oath of allegiance shall have
administered and take the oath in the following form, and no other:
I, ...................., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth
the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Quote # 13 from the BC Constitution Act
Lieutenant Governor may initiate Bills
46 The Lieutenant Governor may transmit, by message to the Legislative Assembly, the draft of any
law that appears to the Lieutenant Governor desirable to introduce, and all drafts must be taken into
consideration by the Legislative Assembly in a manner provided by the rules and orders.
Appropriation by message of Lieutenant Governor
47 The Legislative Assembly must not originate or pass any vote, resolution, address or Bill for the
appropriation of any part of the consolidated revenue fund, or of any tax or impost, to any purpose that
has not been first recommended by a message of the Lieutenant Governor to the Legislative
Assembly during the session in which the vote, resolution, address or Bill is proposed.
Lieutenant Governor may return Bills
48 If a Bill is presented to the Lieutenant Governor for the Lieutenant Governor's assent, the
Lieutenant Governor may return it, by message, for the reconsideration of the Legislative Assembly,
with amendments the Lieutenant Governor thinks fit.
The elected representatives are forbidden to spend money without the Lieutenant Governor’s permission.
Control of the purse strings is the ultimate control.
The Lieutenant Governor can keep on refusing to sign a Bill or may sign a Bill which is in violation of
God's law because the government is usurped, de facto, and the sworn oath is a fraudulent oath.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Excerpts from the BNA Act 1867
9 The executive government and authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be
vested in the Queen.
Queen Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor swore an oath to God
to protect my faith and to uphold His (God's) laws.
Romans 13:1 - ...there is no authority except for God.
Here are a few more important notes regarding "Canada":
Myth of Canada
"Throughout the world ... we use the word 'politics' to describe the process so well:
'Poli' in Latin meaning 'many' and 'tics' meaning 'bloodsucking creatures"
- Canada is not a federated nation.
- 1864, The Quebec resolution, which expressed the desire for the provinces to confederate under
the British Crown based upon the principles of the British constitution, was never included in the
British North America Act. As a matter of fact, the British Parliament rushed the BNA Act
through in four days reading and then foisted it upon Canada at that time, and hence the
dominion of Canada was born, or, the consolidation of four colonies in to one. (Still remained a
colony of the British empire, until 1931 Statute of Westminster).
- 1893 Revisions Act took the Crown away as part of the British North America Act
- Queen Victoria, after she passed away in 1901, the monarchy ended in Canada.
- The Statute of Westminster, put together by King George the 5th, delivered December eleventh
1931, removed the British Parliament from Canada and allowed Canada to become a sovereign
nation and confederate. In 1935, the mandarins in the legislature went to Delaware and did an
incorporation called 'CANADA' instead.
- CANADA is a privately traded company.
- The Statue of Westminster ended the British North America Act.
- The provinces became 12 sovereign nations.
- 1982 "repatriation" of the Constitution Act was a commercial document. It does not apply to
men. It only applies to corporate entities (legal fictions). A man can not lawfully be compelled to
be a party to a corporation.
- Canada has not been a democracy since 1931.
- Bar licensed lawyers practice commercial law. Within their purview they deliver the person and
it's property unto the state.
- Social insurance is an application for benefits which was created by the corporation.
- The Birth Certificate is a bond (debenture) which is sent to the bank of Canada. The
government of Canada gets its "money" by borrowing off of the bonds. It uses the bonds to make
corp. CANADA run off of a man's life from birth until death.
- The Order of the Garter owns the corporation called CANADA.
Therefor the Criminal Code for CANADA is null and void to all who reject it. Section 91(27) of
the Constitution Act, 1867 is of no force and effect. It is affirmed in section 8:
'Criminal Code'
Application to territories
8. (1) The provisions of this Act apply throughout Canada except
(a) in Yukon, in so far as they are inconsistent with the Yukon Act;
(b) in the Northwest Territories, in so far as they are inconsistent with the Northwest Territories
Act; and
(c) in Nunavut, in so far as they are inconsistent with the Nunavut Act.
(Note: The Criminal Code for Canada clearly states that "The provisions of this Act apply
throughout Canada... ".
The fact is, Canada is a security at Washington, District of Columbia, so it only applies to
corporate members who have wilfully agreed to be bound by the corporate CODE.
The Interpretation Act for Canada defines "land" as well as "Canada" as water. (Definitions are
below))
"Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God", therefore, if the
Supreme law of the bankrupt corporation called CANADA is superior to all of the subordinate laws and
only applies to the (de facto) government, can you tell me how the subordinate laws apply to me when I
am not government nor a partner, employee, and/or office holder with your government?
The writers of that alleged "law" make it difficult to read, but I am not the author of that confusion and
deceit. My God given dutiful freedoms to not bow to a false god is a law from my God which I intend
to follow.
You, with a competent eye and an open mind, can readily see that the de facto government of Canada
was usurped and taken over by wealthy international bankers when in January 22, 1901 at Osborne
house on the isle of wight Queen Victoria died. This effectively brought the British North American Act
to a Sudden death as of the repeal of section two (2) that took place in 1893. You have seen above that
section two (2) was originally intended to bind her heirs to the enforcement of that enactment. The
repeal, as you have read in the Statute law revision act of 1893, was of the consideration of the drafters
of that enactment that they no longer needed the Queen or her heirs to continue their plunder and as
such you have a de facto and usurped unlawful and tyrannical "government" acting as if they were
lawfully in a de jure position of law, which as you must know is clearly a fraud.
Colossians 3:22-23
Servants, obey your fleshly masters in all things--not with eye service as pleasing men; but with
singleness of heart, fearing God. And whatever you do, do heartily, as to the Lord and not to men.
So, here is the agreement I offer to you in in the hopes that neither of us violates the laws which we are
bound by.
I aver that the following facts of our private agreement of honour and good faith are the truth, the
whole truth and nothing but the truth, correct, complete and certain, without the intent to mislead, under
penalty of perjury and where I believe and do present fact of something to be true I do state my belief:
1. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, am a
living, breathing, flesh and blood man created by Yahweh, in His image, and have been
ordained as His minister through his only begotten son Jesus Christ, to protect His laws.
2. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, am
not, nor do I represent myself to be, a corporation or any form of fictitious legal entity referred
to as a “person”, for it is a violation of the laws of my Creator and my faith, as written in the
King James Bible: Deuteronomy 1:17, 10:17; Ephesians 6:9; Romans 2:11; Acts 10: 34; James
2:9; Colossians 3:25; sworn to be protected by Queen Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor and
Her Majesty's judges and agents.
3. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, am not the
legal representative of the fictitious corporate entity known as FIDLER, ANDREW CLAYTON
or any other combination of partial or all capitalized letters or reversed name.
4. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that the said fictitious entities as created by the Crown without my informed consent are
the property of Her Majesty as evidenced by government documents such as: a driver’s license,
birth certificate, social insurance card, medical service card, etc., etc., all of which I make no
use of.
5. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that all the private men and women acting as crown
counsel and all provincial lawyers, that may wish to advise you in a public capacity, have by
law sworn an oath to God to be truly allegiant to the Queen as de jure Christian monarch styled
as "Defender of the Faith" and cannot defend or advise private parties using public taxpayer
dollars.
6. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that any man or woman who takes an oath to a Christian
monarch who does not know the law regarding the meaning of their oath when asked is
incompetent to provide the true allegiance as they simply do not know what it is.
7. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that corruption is evident and existing within all sectors
of government be it municipal, provincial, or federal and that no man, woman, or Church can
lawfully be compelled to participate with or contractually submit to a corrupt and admitted de
facto government, it's registries, or it's agents.
8. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that any intimidation by any man or woman to violate
my faith based in the King James Bible, as defended by the Queen, is treason upon her
majesty's government and is a breach of trust that the oath to God promised to faithfully provide
as found in section 122 of the Criminal Code for Canada, which I make no use of (Ezekiel
33:6).
9. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the first commandment of God in the King James
Bible, as defended by her majesty the Queen, is specifically to not bow to nor serve false god's
(Exodus 20:3-5).
10. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact, that the eleventh commandment of God in the King
James Bible is to not add to his law nor take away from it. Deuteronomy 4:2 ;12:32
11. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that any attendance I may make or may have made in a de facto COURT of "law", or a de
facto statute court of British Columbia, is done under threat and duress, contrary to the holy
nature and righteous law of God, as written in the King James Bible: Romans 16:17; Acts 5:29;
and without my informed consent, agreement, and/or permission, and without having
knowledge of or a required understanding of the lawful reasons for the de facto proceedings or
any assumed CHARGES that may be brought against the said fictitious entity/person.
12. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that any document which I may have signed promising to attend and/or appear in any said
court was signed under protest of duress, threat and intimidation, contrary to the statutes and
codes which govern the conduct of your company's agents, ie. s.423 and s.176 of the Criminal
Code, which I make no use of (Ezekiel 33:6); and that my signature is evidence of intimidation,
extortion, coercion and threat of unlawful arrest, shackling, persecution, torture and
imprisonment, contrary to s.4, s.6, and s.13 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes
Act, which I make no use of (Ezekiel 33:6), being un-lawfully demanded of me by an agent of
her majesty.
13. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that in a financial relationship the creditor has control
over the debtor and that the world bank is the creditor for Canada (being the debtor) and all of
it's enitities (persons, employees, citizens, etc.).
14. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the world bank, being Canada's creditor has defined
a de facto government, in it's operational policy manual, as being usurped authority as in a coup
d'etat, being a military revolution or abrogation of the constitution. It is further agreed that all
the law dictionaries of the world define de facto as being unlawful, usurped, illegitimate
authority as opposed to dejure government which means lawfully formed and ruled.
15. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the laws for Canada specifically prohibit the act of
intimidation to do a thing you have a right to not do and that my faith in Christ cannot be
lawfully intimidated.
16. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I, as a minister of Christ, am officially performing a
function of my calling by avoiding the de facto false god registry of the de facto provincial and
municipal military style governments as per Exodus 20:3-5 Deuteronomy 4:2;12:32; Matthew
6:24; Acts 5:29; Romans 16:17-20; and Colossians 2:8-22 and by doing so, as Christ directed,
practicing my Christian faith unmolested. It is further agreed with no rebuttal to the fact that
you now are irrevocably aware it is a violation of God's commands and my faith as defended by
the Queen to submit the property of the church or my property to a de facto registry.
17. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that I am officiating in my ministerial capacity and performing my ministerial function of
professing my calling at all times in all locations, pursuant to God's laws as written in the King
James Bible, Exodus 19:6, sworn by an oath to God to be protected by her majesty Queen
Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor and her majesty's agents.
18. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that I stand in the Kingdom of God wherever I am at all times.
19. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that the Holy King James Bible has official standing in all courts of British Columbia and
represents the rule of law so stated in the preamble to the Canadian Bill of Rights and Charter of
Rights and Freedoms, the latter Sections of which apply only to her majesty’s agents.
20. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that Section 423 of the Criminal Code for Canada
applies to all government employee's as well as sections 15,19,122 126,176 and 180 of that
same code.
21. It is agreed with no rebuttal to the fact that any man/wo-man trespassing against me, vi et armis
or otherwise, under the guise of prosecuting the said fictitious entity/person in a civil/criminal
matter regarding corporate commercial codes, acts, and statutes does commit a crime of
obstructing me as an officiating minister performing a function of my calling (Exodus 19:6).
22. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that any man/wo-man trespassing against me, vi et armis or otherwise, under the guise of
prosecuting the said fictitious entity/person in a civil/criminal matter regarding corporate
commercial codes, acts, and statutes does commit a crime of intimidating me, contrary to section
423 of the Criminal Code for Canada, which I make no use of (Ezekiel 33:6), to accept the
unlawful jurisdiction of the said court and the joinder with the said fictitious entity/person.
23. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that any man/wo-man trespassing, vi et armis or otherwise, against me the minister and
creation of God, under the guise of prosecuting the said fictitious entity/person in a
civil/criminal matter regarding corporate commercial statutes, acts, and codes does commit a
crime of common nuisance, contrary to section 180 of the Criminal Code for Canada, of which
I make no use of (Ezekiel 33:6).
24. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that any man/wo-man trespassing, vi et armis or otherwise, against me the minister and
creation of God, under the guise of prosecuting the said fictitious entity/person in a civil matter
regarding corporate commercial statutes, acts, and codes does commit a crime of obstructing or
violence to or arrest of officiating clergyman, contrary to section 176 of the Criminal Code for
Canada, which I make no use of (Ezekiel 33:6).
25. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that any man/wo-man trespassing against me, vi et armis or otherwise, under the guise of
prosecuting the said fictitious entity/person in a civil/criminal matter regarding corporate
commercial codes, acts, and statutes does commit a crime of disobeying a statute: Canadian Bill
of Rights Section 1(c), which I make no use of (Ezekiel 33:6).
26. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that any man/wo-man trespassing against me, vi et armis or otherwise, and thereby
obstructs my freedom to travel privately and/or the enjoyment of my private property does
commit a crime of disobeying a statute: Canadian Bill of Rights Section 1(a), which I make no
use of (Ezekiel 33:6).
27. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I: Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler, do hereby
aver that I have evidence and good reason to believe that the court formed in her majesty’s
name is de facto, an impostor, and acts as a false god and as such it is clearly a false authority
that, as of my faith in Yahweh’s Law, I cannot submit to nor lawfully be intimidated to bow
down to (Exodus 20:3-5).
28. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that any birth registry and financial bonding to effect
jurisdiction over my body (temple) was formed in fraud as it was without my fully informed
and wilfull consent, agreement, and/or permission, and as such is null and void.
29. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that you are with the knowledge that ministers of the
Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International cannot, as of our faith to follow God's first
command as defended by the Queen, register with de facto government entities.
Note: The following can be read at the website of Ministry of the Attorney General:
http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/family/pgt/nfpinc/charities.asp#special_religious
"6.5 Special situations of religious organizations
Religious organizations should consider certain issues carefully before incorporating.
Governing Law
If a religious organization becomes incorporated, its ecclesiastical, canon or church laws, rules or
regulations may be subject to the Corporations Act . This means that if any ecclesiastical, canon or
church law, rule or regulations conflicts with the Corporations Act , the organization, once
incorporated, must comply with the Corporations Act and will no longer be able to use that law, rule or
regulation in administering its affairs."
30. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that registration, with dead de facto regimes, requires and
contracts to provide servitude. I cannot, by my faith, submit to de facto regimes as it is my contention
and belief as a Christian minister that de facto government's are false gods and have no de jure
authority.
31. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that a wilfull appearance at the corrupt, de facto
commercial equity COURT(S) for CANADA/BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF is an acceptance
of mammons and man's law and a violation of my faith and religious beliefs as well as a violation of
the oath of her majesty Queen Elizabeth II, therefore I can not wilfully appear and participate at any
aforementioned COURT for it is un-lawful and fraud. Be it known that any attendance I may make at
the aforementioned COURT(S) is under threat, duress, and intimidation and in violation of section 176
and section 423 of the Criminal Code for Canada to name a few, which I make no use of (Ezekiel
33:6).
32. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the de facto authority of the judges, prosecutors, and
agents of CANADA/BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF will not be tolerated for it is a violation
of God's laws as written in the King James Bible which Queen Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor has
sworn an oath to protect.
33. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that Paul in Romans 13 says they are ministers of God
three times and that any minister of God when asked of the meaning of his oath will immediately know
it is to uphold all of God's laws as per Ezra 7:25-26.
34. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that judges, prosecutors, and agents of CANADA /
BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF are impostors who have sworn false oaths and are acting as
false gods without authority to make me bow to them, and I can not be compelled to violate God's
commands nor participate in fraud.
35. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I am a man created by God in his service and ministry
ordained by Christ and I can not be compelled to operate my life as a commercial entity created by de
facto governments known as a "person".
36. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the alteration of my name, without my consent,
agreement, and/or permission, for a financial purpose and/or in association with persons in law by any
man, wo-man, or entity inclusive of de facto governments is fraud and is a violation of my faith and
religious beliefs.
37. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the Government of Canada or the province are false
corporate gods that have no force and effect upon non commercial ecclesiatically engaged ministers of
Christ following the commandment to not bow to or serve false gods.
38. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that it is a violation of my faith to submit to man's laws as
many of the men and wo-men holding de facto offices for the corporations called CANADA/BRITISH
COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF seem to dictate and impose upon me in a discriminatory practice.
39. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that Jesus never paid tax to Caesar who had declared
himself a god (a false god), but quite to the contrary, Jesus/Yashua paid the Hebrew temple tax with a
coin from a fishes mouth equal to one shekel , being the Hebraic covenanted temple tax tribute for two
men, himself and Peter.
40. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that many of the men and women who have been
employed and who are employed as members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police by the usurped,
de facto government of Canada and many of the men and women who have been and who are members
of it's registered Catholic Churches are responsible for the genocide of the indigenous men, women,
and children of the dry land mass called Turtle Island.
41. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that "British Columbia" owns no dry land for the land
known by some as "British Columbia" has been unlawfully stolen from the indigenous protectors by
false and fraudulent claim(s) and/or contract(s) contrary to God's law wherein during the year of our
Lord 1858 "Governor" James Douglas deceitfully manipulated many men and women to use violence
to destroy the homes of the indigenous men and women of the dry land called: 'Turtle Island'. See
Leviticus 25: regarding land laws.
42. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that a de jure government rules with the Bible or other
religious text such as Torah and is lawful as long as no harm befalls the men and women who are
subject to that form of government as a result of adding to or taking away from God's law.
"Love your brother as yourself" is the golden rule.
43. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the debtor corporation of Canada has been a bankrupt
country since 1931 and has had no gold to back the paper fiat money since 1933 when receivership for
the creditor, being the world bank, kicked in, and has bonded the men and women registered with
Canada for 8 million dollars a piece and classified the Bonded men and women as sureties for the debt
and as fiduciaries for the legal fiction persons (strawmen) created by provincial and federal statute as
per the regulations of the Canadian Ownership Control and Determination Act of 1982, formerly the
Foreign Investment Act of 1933 created by the debtor corporation of Canada.
44. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that legal fictions are creations of law for the convenience
of the court and are done with out gaining permission from the one whose name is being monetised.
R.v. Staufen BCSC 2001
45. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the debtor commercial corporation of Canada assumes
a financial interest in such registrant after the applicant has consented to registry and issues a certificate
of Birth, drivers licence, property registration, etc., as the birth certificate resulting from such
commercial registry proves, having been printed on Canadian Banknote paper reserved under law for
security documents and valuable securities such as currency.
Jubilee of Leviticus 25: is supported by the Levitical high priest being Elizabeth Alexandra Mary
Windsor the Queen of the Commonwealth.
To one of faith in God's law, we are to not ignore knowledge. Hosea 4:6
The creditor makes the commercial rules. The World Bank is the Creditor. The World Bank,
Canada's commercial creditor, says de facto is usurped power like under military rule. It is
unlawful. Corporate Canada's creditors are a private for profit venture owned by Bankers all having
the same religious affiliation using Talmud, fraud and usury to quite literally enslave the nations
46. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that you can not provide me with the proof as to which
legislation of man can abrogate God's law. Exodus 20:3-5 Numbers 15:15, Deuteronomy 4:2;12:32
Acts 5:29.
In good faith, I share with you the following to investigate for your self: the Westminster
Confession of Faith from 1646, section 22. Lawful oaths;. And section 126 from the Criminal
Code for Canada. The Acts? Bills of Exchange Act and the Oaths of Allegiance Act, Royal
Styles and Titles Act, Statute of Westminster 1931, Confession of Faith Act 1646, and the
Coronation Act of 1689 for starters. The act below is from 1778 and the reign of King George
the Third and is still on the books as in force law for Canada. Note how it says no tax
whatever shall be imposed except for commerce. Commerce is described as the worldly
pursuit of wealth for self gain and enrichment. It is also known ecclesiastically as mammon,
and Christ for-warned us we cannot serve God and Mammon. Matthew 6:24
47. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that an oath to a Christian Monarch is an act of
religious worship and all who refuse to acknowledge and submit to that fact are impostors who lied
to get their job.
48. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that an agent of her Majesty when failing to
acknowledge they have an oath of allegiance to the defender of the faith and recognition of the
supremacy of God relieves themselves from sworn duty and reverts themselves to a private man or
woman with no more judicial authority than the sovereign inheritance of birth as they have by lack
of recognition of those prime points of law indicated they perjured themselves when swearing their
oath to God.
49. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that a minister once notifying whoever obstructs them
that he is a minister not bound by commercial law in performing the functions of his calling and
that unless proof to the contrary is evident the man or woman once made aware of the ministry
being performed has no sanction in law or from the Christian monarch they swore to be truly
allegiant to, to obstruct intimidate or act as a nuisance to him while performing the official
functions of his calling.
50. It is agreed with no rebuttal to the fact that we as men and women of the Christian faith and
confession are not commercial entities.
XLIII. ''And whereas by an Act passed in the Eighteenth Year of the Reign (1778) of His late
Majesty King George the Third, instituted An Act for removing all Doubts and Apprehensions
concerning Taxation by the Parliament of Great Britain in any of the Colonies, Provinces, and
Plantations in North America and the West Indies; and for repealing so much of an Act made in the
Seventh Year of the Reign of His present Majesty as imposes a Duty on Tea imported from Great
Britain into any Colony or Plantation in America, or relating thereto, it was declared, that "the King
and Parliament of Great Britain would not impose any Duty, Tax, or Assessment whatever, payable
in any of His Majesty's Colonies, Provinces, and Plantations in North America or the West Indies,
except only such Duties as it might be expedient to impose for the Regulation of Commerce, the net
Produce of such Duties to be always paid and applied to and for the Use of the Colony, Province, or
Plantation in which the same shall be respectively levied, in such Manner as other Duties collected
by the Authority of the respective General Courts or General Assemblies of such Colonies,
Provinces, or Plantations were ordinarily paid and applied:'' And whereas it is necessary, for the
General Benefit of the Empire, that such Power of Regulation of Commerce should continue to be
exercised by Her Majesty and the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland,
subject nevertheless to the Conditions herein before recited with respect to the Application of any
Duties which may be imposed for that Purpose;'' be it therefore enacted, That nothing in this Act
contained shall prevent or affect the Execution of any Law which hath been or shall be made in the
Parliament of the said United Kingdom for establishing Regulations and Prohibitions, or for the
imposing, levying, or collecting Duties for the Regulation of Navigation, or for the Regulation of
the Commerce between the Province of Canada and any other Part of Her Majesty's Dominions, or
between the said Province of Canada or any Part thereof and any Foreign Country or Stint, or for
appointing and directing the Payment of Drawbacks of such Duties so imposed, or to give to Her
Majesty any Power or Authority, by and with the Advice and Consent of such Legislative Council
and Assembly of the said Province of Canada, to vary or repeal any such Law or Laws, or any Part
thereof, or in any Manner to prevent or obstruct the Execution thereof
Note: I make no use of mans laws (Ezekiel 33:6). I merely provide them for your benefit to show
those laws apply to you when at work for the corporate fiction and not to members of our church.
(See above: section 32 of the supreme law of Canada)
51. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the Coronation Ceremony of Queen Elizabeth
Alexandra Mary Windsor declares that the Bible is the Royal rule for the government of Christian
princes and the Westminster Confession of Faith from 1646 still in force law in Canada has, as the
whole purpose of the Monarchy, in defending the Christian faith from covetous actions of vain men
of commercially minded gain.
52. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that any man or woman who has sworn an oath to the
Christian Monarch to be truly allegiant to the “Defender of the faith” then obstructs, intimidates, or
acts as a nuisance to the ability of an officiating minister of God, has acted against the Queens
ability to defend the faith and is attempting to overthrow her majesty’s government, being the King
James Bible, by force.... and that Section 46 of the Criminal Code for Canada (which I make no use
of - Ezekiel 33:6) applies to all sworn allegiant officers of her majesty.
53. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the “Rule of law” spoken of in the preamble to the
1982 de facto Constitution, being a rule for debtors, (that clearly only applies to all registered
corporate government employee’s via section 32 of that charter), is indisputably God’s law, being
the King James Bible, as defended by the Christian monarch you the private man/wo-man swore to
be truly allegiant to via the Canadian oaths of Allegiance Act and Coronation Act of 1689. Any
other act that dares speak contrary or may have altered the authorized form is not withstanding nor
legitimate.
54. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that all de facto authorities are impostors and have no
sanction from the Queen to intimidate any man or woman from practicing their Christian faith.
55. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that if you ignore this good faith ecclesiastical
agreement and proceed to intimidate me while in your de facto capacity that you consent to the fact
and admit to be actively and irrefutably involved in a conspiracy to violate my faith in the King
James Bible.
56. It is agreed by you, with no rebuttal to the fact you consent to pay me one (1) million Dollars
$1,000,000.00 in Gold Maple Leaf coin for the damages to my ability to practice my faith
unimpeded and that you will, once our agreement is witnessed and published, provide me the name
and address of your liability insurance bond agent to pay for damages due to your intimidation
should you choose to break the laws and violate your oath.
57. It is agreed, understood, and with no rebuttal to the fact that the Sikh's from Quesnel British
Columbia sued the RCMP in 1980 and easily recouped $10,000,000.00 for the rejection of one man
from RCMP employment as of his faith to wear a turban.
58. It is agreed, that the Queen's defence of the King James Bible as of oath and duty is decidedly
more powerful as standing and defence than the turban.
59. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I am of the kingdom of God and of private faith
and religious nature, and I am not the legal person created by the usurped de facto government nor of
commercial corporate profit motivated quest. I follow God’s laws as defended by the Queen.
God’s first commandment in her majesty’s Bible is: do not bow to false gods. Exodus 20:3-5
60. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that God’s law has been added to if no man/wo-man has
been harmed and there is no private complaint by a man (not a "person").
King James Bible
Deuteronomy 1:17 - Ye shall not respect persons in judgment .
Deuteronomy 10:17 - For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great
God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons , nor taketh
reward:
Acts 10:34 - Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive
that God is no respecter of persons :
Romans 2:11 - For there is no respect of persons with God .
Ephesians 6:9 - And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing
threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is
there respect of persons with him .
Colossians 3:25 - But the one who does wrong shall receive for the wrong he has done, and there is no
respect for persons .
James 2:9 - But if ye have respect to
persons , ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors .
The Word "person" is defined by the Interpretation Act of "Canada" as:
Interpretation Act
"person" includes (is/means) a corporation, partnership or party, and the personal or other legal
representatives of a person to whom the context can apply according to law.
"corporation" means an incorporated association, company, society,
municipality or other incorporated body, where and however incorporated,
and includes (is/means) a corporation sole other than Her Majesty or the Lieutenant Governor.
Canadian LAW Dictionary
EXPRESSIO UNIUS EST EXCLUSIO ALTERIUS - Lat: the express mention of one person or
thing is the exclusion of another.
The Canadian Style
A guide to Writing and Editing
by Dundurn Press Limited in co-operation with Public Works and
Government Services Canada Translation Bureau
Chapter 12
page 224
12.03 Words commonly confused or misused:
"include, comprise- Include implies only part of a whole ; comprise implies all"
If you were to say, "The price includes bed and breakfast,"
you are basically saying "the price means bed and breakfast." It does not
mean ( include ) a limo ride from the airport, free booze and a massage with a
happy ending.
Canadian LAW Dictionary
ARTIFICIAL PERSON - A legal entity, not a human being, recognized as a
person in law to whom legal rights and duties may attach- e.g., a body
corporate. The Interpretation Act, R.S.O. 1990, C. I. 11, s.29(1), states
that "person" includes a corporation and the heirs, executors,
administrators, or legal representatives of a person to whom the context
can apply according to "law".
Canadian LAW Dictionary
NATURAL PERSON - "A natural person is a human being that has the capacity for rights and
duties." Hague v. Cancer Relief & Research Institute, [1939] 4 D.L.R. 191 at 194 (Man.K.B.).
The word 'human' does not exist by definition in Black's, Bouvier's, and Canadian Law
Dictionaries. In 'Balantine's Self Pronouncing Law Dictionary', 1948, page 389, "Human Being" is
defined as: "See Monster". On page 540 of this same Law Dictionary, the word: "Monster", is defined
as: "a human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal."
In 'Webster's New World dictionary', Third College Edition, 1988, pages 879-880, "monster" is defined
as: "a person so cruel, wicked, depraved, etc., as to horrify others."
From the 'Random House Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd Edition, page 901, "Human Being"
is defined as: "Natural man: unenlightened or unregenerate", and on 1461, "unregenerate" means: "not
regenerate; unrepentant; an unregenerate sinner; not convinced by or unconverted to a particular
religion; wicked, sinful, dissolute."
In 'Webster's New World Dictionary', Third College Edition, 1988, page 657, "Humanitarianism" is
defined as: "the doctrine that humankind may become perfect without divine aid."
In 'Collier's New Dictionary of the English Language', 1928, "Humanitarianism" is defined as: "a
philanthropist; an anti-Trinitarian who rejects the doctrine of Christ's divinity; a perfectionist."
And in the 'Random House Webster's College Dictionary', 1990, page 653, "Humanism" is defined as:
"any system or mode of thought or action in which human interests, values and dignity predominate,
especially an ethical theory that often rejects the importance of a belief in God."]
Therefore, when a man or woman says that he/she is a "human being" or a "humanitarian", they are
saying (according to every definition of these words, and according to law), "I am an animal; I am a
monster; I am not saved; I am unrepentant; I am an unregenerate sinner; I am not converted; I am
wicked, sinful, and dissolute; I am cruel, depraved, unenlightened; and I reject Christ's divinity and the
importance of a belief in the Creator or a higher power.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Article 25: Individual criminal responsibility
1. The Court shall have jurisdiction over natural persons pursuant to this Statute.
The "person" is corporate property. A "CHARGE" from a bankrupt corporation is:
Bouvier's Law Dictionary
CHARGE, contracts. An obligation entered into by the owner of an estate which makes the estate
responsible for its performance. Vide 2 Ball & Beatty, 223; 8 Com. Dig. 306, Appendix, h. t. Any
obligation binding upon him who enters into it, which may be removed or taken away by a
discharge. T. de la Ley, h. t.
2. That particular kind of commission which one undertakes to perform for another, in keeping the
custody of his goods, is called a charge .
Canadian LAW Dictionary
CHARGE - In property law, a charge is an encumbrance, lien, or claim, a burden on the land. As
such, it is a form of security for the satisfaction of a debt or performance of an obligation .
In it's broadest sense, it means simply to entrust with, by way of responsibility, duty, etc. F.C. Rickert
Co. v. Larkin [1928] 3 W.W.R. 305 (Alta.S.C.A.D.); Dominion Creosoting Co. v. T.R. Nickerson Co.
(1917), 55 S.C.R. 303.
(Ezekiel 33:6)
61. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that those who may be empowered de facto have falsely
and fraudulently assumed things about me that unlawfully take away my dutiful freedoms through the
use of violence, intimidation, and without my consent, agreement, and/or permission. This
'Asseveration and Notice of Denial of Corporate Status Agreement' proves that assumption is wrong
and that I can not be lawfully compelled to submit to false god's and mammon's/man-made laws that
are contrary to God's laws.
(Note: "Canada" is defined by an amendment to the Interpretation Act, which can usually be found at
the back of the private, copyrighted "Criminal Code" of "Canada", excluding the following
amendment, which is cleverly and deceitfully hidden at the back of the Ocean's Act, as:
87. Subsection 35(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order:
Ocean's Act - Interpretation Act
"Canada"
<< Canada >>
"Canada", for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of
Canada;)
(Ezekiel 33:6)
62. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the so called provinces, just like in the Canada Land
Surveys Act, are not included in acts of the federal government as they have no jurisdiction in areas
outside of Canada as declared in the boundaries described within the Surveys enactment. The
jurisdiction of the federal government of Canada, according to their own enactments, is only upon
Canada lands (non-existent bodies of water) and owned territories as per the surveys act clear definition
and is only applicable to government controlled entities.
63. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that only by an unlawful, de facto memorandum of
agreements between the provinces and the federal government in league with the World Bank, who’s
soul motivation is profit, that the debt ridden Canadian corporate structure using the souls of men and
women as sureties bonded for millions of dollars can float the paper issued as money. Every dollar
struck by the Canadian mint is backed by a birth value of each and every child that was registered with
the provincial and federal governments since 1933. Each one was bonded, without full disclosure, and
listed as a security value with the treasury board of Canada and assigned a number. Each certificate was
issued on banknote paper which is listed to only be used for as security items of value such as a
certificate of listed value as an evidence of a bonded debt to the world bank.
64. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that there is no valid existing legislation to enforce federal
law in the provinces and the Bruno decision in BC federal tax court in 2002 settled that. The crown
never appealed as through the difference between “province” and “Province” which was key in the
defense and the Judge remarked he did not like his own decision but the law was before him. Only the
federal attorney general has jurisdiction over criminal code prosecutions and then only on Canada
lands.
(Note: Canada Land Surveys Act defines "Canada Lands" as:
24. (1) In this Part, "Canada Lands" means
(a) any lands belonging to Her Majesty in right of Canada or of which the Government of
Canada has power to dispose that are situated in Yukon, the Northwest Territories, Nunavut
or in any National Park of Canada and any lands that are
(i) surrendered lands or a reserve, as defined in the Indian Act,
(b) any lands under water belonging to Her Majesty in right of Canada or in respect of any
rights in which the Government of Canada has power to dispose.
(Ezekiel 33:6)
65. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the word province in section 2 of the Criminal Code
for Canada (which I make no use of - Ezekiel 33:6) refers to a geographical land mass and not a
legislature defined as Province with a capital “P”.
66. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the geographical limits of “Canada” are delineated in
the Canada Land Surveys Act, Section 24, and that Canada being the land mass spoken of in that
enactment only includes the North West Territories, Nunavut, and the Yukon as provinces as concurred
in section 2 of the Criminal Code for Canada and section 30 of the de facto Charter of Rights and
Freedoms (of which I make no use of - Ezekiel 33:6).
67. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I am not a member of a dead legal fiction entity
corporation known as CANADA or BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF and that specifically my
name, being my ecclesiastical possession under the exclusive authority of Yahweh, is not allowed by
my faith in God’s commands as defended by the Queen you swore an oath to be truly allegiant to, to be
used, recorded, registered, or altered or exchanged for a financial purpose without my permission and
that it has never been offered or pledged to be for any of those reasons or to be used as a surety or as a
commodity with my fully informed consent.
68. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that Romans 16:17-20 tells us clearly as those of faith in
the word of God that her majesty the high priest of the Church of Christ and defender of the mosaic law
knows any law not in line with God’s law is invalid against men and women of faith in Yahweh and his
son Yashua and the law of loving your brother.
69. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that any man or woman in office who is hired to up
hold the law of the land and thereby have taken an oath to the Christian Monarch to be Truly
allegiant, if they do not know what that true allegiance is when asked, then they have provided
irrefutable evidence that they lied to get their job.
70. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that you have seen no proof of any malevolent act from
me and hearsay or assumption is not admissible in court.
71. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that I cannot be forced to violate my faith and register
with a false god de facto government.
72. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that you are aware that I reserve my right under God’s law
not to be compelled to perform under any fraudulently obtained contract or commercial agreement that
I did not enter knowingly, with informed consent, voluntarily and intentionally.
73. It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that you are aware that I do not accept the liability of
the compelled benefit of any unrevealed de facto contract or unlawful commercial agreement,
which is my ministerial duty pursuant to God’s law to divide myself from.
II Corinthians
11:12 But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from
them which desire occasion; that wherein they glory, they may be found
even as we.
11:13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming
themselves into the apostles of Christ.
Default Notice
It is agreed, with no rebuttal to the fact that the anointed of God Queen Elizabeth Alexandra
Mary Windsor will act as witness to our agreement along with three other witnesses to
confirm our good faith covenant in twenty (20) days time from your receipt of this contractual
agreement that will then be advertised, posted, and circulated to as many as can benefit from
it's honourable position.
Blessings and thank you for honouring the Defence of the Christian Faith
The Bible does indeed declare the existence of a being with a personality who is called Satan, the
devil. In fact, between thirty-five and forty names have been attributed to him in the Scriptures.
He is called not only "Satan" and "devil" but "Abaddon" (Rev. 9:11); "The accuser of our
brethren" (Rev. 12:10); "Your adversary" (I Peter 5:8); "Apollyon" (Rev. 9:11);
"Beelzebub" (Matthew 12:24); The father of lies (John :44); "Belial" (II Corinthians 6:15); "the
dragon" (Rev. 20:2); "murderer" (John 8:44); "the power of darkness" (Colossians 1:13); "the
prince of this world" (John 14:30); "the prince of the devils" (Matthew 12:24); "the prince of the
power of the air" (Ephesians 2:2); "the rulers of the darkness of this world" (Ephesians 6:12);
"that old serpent" (Rev. 20:2); "the spirit that now worketh in the children of
disobedience" (Ephesians 2:2); and on and on. According to the Scriptures he is powerful
(Ephesians 2:2), wicked (I John 2:13), malignant (Job 1:9), subtle (Genesis 3:1) and cruel (I Peter
5:8).
However the sophisticated people of this age regard Satan, Christ excepted him as a real being.
The apostles did likewise, as did all the Bible writers who mentioned him at all. According to the
Scriptures, Satan is an apostate angel. He is the source and promoter of all evil. His chief
designations show this; for instance, "Satan" means "adversary"; and "devil" from the Greek
diabolos, "Calumniator". The New Testament is full of allusions to the personality and agency of
the evil one.
Malachi - 4:1 For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all
the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the
day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the LORD of hosts, that it
shall leave them neither root nor branch.
The Book of the Prophet Isaiah - 14:3 And it shall come to pass in the day that the LORD shall give
thee rest from thy sorrow, and from thy fear, and from the hard
bondage wherein thou wast made to serve, 14:4 That thou shalt take up
this proverb against the king of Babylon, and say, How hath the
oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased! 14:5 The LORD hath broken
the staff of the wicked, and the sceptre of the rulers.
The Book of the Prophet - 28:18 Thou hast defiled thy sanctuaries by the multitude of thine
iniquities, by the iniquity of thy traffick; therefore will I bring
forth a fire from the midst of thee, it shall devour thee, and I will
bring thee to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all them that
behold thee. 28:19 All they that know thee among the people shall be astonished at
thee: thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more.
God does not want people to rebel against what he himself has set up. However, God's people must
remember that the final authority is always God himself. If those with power do not honour God, the
followers of Jesus will have to obey God rather than men.
Romans 13:1 Let everyone be subject to the higher authorities because there is no authority
except from God;
So in closing, I await any proof you may have that anything I have written and presented hereon is
untrue or false, and that the authority you and the other men and wo-men who are employed by
CANADA/ BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCE OF may have to intimidate me to violate my faith is
not contrary to God's laws, for if you do not I will be continuing my life as a minister of God united
with the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International as one of an international group of
ministers promoting faith in God's law and not bowing to false gods.
I welcome your provision of any proof you have of error or omission in the agreement hereon and
your tacit consent will be graciously received should no proof of error in our agreement be
forthcoming from you within twenty (20) days time. At that time I will confirm my honor in
gaining this ecclesiastical agreement with you by having witnesses signing an Ecclesiastical Notice
of Dishonour as per Matthew 18:15-20 and effect service of the confirmed agreement with you to
ensure our agreement is accepted and un-rebutted and as confirmation that we have an agreement
that you have no authority to intimidate me in the exercising of my faith. I will allow three days
time beyond the service date of the witnessed agreement which will be posted to make aware our
covenant in as many local papers and media as possible to ensure diligence is observed for the
benefit of all concerned men and women and in sealing our agreement historically.
Blessings upon your patience in discovering words have origins to their meanings and are applicable in
law (2 Peter 2:3) and, in fact, are being used to deceive us, and blessings upon your expeditious reply
shall you have any law, regulation, and/or court case or other authority that says you can tell me how to
practice my faith or obstruct me from the official performance of the functions of my calling.
I do sincerely thank you for your focused attention to this, my honest effort at officially
performing the function of my calling in establishing this agreement with you as per Matthew
5:25 and 18:15-20.
It is agreed by you with full understanding that failure to refute or disprove the facts provided
above as agreed upon by you will be witnessed in 20 days time.
Ecclesiastically autographed, non commercial, on Turtle Island at the dry land mass known as
Southbank, province of British Columbia the geographical location, during the
_______________ day of the fourth month of the year of Our Lord two thousand and nine (six),
uberummi fides, towards all the private men and wo-men who receive it and in defense of my
faith in front of these witnesses of good and moral character and of sound mind.
Dutiful freedoms reserved under Yahweh’s Law
________________________________________________
minister Andrew-Clayton: of the family Fidler
le style c'est l'homme, meum et tuum
Ezra
7:23 Whatsoever is commanded by the God of heaven, let it be
diligently done for the house of the God of heaven: for why should
there be wrath against the realm of the king and his sons?
7:24 Also we certify you, that touching any of the priests and Levites, singers,
porters, Nethinims, or ministers of this house of God, it shall not be
lawful to impose toll, tribute, or custom, upon them.
7:25 And thou, Ezra, after the wisdom of thy God, that is in thine
hand, set magistrates and judges, which may judge all the people that
are beyond the river, all such as know the laws of thy God; and teach
ye them that know them not.
7:26 And whosoever will not do the law of thy God, and the law of the
king, let judgment be executed speedily upon him, whether it be unto
death, or to banishment, or to confiscation of goods, or to
imprisonment.